政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145073

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145073

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51569720 Online Users : 968

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > MBA Program > Theses > Item 140.119/145073

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145073

Title:	品牌進行聯名合作時的夥伴挑選策略對品牌權益與知名度之影響 -以時尚產業為例 The impact of partner selection strategies on brand equity and brand awareness in co-brand ing cooperation - taking the fashion industry as an example
Authors:	蔡佩軒 Tsai, Pei-Hsuan
Contributors:	韓志翔 Han, Tzu-Shian 蔡佩軒 Tsai, Pei-Hsuan
Keywords:	品牌聯名聯名夥伴時尚產業行銷策略品牌權益品牌知名度 Co-branding Co-branding partners Fashion industry Marketing strategy Brand equity Brand awarness
Date:	2023
Issue Date:	2023-06-02 11:42:18 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	近年來，品牌聯名合作已成為時尚產業中的一個熱門趨勢。品牌透過與其他品牌、設計師、藝術家等不同夥伴的合作，旨在增加品牌的知名度、提高品牌形象、擴大品牌影響力以及滿足消費者多元化的需求。然而，不同的夥伴挑選策略對於該品牌之權益與知名度影響卻不盡相同。本研究旨在探討品牌在進行聯名合作時不同夥伴挑選策略對於該品牌之權益與知名度影響。本研究以時尚產業為例，運用質性研究方法分別向經營者們以及消費者們等兩大方向進行數場深度訪談，針對三種不同的聯名合作夥伴策略進行分析:整合性之高與低、獨家性之高與低、延續性之高與低。研究發現，高整合性、高獨家性、低延續性等的品牌聯名策略，將使主品牌所受的品牌權益擁有較大的影響。而在品牌知名度方面，高整合性、低獨家性、高獨家性等品牌聯名策略，將直接帶來正向的影響效果。總體而言，品牌在進行聯名合作時，應根據自身品牌形象、品牌定位和品牌目標來選擇不同的夥伴挑選策略，以達到最佳的權益和知名度提升效果。 In recent years, brand collaboration has become a popular trend in the fashion industry. Brands collaborate with other brands, designers, artists, and other partners to increase bran d awareness, enhance brand image, expand brand influence, and satisfy diverse consumer needs. However, different partner selection strategies may have varying effects on the brand`s equity and recognition. This study takes the fashion industry as an example, uses qualitative research methods to conduct in-depth interviews, and analyzes three different co-branding strategies: high or low integration, high or low exclusivity, and high or low continuity. The study found that the co- branding strategy with high integration, high exclusivity, and low continuity will have a greater impact on the brand equity of the main brand. In terms of brand awareness, brand co-branding strategies such as high integration, low exclusivity, and high exclusivity will directly b ring positive effects . In conclusion, brands should select different partner selection strategies based on their brand image, brand positioning, and brand objectives to achieve the best results in terms of equity and recognition enhancement in brand collaborations.
Reference:	1.中文部分蔡東峻. (2001). 顧客忠誠度及其影響因素之探討. 國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文. 黃俊英, & 陳世穎. (2003). 市場基礎資産之角色: 資源基礎理論觀點. 運籌研究集刊, (3), 4 3-59. 陳振燧, & 呂芳洲. (1999). 品牌聯盟策略影響品牌權益建立之研究. Asia Pacific Managem ent Review, 4(4), 431-442. 林婷鈴, & 蕭如伶. (2012). 廠商層級與消費族群品牌形象知覺差異分析: 以運動休閒用品 ATUNAS 品牌為例. 臺大管理論叢, 23(1), 29-58. 劉麗滿. (2015). 品牌形象, 促銷方式與知覺價值對消費者購買意願之影響: 以台南地區小北百貨為例, 南臺科技大學高階主管企管碩士班碩士論文. 顧宜錚, 李家瑩, & 黃相翎. (2013). 有服務品質就足夠嗎? 顧客體驗對站滿意度之影響. 華岡論叢, 38(1), 97-117. 2.英文部分 Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer responses to brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54, 27–41. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347 –356. Acevedo, C. (2018). Consumer Behaviour and Advertising Management (1st ed.). Essex, UK: ED-Tech Press. Balachander, S., & Stock, A. (2009). Limited edition products: When and when not to offer them. Marketing Science, 28(2), 336-355.54 Bin, S., Tsan, M. C., & Pui, S. C. (2017). Brand Loyalties in Designer Luxury and Fast Fashion Co-Branding Alliance. Journal of Business Research, 81, 173-180. Blackett, T., & Boad, B. (Eds.) (1999). Co-Branding: The Science of Alliance. London: Macmillan Business. Byun, S. E., & Sternquist, B. (2011). Fast fashion and in-store hoarding: The drivers, moderator, and consequences. Clothing and textiles research Journal, 29(3), 187-201. Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of consumer research, 31(1), 191-198. Newmeyer, C. E., Venkatesh, R., Ruth, J. A., & Chatterjee, R. (2018). A typology of brand alliances and consumer awareness of brand alliance integration. Marketing Letters, 29, 275-289. Childs, M., & Jin, B. E. (2020). Brand and retailer co-branding: Examining factors to favourably change consumers` brand evaluations. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 24(1), 49-65. Cornwell, T. B., Humphreys, M. S., & Kwon, Y. (2022). Shared Brand Equity. Journal of Advertising, 51(1), 27-40. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1998). Resource and risk management in the strategic alliance making process. Journal of Management, 24, 21–42. Devlin, G., & Bleackley, M. (1988). Strategic alliances—guidelines for success. Long Range Planning, 21, 18–23. Desai, K. K., & Keller, K. L. (2002). The effects of ingredient branding strategies on host brand extendibility. Journal of Marketing, 66,73–93. Foroudi, P., Jin, Z., Gupta, S., Foroudi, M. M., & Kitchen, P. J. (2018). Perceptional components of brand equity: Configuring the Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Paths to brand loyalty and brand purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 89, 462-474. 55 Gabriel, A., & Violato, C. (2013). Problem-solving strategies in psychiatry: differences between experts and novices in diagnostic accuracy and reasoning. Advances in Medical Educat-ion and Practice, 11-16. Greenwald, A. G., Brock, T. C., & Ostrom, T. M. (Eds.). (2013). Psychological foundations of attitudes. New York, NY:Academic Press. Jara, M., & Cliquet, G. (2012). Retail brand equity: conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(1), 140-149. Johnson, M. D., & Lehmann, D. R. (1997). Consumer experience and consideration sets for brands and product categories. In M. Brucks & D. J. MacInnis (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 295– 300). Provo: Association for Consumer Research. Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). The effects of sequential introduc- tion of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 35–50. Lassar, W., Mittal, B., & Sharma, A. (2018). Measuring customer-based brand equity. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(5), 532-540. Leung, L. C., Bougoure, U. S., & Miller, K. W. (2014). The effects of affective and utilitarian. brand relationships on brand consideration. Journal of Brand Management, 21, 469-484. Miao, M., Zhang, J., & Wang, T. (2021). The Impact of co-branding on firm stock value. International Journal of Business & Applied Sciences, 10(1), 1-6. Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 263–276. Newmeyer, C. E., Venkatesh, R., & Chatterjee, R. (2014). Cobranding arrangements and partner selection: A conceptual framework and managerial guidelines. Journal of the Aca demy of Marketing Science, 42, 103-118. Paydas Turan, C. (2021). Success drivers of co‐branding: A meta‐analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 911-936. 56 Park, C. W., Jun, S. Y., & Shocker, A. D. (1996). Composite branding alliances: an investigation of extension and feedback effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 453– 466. Pinello, C., Picone, P. M., & Mocciaro Li Destri, A. (2022). Co-branding research: where we are and where we could go from here. European Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 584-621. Robson, C. (2002) Real World Research (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell. Romaniuk, J., & Sharp, B. (2004). Conceptualizing and measuring brand salience. Marketing theory, 4(4), 327-342. Ruekert, R. W., & Rao, A. (1994). Brand Alliances as Signals of Product Quality.Sloan management review, 36(1), 87-97. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson Education Limited. Simonin, B. L., & Ruth, J. A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing. the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 30–42. Worm, S., & Srivastava, R. K. (2014). Impact of component supplier branding on profitability. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(4), 409-424. Wugon, K., Sujin, L., & Haiyoung, L. (2007). Co-branding and brand loyalty. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism, 8(2), 1-23. Xue, M. T., & Chawdhary, R. (2023). Co-branding as a masstige strategy for luxury brands: Desirable or not? Journal of Brand Management, 30(2), 136-152.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) 109363007
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109363007
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[MBA Program] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
300701.pdf		15091Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback