政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/144054

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Master for Eminent Public Administrators > Theses > Item 140.119/144054

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/144054

Title:	領導類型對於訓練成效之影響：以空軍基礎飛行訓練為例
Authors:	温立人 Wen, Li-Jen
Contributors:	連賢明 Lien, Hsien-Ming 温立人 Wen, Li-Jen
Keywords:	領導力訓練成效基礎飛行訓練行為理論
Date:	2023
Issue Date:	2023-04-06 18:03:16 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	堅實國防戰力是維繫國家安全之必要條件，基礎飛行訓練乃培養我國空軍戰力之基石，空軍長年以來的訓練模式每年平均完訓率僅約50％，戰力補充緩不濟急。且國防資源有限，兵力的持續精簡，加上武器系統的操作日益精進，人員的維持及訓練成為一項不可忽略的成本，國防預算佔中央政府總預算約為16％且無法再得到更多的分配。加上少子化、快速老齡化及勞動人口短絀等人口結構變化挑戰、台灣傳統社會舊有思想及軍方負面新聞等，都對部隊招募形成不小的阻力。故本文以帶飛教官領導方式為變項，探討如何強化空軍官校基礎飛行訓練之領導環境，以適切的領導及教學方式使其訓練效益最大化，以節約國防資源並克服兵源不足等窒礙，維持我空軍堅實戰力及飛行安全。研究後發現在民主領導情境中，被領導者的思想與行為較不易遭受箝制，有更多的機會可以表達自己對於飛行的想法與疑惑，進而促使帶飛教官調整教學模式或與學員共同尋找解決問題的方法，完訓率有顯著的正向表現，而學員的自願停飛率亦越低；放任領導情境中帶飛教官雖對學員投注的時間較少，對於學員完訓率之影響雖顯著為負，但飛行教學的過程是雙向的，除了帶飛教官領導的類型，學員的心理狀態及人格特質也必須考慮。運用迴歸分析得知，訓練成效仍能以受訓學員個人心態的建立、主動學習的行為及解決問題的能力彌補教官教學上的不足。故除了篩選適合的帶飛教官以外，利用基礎的軍事養成教育，形塑學員的人格特質與對未來的憧憬，都可以使得訓練成效獲得改善。
Reference:	中文文獻吳清山（2000）。學校行政 (第五版)。臺北市：心理出版社。李文進、陳正中、吳克銳（2011）。飛行員於戰術訓練情境下之認知決策模式。危機管理學刊， 8（1），1-8。林明村（2002）。直屬主管之差序格局對領導行為與領導效能影響之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。秦夢群（2006）。教育行政：理論部分。臺北市：五南圖書。陳伯宗（2007）。校長轉型領導與學校專職行政人員工作滿意度之相關研究── 以臺北縣立中學為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。程千芳、李文進、陳欣進（2001）。初階飛訓生之人格特質與其飛行訓練表現之關係。應用心理研究，（12），221-243. 黃宗顯、陳麗玉、徐吉春、劉財坤、鄭明宗、劉峰銘、郭維哲、黃建皓、商永齡（2008）。學校領導：新理論與實踐。臺北市：五南出版社。劉若蘭、楊昌裕（2013）。影響大學生能力發展相關因素研究。公民訓育學報，（22），1-21。歐陽國南（2008）。軍事教育與訓練轉型的時代意義。國防雜誌，23（6），73-82。李華輝（2008）。軍事院校校長領導風格與領導效能關係之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士在職專班，未出版，新北市。蔡進雄（2004）。論教師領導的趨勢與發展。教育資料與研究，5（3）， 92-98。謝文福（2006）。軍校生生活壓力知覺模式之探究。國立空中大學社會科學學報，（14），49-87。英文文獻 Avolio, B. J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American psychologist, 62(1), 25. Bennis, W. (2007). The challenges of leadership in the modern world: Introduction to the special issue. American psychologist, 62(1), 2. Berdie, D. R. (1989). Reassessing the Value of High Response Rates to Mail Surveys. Marketing Research, 1(3). Blake, R. & Mouton, J. (1964). The Managerial Grid: The Key to Leadership Excellence. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company. Prince, C., Salas, E., Brannick, M. & Prince, A. (2010). The influence of experience and organizational goals on leadership in the military cockpit. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 20(4), 375-389. Chidester, T. R., Kanki, B. G., Foushee, H. C., Dickinson, C. L. & Bowles, S. V. (1990). Personality factors in flight operations. Volume 1: Leader characteristics and crew performance in a full-mission air transport simulation (No. NASA-TM-102259). McClernon, C. K., McCauley, M. E., O’Connor, P. E. & Warm, J. S. (2011). Stress training improves performance during a stressful flight. Human factors, 53(3), 207-218. Evan, W. M. & Zelditch Jr, M. (1961). A laboratory experiment on bureaucratic authority. American Sociological Review, 883-893. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A Theory of leadership efectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ginnett, R. C. (1987). First encounters of the close kind: the formation process of airline flight crews (group; leadership). Yale University. Ginnett, R. C. (1993). Crews as groups: Their formation and their leadership, Cockpit resource management (pp. 71–98). Academic Press. Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Howell, J. M. & Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of management review, 30(1), 96-112 Katz, D., Maccoby, N., & Morse, N. C. (1950). Productivity, supervision, and morale in an office situation. Part I. Institute for Social Research, Univ. David O`Hare & Stanley Roscoe (1990). Flightdeck performance: The human factor, Iowa State University Press. Pfeffer, J. (1977). The Ambiguity of Leadership. Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 104-112. Prince, C. & Salas, E. (1993). Training and research for teamwork in the military aircrew. Cockpit resource management (pp. 337–366). Academic Press. Reddin, W. J. (1970). Managerial effectiveness. McGraw-Hill. Stagl, K. C., Salas, E. & Burke, C. S. (2007). Best practices in team leadership: What team leaders do to facilitate team effectiveness. The practice of leadership: Developing the next generation of leaders, 172-198. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. Free Press. Schriesheim, C. A. & Stogdill, R. M. (1975). Differences in factor structure across three versions of the Ohio State Leadership Scales. Personnel Psychology, 28(2), 189–206. Salas, E., Fowlkes, J. E., Stout, R. J., Milanovich, D. M., & Prince, C. (1999). Does CRM Training Improve Teamwork Skills in the Cockpit?: Two Evaluation Studies. Human Factors, 41(2), 326–343. Vroom, V. H. & Jago, A. G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American psychologist, 62(1), 17. Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall Yun, S., Faraj, S. & Sims Jr, H. P. (2005). Contingent leadership and effectiveness of trauma resuscitation teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1288.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程 110921313
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110921313
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
131301.pdf		1860Kb	Adobe PDF2	144	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...