政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145739

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Graduate Institute of Development Studies > Theses > Item 140.119/145739

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145739

Title:	社區參與在莫拉克風災心理復原中的角色 The role of community participation in the psychological recovery of Typhoon Morakot disaster
Authors:	卓韋鋐 Cho, Wei-Hung
Contributors:	蘇昱璇 Su, Yu-Hsuan 卓韋鋐 Cho, Wei-Hung
Keywords:	災後重建心理復原韌性社區參與 Disaster reconstruction Psychological recovery Resilience Community participation
Date:	2023
Issue Date:	2023-07-06 16:21:37 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	災害對人類生活帶來嚴重衝擊，不只破壞了原本正常的生活秩序，往往還對個人的心理健康產生不利影響，不管是外在財產及人際網絡的損壞或是內在心理的創傷都須經歷一段時間的恢復，但相較於房屋財產的損失，個人心理創傷更難復原，且心理復原的情況容易受到外在環境因素影響，因此災後重建對於受災者來說格外重要。隨著公民意識的抬頭，社區參與逐漸作為推動災後重建的執行核心，使災後社區的重建變成了政府、非政府組織與社區居民協力合作的場域，除了將公民參與落實到社區以強化韌性外，更可成為平衡政府權力的體制，因此本研究透過莫拉克颱風社會衝擊與復原調查資料進行量化實證分析，探討社區居民的特質差異與「社區參與」及「心理復原」的關聯性檢視社區居民在災後參與社區公共事務上以及心理復原過程中可能面臨的困境，本研究發現受災程度嚴重、原住民、已婚、沒有小孩、高收入及對政府與民間組織的災復能力信任度高會有較高機會參與社區重建，而女性、原住民、喪偶、離婚等群體在心理復原上容易處於弱勢。為了解災後社區參與的功能，進一步分析社區參與對心理復原產生的影響，雖從整體分析結果來說，社區參與行為對居民在災後心理復原上所產生的效益並未如預期明顯，但對某些變項還是存在調節效果，如婚姻狀況、宗教信仰、對社區災復能力信任度、社區認同等。此外，參與程度差異也會對心理復原引起不同的反應，因此本研究認為積極的社區參與不一定有利於心理復原，社區居民應視自身的情況採取適合的復原策略。 Disasters have a serious impact on human life. It not only destroys the normal order of life, but also has a bad influence on the mental health of individuals. Damages of property and personal networks and internal psychological trauma all require a period of recovery. Psychological recovery is especially difficult and susceptible to external environmental factors. Therefore, the post-disaster reconstruction is very important for the victims. With the rise of civic consciousness, community participation has gradually become the core implementation for post-disaster reconstruction. It has transformed the rebuilding of post-disaster communities into a collaborative effort between the government, non-governmental organizations, and community residents. By implementing citizen participation at the community level, not only does it strengthen resilience, but it also serves as a system to balance governmental power. Therefore, this study uses Social Impacts and Recovery Survey of Typhoon Morakot for quantitative analysis. By exploring the relationship between the characteristics of community residents and their involvement in “community participation” and “psychological recovery” to examine the potential challenges faced by community residents in participating in community public affairs after a disaster and in the process of psychological recovery. This study found that people from the most damaged areas, indigenous people, people who are married, have no children, higher-income, and those with a high level of trust in the disaster recovery capabilities of the government and non-governmental organizations are more likely to participate in community reconstruction. On the other hand, women, indigenous people, widows, and divorced individuals tend to be more vulnerable in terms of psychological recovery. In order to understand the function of community participation after disaster, we further analyze the impact of community participation on psychological recovery. Although the regression results did not show significant benefits of community participation on residents’ psychological recovery as expected, it still has a moderation effect on some variables, such as marriage, religious beliefs, trust in community disaster recovery capabilities, and community identity. etc. Furthermore, the level of participation also elicited different responses in terms of psychological recovery. Therefore, this study believes that active community participation may not always be beneficial for psychological recovery, and community residents should adopt appropriate recovery strategies based on their individual circumstances.
Reference:	Amstadter, A. B., Acierno, R., Richardson, L. K., Kilpatrick, D. G., Gros, D. F., Gaboury, M. T., Tran, T. L., Trung, L. T., Tam, N. T., Tuan, T., Buoi, L. T., Ha, T. T., Thach, T. D., & Galea, S. (2009). Posttyphoon prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, panic disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder in a Vietnamese sample. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(3), 180-188. Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Social Capital in Post Disaster Recovery：Towards a Resilient and Compassionate East Asian Community. In Sawada, Y. and S. Oum , eds. Economic and Welfare Impacts of Disasters in East Asia and Policy Responses. ERIA Research Project Report 2011-8, Jakarta： ERIA, 157-178. Bilau, A. A., Witt, E., & Lill, I. (2018). Practice framework for the management of post-disaster housing reconstruction programmes. Sustainability, 10(11). Bui, B. K. H., Anglewicz, P., & VanLandingham, M. J. (2021). The impact of early social support on subsequent health recovery after a major disaster：A longitudinal analysis. SSM - Population Health, 14. Carr, L. J. (1932). Disaster and the Sequence-Pattern Concept of Social Change. American Journal of Sociology, 38(2), 207-218. Chen, H., Zhu, T., Krott, M., & Maddox, D. (2013). Community forestry management and livelihood development in northwest China：Integration of governance, project design, and community participation. Regional Environmental Change, 13(1), 67-75. Cheng, T., Wu, J., Chong, M., & Williams P. (1900). Internal consistency and factor structure of the Chinese Health Questionnaire. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 82(4), 304-308. Chong, M., & Wilkinson, G. (1989). Validation of 30-and 12-item versions of the Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ) in patients admitted for general health screening. Psychological Medicine, 19(2), 495-505. Clark, P. B., & Wilson, J. Q. (1961). Incentive Systems A Theory of Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6(2), 129-166. Coppola, D. P. (2015). Introduction to International Disaster Management (3rd ed.). Oxford, England： Butterworth-Heinemann. Coleman, D., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1993). Leisure and Health：The Role of Social Support and Self-Determination. Journal of Leisure Research, 25(2), 111-128. Davidson, C. H., Johnson, C., Lizarralde, G., Dikmen, N., & Sliwinski, A. (2007). Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat International, 31(1), 100-115. Drabek, T. E. (1970). Methodology of Studying Disasters：Past Patterns and Future Possibilities. American Behavioral Scientist, 13(3), 331-343. Freedy, J. R., Shaw, D. L., Jarrell, M. P., & Masters, C. R. (1992). Towards an Understanding of the Psychological Impact of Natural Disasters：An Application of the Conservation Resources Stress Model. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5(3), 441-454. Freedy, J. R., & Simpson, W. M. (2007). Disaster-Related Physical and Mental Health：A Role for the Family Physician. Am Fam Physician, 75(6), 841-846. Gamo, B. R., & Park, D. B. (2022). Community capacity influencing community participation：Evidence from Ethiopia. World Development Perspectives, 27. Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2012). Social Media Use for News and Individuals’ Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336. Gilchrist, A. (2004). The well-connected community：a networking approach to community development. Bristol, England： The Policy Press. Haas, J. E., Kates, R. W., & Bowden, M. J. (1977). Reconstruction following disaster. United States, Cambridge：The MIT Press. Kapucu, N. (2007). Non-profit response to catastrophic disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management, 16(4), 551-561. Kaniasty, K. (2020). Social support, interpersonal, and community dynamics following disasters caused by natural hazards. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 105-109. Lawther, P. M. (2009). Community involvement in post disaster reconstruction Case study of the British red cross maldives recovery program. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 13(2), 153-169. Lian, W. M., Gan, G. L., Pin, C. H., Wee, S., & Ye, H. C. (1999). Correlates of Leisure-Time Physical Activity in an Elderly Population in Singapore. American Journal of Public Health, 89(10), 1578-1580. Logan, J. R. (2006). The Impact of Hurricane Katrina on the Race and Class Divide in America. In： Marable, M., Clarke, K. (eds) Seeking Higher Ground. The Critical Black Studies Series. New York, United States：Palgrave Macmillan. López-Carresi, A., Fordham, M., Wisner, B., Kelman, I., &Gaillard, J. C. (2013). Disaster management：International lessons in risk reduction, response and recovery, London： Routledge. Lowe, S. R., Hennein, R., Feingold, J. H., Peccoralo, L. A., Ripp, J. A., Mazure, C. M., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2021). Are Women Less Psychologically Resilient Than Men? Background Stressors Underlying Gender Differences in Reports of Stress-Related Psychological Sequelae. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 83(1). Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance：Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part A： Policy and Practice, 101, 238-251. Moore, J. (2000). Placing home in context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), 207-217. Mandleco, B. L., & Peery, J. C. (2000). An organizational framework for conceptualizing resilience in children. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 13(3), 99-111. Nakayama, R., Koyanagi, A., Stickley, A., Kondo, T., Gilmour, S., Arenliu, A., & Shibuya, K. (2014). Social networks and mental health in post-conflict Mitrovica, Kosova. BMC Public Health, 14(1). Neal, D. M. (1997). Reconsidering the Phases of Disaster. International Joumal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 15(2), 239-264. Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1-2), 127-150. Ntontis, E., Drury, J., Amlôt, R., Rubin, G. J., Williams, R., & Saavedra, P. (2021). Collective resilience in the disaster recovery period：Emergent social identity and observed social support are associated with collective efficacy, well-being, and the provision of social support. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(3), 1075-1095. O’Leary, V. E. (1998). Strength in the Face of Adversity：Individual and Social Thriving The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues. Journal of Social Issues, 54(2). Olivia, F. W., Claudia, L. K., & Yuen, L. A. (2009). Nurses’ perception of disaster： Implications for disaster nursing curriculum. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(22), 3165-3171. Opdyke, A., Javernick-Will, A., & Koschmann, M. (2018). A comparative analysis of coordination, participation, and training in post-disaster shelter projects. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(11). Osti, R. (2004). Forms of community participation and agencies’ role for the implementation of water-induced disaster management：Protecting and enhancing the poor. Disaster Prevention and Management, 13(1), 6-12. Powell, J. W. (1954). An Introduction to the Natural History of Disaster. University of Maryland： Disaster Research Project. Pretty, J. N. (1995). Participatory Learning For Sustainable Agriculture. World Development, 23(8). Proag, V. (2014). The Concept of Vulnerability and Resilience. Procedia Economics and Finance, 18, 369-376. Raker, E. J. (2020). Natural Hazards, Disasters, and Demographic Change：The Case of Severe Tornadoes in the United States, 1980–2010. Demography, 57(2), 653-674. Rifkin, S. B. (2014). Examining the links between community participation and health outcomes：A review of the literature. Health Policy and Planning, 29, ii98–ii106. Song, J., Pandey, R., Dong, G., Sharifi, A., & Subedi, B. P. (2022). Urban-Rural Disparity in Community Resilience：A Multilevel Analysis of the Relief Progress after the 2015 Nepal Earthquake. Sustainable Cities and Society, 79. Sorensen, S., Schofield, G., & Jarden, A. (2016). A systems-approach model of mental toughness: Understanding inputs, processes and outputs. Psychology, 7, 1402-1423. Sullivan, M. (2003). Integrated recovery management：A new way of looking at a delicate process. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 18(2), 4-27. Tedeschi, R., & Calhoun, L. (1995). Trauma & Transformation：Growing in the Aftermath of Suffering. New York, United States： SAGE Publications, Inc. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory：Measuring the Positive Legacy of lkauma. Journal of Tmumatic Stress, 9(3). Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic Growth：Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1-18. Telles, S., Singh, N., & Joshi, M. (2009). Risk of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in survivors of the floods in Bihar, India. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, 63(8), 330-334. Tsai, S. L., Ochiai, C., Tseng, M. H., & Deng, C. Z. (2022a). Suggestions for large-scale, postdisaster reconstruction involving indigenous populations：a participatory approach to recovery after Typhoon Morakot. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13(2), 180-196. Tsai, S. L., Ochiai, C., Tseng, M. H., & Deng, C. Z. (2022b). A framework for NGO-led post-disaster reconstruction programs in the indigenous community：A case study of the 2009 Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 73. Turner, B. (2009). ASEAN-Mekong Basin Development Cooperation (Mekong Group). The Statesman’s Yearbook 2010, 66-67. United Nations. (2009). Risk and poverty in a changing climate. New York, United States： United Nations publications. Vukasović, T., & Bratko, D. (2015). Heritability of personality: a meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychol Bull. 141(4) , 769-785. Wang, D. (2022). Effects of social capital on mental health of disaster victims：Evidence from the Wenchuan earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 83. Wang, J., Liu, F., Li, L., & Zhang, J. (2022). More than innovativeness：Comparing residents’ motivations for participating renewable energy communities in different innovation segments. Renewable Energy, 197, 552-563. Wakefield, S. E. L., & Poland, B. (2005). Family, friend or foe? Critical reflections on the relevance and role of social capital in health promotion and community development. Social Science and Medicine, 60(12), 2819-2832. World Bank. (2010). Safer Homes, Stronger Communities：A Handbook for Reconstructing after Natural Disasters. Washington D.C., United States： World Bank. World Economic Forum. (2015). Global Risks 2015 Report (10th ed.). Cologny, Switzerland： World Economic Forum. Xu, Q., Perkins, D. D., & Chow, J. C. C. (2010). Sense of Community, Neighboring, and Social Capital as Predictors of Local Political Participation in China. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3-4), 259-271. Yi, F., Deng, D., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Collaboration of top-down and bottom-up approaches in the post-disaster housing reconstruction： Evaluating the cases in Yushu Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China from resilience perspective. Land Use Policy, 99. Ziersch, A. M., & Baum, F. E. (2004). Involvement in civil society groups：Is it good for your health? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(6), 493-500. 中文部分王仕圖、趙善如與許慧麗（2011）。地方政府與民間團體在災後社區重建互動關係之探究：以屏東縣政府之莫拉克風災社區參與重建計畫爲例。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，1（2），59-94。王增勇（2000）。南投縣災後生活重建規畫-社區家庭支援中心。護理雜誌，47（5），39-46。王光旭與黃怡臻（2018）。社區人際網絡與社區意識及參與關聯性之研究：不同營造經驗社區的比較。調查研究—方法與應用，40，63–125。王美媛與鄧明賢（2000）。921災後重建工作人員生活事件與工作適應之研究—以中華基督教救助協會工作人員為例。九二一災後重建經驗交流研討會。朱蓓蕾（2018）。美國緊急應變管理機制之改革：國土安全之概念分析。遠景基金會季刊，13（2），47-97。江天健（2003）。社區工作與社區總體營造。國教世紀，204，13-20。吳越菲與文軍（2016）。從社區導向到社區為本：重構災害社會工作服務模式。華東師範大學學報（哲學社會科學版），6，101-110。吳英璋（1999）。災後心理與心靈重建（921震災重建專題）。新世紀智庫論壇，8。吳舜堂與陳欽雨（2017）。高齡長者社會支持、社會參與與活躍老化關係之研究。福祉科技與服務管理學刊，5（4），331-352。呂大慶（2008）。美國緊急事件（災害）管理體系與專職人員訓練之研究。選送公務人員出國專題研究實施計畫（報告編號：C09700464），行政院人事行政局。邵珮君（2003）。臺灣集集震災後社區營造式重建機制之探討－以軍功里和劉家伙房之重建為例。都市與計劃，30（4），371-389。林宗弘與李宗義（2013）。社會韌性與災後重建：汶川地震中的國家與地方社會。東亞研究，44（2），1-38. 周仲島、于宜強、鳳雷、陳永明、李清勝與鄭明典（2010）。莫拉克颱風綜觀環境以及降雨特徵分析。大氣科學，38（1），21-38。柯文升與黃志中（2011）。災難心理衛生。家庭醫學與基層醫療，26（1）。洪鴻智（2007）。自然災害後政府重建資源分配之決策因素分析：以 921 地震為例。公共行政學報，23，95-124。洪啟東與傅玟盛（2013）。重大災害後的族群社經脆弱現象觀察與分析：以莫拉克颱風災後重建的杉林慈濟大愛園區為例。災害防救科技與管理，2（1），51-70。洪瑜君（2010）。民眾生活型態與防災素養關係之研究-以臺中縣市為例。國立臺中教育大學環境教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。陳亮全、林李耀、李維森、謝龍生、李欣輯與陳聯光（2011）。莫拉克颱風之災情勘查與分析。國家災害防救科技中心。陳茂祥（1985）。淺談一般社會行動理論。社區發展季刊，32，32-41。陳宇嘉與王糸秀蘭（2001）。震災後兒童與少年的創傷處置。研考雙月刊，221，89-96。陳亭君、林耀盛與許文耀（2013）。原住民與漢人族群的災變因應與心理適應關係探討：以莫拉克風災為例。中華心理衛生學刊，26（2），249-278。高晧翎、王鴻濬、蔣佩君與陳美惠（2011）。影響居民參與社區林業因子之研究－以林美社區與湖本社區為例。中華林學季刊，44（1），87-102。許文耀與曾幼涵（2004）。災難因子與心理症狀間之關係－以921地震為例。臨床心理學刊，1（1），30-39。許文耀（2005）。子計畫：以資源理論之觀點探討雙重災害與單一災害災民的資源變化與身心反應歷程（II）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（計畫編號：NSC94-2625-Z-004-001）。國科會。許文耀、吳英璋、謝臥龍、賴春生、鄭英耀、謝碧玲、駱慧文、黃旼儀（2011）。八八水災災後社會心理復健工作模式建立計畫。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（計畫編號：NSC 98-2420-H-004-182）。國科會。許茂森（2004）。高雄市政府中高階主管決策風格與危機處理反應關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所在職專班碩士論文，未出版。張學聖與廖晉賢（2014）。複合性災害評估架構研究:莫拉克風災為例。都市與計畫，41（3），305-327。鄒芹（2022）。基層政府信任度影響因素研究—基於對公民參與質量的考察。應用數學進展，11（4），1740-1746。黃松林、郭銀漢、楊秋燕與汪中華（2012）。社區復原韌性與社會工作災害重建的關係。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，2（1），1-27。湯京平（2001）。災難、官僚與民主：臺灣九二一震災援救的政治與制度分析。中國行政評論，11（1），67-98。湯京平、黃詩涵與黃坤山（2009）。災後重建政策與誘因排擠－以九二一地震後某社區營造集體行動為例。政治學報，48，1-31。湯京平、蔡允棟與黃紀（2002）。災難與政治：九二一地震中的集體行為與災變情境的治理。政治科學論叢，16，137-162。楊永年（2009）。八八水災救災體系之研究。公共行政學報，32，143-169。楊惠萱、李香潔與鄧傳忠（2018）。莫拉克颱風永久屋政策下高雄市受災戶的資源獲取與復原。都市與計劃，45（4），257-281。溫宜琳（2018）。從社會支持觀點探討愛滋線上匿名諮詢問答。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，未出版。廖俊松（2004）。社區營造與社區參與：金鈴園與邵社的觀察與學習。社區發展季刊，107，133-145。鄧傳忠、陳淑惠與李香潔（2020）。資源適配度對災後心理健康的影響－以莫拉克風災為例。中華心理衛生學刊，33（1），1-26。蔡育軒、陳怡君與王業立（2007）。社區發展協會、選舉動員與地方政治。東吳政治學報，25（4），93-135。劉麗雯、邱瑜瑾與陸宛蘋（2003）。九二一震災的救災組織動員與資源連結。中國行政評論，12（3），139-178。劉斌志（2015）。論家庭社會工作在災後青少年心理重建中的運用。西華大學學報（哲學社會科學版），34（1），107-112。劉晏汝與林貝珊（2021）。異地重建原住民社區的社會資本樣貌與作用：以阿里山得恩亞納社區為例。災害防救科技與管理學刊，10（1），1-14。謝志誠、傅從喜、陳竹上與林萬億（2012）。一條離原鄉愈來愈遠的路？：莫拉克颱風災後異地重建政策的再思考。臺大社工學刊，26，41-86。嚴景惠與蔡明昌（2009）。大學生宗教信仰與來生信念關係之研究。生命學研究，10，61-116。顧艷秋、顏芳慧、王翠彬與錢端蘭（2010）。八八水災災民創傷後反應及其影響因素之探討。護理雜誌，57（3），32-42。
Description:	碩士國立政治大學國家發展研究所 109261010
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109261010
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Development Studies] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
101001.pdf		7075Kb	Adobe PDF2	149	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...