政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145872
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51255438      線上人數 : 927
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/145872
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145872


    題名: 運用文字探勘分析致股東報告書與盈餘管理及審計公費之關聯性
    The Association between Reports to Shareholders, Earnings Management and Audit Fees:Using Text Mining Approach
    作者: 蔡和翰
    Tsai, Ho-Han
    貢獻者: 張祐慈
    Chang, Yu-Tzu
    蔡和翰
    Tsai, Ho-Han
    關鍵詞: 盈餘管理
    審計公費
    致股東報告書
    語調分析
    Tone analysis
    Earnings management
    Audit fees
    Reports to shareholders
    日期: 2023
    上傳時間: 2023-07-06 16:49:16 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究使用Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers (BERT)模型進行文字探勘,對我國2016年至2020年上市(櫃)公司致股東報告書進行語調分析,並探討語調與盈餘管理及審計公費之關聯性。BERT模型經過超參數調整及交叉驗證後,語調分類準確率達86%,具有一定的準確性。實證結果發現,致股東報告書語調與裁決性應計數呈現正相關,亦即語調越正向,公司盈餘管理程度越高。顯示管理階層可能會在報告書中呈現特定的語調,營造出公司經營良好的形象,以配合其盈餘管理行為。此外,致股東報告書語調與審計公費呈正相關。當報告書語調越正向時,會計師可能認為管理階層過度誇大營運表現,並未如實揭露公司資訊,因此存在較高的風險,故將收取更多審計公費。綜上所述,我國致股東報告書語調對盈餘管理程度之評估,以及審計公費之訂價具有一定影響。
    This study uses the Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers (BERT) model to conduct tone analysis on reports to shareholders of listed and OTC companies in Taiwan from 2016 to 2020, and explores the association between the tone of the reports and earnings management and audit fees. After hyperparameter tuning and cross-validation, the BERT model achieves a high classification accuracy of 86%. The empirical results show a positive association between the tone of reports to shareholders and discretionary accruals, indicating that the more positive the tone, the higher the degree of earnings management. This implies that management may utilize a specific tone to create a positive image of their business operations, aligning with their earnings management practices. Furthermore, the tone is positive associated with audit fees. This suggests that when the reports convey a more positive tone, auditors may perceive management as excessively emphasizing their performance and inadequately disclosing company information, leading to higher risks and thus higher audit fees. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the tone of the reports to shareholders in Taiwan has an impact on the assessment of the extent of earnings management and the determination of audit fees.
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻
    陳予得與林嬋娟,2022,應用遷移學習與文字探勘分析致股東報告書,中華會計學刊,第18卷,第1期 (7月):123-166。
    廖秀梅、王貞靜與戚務君,2012,一套臺灣完整的審計公費資訊告訴我們什麼,中華會計學刊,第8卷,第1期 (1月):49-88。

    二、英文文獻
    Ashbaugh, H., R. LaFond, and B. W. Mayhew. 2003. Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78 (3): 611-639.
    Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2006. The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of Accounting Research 44 (2): 207-242.
    Becker, C. L., M. L. Defond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (1): 1-24.
    Bell, T. B., R. Doogar, and I. Solomon. 2008. Audit labor usage and fees under business risk auditing. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (4): 729-760.
    Boo, E., and D. Sharma. 2008. Effect of regulatory oversight on the association between internal governance characteristics and audit fees. Accounting & Finance 48 (1): 51-71.
    Boudt, K., and J. Thewissen. 2019. Jockeying for position in CEO letters: Impression management and sentiment analytics. Financial Management 48 (1): 77-115.
    Chen, C. Y., C. J. Lin, and Y. C. Lin. 2008. Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality? Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (2): 415-445.
    Chi, J. X., and M. Gupta. 2009. Overvaluation and earnings management. Journal of Banking & Finance 33 (9): 1652-1663.
    Chi, W., and H. Huang. 2005. Discretionary accruals, audit-firm tenure and audit partner tenure: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 1 (1): 65-92.
    Choi, J. H., J. B. Kim, and Y. S. Zang. 2010. Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality? Auditing: Journal of Practice & Theory 29 (2): 115-140.
    Craswell, A. T., and J. R. Francis. 1999. Pricing initial audit engagements: A test of competing theories. The Accounting Review 74 (2): 201-216.
    Davis, A. K., J. M. Piger, and L. M. Sedor. 2012. Beyond the numbers: Measuring the information content of earnings press release language. Contemporary Accounting Research 29 (3): 845-868.
    de Castro, V. B., F. A. Gul, M. B. Muttakin, and D. G. Mihret. 2019. Optimistic tone and audit fees: Some Australian evidence. International Journal of Auditing 23 (2): 352-364.
    DeAngelo, H., L. Deangelo, and D. J. Skinner. 1994. Accounting choice in troubled companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1-2): 113-143.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor independence, low balling, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (2): 113-127.
    Dechow, P. M., and I. D. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (s-1): 35-59.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 193-225.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (1): 1-36.
    DeFond, M. L., J. R. Francis, and T. J. Wong. 2000. Auditor industry specialization and market segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Auditing: Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (1): 49-66.
    DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1-2): 145-176.
    DeFond, M. L., and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. Auditor changes and discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25 (1): 35-67.
    Devlin, J., M. W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv:1810.04805.
    Ettredge, M., and R. Greenberg. 1990. Determinants of fee cutting on initial audit engagements. Journal of Accounting Research 28 (1): 198-210.
    Feldman, R., S. Govindaraj, J. Livnat, and B. Segal. 2010. Management`s tone change, post earnings announcement drift and accruals. Review of Accounting Studies 15 (4): 915-953.
    Francis, J. R. 1984. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 (2): 133-151.
    Francis, J. R., K. Reichelt, and D. Wang. 2005. The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the US audit market. The Accounting Review 80 (1): 113-136.
    Frankel, R. M., M. F. Johnson, and K. K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditors` fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77 (s-1): 71-105.
    Fung, S. Y. K., F. A. Gul, and J. Krishnan. 2012. City-level auditor industry specialization, economies of scale, and audit pricing. The Accounting Review 87 (4): 1281-1307.
    Ghosh, A., and D. Moon. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review 80 (2): 585-612.
    Goncharov, I., E. J. Riedl, and T. Sellhorn. 2014. Fair value and audit fees. Review of Accounting Studies 19 (1): 210-241.
    Goodwin-Stewart, J., and P. Kent. 2006. Relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics and internal audit. Accounting & Finance 46 (3): 387-404.
    Greiner, A., L. Patelli, and M. Pedrini. 2020. Characteristics of managerial tone priced by auditors: Evidence based on annual letters to shareholders of large U.S. firms. Auditing: Journal of Practice & Theory 39 (3): 139-161.
    Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (1): 141-191.
    Healy, P. M., and J. M. Wahlen. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons 13 (4): 365-383.
    Hogan, C. E., and M. S. Wilkins. 2008. Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies? Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (1): 219-242.
    Hossain, M., S. Mitra, and F. Salama. 2019. Narrative disclosures, firm life cycle, and audit fees. International Journal of Auditing 23 (3): 403-423.
    Houston, R. W., M. F. Peters, and J. H. Pratt. 2005. Nonlitigation risk and pricing audit services. Auditing: Journal of Practice & Theory 24 (1): 37-53.
    Huang, A. H., A. Y. Zang, and R. Zheng. 2014. Evidence on the information content of text in analyst reports. The Accounting Review 89 (6): 2151-2180.
    Jegadeesh, N., and D. Wu. 2013. Word power: A new approach for content analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 110 (3): 712-729.
    Johnson, V. E., I. K. Khurana, and J. K. Reynolds. 2002. Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (4): 637-660.
    Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (2): 193-228.
    Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1): 163-197.
    Lai, K. M. Y., B. Srinidhi, F. A. Gul, and J. S. L. Tsui. 2017. Board gender diversity, auditor fees, and auditor choice. Contemporary Accounting Research 34 (3): 1681-1714.
    Li, M. G., W. R. Li, F. Wang, X. J. Jia, and G. W. Rui. 2021. Applying BERT to analyze investor sentiment in stock market. Neural Computing & Applications 33 (10): 4663-4676.
    Loughran, T., and B. McDonald. 2011. When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. The Journal of Finance 66 (1): 35-65.
    Malik, M. F., Y. G. Shan, and J. Y. Tong. 2022. Do auditors price litigious tone? Accounting & Finance 62 (s-1): 1715-1760.
    Manela, A., and A. Moreira. 2017. News implied volatility and disaster concerns. Journal of Financial Economics 123 (1): 137-162.
    Mitra, S., D. R. Deis, and M. Hossain. 2009. The association between audit fees and reported earnings quality in pre‐ and post‐Sarbanes‐Oxley regimes. Review of Accounting and Finance 8 (3): 232-252.
    Palmrose, Z. V. 1986. Audit fees and auditor size - Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (1): 97-110.
    Pan, S. J., and Q. Yang. 2010. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 22 (10): 1345-1359.
    Reynolds, J. K., and J. R. Francis. 2000. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting & Economics 30 (3): 375-400.
    Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (3): 335-370.
    Schipper, K. 1989. Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons 3 (4): 91-102.
    Siano, F., and P. Wysocki. 2021. Transfer learning and textual analysis of accounting disclosures: Applying big data methods to small(er) datasets. Accounting Horizons 35 (3): 217-244.
    Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services - Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 161-190.
    Simunic, D. A. 1984. Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (2): 679-702.
    Srinidhi, B. N., and F. A. Gul. 2007. The differential effects of auditors` nonaudit and audit fees on accrual quality. Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (2): 595-629.
    Yang, R., Y. Yu, M. L. Liu, and K. Wu. 2018. Corporate risk disclosure and audit fee: A text mining approach. The Accounting Review 27 (3): 583-594.
    Zerni, M. 2012. Audit partner specialization and audit fees: Some evidence from Sweden. Contemporary Accounting Research 29 (1): 312-340.
    Zhang, X. F. 2007. Accruals, investment, and the accrual anomaly. The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1333-1363.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    110353016
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110353016
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    301601.pdf1074KbAdobe PDF2127檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋