政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/144065
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51311905      Online Users : 856
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Law > Department of Law > Theses >  Item 140.119/144065


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/144065


    Title: 巨型科技業者從事金融服務之監理
    The Supervision of BigTech in Finance
    Authors: 游舒惟
    Yu, Shu-Wei
    Contributors: 臧正運
    Tsang, Cheng-Yun
    游舒惟
    Yu, Shu-Wei
    Keywords: 巨型科技業者
    大型科技業者
    金融科技
    金融監理
    BigTech
    FinTech
    Financial regulation
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-04-06 18:06:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 巨型科技業者向金融服務領域的擴張正在快速進行，而且是跨領域和跨國境的，鑑於巨型科技業者的全球足跡，再加上他們龐大的客戶群，政策制定者需要解決監理巨型科技業者的問題。
    然而，目前仍未見監理者對巨型科技業者從事金融服務有一套完整的監理方法，對此，本研究首先分析國際上幾個知名的巨型科技業者，視其所提供之金融服務及其提供金融服務的模式，同時參考了國際組織的文獻，統整出巨型科技業者從事金融服務可能會產生的五個主要風險，並進一步提出五個監理面向去應對此些風險，此外，本研究亦分析了美國、歐盟和中國於此五個監理面向所採取的舉措，瞭解不同國家或地區針對巨型科技業者從事金融服務所選擇的監理態度和監理方法，從中汲取可以學習的監理方法，以及尚可改進的部分。
    最後，本研究參考了上述三個國家或地區的監理方法、國際組織的文獻以及學者們的監理建議，針對本文所提及之五個監理面向為監理建議，希冀能提供監理者更多的監理想法，並促進對金融市場和消費者的保護。
    BigTechs are now expanding to the financial sector, and they are cross-sectoral and cross-border by their nature. According to BigTechs’ global footprint and their huge customer bases, policy makers need to tackle the question of regulating BigTechs.
    At present, there is no comprehensive supervisory approach for BigTechs engaged in financial services. As a result, this thesis first analyzes several well-known BigTechs in the world, and depends on the financial services they provide, the mode of providing financial services, and international organizations’ papers to unified the five main risks that BigTechs may have in financial services, and summarize five aspects of supervision to deal with these risks. Besides, the thesis also examines the measures taken by the United States, the European Union and China in these five aspects of supervision, understanding the supervisory attitudes and supervisory approaches chosen by different jurisdictions for BigTechs engaged in financial services, and learning from the worth learning supervisory approaches, as well as observing the parts that can still be improved.
    Last but not least, the study refers to the supervisory approaches of the three jurisdictions mentioned above, the literature of international organizations, and the supervisory recommendations of scholars, proposing supervisory approaches for each aspect of supervision. It is hoped that it will provide supervisors with more ideas about supervision and promote the protection of financial markets and consumers.
    Reference: 中文部分（依筆畫順序）
    一、 期刊論文
    1. 宋皇志，大數據之競爭法議題——以限制競爭為中心，政大法學評論，第163期，2020年10月。
    2. 姜權祐，臉書發行虛擬加密貨幣Libra對全球金融市場之影響，彰銀資料，第68卷第9期，2019年9月。
    3. 徐曼慈，美國眾議院發布「數位市場下之競爭調查」報告，公平交易委員會電子報，第170期，2021年5月5日。
    4. 洪德欽，歐洲聯盟法的法源，華岡法粹，第57期，2014年12月。
    5. 彭贵才、娄金炜，跨部门协同法治化/定位、困境与进路，青海民族大学学报（社会科学版），第4期，2021年。
    6. 楊宏暉，搭售行為之法律分析，公平交易季刊，第12卷第1期，2004年1月。
    7. 廖元豪，美國聯邦交易委員會法第五條與其他反托拉斯法之關係—兼論我國公平交易法第二十四條之適用範圍，公平交易季刊，第8卷第4期，2000年10月。
    8. 魏杏芳，電子商務、轉售價格維持與演算法──由歐盟產業調查與華碩案談起，公平交易季刊，第27卷第4期，2019年11月。
    英文部分（依字母順序）
    一、 英文專書
    1. ARMOUR JOHN, DAN AWREY, PAUL DAVIES, LUCA ENRIQUES, JEFFREY N. GORDON, COLIN MAYER, AND JENNIFER PAYNE, PRINCIPLES OF FINANCIAL REGULATION (2016).
    2. CORMEN THOMAS H., CHARLES E. LEISERSON, RONALD L. RIVEST., INTRODUCTION TO ALGORITHMS (2009).
    二、 期刊論文
    1. Alford Duncan, Supervisory Colleges: The Global Financial Crisis and Improving International Supervisory Coordination, 24 EMORY INT’L L. REV. 57 (2010).
    2. Arner Douglas, Ross Buckley, Kuzi Charamba, Artem Sergeev & Dirk Zetzsche, Governing FinTech 4.0: BigTech, Platform Finance, and Sustainable Development, 27 Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law 1 (2022).
    3. Beneke Francisco & Mark-Oliver Mackenrodt, Remedies for algorithmic tacit collusion, 9 Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 152 (2021).
    4. Ezrachi Ariel & Maurice E. Stucke, Sustainable and Unchallenged Algorithmic Tacit Collusion, 17 Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 217, 218 (2020).
    5. Hanley Daniel, How Self-Preferencing Can Violate Section 2 of the Sherman Act, Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle 2 (2021).
    6. Kim Pauline T., Auditing Algorithms for Discrimination, 166 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 189 (2017).
    7. Kroll Joshua A., Joanna Huey, Solon Barocas, Edward W. Felten, Joel R. Reidenberg, David G. Robinson & Harlan Yu, Accountable Algorithms, 165 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 633 (2017).
    8. León Carlos, Clara Machado, Freddy Cepeda and Miguel Sarmiento, Too-connected-to-fail institutions and payment system`s stability: assessing challenges for financial authorities, Borradores de Economia 1 (2011).
    9. Malgieri Gianclaudio, Property and (Intellectual) Ownership of Consumers’ Information: A New Taxonomy for Personal Data, Privacy in Germany - PinG, n. 4 133 (2016).
    10. Petit Nicolas, Theories of Self-Preferencing Under Article 102 TFEU: A Reply to Bo Vesterdorf, Competition Law & Policy Debate 1 CLPD 1 (2015).
    11. Schwarcz Steven L., Systemic Risk, 97 Georgetown Law Journal 193 (2008).
    12. Stucke Maurice E. & Ariel Ezrachi, Two Artificial Neural Networks Meet in an Online Hub and Change the Future (Of Competition, Market Dynamics and Society), University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 323 (2017).
    13. Turow Joseph, Michael Hennessy & Nora A. Draper, The Trade-off Fallacy – How Marketers Are Misrepresenting American Consumers and Opening Them up to Exploitation, University of Pennsylvania-Annenberg School for Communication Working Paper (2015).
    14. Vesterdorf Bo, Theories of Self-Preferencing and Duty to Deal - Two Sides of the Same Coin?, 1 Competition Law & Policy Debate 4 (2015).
    15. Wachter Sandra & Brent Mittelstadt, A Right to Reasonable Inferences: Re-Thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and AI, 2019 Columbia Business Law Review 494 (2019).
    16. Werbach Kevin & David T. Zaring, Systemically Important Technology, TEXAS Law Review (forthcoming 2022).
    三、 國際機構與非政府組織報告
    1. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), Implications of fintech developments for banks and bank supervisors (February 19, 2018), available at https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d431.htm.
    2. Bank of International Settlement (BIS), Big techs in finance: on the new nexus between data privacy and competition (October, 2021), available at https://www.bis.org/publ/work970.pdf.
    3. Bank of International Settlement (BIS), Whom do consumers trust with their data? US survey evidence (May 27, 2021), available at https://www.bis.org/publ/bisbull42.pdf.
    4. Crisanto Juan Carlos, Johannes Ehrentraud & Marcos Fabian, Big techs in finance: regulatory approaches and policy options, FSI Briefs No.12 (2021), available at https://www.bis.org/fsi/fsibriefs12.pdf.
    5. Crisanto Juan Carlos, Johannes Ehrentraud, Aidan Lawson & Fernando Restoy, Big tech regulation: what is going on?, FSI Insights on policy implementation No. 36 (2021), available at https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights36.pdf.
    6. Ehrentraud Johannes, Jamie Lloyd Evans, Amelie Monteil & Fernando Restoy, Big tech regulation: in search of a new framework, Financial Stability Institute Occasional Paper No 20 (2022), available at https://www.bis.org/fsi/fsipapers20.pdf.
    7. Financial Stability Board (FSB), BigTech in Finance Market Developments and Potential Financial Stability Implications (December, 2019), available at https://www.fsb.org/2019/12/bigtech-in-finance-market-developments-and-potential-financial-stability-implications/.
    8. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Personalised Pricing in the Digital Era, Background Note presented at the joint meeting between the Competition Committee and the Committee on Consumer Policy on the Personalised Pricing in the Digital Era, Pairs, available at https://www.oecd.org/competition/personalised-pricing-in-the-digital-era.htm.
    9. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age (2017), available at www.oecd.org/competition/algorithms-collusion-competition-policy-in-the-digital-age.htm.
    10. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Algorithms and Collusion-Note from the European Union (2017), available at https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2017)12/en/pdf.
    11. Zamil Raihan & Aidan Lawson, Gatekeeping the gatekeepers: when big techs and fintechs own banks-benefits, risks and policy options, FSI Insights on policy implementation No. 39 (January 20, 2022), available at https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights39.pdf.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法律學系
    109651039
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109651039
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    103901.pdf3216KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback