政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145812

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145812

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造访人次 : 50840505 在线人数 : 715

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS) > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/145812

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145812

题名:	亞太經濟合作會議之能源安全議程發展－重訪多流框架 Agenda Development of Energy Security in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation - A Multiple Streams Framework Revisited
作者:	李蓁 Lee, Chen
贡献者:	蔡中民 Tsai, Chung-min 李蓁 Lee, Chen
关键词:	能源安全亞太經濟合作會議議題設定多流框架 Energy Security APEC Agenda Setting Multiple Streams Framework
日期:	2023
上传时间:	2023-07-06 16:35:24 (UTC+8)
摘要:	過去數十年間，鑑於政治關係、產業發展、地理位置、能源配置等因素，亞太地區成長最為迅速，而在全球舞台上地位突出。由過去的經驗可知，在衝突發生或電力配比中再生能源來源穩定度不足等情況下，石油及天然氣經常被用做政治武器，至於天然氣則亦在能源轉型過程中被視為重要的過渡燃料。因此，人們愈發注意能源部門之穩定性與透明度，進而提高對能源安全發展的重視，並加深市場參與者間的依存關係、影響整個區域的互利互惠。亞太地區國家將屬於柔性區域主義之亞太經濟合作會議，視作一應對緊急問題與達成一致目標之務實平台。隨著市場規模不斷擴大及貿易結構持續變化，關鍵能源業者之觀點與影響力不容忽視，本研究借鑑「議題設定理論」及「多流框架」，說明亞太經濟合作會議架構下的「制度機制」，透過問題流、政治流、政策流、以及本研究修正後加入之市場流，強化亞太地區能源安全的方式；其中，石油及天然氣安全演練、液化天然氣生產者和消費者大會、以及液化天然氣貿易促進倡議等亞太經濟合作會議既有的制度機制為研究案例。綜言之，自能源安全角度而言，當國家之間的地緣政治實力、社會發展程度、以及能源稟賦條件存在高度不平等之情形，本研究探討亞太經濟合作會議及其成員經濟體如何藉由具務實特性的多元化制度機制，因應瞬息萬變的國際情勢並融入更廣泛的全球能源治理體系。 In the past decades, due to political relations, industrial development, geographic location, and energy allocation, the Asia Pacific has been prominent on the global stage and become the fastest-growing region. The previous experiences show that, while conflict happens or renewable energy is not stable enough in the electricity mix, oil and natural gas have often been used as political weapons, inter alia, natural gas is also regarded as the major transition fuel during the energy transition. Hence, people pay more attention to the stability and transparency of energy sector, which boosts the importance of energy security development, deepens interdependence between market participants, and affects the mutual benefits to the entire region. Asia-Pacific countries regard soft regionalism - APEC - as the pragmatic platform to not only cope with urgent problems but also achieve the unanimous goal. As the market scope keeps growing and the trade structure continues to change, the perspectives from key energy enterprises are too influential to ignore. Drawing on agenda-setting theory and Multiple Streams Framework, the institutional mechanisms, including the Oil and Gas Security Exercise, LNG Producer-Consumer Conference, and LNG Trade Facilitation Initiative, reveal the way to enhance energy security in the Asia Pacific region through the problem, political, and policy streams, with the market stream proposed in this dissertation. Overall, it argues the way APEC and its member economies deal with the constantly changing international situations and fit in the larger global energy governance panoply through functional institutional mechanisms, inter alia, when large inequalities in geopolitical power, social development, and energy endowment between countries.
參考文獻:	Acharya, A. (1997). Idea, Identity, and Institution-Building: From the ‘ASEAN Way’ to the ‘Asia-Pacific Way’, The Pacific Review, 10(3), 319-346. Acharya, A. (2009). Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. Cornell University Press. Acharya, A. (2016). Regionalism Beyond EU-Centrism. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 109-130). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199682300.001.0001 Alhajji, A. (2005). The oil weapon: past, present, and future. The Oil & Gas Journal, 103(17), 22-33. Allison, G. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Allison, G., Blackwill, R. D., & Wyne, A. (2013). Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master`s Insights on China, the United States, and the World. The MIT Press. APEC Energy Working Group. (2015). APEC Oil and Gas Security Exercise: The Philippines Exercise. https://aperc.or.jp/file/2016/8/22/OGSE_Philippines_Final_Report_APEC_Secretariat.pdf APEC Energy Working Group. (2017). APEC Oil and Gas Security Exercise: A Regional Capacity Building. https://aperc.or.jp/file/2017/11/21/The_Australian_Exercise_APEC_Oil_and_Gas_Security_Exercise.pdf APEC Energy Working Group. (2018). APEC Oil and Gas Security Exercise in Peru. https://apec.org/Publications/2018/09/APEC-Oil-and-Gas-Security-Exercise-in-Peru APEC Energy Working Group. (2019). APEC Oil and Gas Security Exercise in Chile. https://www.apec.org/Publications/2019/12/APEC-Oil-and-Gas-Security-Exercise-in-Chile Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre. (2015). APEC Oil and Gas Security Exercise Model Procedure. https://www.apec.org/Publications/2016/02/APEC-Oil-and-Gas-Security-Exercise-Model-Procedure Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. (2014). APEC Oil and Gas Security Exercises Final Report. https://aperc.or.jp/publications/reports/ogse/Final_Report_OGSE_May-2014.pdf Bahgat, G. (2009). Energy Security. In the Middle East Institute, The 1979 “Oil Shock:” Legacy, Lessons, and Lasting Reverberations (pp.23-25). Baumgartner, F. R. (2016). John Kingdon and the evolutionary approach to public policy and agenda setting. In Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting (pp.53-66). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715922.00011 Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). The Role and Impact of the Multiple-Streams Approach in Comparative Policy Analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 18(3), 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1174410 Bendor, J., Moe, T. M., & Shotts, K. W. (2001). Recycling the Garbage Can. An Assessment of the Research Program. American Political Science Review 95(1), 169-190. Bloomfield, A. (2016). To Balance or to bandwagon? Adjusting to China’s rise during Australia’s Rudd - Gillard era. The Pacific Review, 29(2), 259-282. Bompard, E., Carpignano, A., Erriquez, M., Grosso, D., Pession, M., & Profumo, F. (2017). National energy security assessment in a geopolitical perspective. Energy (Oxford), 130, 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.108 Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2016). The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism / edited by Tanja A. Börzel and Thomas Risse. (First edition.). Oxford University Press. Bouchard, C., & Peterson, J. (2011). Conceptualising Multilateralism: Can We All Just Get Along? Mercury, E-paper No.1. BP. (2020). Statistical Review of World Energy. (69th ed.). BP. (2021). Statistical Review of World Energy. (70th ed.). Capie, D., & Evans, P. (2002). The Asia-Pacific Security Lexicon. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Center for Strategic & International Studies. (May, 2022). Unpacking The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework Launch. Chan, M. J., & Chiang, C. C. (2002). The Analysis and Comparison of APEC and WTO by International Regime. APEC Review, 10, 11-22. Chiang, C. C. (2000). Conceptualizing the APEC Way: International Cooperation in a Non-Institutionalized Regime. Issues & Studies, 36(6), 177-204. Chiang, C. C. (2005). A Study on the Development of Counter-Terrorism Issue under the APEC. Political Science Review, 25, 29-66. Chou, T. C. (2019). The Development of APEC’s Institutionalization: The Emergence of a Semi-binding Decision and the Institutional Enhancement of its Secretariat. Political Science Review, 82, 153-186. Chua, A. M. M., Garcia, Y. T., & Andal, E. G. T. (2018). The Spaghetti Bowl Phenomenon in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) among APEC Economies. Journal of Global Business and Trade, 14(2), 45-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.20294/jgbt.2018.14.2.45 Chung, G. (2015). The Public Private Partnership in Framework of APEC: The Operation Analysis with ABAC. Review of Global Politics, 50, 115-135. Crain, K. (2013). “It was the end of innocence”; 1973 OIL EMBARGO 40 YEARS LATER. Automotive News, 88(6590). Dahl, R. A. (1957). The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201-215. Energy Charter Secretariat. (2015). International Energy Security: Common Concept for Energy Producing, Consuming and Transit Countries. Feng, S., Li, H., Qi, Y., Guan, Q., & Wen, S. (2017). Who will build new trade relations? Finding potential relations in international liquefied natural gas trade. Energy (Oxford), 141, 1226-1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.030 Florini, A. (2011). The international energy agency in global energy governance. Global Policy, 2(s1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00120.x Funabashi, Y. (1995). Asia Pacific Fusion: Japan’s Role in APEC. Institute for International Economics. Ghouri, S. S. (2009). Oil Price Volatility: Speculation or Market Fundamentals? In the Middle East Institute, The 1979 “Oil Shock:” Legacy, Lessons, and Lasting Reverberations (pp.26-29). Goh, E. (2013). The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in Post-Cold war East Asia. Oxford UP. Green, M., & Gill, B. (2009). Asia’s New Multilateralism - Cooperation, Competition, and the Search for Community. Columbia University Press. Grigas, A. (2017). The New Geopolitics of Natural Gas. Harvard University Press. Gross, S. (2019, March 5). What Iran’s 1979 revolution meant for US and global oil markets. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/03/05/what-irans-1979-revolution-meant-for-us-and-global-oil-markets/ Haggard, S., & Simmons, B. A. (1987). Theories of International Regimes. International Organization, 41(3), 491-517. Hayton, B. (2014). The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia. Yale University Press. Herweg, N. (2016). Explaining European agenda-setting using the multiple streams framework: the case of European natural gas regulation. Policy Sciences, 49(1), 13-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9231-z Herweg, N. (2017). Theoretical Approach to the Policy Process: The Multiple Streams Framework. In European Union Policy-Making (pp. 23-72). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49400-5_2 Heywood, A. (2012). Political Ideologies: An Introduction / Andrew Heywood. (5th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. Hogan, L., Fairhead, L., Gurney, A., & Pritchard, R. (2005). Energy Security in APEC: Assessing the Costs of Energy Supply Disruptions and the Impacts of Alternative Energy Security Strategies. APEC Energy Working Group, Report no. APEC#205RE-01.5, Published by ABARE as Research Report 05.2, Canberra, June. Högselius, P. (2019). Energy and Geopolitics. Routledge. Horne, A. (2009). Kissinger : 1973, the crucial year / Alistair Horne. Simon & Schuster. Hughes, L. (2012). A generic framework for the description and analysis of energy security in an energy system. Energy Policy, 42, 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.079 International Gas Union. (2021). World LNG 2021. International Gas Union. (2022). Global Voice of Gas #4 Vol.2. IRIE, K. (2019). Sharing Experience of APEC Oil and Gas Security Exercises with Chinese Taipei. Journal of Taiwan Energy, 6(4), 297-312. Issawi, C. (1978). The 1973 oil crisis and after. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1(2), 3-26. Janow, M. E. (1996). Assessing APEC’s Role in Economic Integration in the Asia-Pacific Region. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 17(2/3), 947-1013. Jetschke, A., & Katada, S. N. (2016). Asia. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 225-248). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199682300.001.0001 Jones, M. D., Peterson, H. L., Pierce, J. J., Herweg, N., Bernal, A., Lamberta Raney, H., & Zahariadis, N. (2016). A River Runs Through It: A Multiple Streams Meta-Review. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 13-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12115 Kahler, M. (1992). Multilateralism with small and large numbers. International Organization, 46(3), 681-708. Kaufmann, D., & Penciakova, V. (2011, March 16). Japan’s Triple Disaster: Governance and the Earthquake, Tsunami and Nuclear crises. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/japans-triple-disaster-governance-and-the-earthquake-tsunami-and-nuclear-crises/ Keohane, R. O. (1978). The International Energy Agency: State Influence and Transgovernmental Politics. International Organization, 32, 929-952. Keohane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589 Keohane, R. O. (1989). Neoliberal Institutionalism: A Perspective on World Politics. In Keohane, R. O., International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory (pp. 1-20). Westview Press. Keohane, R. O., & Hoffmann, S. (1991). Institutional Change in Europe in the 1980s. In: R. O. Keohane & S. Hoffmann (Eds.), The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change (pp.1-40). Westview Press. Khayyat, N. T. (2015). Energy Demand in Industry: What Factors Are Important? Springer. Kim, S. Y., Mansfield, E. D., & Milner, H. V. (2016). Regional Trade Governance. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 323-350). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199682300.001.0001 Kingdon, J. W. (2001). A Model of Agenda-setting, with Applications. Law Review of Michigan State University Detroit College of Law, 2001(2), 331-338. Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies / John W. Kingdon ; with a new foreword by James A. Thurber. (Updated 2nd ed.). Longman. Kingdon, J. W. (2013). How Do Issues Get on Public Policy Agendas? In W. J. Wilson (Eds.), Sociology and the public agenda (pp.40-50). Koshimura, S., & Shuto, N. (2015). Responses to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami disaster. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 373(2053). Krane, J. (2015). Stability versus Sustainability: Energy Policy in the Gulf Monarchies. The Energy Journal (Cambridge, Mass.), 36(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.36.4.jkra Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structure Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018920 Lake, D. A. (1993). Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch with Potential? International Studies Quarterly, 37(4), 459-489. Lee, J. (2009). The Impact of Oil Price Shocks on Oil Demand Growth. In the Middle East Institute, The 1979 “Oil Shock:” Legacy, Lessons, and Lasting Reverberations (pp.13-17). Lee, J. Y. (2017). Hedging Strategies of the Middle Powers in East Asian Security: the Cases of South Korea and Malaysia. East Asia: An International Quarterly, 34(1), 23-37. Lenz, T. & Marks, G. (2016). Regional Institutional Design: Pooling and Delegation. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 513-537). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199682300.001.0001 Liao, H. C. (2019). The Struggle for APEC Leadership between the US and China: Taking FTAAP as an Example. Political Science Review, 82, 187-226. Liao, S. (2019). The Future of APEC under the Wave of International Organization Fragmentation. Eurasian Studies Quarterly, 9, 37-44. Lindberg, L. N. (1970). Political Integration as a Multidimensional Phenomenon Requiring Multivariate Measurement. International Organization, 24(4), 648-731. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300017501 Loris, N. D. (2015). Economic Freedom, Energy, and Development. In T. Miller & A. B. Kim (Eds.), 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (pp. 57-68). Heritage Books. Lu, H. C. (2019). The APEC Model at a Crossroad: Dilemma of the APEC Model from the China-Japan-Korea Summit. Eurasian Studies Quarterly, 9, 55-62. Lucas, N. (2014). Energy Security in Asia: Prospects for Regional Cooperation. ADB Economics Working Paper Series, 407. Asian Development Bank. Luft, G., Korin, A., & Gupta, E. (2011), Energy security and climate change: a tenuous link. In The Routledge handbook of energy security (pp. 43-55). Routledge. Lynch, B. (2018). APEC post-2020. New Zealand International Review, 43(2), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.448264780565238 Majone, G. (2006). Agenda Setting. In M. Moran, M. Rein & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 228-250). Oxford University Press. Masum, M., & Akbar M. A. (2019). The Pacific Ring of Fire is Working as a Home Country of Geothermal Resources in the World. IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science / Institute of Physics. IOP Pub. Miebach, B. (2013). The Garbage Can Model and the Study of the Policy-Making Process. In Araral, E., Fritzen, S., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Wu, X. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 320-328). Routledge. Miller, K. (2011). Energy Policy. In The American Economy : A Historical Encyclopedia, Rev. ed (Vol. 2, pp. 609-618). Mirchi, H. (2012). World Energy Balance Outlook and OPEC Production Capacity: Implications for Global Oil Security. Energies (Basel), 5(8), 2626-2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/en5082626 Moon, C.-I., & Yoon, D.-Y. (2011). Industry Policy in an Integrated World Economy: South Korean Paradox. In D. H. Claes & C. H. Knusten (Eds.) Governing the Global Economy (pp. 204-222). Routledge. Morrison, C. E. (1998). APEC: The Evolution of an Institution. In V. K. Aggarwal & C. E. Morrison (Eds.), Asia-Pacific Crossroads: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC (pp.1-22). Macmillan. Muñoza, B., García-Verdugob, J., & San-Martín, E. (2015). Quantifying the geopolitical dimension of energy risks: A tool for energy modelling and planning. Energy (Oxford), 82, 479-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.058 National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. (n.d.). The 9/11 Commission Report. https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf Nye, J. S. (1968). Comparative Regional Integration: Concept and Measurement. International Organization, 22(4), 855 - 880. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300013837 Nye, J. S. (2015). Is the American Century Over? Polity Press. Nye, J. S., & Welch, D. A. (2019). Understanding Global Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction to Theory and History (X. M. Zhang, Trans.). Pearson Education, Inc. (Original work published 2017) Office of the United States Trade Representative. (2022, November). United States and Taiwan to Hold Meetings on U.S.-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade in New York. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2022/november/united-states-and-taiwan-hold-meetings-us-taiwan-initiative-21st-century-trade-new-york O’Sullivan, M. L. (2017). In the Windfall: How the New Energy Abundance Upends Global Politics and Strengthens America’s Power. Simon & Schuster. Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries. (2018). History. http://oapecorg.org/Home/About-Us/History Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. (2020). Brief History. https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/about_us/24.htm Pempel, T. J. (2010). Soft Balancing, Hedging, and Institutional Darwinism: The Economic-Security Nexus and East Asian Regionalism. Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(2), 209-238. Pevehouse, J. (2016). Regional Human Rights and Democracy Governance. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 487-510). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199682300.001.0001 Piotrowski, M. (2015, December 15). Oil & Terrorism: Why Now Is Worse Than After 9/11. The Fuse. https://energyfuse.org/oil-terrorism-now-is-worse-than-after-911/ Prontera, A. (2009). Energy Policy: Concepts, Actors, Instruments and Recent Developments. World Political Science, 5(1), 1-30. Ribeiro, C. T. (2020). Agenda-setting in public policies: the strategy for financial education in Brazil through the lens of the multiple streams model. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 18(3), 486-497. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120190038x Risse, T. (2016). The Diffusion of Regionalism. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 87-108). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199682300.001.0001 Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Fostering the Development of Policy Theory. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 321-336). Westview. Scott, R. (1977). Innovation in International Organization: The International Energy Agency. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 1, 1-56. Shi, X., & Variam, H. M. P. (2016). Gas and LNG trading hubs, hub indexation and destination flexibility in East Asia. Energy Policy, 96, 587-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.032 Shi, X., Variam, H. M. P. & Shen, Y. (2019). Trans-ASEAN gas pipeline and ASEAN gas market integration: Insights from a scenario analysis. Energy Policy, 132, 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.025 Skrabec, Q. (2012). The 100 most significant events in American business an encyclopedia. Greenwood. Sovacool, B. K. (2016). Differing cultures of energy security: An international comparison of public perceptions. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 811-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.144 Suzuki, I., & Kaneko, Y. (2013). Japan’s Disaster Governance : How Was the 3.11 Crisis Managed? Springer. Suzuki, M., & Okada, A. (2017). Games of conflict and cooperation in Asia. Springer Japan. Tago, A. (2017). Multilateralism, Bilateralism, and Unilateralism in Foreign Policy. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-449 Taylor, B., & Tow, W. T. (2009). Challenges to Building an Effective Asia-Pacific Security Architecture. In M. J. Green & B. Gill (Eds.), Asia’s New Multilateralism - Cooperation, Competition, and the Search for Community (pp. 329-349). Columbia University Press. Terada, T. (2001). Directional leadership in institution-building: Japan’s approaches to ASEAN in the establishment of PECC and APEC. Pacific Review, 14(2), 195-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740110037352 The Middle East Institute. (2009, September). The 1979 “Oil Shock:” Legacy, Lessons, and Lasting Reverberations. The White House. (2022a, February). Indo-Pacific Strategy of The United States. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/U.S.-Indo-Pacific-Strategy.pdf The White House. (2022b, May). FACT SHEET: In Asia, President Biden and Dozen Indo-Pacific Partners Launch the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/05/23/fact-sheet-in-asia-president-biden-and-a-dozen-indo-pacific-partners-launch-the-indo-pacific-economic-framework-for-prosperity/ The World Bank. (2014). Learning from Megadisasters: Lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/478711468038957554/pdf/Learning-from-Megadisasters-lessons-from-the-great-east-Japan-earthquake.pdf Toft, P., Duero, A., & Bieliauskas, A. (2010). Terrorist targeting and energy security. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4411-4421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.070 Türk, H. (2013, September 26-28). Anti-OPEC or a neutral consumer organisation? The founding of the International Energy Agency in 1973/1974 [Paper presentation]. The Energy Crises of the 1970s as Challenges to the Industrialized World, Potsdam, Germany. https://networks.h-net.org/system/files/contributed-files/henergy-h-turk-founding-iea-1974.pdf Türk, H. (2014). The Oil Crisis of 1973 as a Challenge to Multilateral Energy Cooperation among Western Industrialized Countries. Historical Social Research, 39(4), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.39.2014.4.209-230 Union of Concerned Scientists. (2006, July 25). A Brief History of US Fuel Efficiency. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/brief-history-us-fuel-efficiency United States Department of Energy - Office of Fossil Energy. (n.d.). Strategic Petroleum Reserve. https://www.energy.gov/fe/services/petroleum-reserves/strategic-petroleum-reserve United States Department of Energy - Office of Fossil Energy. (n.d.). Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). https://www.energy.gov/fe/science-innovation/oil-gas/liquefied-natural-gas United States Department of State - Office of the Historian. (n.d.). Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), 1989. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1989-1992/apec U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2020, October). Country Analysis Executive Summary: Japan. https://www.eia.gov/international/content/analysis/countries_long/Japan/japan.pdf Van de Graaf, T. (2013). The “Oil Weapon” Reversed? Sanctions Against Iran and U.S.‐EU Structural Power. Middle East Policy, 20(3), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12040 Verrastro, F., & Caruso, G. (2013, October 16). The Arab Oil Embargo—40 Years Later. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/arab-oil-embargo%E2%80%9440-years-later Vitale, H. M., & Keagle, J. M., (2014). A Time to Tweet, as Well as a Time to Kill: ISIS’s Projection of Power in Iraq and Syria. Defense Horizons, 77, 1-12. http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo61782 Vivoda, V. (2014). LNG import diversification in Asia. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2(3-4), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2013.11.002 Wade, R. (2003). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, Princeton University Press. Introduction. Wang, Q., & Zhou, K. (2017). A framework for evaluating global national energy security. Applied Energy, 188, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.116 World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Principles of the trading system. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/fact2_e.htm Wu, L. (2015). Turning up Asia Pacific Regional Economic Integration. Hung Yeh. Zahariadis, N. (2008). Ambiguity and choice in European public policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 514–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760801996717 Zahariadis, N. (2013). Building better theoretical frameworks of the European Union’s policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781815 Zaré, M., & Afrouz, S. G. (2012). Crisis Management of Tohoku; Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, 11 March 2011. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 41(6), 12-20. https://login.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/scholarly-journals/crisis-management-tohoku-japan-earthquake-tsunami/docview/1020879472/se-2?accountid=10067
描述:	博士國立政治大學亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS) 105265501
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105265501
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
550101.pdf		1691Kb	Adobe PDF2	152	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈