政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145881
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51598360      在线人数 : 816
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/145881


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145881


    题名: SDGs目標影響創新策略之形成與執行 －以A非營利組織為例
    The Impact of SDGs Goals on the Formation and Execution of Innovation Strategies - A Case Study of A Non-Profit Organization
    作者: 李承翰
    Li, Cheng-Han
    贡献者: 吳安妮
    Anne, Wu
    李承翰
    Li, Cheng-Han
    关键词: SDGs目標
    SO計分卡
    自然資本
    平衡計分卡
    SDGs Goals
    SO Scorecard
    Natural Capital
    Balanced Scorecard
    日期: 2023
    上传时间: 2023-07-06 16:51:02 (UTC+8)
    摘要: SDGs目標為聯合國《2030永續發展議程》所提出的17項目標，試圖解決經濟、社會及環境所面臨的問題。本研究也將利用個案組織於自然資本產業運用之SDGs目標，結合SO計分卡，瞭解其內部優勢及外部機會，並協助個案組織釐清使命、願景及價值觀，形成創新策略。

    形成個案組織創新策略後，如何有效率且有效果的執行策略，將成為策略執行成敗關鍵。因此本研究以平衡計分卡（Balanced Scorecard，簡稱BSC）作為個案組織策略執行工具。透過策略性議題、目標及衡量指標的展開，協助個案組織確定組織執行方向及績效衡量，並隨著產業創新、法規修正及國際趨勢適時調整組織策略。

    綜上所述，本研究將以SDGs目標結合SO計分卡及平衡計分卡，形成個案組織創策略並有效執行，並探討三者之間結合所能帶來的預期效益，提供一套經濟、社會及環境三者皆贏的自然解決方案。
    The SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) are 17 goals proposed by the United Nations in the "2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" aimed at addressing Economic, Social, and Environmental challenges. This study will utilize the SDGs related to the natural capital industry, in conjunction with the Balanced Scorecard, to understand its internal strengths and external opportunities. It will also assist the case organization in clarifying its mission, vision, and values, and formulating innovative strategies.

    Once the case organization has developed its innovative strategy, the key to success lies in the efficient and effective execution of the strategy. Therefore, this study use the BSC as a strategic execution tool for the case organization. By defining strategic issues, objectives, and performance indicators, it helps the case organization determine its execution direction and performance measurement. Furthermore, the organization can adjust its strategies in response to industry innovations, regulatory amendments, and international trends.

    In summary, this study aims to combine the SDGs with the BSC to formulate and effectively execute case organization strategies. It explores the expected benefits of integrating these three approaches, providing a solution that benefits the economy, society, and environment, thereby achieving a win-win outcome for all three.
    參考文獻: 一、中文部分

    1.中華民國外交部，巴黎協定，https://subsite.mofa.gov.tw/igo/cp.aspx?n=5BCEFD9636EDFFE4（最後瀏覽日：2023年3月28日）
    2.行政院環保署，2023，氣候變遷因應法，全國法規資料庫，https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0020098（最後瀏覽日：2023年3月15日）
    3.行政院農委會，2022，農業統計年報，https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/book/Book.aspx（最後瀏覽日：2023年2月10日）
    4.行政院農委會，2023，臺灣 2050 淨零轉型 自然碳匯關鍵戰略行動計畫，https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xNTAyOC8wN2FjZmEyZC1iZTc3LTRjMTYtOTFlNC04NjI3MDdlZmMyYWYucGRm&n=MDlf6Ieq54S256Kz5Yyv6Zec6Y215oiw55Wl6KGM5YuV6KiI55WrKOaguOWumuacrCkucGRm&icon=.pdf（最後瀏覽日：2023年5月2日）
    5.吳安妮，2003，平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合(上)，會計研究月刊，211，46。
    6.吳安妮，2018，策略形成及執行：以BSC為核心，為企業創造「利」與「力」，臉譜出版社股份有限公司。
    7.吳安妮， 2019，企業策略的終極答案，台北：臉譜出版社股份有限公司。
    8.吳安妮，2020，學術價值鏈的建構及發展：知行合一論，管理學報，37(4)，285-306。
    9.李蘇竣，2023，《氣候變遷因應法》三讀過關碳費即將開徵重點整理一次看，https://e-info.org.tw/node/235882（最後瀏覽日：2023年3月10日）
    10.邱祈榮、蔡維倫、林思吟、陳莉坪，2010，台灣林業碳匯管理策略探討，中華林學季刊，43(2)，277-293。
    11. 邱志郁，2018，決戰山林惡地之巔！剖析竹林亦俠亦盜的本質，中央研究院， https://research.sinica.edu.tw/chiu-chih-yu-soil-biochemistry-bamboo/（最後瀏覽日：2023年1月8日）
    12.陳本源、蔡泳銓、蘇細煌、談珮華，2007，廢棄檳榔坡地生態工法復育之研究，環境與藝術學刊，5， 97-114。
    13. 孫晉英，2021，從歐盟碳邊境調整機制（CBAM）談我國碳定價之研析，立法院。

    二、英文部分

    1. Adina D. and L. Wendling. 2021. Evaluating the impact of nature-based solutions: A handbook for practitioners. European Commission EC.
    2. Allio, M. K. 2005. A Short, Practical Guide to Implementing Strategy, The Journal of Business Strategy 26(4): 1221.
    3. Andrea B., J. C. J. M. van den Bergh , C. Stefano, B. H. Richard, P. Emilio and R. Jordi . 2017. Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change 8(4): 3.
    4. Ashley, A. A. 2017. Effects of Social Media Use on Climate Change Opinion, Knowledge, and Behavior. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science.
    5. Dawson, R . Hancock and A. Robert. 2006. Doing Case Study Research a Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers, New York : Teachers College Press.
    6. European Commission. 2022.Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. From: https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en. （last visited Feb. 22, 2023）
    7. Evans, M. C. 2018. Effective Incentives for Reforestation: Lessons from Australia’s Carbon Farming Policies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 32: 38-45.
    8. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 2003. Keeping Your Balance With Customers. Harvard Business School. From: https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/keeping-your-balance-with-customers（last visited Jan. 20, 2023）
    9. Lefroy and Tsarenko. 2017. Business-nonprofit partnerships as a driver of internal marketing in nonprofit organizations. Consequences for nonprofit performance and moderators. Business Research Quarterly 20(2): 112-123.
    10. Marchi, V. D., E. D. Maria and S. Micelli. 2013. Environmental Strategies, Upgrading and Competitive Advantage in Global Value Chains, Business Strategy and the Environment 22(1): 62-72.
    11. Maas, S. and G. Reniers. 2013. Development of a CSR model for practice: Connecting five inherent areas of sustainable business. Journal of Cleaner Production.
    12. Meenakshi, S., K. Rajesh, P. Prashant and R. Seeram. 2021. Carbon Farming: Prospects and Challenges. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland).13(19): 11122.
    13. Oljaca, V. M., D. Raicevic, D. Ercegovic, D. Vukic, O. I. Snezana, R. Radojevic, M. Zivkovic, K. Gligorevic, M. Paji, V. Spalevic, L. Ruzicic. 2014. Aspects of Using Machinery and Tools in Contemporary Plant Production- Marsh Soils Case. Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo 60(1): 39.
    14. Paul Ekins. 2003. Identifying critical natural capital: Conclusions about critical natural capital. Ecological Economics (2): 277-292.
    15. Sherman, S., D. J. Rowley and B. R. Armandi. 2007. Developing a Strategic Profile: The Pre-Planning Phase of Strategic Management, Business Strategy Series 8(3): 162-171.
    16. Sabeti Heerad. 2011. The for-benefit enterprise. Harvard business review 89 (11):98.
    17. Suaad J. , Z. Zarina and Anna Che Azmi. 2022. Sustainability balanced scorecard architecture and environmental performance outcomes: a systematic review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 71(5): 1728-1760.
    18. United Nations.2004. The Global Compact Leaders Summit United Nations Headquarters.From:https://d306pr3pise04h.cloudfront.net/docs/news_events%2F8.1%2Fsummit_rep_fin.pdf (last visited Jan. 4, 2023)
    19. United Nations. 2015. Sustainable Development. Department of Economic and Social.From: Affairs. https://sdgs.un.org/goals（last visited Apr. 2, 2023）
    20. United Nations. 2018. The Katowice climate package: Making The Paris Agreement Work For All. From: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/katowice-climate-package（last visited Mar. 18, 2023）
    21. United Nations. 2022. Sharm el-Sheikh Implementation Plan. From: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cop27_auv_2_cover%20decision.pdf (ast visited Apr. 18, 2023)
    21. Leal Filho, W., S. K. Tripathi, J. B. S. O. D. Andrade Guerra, R. Giné-Garriga, V. Orlovic Lovren and J. Willats. 2019. Using the Sustainable Development Goals towards a Better Understanding of Sustainability Challenges, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 26(2): 179-190.
    22. Woroniecki, S. ,C. Wamsler and E. Boyd, 2019. The promises and pitfalls of ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change as a vehicle for social empowerment. Ecology and Society 24(2): 4.
    23. World Bank. 2022. Publication: State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022.From: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/a1abead2-de91-5992-bb7a-73d8aaaf767f（last visited May. 9, 2023）
    24. Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    110353105
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110353105
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    310501.pdf3708KbAdobe PDF2148检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈