政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145810
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造访人次 : 51176306      在线人数 : 875
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145810


    题名: 彌爾的政治與社會思想中之維續發展論
    Sustained Progress in John Stuart Mill`s Social and Political Thought
    作者: 簡智柔
    Chien, Chih-Jou
    贡献者: 陳建綱
    Chen, Chien-Kang
    簡智柔
    Chien, Chih-Jou
    关键词: 效益主義
    約翰 史都華 彌爾
    代議式民主
    社會主義
    資本主義
    對立主義
    Utilitarianism
    John Stuart Mill
    Representative democracy
    Socialism
    Capitalism
    Antagonism
    日期: 2023
    上传时间: 2023-07-06 16:35:08 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 此論文研究約翰 史都華 彌爾之經濟、社會與政治思想中之效益主義，主張維續社會發展貫穿其思想。透過詳細分析自由與平等如何形塑彌爾提倡之體制理想，聚焦其去中心化社會主義市場經濟、競合性別關係與代議式政府。透過體制設計，個人性與親社會性之協作得以推進動態社會發展。
    This thesis examines John Stuart Mill’s utilitarian ethics of social progress in the context of his economic, social and political thought. In contending that Mill was committed to the inculcation of individuality and sociability, the thesis offers a detailed analysis of how liberty and equality frame and qualify Mill’s institutional ideals, specifically his prescribed regimes of the decentralized socialist market economy, a gender relation founded on competitive partnership, and the representative government. It’s shown that a synergy among economic, social, and political development is instrumentalized to permanently serve the overall utility.
    參考文獻: References
    Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2005. The Ethics of Identity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Allen, Barbara. “The Puzzle of Gender in Liberal Theory: Tocqueville and Mill on Women and the Family.” Digital Library of the Commons. Indiana University, 1995. https://hdl.handle.net/10535/4115.
    Annas, Julia. 1977. “Mill and the Subjection of Women.” Philosophy, 52(200), 179-194.
    Anthony, Kanu Ikechukwu. 2012. “The Equality of Sexes in J.S. Mill Vis-A-Vis the Participation of Women in the Nigerian Labour and Economy.” Afrrev Laligens, 1(1), 18-29.
    Barker, Chris. 2015. “JS Mill on Nineteenth Century Marriage and the Common Law.” Law, Culture, and the Humanities. 15(1), 106-126.
    Berlin, Isiah. 1960. John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life. London: Council of Christians and Jews.
    Brilhante, A. Amaral. “The Centrality of Accountability in John Stuart Mill’s Liberal-Utilitarian Conception of Democracy.” PhD diss., University of London, 2007, https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1444009.
    Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert. 1986. Democracy and Capitalism, Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought. New York: Basic Books.
    Dalaqua, Hessmann Gustavo. 2018. “John Stuart Mill’s Republican Feminism.” Kalagatos, 15(2), 14-33.

    Gairdner, William. 2008. “Poetry and the mystique of the self in John Stuart Mill: sources of libertarian socialism.” Humanitas, 21(1/2), 1-9.

    Gaus, Gerald. “Mill`s Normative Economics.” In The Companion to Mill, ed. Macleod Christopher and Miller E. Dale (West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017), 488-503.
    Gray, John and Smith, G.W. 2013. Mill on Liberty in Focus. London: Routledge.
    Groenewegen, D. Peter. 2005. “Was John Stuart Mill A Classical Economist?” History of Economic Ideas, 13(3), 9-31.
    Hamburger, Joseph. 2001. John Stuart Mill on Liberty and Control. Chichester: Princeton University Press.
    Halliday, R. J. 1976. Political Thinkers. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
    Hansson, O. Sven. 2022. “John Stuart Mill and the Conflicts of Equality.” The Journal of Ethics, 26, 433-453.
    Hirschmann, J. Nancy. 2008. “Mill, Political Economy and Women’s Work.” American Political Science Review 102(2), 199-213.
    Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. New York: Dover.
    Hughes, Patricia. 1979. “The Reality versus the Ideal: J. S. Mill`s Treatment of Women, Workers, and Private Property.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 12(3), 523-542.
    Jahn, Beate. 2005. “Barbarian Thoughts: Imperialism in the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill.” Review of International Studies, 31(3), 599-618.
    Kinzer, L. Bruce. 1978. “J. S. Mill and the Secret Ballot.” Historical Reflections, 5 (1), 19-39.
    Kors, Alan Charles. 2011. “The Paradox of John Stuart Mill.” Social Philosophy and Policy, 28(2), 1-18.
    Krall, E. Lorraine. 2012. Freeing Women: Tocqueville, Mill, and Arendt on Women’s Role. Phd dissertation, Georgetown University.
    Kundakci, Deniz. 2018. “Right to Universal, Plural and Secret Vote: On the Liberal and Conservative Paradoxes of Mill`s `Elitist` Democracy.” Beytulhikme Philosophy Circle, 8(2), 593-617.
    Kwame Anthony Appiah. 2007. The Ethics of Identity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Lamberti, Jean-Claude. 1989. Tocqueville and the Two Democracies. Washington: Harvard University Press.
    McCabe, Helen. 2015. “John Stuart Mill, Utility and the Family : attacking the `citadel of the enemy’." Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 272 (2). 225-235.
    Macleod Christopher and Miller E. Dale, eds. 2017. A Companion to Mill. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Mann, Hollie and Spinner-Halev Jeff. 2010. “John Stuart Mill`s Feminism: On Progress, the State, and the Path to Justice.” Polity, 42(2), 244-270.
    Mousourakis, George. 2013. “Human Fallibilism and Individual Self-Development in John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Liberty.” Ethics & Politics, 15, 386-396.
    Morales, H. Maria. Donner,Wendy, Burgess-Jackson, Keith and Annas Julia. 2005. Mill’s the Subjection of Women. United States: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Murdoch, Iris. 1993. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. London: Penguin Books.
    Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. J.M. Robson (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963-1991), 33 vols.
    Volume titles as listed:

    Volume I - Autobiography and Literary Essays
    Volume II - The Principles of Political Economy I
    Volume III - Principles of Political Economy Part II
    Volume IV - Essays on Economics and Society Part I
    Volume V - Essays on Economics and Society Part II
    Volume VI - Essays on England, Ireland, and the Empire
    Volume VII - A System of Logic Part I
    Volume VIII - A System of Logic Part II
    Volume IX - William Hamilton’s Philosophy
    Volume X - Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society
    Volume XI - Essays on Philosophy and the Classics
    Volume XII - The Earlier Letters 1812-1848 Part I
    Volume XIII - The Earlier Letters 1812-1848 Part II
    Volume XIV - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part I
    Volume XV - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part II
    Volume XVI - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part III
    Volume XVII - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part IV
    Volume XVIII - Essays on Politics and Society Part I
    Murdoch, Iris. 2003. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. London: Vintage.
    Lipson, Leslie. 1964. The Democratic Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Eunseong, Oh. 2016. “Mill on Paternalism.” Journal of Political Inquiry, 47, 1-9.
    Okin, Susan Moller. 1973. ”John Stuart Mill’s Feminism: The Subjection of Women and the Improvement of Mankind." New Zealand Journal of History, 7(2), 105-127.
    Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.
    Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire : The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Plamenatz, John.1949. The English Utilitarians. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Riley, Jonathan. “Mill’s Neo-Athenian Model of Liberal Democracy.” In J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 221-249.
    Ryan, Alan. 2012. The Making of Modern Liberalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Saunders, Ben. 2016. “Reformulating Mill’s Harm Principle.” Mind, 125(500), 1005-1032.
    Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 1981. “Marital Slavery and Friendship: John Stuart Mill’s the Subjection of Women.” Political Theory, 9(2), 229-247.
    Sigot, Nathalie and Beaurain, Christophe. 2021. “John Stuart Mill and the Employment of Married Women: Reconciling Utility and Justice.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31(3), 1-43.
    Skorupski, John, eds. 1998. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Smart, Paul. 1990. “‘Some Will be More Equal than Others’: J. S. Mill on Democracy, Freedom and Meritocracy.” Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 76(3), 308-323.
    Spitz, Elaine. 1982. “On Shanley, ‘Marital Slavery and Friendship.’” Political Theory, 10(3), 461-464.
    Taylor, Charles and Gutmann, Amy. 1994. Multiculturalism : Examining the Politics of Recognition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Ten, C. L. “Democracy, Socialism, and the Working Classes.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, ed. Skorupski, John (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 372-395.
    Thompson, F. Dennis. “Mill in Parliament : When Should a Philosopher Compromise?” In J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 166-199.
    Thompson, F. Dennis. 1976. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Tunick, Mark. 2006. “Tolerant Imperialism: John Stuart Mill’s Defense of British Rule in India.” The Review of Politics, 68(4), 586–611.
    Turner, P. Brandon. 2010. “John Stuart Mill and the Antagonistic Foundation of Liberal Politics.” The Review of Politics, 72(1), 25-53.
    Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, eds. 2007. J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Warner, E. Beth. 2001. “John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Bureaucracy Within Representative Government: Balancing Competence and Participation.” Public Administration Review, 61(4), 403-413.
    Zakaras, Alex. “John Stuart Mill, Individuality, and Participatory Democracy.” In J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 200-220.
    Zouboulakis, S. Michel. 2002. “John Stuart Mill’s Institutional Individualism.” History of Economic Ideas, 10(3), 29-45.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
    109862003
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109862003
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[國際研究英語碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2154检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈