Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145041
|
| Title: | 風險承受度、感知繁文縟節、公共服務動機對我國公務人員創新行為影響之研究
A Study of the Impact of Risk-taking, Red Tape and Public Service Motivation on Public Servants’ Innovative Behavior |
| Authors: | 葉馨
Yeh, Hsin |
| Contributors: | 陳敦源
Chen, Don-Yun
葉馨
Yeh, Hsin |
| Keywords: | 創新行為
風險承受度
公共服務動機
繁文縟節
Innovative Behavior
Risk-taking
Public Service Motivation
Red Tape |
| Date: | 2023 |
| Issue Date: | 2023-06-02 11:34:47 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著經濟、社會快速發展與進步，私部門的創新能力被視為成功關鍵，同樣地，公部門會面臨到錯綜複雜的公共問題，公務人員必須要有創新的思維，才能給予人民即時又有品質的服務。公務人員的創新行為，不僅與個人特質「風險承受度」、「公共服務動機」有關，還會受公部門環境特有的「繁文縟節」所影響。
本研究採用混合方法途徑，分別採用次級資料法與深度訪談法。藉由次級資料法了解公務人員的風險承受度、公共服務動機與繁文縟節對創新行為的因果關係，次級資料來源為第四期「台灣文官調查（Taiwan Government Bureaucrat Survey, TGBS-Ⅳ）中的第二波調查，共回收758份有效樣本。再以深度訪談法分析風險承受度、公共服務動機與繁文縟節對公務人員創新行為的重要性，共訪談6位中央及地方行政機關中之公務人員。
研究結果獲得以下發現：一、越能承受風險的公務人員，越會出現創新的行為；二、越感受到繁文縟節的公務人員，對創新行為不會有影響；三、公共服務動機越高的公務人員，越會出現創新的行為；四、感受繁文縟節嚴重的公務人員，會降低公共服務動機；五、感知繁文縟節可以透過公共服務動機去影響創新行為；六、內部顧客的抗拒、外部顧客的輿論質疑與反對是創新的風險；七、過時的法律規章對於公務人員是一種阻礙；八、創新行為不僅考量公共利益，還會參雜個人利益；九、長官的支持、有主見的特質亦是公務人員創新行為的關鍵因素；十、公部門的創新可以分為主、被動與由上而下、由下而上。最後，本研究依據上述發現提出增進公務人員創新行為的實務建議給公共管理者參考。
With the rapid development of economy and society, the private sector’s ability to innovate is regarded as a key factor for success, as well as the public sector. Because the public sector will face complex public issues, it is vital that public servants should have an innovative mind in order to deliver immediate and high-quality services to the people. Public servants’ innovative behavior should not only be related to individual level “risk-taking” and “public service motivation”, but also related to organization level “red tape”.
This study uses Mixed-method research, including secondary data research and in-depth interview. First, use secondary data research to analyze the relationship between “risk-taking”, “red tape”, “public service motivation” and “innovative behavior”. The source of the data is from the second survey of TGBS-Ⅳ, and 758 replies were received. Then, the study chooses public servants from the central and local administrative agencies of Taiwan to analyze the importance of risk-taking, public service motivation and red tape on the innovation behavior.
According to the research, there are several findings: 1. Public Servants with strong risk-taking will increase innovative behaviors. 2. Public Servants with strong perceived red tape won’t have effect on innovative behaviors. 3. Public Servants with strong public service motivation will increase innovative behaviors. 4. Public Servants with strong perceived red tape will decrease public service motivation. 5. Perceived red tape can influence innovative behavior through public service motivation. 6. The internal customer’s resistance and the external customer’s suspection are the risks of innovation. 7.Outdated laws are a hindrance to public servants. 8. Public servants who engage in innovative behavior take into account not only public interest, but also individual interest. 9. “Manager’s support” and “independent thinking” are the key components of public servants’ innovative behavior. 10. The innovative behavior in public sector can be proactive, reactive and top-down, bottom- up.
Finally, based on the above findings, the researcher provides practical suggestions related to public servants’ innovative behavior to the public manager. |
| Reference: | 壹、英文文獻
Acar, O. A., Tarakci, M., & van Knippenberg, D. (2019). Creativity and Innovation Under Constraints: A Cross-Disciplinary Integrative Review. Journal of Management, 45(1), 96–121.
Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. B. (2001). Public Service Motivation and Job Performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 31(4), 363–380.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., &Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment For Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.
Anderson, N. R., & R. M. Gasteiger (2008). Innovation and creativity in organizations: Individual and work team research findings and implications for government policy. In B. Nooteboom & E. Stam (Eds.), Micro-foundations for innovation policy (pp. 249-272). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and Creativity in Organizations. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.
Andersen, L. B., Jørgensen, T. B., Kjeldsen, A. M., Pedersen, L. H., & Vrangbæk, K. (2012). Public Values and Public Service Motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(3), 292–311.
Baldwin, P. (1990). The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class bases of the European. Welfare state, 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baldwin, J. N. (1990). Perceptions of Public versus Private Sector Personnel and Informal Red Tape: Their Impact on Motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 7–28.
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429.
Bellante, D., & Link, A. N. (1981). Are Public Sector Workers More Risk Averse Than Private Sector Workers? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 34(3), 408.
Bhatta, G. (2003) “Don’t just do something, stand there!” Revisiting the Issue of Risks in Innovation in the Public Sector. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 8(2), 1-12.
Bright, L. (2008). Does Public Service Motivation Really Make a Difference on the Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions of Public Employees? The American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 149–166.
Brown, L. (2010) Balancing Risk and Innovation to Improve Social Work Practice. The British journal of social work, 40(4), 1211-1228.
Borry, E. L. (2016). A New Measure of Red Tape: Introducing the Three-Item Red Tape (TIRT) Scale. International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 573–593.
Bozeman, B., Reed, P. N., & Scott, P. (1992). Red Tape and Task Delays in Public and Private Organizations. Administration & Society, 24(3), 290–322.
Bozeman, B. (1993). A Theory of Government “Red Tape”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273-304.
Bozeman, B. & Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk Culture in Public and Private Organizations. Public Administration Review, 58(2), 109-118.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bozeman, B. (2012). Multidimensional Red Tape: A Theory Coda. International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 245–265.
Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2011). Rules and Red Tape: A Prism for Public Administration Theory and Research. London: Routledge.
Bozeman, B., & Su, X. (2014). Public Service Motivation Concepts and Theory: A Critique. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 700–710.
Buchanan, B. (1975). Red-Tape and the Service Ethic Some Unexpected Differences Between Public and Private Managers. Administration & Society, 6(4), 423-444.
Camilleri, E., & Beatrice van der Heijden, B. (2007). Organizational Commitment, Public Service Motivation and Performance Within the Public Sector. Public performance & management review, 31(2), 241-274.
Campbell, J. W., & Im, T. (2016). PSM and Turnover Intention in Public Organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(4), 323–346.
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An Empirical Examination of Self-Reported Work Stress Among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74.
Chen, C.-A., & Bozeman, B. (2012). Organizational Risk Aversion: Comparing The Public and Non-Profit Sectors. Public Management Review, 14(3), 377–402.
Chen, C.-A., Hsieh, C.-W., & Chen, D.-Y. (2019). Can Training Enhance Public Employees’ Public Service Motivation? A Pretest–Posttest Design. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(1), 1-22.
Coursey, D. H., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Content Domain, Measurement, and Validity of the Red Tape Concept. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 342–361.
Coursey, D. H., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Public Service Motivation Measurement Testing an Abridged Version of Perry’s Proposed Scale. Administration & Society, 39(5), 547–568.
Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public-Service Motivation: Building Empirical Evidence of Incidence and Effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 7(4), 499–518.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cuieford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental Statistic in Psychology and Education (4^th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
DeHart-Davis, L. and Pandey, S.K. (2005). Red Tape and Public Employees: Does Perceived Rule Dysfunction Alienate Managers? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 133-148.
De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How Leaders Influence Employees’ Innovative Behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64.
De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring Innovative Work Behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-3.
Dewett, T. (2006). Exploring the Role of Risk in Employee Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 27–45.
Dong, H. K. D. (2017). Individual Risk Preference and Sector Choice: Are Risk-Averse Individuals More Likely to Choose Careers in the Public Sector? Administration & Society, 49(8), 1121-1142.
Drucker, P. F. (1985). The Discipline of Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 95-102.
Drucker, P. F., & Maciariello, J. A. (2008). Management: Revised Edition. New York: Harper Collins.
Dul, J., Ceylan, C., & Jaspers, F. (2011). Knowledge Workers’ Creativity and the Role of the Physical Work Environment. Human Resource Management, 50(6), 715–734.
Fessler, D. M. T., Pillsworth, E. G., & Flamson, T. J. (2004). Angry Men and Disgusted Women: An Evolutionary Approach to the Influence of Emotions on Risk Taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(1), 107–123.
García-Granero, A., Llopis, Ó., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2015). Unraveling the Link Between Managerial Risk-Taking and Innovation: The Mediating Role of A Risk-Taking Climate. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1094–1104.
Giaccone, S. C., & Magnusson, M. (2021). Unveiling the role of risk‐taking in innovation: antecedents and effects. R&D Management, 52(1), 93-107.
Hassan, H. A., Zhang, X., & Ahmad, A. B. (2020). Red Tape and Change-Supportive Intention: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. ahead-of-print.
Harwood, I. A., Ward, S. C., & Chapman, C. B. (2009). A grounded exploration of organisational risk propensity. Journal of Risk Research, 12(5), 563–579.
Hattke, F., Hensel, D., & Kalucza, J. (2019). Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 53-63.
Huff, R. A., Keil, M., Kappelman, L., & Prybutok, V. (1997). Validation of the Sitkin‐Weingart Business Risk Propensity Scale. Management Research News, 20(12), 39–48.
Hung, K. T. & Tangpong, C. (2010) General Risk Propensity in Multifaceted Business Decisions: Scale Development. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(1), 88-106.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-Reward Fairness And Innovative Work Behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.
Jiang, J., Wang, S., & Zhao, S. (2012). Does HRM Facilitate Employee Creativity and Organizational Innovation? A study of Chinese Firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(19), 4025–4047.
Kanter, R. M. (1988). When A Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
Kaufman, W., & Fenney, M. K. (2012). Objective Formalization, Perceived Formalization and Perceived Red Tape. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1195-1214.
Kaufman, H. (1977). Red tape: Its Origins, Uses, and Abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Kim, S. (2004) Individual-Level Factors and Organizational Performance in Government Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 245-261.
Kim, S. (2009). Testing the Structure of Public Service Motivation in Korea: A Research Note. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 839–851.
Kim, S., & Vandenabeele, W. (2010). A Strategy for Building Public Service Motivation Research Internationally. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 701–709.
Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., Andersen, L. B., Cerase, F. P., Christensen, R. K., Desmarais, C., Koumenta, M., Leisink, P., Liu, B., Palidauskaite, J., Pedersen, L. H., Perry, J. L., Ritz, A., Taylor, J., & De Vivo, P. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79-102.
Kjeldsen, A. M., & Jacobsen, C. B. (2013). Public Service Motivation and Employment Sector: Attraction or Socialization? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(4), 899-924
Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1967). Group Risk Taking as A Function of Members` Anxiety and Defensiveness Levels. Journal of Personality, 35(1), 50–63.
Kleysen, R.F. and Street, C.T. (2001) Toward a Multi-Dimensional Measure of Individual Innovative Behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2, 284-296.
Lauriola, M., & Levin, I. P. (2001). Personality Traits and Risky Decision-Making in A Controlled Experimental Task: An Exploratory Study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(2), 215–226.
Lee, G., & Choi, D. L. (2013). Does Public Service Motivation Influence the College Students’ Intention to Work in the Public Sector? Evidence From Korea. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(2), 145–163.
Liu, B.-C., & Tang, T. L.-P. (2011). Does the Love of Money Moderate the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Job Satisfaction? The Case of Chinese Professionals in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 718–727.
Lynggaard, M., Pedersen, M. J., & Andersen, L. B. (2016). Exploring the Context Dependency of the PSM–Performance Relationship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(3), 332–354.
Meertens, R. M., & Lion, R. (2008). Measuring an Individual’s Tendency to Take Risks: The Risk Propensity Scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1506–1520.
Moon, M. J., & Bretschneider, S. (2002). Does the Perception of Red Tape Constrain IT Innovativeness in Organizations? Unexpected Results from a Simultaneous Equation Model and Implications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 12(2), 273–291.
Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Cooper, B. (2017). How Leadership and Public Service Motivation Enhance Innovative Behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71–81.
Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K. (2007). The Role of Organizations in Fostering Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 67, 40-53.
Moynihan, D., & Herd, P. (2010). Red Tape and Democracy: How Rules Affect Citizenship Rights. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 654–670.
Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5–16.
Norris, P. (2003). ‘Is There Still a Public Service Ethos? Work Values, Experience, and Job Satisfaction among Government Workers’. In J. D. Donahue and J. S. Nye, Jr (Eds.), For the People: Can We Fix Public Service? (pp. 29- 59). Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Pandey, S., Coursey, D., & Moynihan, D. (2007). Organizational Effectiveness and Bureaucratic Red Tape: A Multimethod Study. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 398–425.
Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The Motivation Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.
Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
Perry, J. L. (1997). Antecedents of Public Service Motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 7(2), 181-197.
Petrovsky, N., & Ritz, A. (2014). Public Service Motivation and Performance: A Critical Perspective. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 2(1), 57–79.
Prebble, M. (2016). Has the Study of Public Service Motivation Addressed the Issues that Motivated the Study? The American Review of Public Administration, 46(3), 267-291.
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1968). Dimensions of Organization Structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 65.
Rafique, M.A., Hou, Y., Chudhery, M.A.Z., Gull, N. and Ahmed, S.J. (2021), "The Dimensional Linkage Between Public Service Motivation and Innovative Behavior in Public Sector Institutions; The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment", European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(1), 207-229.
Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Research Note: Public and Private Managers’ Perceptions of Red Tape. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 567-574.
Rainey, H. G. 1999. Using comparisons of public and private organizations to assess innovative
attitudes among members of organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23,
130-149.
Rainey, H. G. (1999). Using Comparisons of Public and Private Organizations to Assess Innovative Attitudes among Members of Organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(2),130-149.
Rainey, H. G., & P. Steinbauer (1999). Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of Atheory of Effective Government Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1-32.
Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward Preferences Among Public and Private Managers: In Search of the Service Ethic. The American Review of Public Administration, 16(4), 288-302.
Robbins, S. (1998). Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications (8^thed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Toward a Public Administration Theory of Public Service Motivation: An Institutional Approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545-556.
Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Development of a Public Service Motivation Measurement Scale: Corroborating and Extending Perry’s Measurement Instrument. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 143–167.
Vandenabeele, W. (2009). The Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Self-Reported Performance: More Robust Evidence of the PSM—Performance Relationship. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 11–34.
Waldo, D. (1946). Government by Procedure. In F. M. Marx (Ed.), Elements of Public Administration (pp. 352-370). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Walker, R. M. (2006). Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government. Public Administration, 84(2), 311-335.
Walker, R. M. (2007). An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a Configuration Framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591–615.
Wang, C. M., Xu, B. B., Zhang, S. J., & Chen, Y. Q. (2016). Influence of Personality and Risk Propensity on Risk Perception of Chinese Construction Project Managers. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1294–1304.
Wang, T.-M., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Heine, F. (2020). A Moral Theory of Public Service Motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-15.
Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290.
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at Work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4(1), 15–30.
Windrum, P. & Koch, P. M. (Eds.). (2008) Innovation in Public Sector Services: Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.
Wright, B. E., & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person—Organization Fit. Administration & Society, 40(5), 502–521.
Wright, B. E., Christensen, R. K., & Isett, K. R. (2013). Motivated to Adapt? The Role of Public Service Motivation as Employees Face Organizational Change. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 738–747.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. (1995). Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), 1573–1592.
Steijn, B. (2008). Person-Environment Fit and Public Service Motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 13–27.
Tajeddini, K. (2014). The Effect of Organisational Structure and Hoteliers’ Risk Proclivity on Innovativeness. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 10(1), 1–12.
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.
Zhang, D. C., Highhouse, S., & Nye, C. D. (2019). Development and Validation of the General Risk Propensity Scale (GRiPS). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(2), 152-167.
Zennouche, M., Zhang, J., & Wang, B. W. (2014). Factors Influencing Innovation at Individual, Group and Organisational Levels: a Content Analysis. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 7(1), 23.
貳、中文文獻
文崇一、楊國樞（2000）。訪問調查法。社會及行為科學研究法下冊。台北：東 華。
王朝旭（2017）。國小教師心理資本對創新行為影響之研究──以工作壓力為中介與干擾變項。私立遠東科技大學創新設計與創業管理系碩士論文，未出版，臺南。
宋明哲（2001）。現代風險管理（第五版）。台北：五南圖書。
宋明哲（2020）。風險管理詮釋角與案例學習，神速掌握重點。台北：五南圖書。
宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2010）。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55(4)，97-130。
杜梅明（2005）。風險承受度、組織氣候、激勵因素與組織承諾之相關性研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士，未出版，高雄。
李仲彬（2013）。為創意留下紀錄：我國地方政府創新個案資料庫的建置。人文與社會科學簡訊，14(4)，92-97。
李仲彬（2013）。政府創新的類型與分佈：我國地方政府1999-2010年間的觀察。公共行政學報，44，73-112。
李仲彬（2018）。與生俱來與後天培養：影響公務人員創新態度與行為的因素分析。公共行政學報，54，1-40。
李俊達（2020）。公共服務動機析論：兼論後年改時代提升公共服務動機之策略。文官制度季刊，12(2) ，57-87。
李楠（2008）。民營企業家創新行為的本質分析。商業經濟與管理，198(4)，39-42。
吳宗憲（2012）。台南市政府文官公共服務動機與工作滿意、工作努力意願實證研究。公共行政學報，43，91-126。
林玉雯（2015）。公共服務動機量表與前導因子之實證研究。國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系博士論文，未出版，南投。
林亞清（2021）。限制抑或激活：繁文縟節如何影響公務員變革行為？公共行政評論，3，40-59。
林慧如（2014）。轉換型領導、組織認同與創新行為之研究－以服務氣候為調節變項。國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士，未出版，嘉義。
林俞君、陳敦源（2019年5月）。公共服務動機可以被訓練嗎？公共服務動機可以被訓練嗎？以「價值性」課程談訓練公共服務動機的可能性。台灣公共行政學會年會（TASPAA）。台中。
周貴忠（2020）。警察機關目標模糊、繁文縟節與組織效能之研究：正、副主管分工模式之調節效果。國立中央警察大學警察政策研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園。
唐永泰（2009）。員工之主管情緒智力知覺對其創新行爲之影響。品質學報，16(6)，461 – 478。
徐嘉琪（2012）。組織氣候認知、組織承諾與創新行為之研究──以台北市運動中心及健身俱樂部員工為例。私立天主教輔仁大學體育學系碩士論文，未出版，新北。
孫同文、許耿銘（2014）。橘淮為枳：公共服務動機指標適用性的分析。民主與治理，1(1)，33-52。
連兆祥（2003）。公開推薦資訊與投資者人格特質對其操作策略和投資績效影響之研究。國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南。
陳美容（2011）。公立醫院員工公共服務動機、組織承諾與組織公民行為之研究。私立淡江大學公共政策碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，新北。
陳俊樺（2017）。個人動機與風險承受度對志願服務行為的影響。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文，未出版，台北。
陳重安（2013）。規範與繁文縟節。公共行政學報，44，161-166。
陳重安、許成委（2016）。公共服務動機：回顧、反思與未來方向。公共行政學報，51，69-96。
陳敦源、呂佳盈（2009）。循證公共行政下的文官調查：台灣經驗的觀點、方法、與實務意義？公共行政學報，31，187-225。
陳敦源、黃建勳（2019）。繁文縟節如何影響公共服務動機？2011年臺灣文官調查資料之分析。文官制度季刊，11(1)，35-72。
陳嘉彌（1997）。接受創新程度的理論與應用。教學科技與媒體，31，36-48。
許婼涵（2016）。政府官僚系統下領導者創新行為、信任、政治技巧與部屬創新行為之關係。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士，未出版，高雄。
許雅棣（2001）。主管領導型態、員工人格特質、組織激勵制度與員工工作績效之相關性--以保險業務員為例。國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士，花蓮縣。
康淑美（2007）。影響中高階經理人被挖角(跳槽)之離職行為的相關因素研究。未出版之碩士論文，私立淡江大學企業管理學系研究所碩士，未出版，台北縣。
黃建實（2020）。協力治理如何使得公部門創新？公共行政學報，58，149-156。
董祥開、楊庭安（2020）。從個人風險特質與組織激勵措施探討公務人員之創新行為－以計畫行為理論為分析架構。空大行政學報，34，1-40。
萬文隆（2004）。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育，37(4)，17-23。
劉祥得、許立一（2019）。公務員社會支持、公共服務動機影響工作倦怠、離職意願之因果模式分析。空大行政學報，33，1-20。
謝金枝（2016）。教科書研究的整合取徑─混合方法研究。課程與教學，19(3)，55-83。
羅振維（2021）。公務人員個人特質與風險承受度之探討。國立臺北大學財政學系碩士論文，未出版，新北。
顧孟迪、雷鵬（2005）。風險管理。北京：清華大學出版社。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政學系
108256028 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108256028 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [公共行政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 602801.pdf | | 3976Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 187 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
