政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145075
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51694271      Online Users : 451
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145075


    Title: 大專院校與社區機構心理師在「非性雙重關係」的倫理判斷與倫理行為之差異研究
    A study on the difference of ethical judgement and ethical behavior in “non-sexual dual relationship” between psycho-therapists serviced at university and in community center.
    Authors: 薛喬
    Hsueh, Chiao
    Contributors: 陳婉真
    Chen, Wan-chen
    薛喬
    Hsueh, Chiao
    Keywords: 非性雙重關係
    大專院校心理師
    社區機構心理師
    倫理判斷
    倫理判斷信心度
    倫理行為
    Psycho-therapists Serviced at School
    Psycho-therapists Serviced in Community Center
    Non-sexual Dual Relationship
    Ethical Judgement
    the Confidence Degree of Ethical Judgement
    Ethical Behavior
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-06-02 11:43:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 非性雙重關係是諮商倫理中最為重要、也最具爭議的一環，且隨著諮商市場逐漸自由化，愈來愈多心理師投入社區成為行動心理師，許多新興的非性雙重關係議題跟著浮現，過往的諮商倫理規範，對於現階段的心理治療環境是否足用？本研究旨在了解大專院校與社區機構執業之心理師，在諮商倫理中的「非性雙重關係」方面，其倫理判斷、判斷信心度與倫理行為之現況，以及當中是否存在差異。研究者蒐集執登記於大專院校之心理師82名、執登於社區機構之心理師103名作為研究對象，並以驗證性因素分析考驗改編的「心理師非性雙重關係倫理判斷與倫理行為問卷」是否具建構效度。接著，以描述性統計瞭解大專及社區心理師在非性雙重關係上的倫理現況，再近一步以混合設計二因子變異數分析，考驗兩場域心理師在非性雙重關係上的差異情形。最後，以獨立樣本t檢定及單因子變異數分析，考驗在其他背景變項下，對非性雙重關係倫理表現是否有影響。
    研究結果發現如下：
    一、 「心理師非性雙重關係倫理判斷與倫理行為問卷」具良好信效度。
    二、 倫理現況：
    （一） 大專院校心理師：在倫理判斷上，傾向認為社交關係不合倫理、收送禮物的分數接近中間值、在身體觸碰上傾向認為合乎倫理；大專心理師對非性雙重關係倫理判斷的信心度有中上程度；整體而言，大專心理師非性雙重關係的倫理行為頻率偏低。
    （二） 社區機構心理師：倫理判斷上，傾向認為社交關係不合倫理、收送禮物的分數接近中間值、在身體觸碰上傾向認為合乎倫理；社區心理師對非性雙重關係倫理判斷的信心度有中上程度；整體而言，社區心理師非性雙重關係的倫理行為頻率偏低。
    三、 倫理差異：大專院校及社區機構心理師，在非性雙重關係之倫理判斷並無差異，且場域及構面之間無交互作用；信心度上，社區心理師在社交關係、收送禮物及身體觸碰上，均顯著高於大專心理師，場域及構面之間無交互作用；倫理行為上，場域及構面間交互作用接近顯著，兩場域心理師在社交關係與收送禮物構面上無差異，在身體觸碰上，差異情形為社區大於大專。
    四、 不同構面對非性雙重關係之影響：
    （一） 生理性別：女性在非性雙重關係的倫理判斷上相較於男性更為嚴謹，同時也對於自己的倫理判斷更有信心；不同性別之倫理行為頻率並無顯著差異。
    （二） 執業年資：不同執業年資在非性雙重關係倫理判斷上並無差異，越資深之心理師對判斷的信心程度愈高，且出現非性雙重關係倫理行為之頻率亦愈高。
    "Non-sexual dual relationships are the most important and controversial part of counseling ethics, and with the gradual liberalization of the counseling market, more and more psycho therapists have entered the community as freelancers, and many emerging issues related to non-sexual dual relationships have emerged. Are the past counseling ethical norms sufficient for the current psychological treatment environment? This study aims to understand the ethical judgments, confidence levels of ethical judgment, and ethical behaviors of psycho therapists practicing at university and in community center in the aspect of "non-sexual dual relationships" in counseling ethics, and whether there are differences among them. The researcher collected a total of 82 psycho therapists registered at university and 103 psycho therapists registered at community center as research subjects, and used confirmatory factor analysis to test the construct validity of the adapted " Non-Sexual Dual Relationship Ethical Judgment and Behavior of Psycho Therapists Questionnaire." Then, descriptive statistics were used to understand the ethical status of university and community psycho therapists in non-sexual dual relationships. Furthermore, a mixed-design two-factor analysis of variance was used to examine the differences between the two groups of psycho therapists in non-sexual dual relationships. Finally, independent sample t-tests and one-way analysis of variance were used to examine the impact of other background variables on the ethical performance of non-sexual dual relationships.
    The results of the study were as follows:
    1. The reliability and validity of "Non-sexual Dual Relationship Ethical judgment and Ethical Behavior of Psycho-therapists Questionnaire" were supported.

    2. Ethical status:
    (1) Psycho-therapists serviced at university: They tend to believe that social relationships are unethical, their scores of giving and receiving gifts are close to the midpoint, and tend to believe that physical touch is ethical. They have a moderate to high degree of confidence in their ethical judgments regarding non-sexual dual relationships. Overall, the frequency of ethical behavior in non-sexual dual relationships among them is relatively low.
    (2) Psycho-therapists serviced in community center: hey tend to believe that social relationships are unethical, their scores for giving and receiving gifts are close to the midpoint, and tend to believe that physical touch is ethical. They have a moderate to high degree of confidence in their ethical judgments regarding non-sexual dual relationships. Overall, the frequency of ethical behavior in non-sexual dual relationships among them is relatively low.
    3. Psycho-therapists serviced at university and in community center have no difference in the ethical judgment of non-sexual dual relationships; psycho-therapists serviced in community center have higher confidence in judgement than the one serviced at universitiy; In terms of ethical behavior, there is no difference between the two fields of psychologists in the dimension of social relationships and giving and receiving gifts, amd psycho-therapists serviced in community center are more likely to engage in physical touch behaviors than the one serviced ay university.
    4. The impact of different dimensions on non-sexual dual relationships:
    (1) Sex: Men are looser than women in the ethical judgment of non-sexual dual relationships, and they are also less confident in their ethical judgments; there is no significant difference in the frequency of ethical behaviors between men and women.
    (2) Years of practice: There is no difference in the ethical judgment of non-sexual dual relationship between different years of practice. The more experienced the psychologist, the higher the confidence in the judgment, and the higher the frequency of non-sexual dual relationship ethical behavior.
    Reference: 中文部分
    牛格正（1991）。諮商專業倫理。五南。
    牛格正、王智弘（2008）。助人專業倫理。心靈工坊。
    中華民國臨床心理師公會全國聯合會（2011）。臨床心理師倫理準則與行為規範。取自：http://www.atcp.org.tw/modules/news/article.php?storyid=52
    王守珍（2009）。台灣臨床心理師的組織與人力現況。應用心理研究，41，35-42。
    王金石、朱翠瑾（2003）。職業心理師專業培養與心理診所專業經營之模式研討。諮商與輔導，215，16-20。
    王智弘（1997）。諮商專業倫理。應用倫理通訊，4，41-48。
    王智弘（2004年11月）。諮商專業倫理之理念架構與諮商專業倫理機制的運作模式。中國輔導學會2004年年會暨學術研討會發表之論文。台北市國立台灣師範大學。
    王智弘（2005）。諮商專業倫理之理念與實踐。教育研究月刊，132，87-98。
    王義德（2017）。諮商關係中發生非性雙重關係之倫理困境。諮商與輔導，377，18-21。
    台灣心理學會（2013）。心理學專業人員倫理準則。取自：https://www.tpa-tw.org/conduct
    台灣輔導與諮商學會（2001）。台灣輔導與諮商學會諮商專業倫理守則。取自：http://www.guidance.org.tw/ethic_001.html
    行政院（2021）。110年醫療與其他醫事機構執業醫事人員數及每萬人口執業醫事人員數。取自：https://statdb.dgbas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/viewplus.asp?ma=HS0203A1A&ti=%C2%E5%C0%F8%BBP%A8%E4%A5L%C2%E5%A8%C6%BE%F7%BAc%B0%F5%B7~%C2%E5%A8%C6%A4H%AD%FB%BC%C6%A4%CE%A8C%B8U%A4H%A4f%B0%F5%B7~%C2%E5%A8%C6%A4H%AD%FB%BC%C6-%A6~&path=../PXfile/Health/&lang=9&strList=L
    何志平（1990）。國民小學輔導人員專業倫理行為與倫理判斷傾向之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中師範學院。
    何金針（譯）（2007）。社區諮商：多元社會的賦能策略（原作者：Lewis, J. A., Lewis, M. D., Daniels, J. A., D’ Andrea, M. J.）。台北：心理出版社。（原著出版年：2003）。
    何思妤、劉若筠（2018）。校園諮商輔導工作之多重關係探究。諮商與輔導，391，25-29。
    李佳儒、張勻銘、王智弘、楊純斐（2012）。諮商心理師團體諮商倫理信念與行為之探究。中華輔導與諮商學報，34，53-81。
    李華璋（2001）。諮商人員專業認同歷程分析研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學。
    呂羿慧（2009）。從雙重關係談輔導教師在學校諮商中多重角色的困境。諮商與輔導，277，11-14。
    宋宥賢（2014）。學校輔導人員諮商專業倫理困境與因應：實務現場之省思。諮商與輔導，347，13-17。
    社團法人中華民國諮商心理師公會全國聯合會（2012）。諮商心理師專業倫理守則。取自：https://www.tcpu.org.tw/legal-and-ethical-complaints/5-professional-ethics-code-for-counseling-psychologists-of-the-national-federation-of-counseling-psychologists-association-of-the-republic-of-china.html
    吳佩芬（2012）。從實務工作者的角度看國中小兼任輔導教師的諮商倫理議題。諮商與輔導，313，24-28。
    吳禹廷、何英奇（2017）。諮商心理師的行銷之道。諮商與輔導，374，21-26。
    林玉珊、顏憶帆（2013）。助人工作者當面對親友尋求諮商時之雙重關係困境。家庭教育雙月刊，43，40-45。
    林美芳、張馥媛、王智弘（2009）。臨床心理師非性雙重關係倫理態度與行為之調查研究。台灣公共衛生雜誌，28（6），530-540。
    林星翔（2019）。心智化能力涉入個別諮商情境之研究－以專家與新手諮商心理師為例（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學。
    林家興、謝昀蓁、孫正大（2008）。諮商心理師執業現況調查研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，23，117-145。
    林家興（2014）。諮商專業倫理臨床應用與案例分析。心理出版社。
    林家興（2014）。臺灣諮商心理師執業現況與執業意見之調查研究。教育心理學報，45（3），279-302。
    林慶仁（1997）。學校輔導教師諮商倫理判斷之調查研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學。
    洪莉竹（2016）。實務工作者面對倫理挑戰的考量與經驗－台灣諮商輔導倫理議題研究之探討。臺灣諮商心理學報，4（1），1-16。
    修慧蘭（2012）。大專院校專任心理諮商輔導人員所需職能之研究。臺灣諮商心理學報，1，89-117。
    修慧蘭、林蔚芳、洪莉竹（譯）（2019）。專業助人工作倫理（二版）（原作者：Corey, G., Corey, M. S., Corey, C. ）。雙葉書廊。（原著出版年：2019）。
    陳文玲（1991）。學校輔導教師諮商倫理信念調查研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學。
    陳志信（1993）。輔導教師專業倫理行為及其倫理判斷傾向之調查研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學。
    陳彥豪（譯）（1999）。非語言傳播（原作者：Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A.）。五南。（原著初版年：1992）。
    許維素（2002）。中學教師焦點解決短期諮商訓練課程方案成效之研究。教育心理學報，33（2），57-77。
    張勻銘、王智弘、楊淳斐、李佳儒（2012）。當事人和諮商師發展友誼關係之經驗：當事人觀點。中華心理衛生學刊，25（4），633-658。
    張涵茹（2018）。從《診療椅上的謊言》一書探討違反界線之諮商倫理議題。諮商與輔導，395，42-44。
    康家華（2009）。中等學校輔導教師對師生諮商雙重關係之經驗探究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學。
    曾仰如（1991）。十大哲學問題之探微。輔仁大學出版社。
    畢恆達（2016）。空間就是性別。心靈工坊。

    黃文俊（2016）。行動心理師生涯轉換與工作型態之敘說研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中國文化大學。
    黃嘉羚（2019）。當我們碰在一起－從個案角度談諮商中的觸碰（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學。
    楊淳斐（1997）。大專院校輔導教師諮商倫理信念與行為之調查研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學。
    楊添圍、周仁宇（譯）（2021）。人我之間：客體關係理論與治療實務（十一版）（原作者：Hamilton, N. G.）。心靈工坊。（原著出版年：2004）。
    楊堯翔、黃文俐、蔡佳伶、江佩耘、吳芝儀（2016）。大專院校諮商多重關係之探討。輔導季刊，52（4），39-48。
    臺灣諮商心理學會（2014）。諮商心理專業倫理守則。取自：http://www.twcpa.org.tw/about.php?id=372
    劉完利（2013）。社區心理輔導志工倫理判斷與倫理行為之調查研究：以「張老師」基金會為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學。
    鄭芷昀（2021）。心理師經營社群網站之自我揭露經驗探討（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學。
    盧怡任、王智弘（2012）。諮商心理師倫理判斷與倫理行為之調查研究。教育心理學報， 43（4），783-803。
    謝蕙如（2014）。諮商師面臨雙重關係困境與其因應之道。諮商與輔導，340， 47-50。


     
    英文部分
    American Counseling Association. (2014). Code of ethics. Retrieved from https://www.counseling.org/knowledge-center/ethics
    Anderson, S. K., & Kitchener, K. S. (1996). Nonromantic, nonsexual posttherapy relationships between psychologists and former clients: An exploratory study of critical incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27(1), 59-66.
    Barr, J. (1971). A comparison between counselor-trainee and practicing counselor awareness of the ethical standards set forth by the APGA. Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 17-71.
    Barnett, J. E., Behnke, S. H., Rosenthal, S. L., & Koocher, G. P. (2007). In case of ethical dilemma, break glass: Commentary on ethical decision making in practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(1), 7-12.
    Blocher, D. H. (1987). The professional counselor. Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
    Borys, D. S., & Pope, K. S. (1989). Dual relationships between therapist and client: A national study of psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20(5), 283-293.
    Brownlee, K. (1996). Ethics in community mental health care: The ethics of non-sexual dual relationships: A dilemma for the rural mental health profession. Community Mental Health Journal, 32(5), 497-503.
    Campbell, C. D., & Gordon, M. C. (2003). Acknowledging the inevitable: Understanding multiple relationships in rural practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34(4), 430-434.
    Crittenden, G. F. (2010). Beliefs about the ethics of dual relationship dilemmas in rural settings: An investigation of counselors` perspectives (Doctoral dissertation). Retrived from ProQuest Dissertation and theses database. (UMI No. 3426823)
    Doromal, Q. S., & Creamer, D. G. (1988). An evaluation of the ethical judgement scale. Journal of College Student Development, 29, 151-158.
    Erikson, E. (1982). The life cycle completed. W.W. Norton & Company.

    Gabbard, G. O. (1994). Psychotherapists who transgress sexual boundaries with patients. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 58(1), 124-135.
    Gibson, W. T., & Pope, K. S. (1993). The ethics of counseling: A national survey of certified counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71(3), 330-336.
    Glosoff, H. L. (2015). Multiple relationship issues in private practice. In B. Herlihy & G. Corey (Eds.), Boundary issues in counseling: Multiple roles and responsibilities (pp. 229-237). John Wiley & Sons.
    Gutheil, T. G., & Gabbard, G. O. (1993). The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: Theoretical and risk-management dimensions. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(2), 188-196.
    Haas, L. J., Malouf, J. L., & Mayerson, N. H. (1986). Ethical dilemmas in psychological practice: Results of a national survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17(4), 316-321.
    Herlihy, B., & Corey, G. (2014). Boundary issues in counseling: Multiple roles and responsibilities. John Wiley & Sons.
    Jehu, D. (1994). Patients as victims: Sexual abuse in psychotherapy and counselling. John Wiley & Sons
    Jones, S. E., & Yarbrough, A. E. (1985). A naturalistic study of meanings of touch. Communication Monographs, 52(1), 19-56.
    Kitchener, K. S. (1984). Intuition, critical evaluation and ethical principles: The foundation for ethical decisions in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 12(3), 43-55.
    Lazarus, A. A. (1994). How certain boundaries and ethics diminish therapeutic effectiveness. Ethics & Behavior, 4(3), 255-261.
    Lazarus, A. A., & Zur, O. (2002). Dual relationships and psychotherapy. Springer Publishing Co.
    Moleski, S. M., & Kiselica, M. S. (2005). Dual relationships: A continuum ranging from the destructive to the therapeutic. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(1), 3-11.

    O` Laughlin, M. J. (2000). Dr. Strangelove: Therapist-client dual relationship bans and freedom of association, or how I learned to stop worrying and love my clients. UMKC Law Review, 69, 697-733.
    Paradise, L. V. (1977). Toward a theory on the ethical behavior of counselors. Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 4140-4141.
    Pope, K. S., Tabachnick, B. G., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (1987). Ethics of practice: The beliefs and behaviors of psychologists as therapists. American Psychologist, 42, 993-1006.
    Pope, K. S., & Vasquez, M. J. (1998). Ethical and legal codes and complaints. In K. S. Pope & M. J. Vasquez (Eds.), Ethics in psychotherapy and counseling (pp. 19-39). Jossey-Bass.
    Post, P. (1989). The use of the ethical judgement scale in counselor education. Counselor Education and Supervision, 28, 229-233.
    Schank, J. A., & Skovholt, T. M. (1997). Dual-relationship dilemmas of rural and small-community psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(1), 44-49.
    Scopelliti, J., Judd, F., Grigg, M., Hodgins, G., Fraser, C., Hulbert, C., Endacott, R., & Wood, A. (2004). Dual relationships in mental health practice: Issues for clinicians in rural settings. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38(11-12), 953-959.
    Shertzer, B., & Morris, K. (1972). APGA members` ethical discriminatory ability. Counselor Education and Supervision, 11(3), 200-206.
    Stake, J. E., & Oliver, J. (1991). Sexual contact and touching between therapist and client: A survey of psychologists` attitudes and behavior. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22(4), 297-307.
    Sperry, L. (2007). The ethical and professional practice of counseling and psychotherapy. Pearson Education.
    Vafakas, K. M. (1974). Ethical behavior of community college counselors. Journal of College Student Personnel, 15(2), 101-104.
    Van Hoose, W. H, & Kottler, J. A. (1977). Ethical and legal issues in counseling and psycho-therapy. Jossey-Bass.
    Van Hoose, W. H., & Paradise, L. V. (1979). Ethics in counseling and psychotherapy: Perspectives in issues and decision making. Carroll Press
    Welfel, E. R. (1998). Ethics in counseling and psychotherapy: Standards, research, and emerging issues. Pacific Grove.
    Wisler, J. A. (1977). Relationship of counselor perception of the ethical standards and response plausibility to rejection of unethical responses. Dissertation Abstracts International, 37(7-A), 4153.
    Zibert, J. C. (1992). Ethical knowledge of counselors: A survey of the membership of the Texas Association for Counseling and Development. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Texas, Denton.
    Zur, O. (2007). Boundaries in Psychotherapy: Ethical and clinical explorations. American Psychological Association.
    Zur, O. (2009). Therapist self-disclosure: Standard of care, ethical considerations, and therapeutic context. In A. Bloomgarden & R. B. Mennuti (Eds.), Psychotherapist revealed: Therapists speak about self-disclosure in psychotherapy (pp. 31-51). Taylor & Francis Group.
    Zur, O., & Nordmarken, N. (2011). To touch or not to touch: Exploring the myth of prohibition on touch in psychotherapy and counseling. Retrieved Sep/20th/2022 from http://www.zurinstitute.com/touchintherapy.html
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    輔導與諮商碩士學位學程
    108172007
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108172007
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[MA Program of Counseling and Guidance] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    200701.pdf2785KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback