政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146350
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51288881      線上人數 : 562
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146350


    題名: 適地性遊戲吸引力—消費者行為觀點
    A consumer-behavioral approach to the attractiveness of location-based games
    作者: 葉子睿
    Yeh, Tsu-Jui
    貢獻者: 陳建維
    Chen, Chien-Wei
    葉子睿
    Yeh, Tsu-Jui
    關鍵詞: 手機遊戲
    適地性遊戲
    位置資訊
    遊戲動機
    遊戲體驗
    自我決定理論
    消費者行為
    日期: 2023
    上傳時間: 2023-08-02 13:15:14 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 手機遊戲《精靈寶可夢》自2016年推出以來蔚為風潮，其最大的特色便是玩家需要在外跑動才能進行遊戲，Niantic公司更在2021年推出同類遊戲《皮克敏》，玩家人數也持續累積中。這種所謂適地性遊戲（Location-based Games）會蒐集玩家的位置、移動距離等情境資訊並動態調整內容，玩家也需要不斷地移動位置才能推動遊戲進行。然而國內針對適地性遊戲的分析為數不多，亦少見關於此類遊戲玩家心理與行為之研究。故本研究整理了常見之遊戲動機與適地性遊戲特性，綜合自我決定理論（Self Determination Theory）的基本心理需求，分析這些變數如何影響玩家的遊戲體驗，欲探討適地性遊戲吸引玩家遊玩之因素。結果顯示強烈的適地性逃避現實、戶外活動需求等遊戲動機會有較強的正向遊戲體驗，遊戲的在地空間重定義、空間自主性越好，玩家的正向體驗也越強。基本心理需求當中僅勝任感、自主感會影響遊戲體驗，歸屬感與遊戲體驗之影響關係在本研究並不顯著。這些結果將提升遊戲公司與廣告商對消費者心理需求與偏好的掌握度，亦能幫助手機遊戲初期的開發設計與後續優化。
    參考文獻: 一、中文資料
    王媛（2015）。適地性服務對消費者至連鎖咖啡店消費意願之研究—以台北市居民為例。未出版碩士論文。國立交通大學管理科學研究所。
    李至倫（2015）。應用適地性服務於發現式地理實察教學。未出版碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學地理學系。
    李來春、郝光中、鄭宇翔（2012）。不同體感操控介面對搜尋及閃躲任務之遊戲經驗比較研究-以遊戲相關設計科系背景的學生為例。設計學報，17(3)， 1-22。
    若林芳樹（2020）。地圖會說謊：AI世代一定要了解的地圖判讀與空間認知能力（陳嫺若譯）。聯經。（原著出版於2018年）
    莊堯閔（2016）。適地性服務種類對採用意願之探討—以社交娛樂型與資訊提供型LBS為例。未出版碩士論文。東吳大學資訊管理學系。
    郭仕呈、沈季燕、白敏賢、張旭光（2012）。建構以LBS為基礎的行動校園入口服務。TANET2012台灣網際網路研訂會。銘傳大學。
    陳克銘（2005）。消費者餐廳用餐消費行為之研究—以台北市各商圈為例。未出版碩士論文。輔仁大學應用統計學研究所。
    陳靖翔（2012）。適地性服務的價值成因及效果之研究。未出版碩士論文。國立臺北大學資訊管理研究所。
    陳臨諴（2019）。遊戲化應用對品牌形象及購買意願之影響。未出版碩士論文。國立高雄科技大學行銷與流通管理系。
    黃國峰、林谷合（2009）。LBS定位之商圈/展場創新服務研究計畫。財團法人資訊工業策進會委託之研究期末報告，計畫編號：98-5028。
    廖俊威（2018）。自主、勝任與歸屬需求對員工感覺當責與工作滿意度的影響—以組織賦權為調節變項。未出版碩士論文。東吳大學心理學系。
     
    二、英文資料
    Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: teleoperators & virtual environments, 6(4), 355-385.
    Ayers, J. W., Leas, E. C., Dredze, M., Allem, J. P., Grabowski, J. G., & Hill, L. (2016). Pokémon GO—a new distraction for drivers and pedestrians. JAMA internal medicine, 176(12), 1865-1866.
    Bartle, R. A. (2004). Designing virtual worlds. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
    Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
    Benford, S., et al. (2003). Copying with Uncertainty in a Location-based Game. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2(3), 34–41.
    Brooks, A., Brooks, E. I., & Jonathan, D. (Eds.). (2021). Interactivity and Game Creation: 9th EAI International Conference, ArtsIT 2020, Aalborg, Denmark, December 10–11, 2020, Proceedings (Vol. 367). Springer Nature.
    C Laudon, K., & P Laudon, J. (2014). Management information systems. Pearson.
    Chang, S.-M., Hsieh, G. M. Y., & Lin, S. S. J. (2018). The mediation effects of gaming motives between game involvement and problematic Internet use: Escapism, advancement and socializing. Computers & Education, 122, 43–53.
    Chen, H.-J., & Lu, J.-T. (2016). Clarifying the impact of social escapism in users’ acceptance for online entertaining services—An extension of the technology acceptance model based on online karaoke television services users. Information Systems Management, 33(2), 141–153.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow – Optimaloplevelsens psykologi (1 ed.). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
    Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39-80). New York: Academic Press.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Springer
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: an overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 1e59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27(1), 23-40.
    Demetrovics, Z., Urbán, R., Nagygyörgy, K., Farkas, J., Zilahy, D., Mervó, B., Reindl, A., Ágoston, C., Kertész, A., & Harmath, E. (2011). Why do you play? The development of the motives for online gaming questionnaire. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 814-825.
    Denisova, A., Nordin, A. I., & Cairns, P. (2016, October). The convergence of player experience questionnaires. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 33-37).
    Ejsing-Duun, S. (2011). Location-based games: from screen to street.
    Ermi, L., & Mäyrä, F. (2005). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: analysing immersion. Paper presented at the Changing Views: Worlds in Play. Selected Papers of the 2005 Digital Games Research Association’s Second International Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
    Frederick, C. M., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Self-determination in sport: A review using cognitive evaluation theory. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26, 5–23.
    Frederick, C., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Differences in motivation for sport and exercise and their relations with participation and mental health. Journal of Sport Behavior, 16, 124–146.
    Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199-223.
    Hahmann, S., & Burghardt, D. (2013). How much information is geospatially referenced? Networks and cognition. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(6), 1171-1189.
    Hamari, J., Malik, A., Koski, J., & Johri, A. (2019). Uses and gratifications of pokémon go: Why do people play mobile location-based augmented reality games?. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(9), 804-819.
    Herzberg, F. (2017). Motivation to work. Routledge.
    IJsselsteijn, W. A., de Kort, Y. A. W., & Poels, K. (2013). The Game Experience Questionnaire. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
    Jegers, K. (2007). Pervasive game flow: understanding player enjoyment in pervasive gaming. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 5(1), 9-es.
    Jelfs, L., Cartwright, W. and Pupedis, G. (2014). Considering innovations in cartography and changes in geographic representation methods. In: Geospatial Science Research.
    Johnson, D., Gardner, M. J., & Perry, R. (2018). Validation of two game experience scales: the player experience of need satisfaction (PENS) and game experience questionnaire (GEQ). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 118, 38-46.
    Jones, A., Blake, C., Davies, C., & Scanlon, E. (2004). Digital maps for learning: A review and prospects. Computers & Education, 43(1-2), 91-107.
    Juhász, L., & Hochmair, H. H. (2017). Where to catch ‘em all?–a geographic analysis of Pokémon Go locations. Geo-spatial information science, 20(3), 241-251.
    Kano, N. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Quality, The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14, 39-48.
    King, D. L., & Delfabbro, P. (2009). Motivational differences in problem video game play. Journal of Cybertherapy and Rehabilitation, 2(2), 139-149.
    Konstantinidis, S., Bamidis, P. D., & Zary, N. (Eds.). (2020). Digital innovations in healthcare education and training. Academic Press.
    Kuo, A., Lutz, R. J., & Hiler, J. L. (2016). Brave new World of Warcraft: A conceptual framework for active escapism. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(7), 498-506.
    Laato, S. (2021). Designing Location-based Games: How to support players` social interaction, physical activity and learning about their local environment. University of Turku.
    Laato, S., Islam, A. N., & Laine, T. H. (2021). Playing location-based games is associated with psychological well-being: an empirical study of Pokémon GO players. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(9), 1888-1904.
    Laato, S., Pietarinen, T., Rauti, S., & Laine, T. H. (2019). Analysis of the quality of points of interest in the most popular location-based games. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (pp. 153-160).
    Laato, S., Rauti, S., Islam, A. N., & Sutinen, E. (2021). Why playing augmented reality games feels meaningful to players? The roles of imagination and social experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106816.
    Laor, T. (2020). The race to escape: Location-based escapism and physical activity as a motivator in the consumption of the AR game Pokémon Go. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 14(2), Article 6.
    Leorke, D. (2019). Location-based gaming: Play in public space. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A. N., Stanek, L. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of educational psychology, 96(1), 68.
    Liao, G. Y., Pham, T. T. L., Huang, H. Y., Cheng, T. C. E., & Teng, C. I. (2022). Real-world demotivation as a predictor of continued video game playing: A study on escapism, anxiety and lack of intrinsic motivation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 53, 101147.
    Malone, T. & Lepper, M. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations in learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.) Aptitude, learning and instruction: vol. 3. Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    McGonigal, J. (2006). This Might be a Game: Ubiquitous Play and Performance at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century. Dissertation submitted to the University of California.
    Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
    Montola, M., Stenros, J., & Waern, A. (2009). Pervasive games: theory and design. CRC Press.
    Nacke, L., & Lindley, C. A. (2008). Flow and immersion in first-person shooters: measuring the player`s gameplay experience. In Proceedings of the 2008 conference on future play: Research, play, share (pp. 81-88).
    Novak, A., & Ostash, V. (2022). Digitizing Historical Maps and their presentation in Online Map Collections. e-Perimetron, 17(1), 33-44.
    Oleksy, T., & Wnuk, A. (2017). Catch them all and increase your place attachment! The role of location-based augmented reality games in changing people-place relations. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 3-8.
    Peng, W., Lin, J. H., Pfeiffer, K. A., & Winn, B. (2012). Need satisfaction supportive game features as motivational determinants: An experimental study of a self-determination theory guided exergame. Media Psychology, 15(2), 175-196.
    Pura, M. (2005). Linking perceived value and loyalty in location‐based mobile services. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 15(6), 509-538.
    Rauschnabel, P. A., Rossmann, A., & tom Dieck, M. C. (2017). An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon Go. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 276-286.
    Richardson, D. (2017). International encyclopedia of geography, 15 volume set: people, the earth, environment and technology (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
    Rigby, S., & Ryan, R. (2007). The Player Experience of Need Satisfaction (PENS): An applied model and methodology for understanding key components of the player experience.
    Rogers, R. (2017). The motivational pull of video game feedback, rules, and social interaction: Another self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 446-450.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 319-338.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research, 2, 3-33. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
    Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and emotion, 30, 344-360.
    Saarenpää, H. (2008). Data gathering methods for evaluating playability of pervasive mobile games (Master`s thesis).
    Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in human behavior, 69, 371-380.
    Schiller, J., & Voisard, A. (Eds.). (2004). Location-based services. Elsevier.
    Sweetser, P., & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 3(3), 3-3.
    Teufl, P., Zefferer, T., Kreuzhuber, S., & Lesjak, C. M. (2012, December). Trusted Location Based Services. In 2012 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (pp. 185-192). IEEE.
    Tregel, T., Raymann, L., Göbel, S., & Steinmetz, R. (2017). Geodata classification for automatic content creation in location-based games. In Serious Games: Third Joint International Conference, JCSG 2017, Valencia, Spain, November 23-24, 2017, Proceedings 3 (pp. 212-223).
    Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J., & Viehland, D. (2004). Electronic Commerce: a managerial perspective 2004. Pearson Education.
    Valente, L., Feijó, B., Leite, J. C. S. D. P., & Clua, E. (2018). A method to assess pervasive qualities in mobile games. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 22, 647-670.
    Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C. P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement, 16, 105-165.
    Warmelink, H., Harteveld, C., & Mayer, I. (2009, January). Press Enter or Escape to Play-Deconstructing Escapism in Multiplayer Gaming. In DiGRA Conference (pp. 1-11).
    White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychological review, 66(5), 297-333.
    Wilson, P. M., Longley, K., Muon, S., Rodgers, W. M., & Murray, T. C. (2006). Examining the contributions of perceived psychological need satisfaction to well‐being in exercise 1. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 11(3‐4), 243-264.
    Wu, A. M., Lai, M. H., Yu, S., Lau, J. T., & Lei, M. W. (2016). Motives for online gaming questionnaire: Its psychometric properties and correlation with Internet gaming disorder symptoms among Chinese people. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(1), 11-20.
    Xu, F., Weber, J., & Buhalis, D. (2013). Gamification in tourism. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2014: Proceedings of the International Conference in Dublin, Ireland, January 21-24, 2014 (pp. 525-537). Springer International Publishing.
    Yang, C. C., & Liu, D. (2017). Motives matter: motives for playing Pokémon Go and implications for well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(1), 52-57.
    Yee, N. (2005). Motivations of Play in MMORPGs. In DiGRA Conference.
    Zickuhr, K. (2013). Location-based services. Pew Research, 679, 695.
    Zsila, Á., Orosz, G., Bőthe, B., Tóth-Király, I., Király, O., Griffiths, M., & Demetrovics, Z. (2018). An empirical study on the motivations underlying augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon Go during and after Pokémon fever. Personality and individual differences, 133, 56-66.

    三、網站資料
    GNN新聞（2019年12月8日）。AR適地性手機遊戲是什麼？細數《Pokemon Go》《勇者鬥惡龍WALK》等作品。https://m.gamer.com.tw/gnn/detail.php?sn=189761&fbclid=IwAR3bgDFP9jI1jcLIlyElFVXdqRUZTyg4kwj45M41-CX-NXTSEk9ag3LVtx4
    吳柏羲（2019年12月5日）。體感科技帶動軟硬體商機。財團法人資訊工業策進會。https://www.iii.org.tw/focus/FocusDtl.aspx?f_type=1&f_sqno=HvfY7MXyetBCFiEukZdFqg__&fm_sqno=12
    陳建鈞（2022年5月12日）。Google AR式地圖拯救路癡、圖文結合多重搜尋！今年I/O上還端出哪些菜？。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/69144/google-io-2022-software
    Bycer, J. (2017, July 13). The 3 Ways Branding Impacts Video Games. Game Developer. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/the-3-ways-branding-impacts-video-games?fbclid=IwAR2g5z9_yvH7NArSzczmamkzjM6us89on0jwVaU-6Eal2x_X8LJXtKftl3s
    Fulton, W., & Bitner, J. (2022, May 16). The 10 best location-based games. digitaltrends. https://www.digitaltrends.com/gaming/best-location-based-gps-games/
    Hill, S. (2023, February 13). The Most Popular Location Based Games You Should Know in 2023. iMyFone. https://www.imyfone.com/change-location/location-based-games/
    Placer.ai. (n.d.) Point of Interest Data (POI data) - All You Need To Know. https://www.placer.ai/guides/poi-data
    Smappen. (n.d.). Points of interest: The beginner’s guide to points of interest: definition, examples and use cases. https://www.smappen.com/points-of-interest-definition/
    Stein, S. (2021, October 26). Pikmin Bloom: How Niantic and Nintendo`s new game mixes walking, memory and AR. CNET. https://www.cnet.com/tech/gaming/pikmin-bloom-how-niantic-and-nintendos-new-game-mixes-walking-memory-and-ar/
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    111351001
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111351001
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    100101.pdf4002KbAdobe PDF20檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋