Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143830
|
| Title: | 探索開放政府程度與各國COVID-19期間貪腐控制下降之相關性
Exploring the Association between the Level of Open Government and Decline on Corruption Control Cross Countries During COVID-19 |
| Authors: | 莊旻煒
Chuang, Min-Wei |
| Contributors: | 廖興中
Liao, Hsing-Chung
莊旻煒
Chuang, Min-Wei |
| Keywords: | 開放政府
CPI全球清廉印象指數
COVID-19
貪腐
開放資料
Open government
Corruption Perception Index
COVID-19
Corruption
Open data |
| Date: | 2023 |
| Issue Date: | 2023-03-09 18:36:07 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | CPI全球清廉印象指數在2021年的年度報告中指出，各國的貪腐控制呈現惡化的狀態，此報告及大多數國家認為COVID-19的爆發正是導致貪腐控制弱化的最大主因。然而縱貫各國公共行政的發展上，各國已推行開放政府好一陣子，大部分國家也認為開放政府所強調的透明與課責理論上可以增加貪腐控制程度，這也造成各國在COVID-19爆發後的貪腐控制呈現惡化的原因令人格外好奇。
本研究提供一個全新的觀點，從COVID-19爆發的時間點切入以利了解開放政府程度、開放資料程度以及各個貪腐相關因素，對於貪腐控制的落差有無相關性。本研究首先探討貪腐的意涵，並說明貪腐指標的選擇，接著則是探討開放政府的意涵以及運作，以及說明開放政府與開放資料指標的選擇。最後則將可測量的貪腐相關因素、開放政府指標、開放資料指標以及貪腐控制製成模型。透過敘述統計與迴歸分析來探究COVID-19期間貪腐控制下降的原因。
研究發現一個國家本身經濟自由程度、法律完善程度、媒體自由程度、人均GDP高低以及開放資料程度，對於COVID-19期間貪腐控制下降並無任何的相關性。然而開放政府程度越高的國家，在COVID-19爆發期間，卻可以有效的抑制貪腐，而形成更好的貪腐控制。
整體而言，雖然開放政府的相關措施可以有效抑制貪腐的形成，並以此增加貪腐的風險。但是回首CPI全球清廉印象指數所提出各國貪腐控制惡化的結論，我們可以知道開放政府程度並不是完全抑制貪腐惡化的唯一解藥。也就是說，COVID-19爆發期間所造成新興或是加重舊有貪腐情形的問題，才有可能是貪腐控制惡化的主因，需從問題根本來消除，才能減低貪腐惡化的結果。
The 2021 CPI Corruption Perception Index annual report pointed out that corruption control in various countries has deteriorated. This report believe that the outbreak of COVID-19 is the biggest reason for the weakening of corruption control. However, throughout the development of public administration in various countries, countries have been promoting open government for a long time. Most countries also believe that open government emphasized transparency and accountability can theoretically increase the degree of corruption control. So the reasons for the deterioration of corruption control after COVID-19 outbreak are particularly curious.
This study provides a new perspective, starting from the time point of the outbreak of COVID-19 to understand whether the degree of open government, the degree of open data, and various corruption-related factors are related to changes in corruption control.
This study first explores the meaning of corruption and explains the selection of indicators of corruption. Second, explores the meaning and operation of open government and explains the selection of open government and open data indicators. Finally, measure the corruption-related factors, open government indicators, open data indicators, and corruption controls to exploring the reasons for the decline of corruption control during COVID-19 through descriptive statistics and regression analysis.
The study found that a country`s own degree of economic freedom, legal perfection, media freedom, GDP per capita, and open data have no correlation with the decline in corruption control during COVID-19. However, countries with a higher degree of open government can effectively suppress corruption and form better corruption control during the outbreak of COVID-19.
Although the relevant measures of open government can effectively restrain the formation of corruption, and increase the risk of corruption. But looking back at the conclusions of the CPI Corruption Perception Index on the deterioration of corruption control in various countries, we can know that the degree of open government is not the only antidote to completely curb the deterioration of corruption. In other words, the emerging or exacerbating problems of corruption during the outbreak of COVID-19 may be the main reason for the deterioration of corruption control. Only by eliminating the problems at their root can the results of corruption deterioration be reduced. |
| Reference: | 世界衛生組織（2020）。世衛組織應對COVID-19疫情時間線。2022年2月1日，取自:https://www.who.int/zh/news/item/29-06-2020-covidtimeline
台灣開放政府國家行動方案（2021）。臺灣開放政府國家行動方案2021 年至 2024 年。2022年2月1日，取自:https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xNDc1My9kMTkyNGEwNC0xN2NhLTQ0NzQtYTU5MC1jNDA5NmM1NjYyNGIucGRm&n=6Ie654Gj6ZaL5pS%2b5pS%2f5bqc5ZyL5a626KGM5YuV5pa55qGIICgxKS5wZGY%3d&icon=..pdf。
台灣透明組織協會（2021）。追日（日本）超港（香港）仍需持續進步。2022年2月1日，取自:https://www.tict.org.tw/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E9%80%8F%E6%98%8E%E7%B5%84%E7%B9%94%E5%85%AC%E5%B8%832020%E5%B9%B4%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E5%90%84%E5%9C%8B%E3%80%8C%E6%B8%85%E5%BB%89%E5%8D%B0%E8%B1%A1%E6%8C%87%E6%95%B8%E3%80%8D/。
我的E政府（2021）。芬蘭最大報專訪唐鳳 分享台灣開放政府經驗。2022年2月1日，取自:https://www.gov.tw/News5_Content.aspx?n=11&s=581456。
余致力（2015）。我國現階段落實反貪腐公約當中預防性措施的成效與挑戰。聯合國反貪腐公約專題學術研討會論文集：我國之實踐與展望，臺北。
吳曉剛、W. D. Berry（2011）。線性迴歸分析基礎。上海:格致出版社。
林明鏘（2015）。政府採購制度之檢討與修法建議 ──從聯合國反貪腐公約第9條第1項規定論起。聯合國反貪腐公約專題學術研討會論文集：我國之實踐與展望，臺北。
陳凱俊（2022）。指揮中心成立今滿2週年 網湧入留言：謝謝守護台灣。2022年2月1日，取自:https://tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/%E6%8C%87%E6%8F%AE%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83%E6%88%90%E7%AB%8B%E4%BB%8A%E6%BB%BF2%E9%80%B1%E5%B9%B4-%E7%B6%B2%E6%B9%A7%E5%85%A5%E7%95%99%E8%A8%80-%E8%AC%9D%E8%AC%9D%E5%AE%88%E8%AD%B7%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3-071223762.html。
許福生（2015）。聯合國反貪腐公約與我國反貪腐刑事政策之思維，聯合國反貪腐公約專題學術研討會論文集─我國實踐與展望，台北。
張立人（2021）。特權查不完？北市府證實林秉樞「7／15偷打疫苗」 禾馨說明：他謊稱是護理師男友！。2022年2月1日，取自:https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E7%89%B9%E6%AC%8A%E6%9F%A5%E4%B8%8D%E5%AE%8C-%E5%8C%97%E5%B8%82%E5%BA%9C%E8%AD%89%E5%AF%A6%E6%9E%97%E7%A7%89%E6%A8%9E-7-15%E5%81%B7%E6%89%93%E7%96%AB%E8%8B%97-%E5%B0%87%E8%A6%81%E6%B1%82%E7%A6%BE%E9%A6%A8%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E-055309709.html。
廖興中（2018）。全球各國貪腐與電子治理發展之關係：空間異質性的初探,臺灣。政治學刊，22(1)，89-141。
廖興中（2014）。全球貪腐傳染之空間分析：以世界銀行貪腐控制指數為例。公共行政學報，46，1-28。
Acton, J. E. E. D. (1887). Letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton, 1887. Bartlett`s Familiar Quotations, 663
Attard, J., F. Orlandi, S. Scerri, & S. Auer (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government information quarterly, 32(4), 399-418.
Anessi-Pessina, E., C. Barbera, C. Langella, F. Manes-Rossi, A. Sancino, M. Sicilia & I.Steccolini (2020). Reconsidering public budgeting after the COVID-19 outbreak: key lessons and future challenges. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32, 957-965.
Agerfalk, P. J., K. Conboy & M. D. Myers (2020). Information systems in the age of pandemics: COVID-19 and beyond. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 203-207.
Arayankalam, J., A. Khan, & S. Krishnan (2021). How to deal with corruption? Examining the roles of e-government maturity, government administrative effectiveness, and virtual social networks diffusion. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102203.
Azzopardi-Muscat, N., H. H. P. Kluge, S. Asma, & D. Novillo-Ortiz (2021). A call to strengthen data in response to COVID-19 and beyond. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(3), 638-639.
Brunetti, A., & B. Weder (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public economics, 87(7-8), 1801-1824.
Bhattacharyya, S., & R. Hodler (2010). Natural resources, democracy and corruption. European Economic Review, 54(4), 608-621.
Boin, A., K. Brock, J. Craft, J. Halligan, P. Hart, J. Roy, G. Tellier & L. Turnbull (2020). Beyond COVID‐19: Five commentaries on expert knowledge, executive action, and accountability in governance and public administration. Canadian Public Administration, 63(3), 339-368.
Chabova, K. (2017). Measuring corruption in Europe: public opinion surveys and composite indices. Quality & Quantity, 51(4), 1877-1900.
Chen, Y., S. Bretschneider, J. M. Stritch, N. Darnall, & L. Hsueh, (2021). E-procurement system adoption in local governments: the role of procurement complexity and organizational structure. Public Management Review, 1-23
Department of Internal Affairs (2019). Te Mahere mō te Whakaurunga Matihiko [The digital inclusion blueprint]. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://apo.org.au/node/233871
Emily, K. & D. Stephen (2020). Fighting corruption through Open Government Initiatives. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://blogs.worldbank.org/governance/fighting-corruption-through-open-government-initiatives
Equal Rights Trust (2021). New Equal Rights Trust – Transparency International study on the links between discrimination and corruption. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.equalrightstrust.org/news/new-equal-rights-trust-%E2%80%93-transparency-international-study-links-between-discrimination-and-corruption
Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in practice, 17(4-5), 663-671.
Farzanegan, M. R., & H. P. Hofmann (2021). Effect of public corruption on the COVID-19 immunization progress. Scientific reports, 11(1), 1-10.
Gray, C., & D. Kaufmann (1998). corruption and Development, International Monetary Fund, finance and Development. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund
Gov.UK (2020). Independent report Addressing trust in public sector data use . Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cdei-publishes-its-first-report-on-public-sector-data-sharing/addressing-trust-in-public-sector-data-use
Goel, R. K., M. A. Nelson, & V. Y. Goel (2021). COVID-19 vaccine rollout—scale and speed carry different implications for corruption. Journal of policy modeling, 43(3), 503-520.
Herzfeld, T., & C. Weiss (2003). Corruption and legal in effectiveness: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 621-632.
Hillman, A. L. (2004). Corruption and public finance: an IMF perspective. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 1067-1077.
Head, B. W. (2012). The contribution of integrity agencies to good governance. Policy Studies, 33(1), 7-20.
Ibodullaevich, K. K., & U. G. K. Kizi (2021). Types, forms of corruption, causes and consequences. Scientific progress, 1(4).
IMD (2021). World Competitiveness Ranking. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-competitiveness/.
Jamil, S. (2021). From digital divide to digital inclusion: Challenges for wide-ranging digitalization in Pakistan. Telecommunications Policy, 45(8), 102206.
J. V. Lazarus, S. C. Ratzan, A. Palayew, L. O. Gostin, H. J. Larson, K. Rabin, S. Kimball & A. El-Mohandes (2021). A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nature medicine, 27(2), 225-228.
Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. CA:University of California press.
Khan, A., S. Krishnan, & A. Dhir (2021). Electronic government and corruption: Systematic literature review, framework, and agenda for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120737
Kumar, R., C. Subramaniam, & K. Zhao (2021). Special issue on digital inclusion. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1-4.
Lambsdorff, J.G. (2007) The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform: Theory, Evidence, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, G., & Y. H. Kwak (2012). An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government information quarterly, 29(4), 492-503.
Lourenço, R. P. (2015). An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government information quarterly, 32(3), 323-332.
Li, Q., L. An, J. Xu, & M. Baliamoune-Lutz (2018). Corruption costs lives: evidence from a cross-country study. The European Journal of Health Economics, 19(1), 153-165.
Mayernik, M. S. (2017). Open data: Accountability and transparency. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1-5.
Moon, M. J. (2020). Fighting COVID‐19 with agility, transparency, and participation: Wicked policy problems and new governance challenges. Public administration review, 80(4), 651-656.
Mohungoo, I., I. Brown, & S. Kabanda (2020). A systematic review of implementation challenges in public E-Procurement. Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, 46-58.
Manes-Rossi, F., L. Ferri, A. Zampella, & A. Caldarelli, (2021). Addressing Corruption: Identifying the Factors Affecting the Disclosure of Anticorruption Plans in Italian Local Governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-12.
Mat Dawi, N., H. Namazi, H. J. Hwang, S. Ismail, P. Maresova, & O. Krejcar (2021). Attitude toward protective behavior engagement during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia: The role of e-government and social media. Frontiers in public health, 9, 113.
Microsoft Bing（2022）。新型冠状病毒肺炎追踪。2022年5月4日，取自: https://www.bing.com/covid/local/taiwan
OECD (2016). Open Government The global context and the way forward 2016 HIGHLIGHTS. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.oecd.org/gov/open-gov-way-forward-highlights.pdf
OECD (2017). Compendium of good practices on the use of open data for Anti-corruption: Towards data-driven public sector integrity and civic auditing. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/g20-oecd-compendium.pdf
Open Government Partnership (2019). Open Government Partnership Global Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Global-Report_Executive-Summary_EN.pdf
Park, S., & J. R. Gil-Garcia (2022). Open data innovation: Visualizations and process redesign as a way to bridge the transparency-accountability gap. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101456.
Park, C. H., R. C. Richards & J. Reedy (2022). Assessing Emergency Information Sharing between the Government and the Public during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Open Government Perspective. Public Performance & Management Review, 1-32.
Risk& Compliance Portal (2020). Taiwan Corruption Report. . Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.ganintegrity.com/portal/country-profiles/taiwan/
Saha, S., R. Gounder, N. Campbell, & J. J. Su (2014). Democracy and corruption: A complex relationship. Crime, law and social change, 61(3), 287-308.
Šumah, Š. (2018). Corruption, causes and consequences. In V. Bobek, Trade and Global Market (pp.64-79).London: IntechOpen.
Shaw, J. A., N. Sethi, & C. K. Cassel (2020). Social license for the use of big data in the COVID-19 era. NPJ digital medicine, 3(1), 1-3.
Sharma, C., & S. R. Paramati (2021). Does financial development reduce the level of corruption? Evidence from a global sample of 140 countries. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(4), 5093-5109.
Simonofski, A., J. Fink, & C. Burnay (2021). Supporting policy-making with social media and e-participation platforms data: A policy analytics framework. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101590.
Transparency International (2020).CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2020. Retrieved February 1, 2022, fromhttps://images.transparencycdn.org/images/CPI2020_Report_EN_0802-WEB-1_2021-02-08-103053.pdf
Transparency International (2021a).CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2021. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/CPI2021_Report_EN-web.pdf
Transparency International (2021b). INTERNATIONAL ANTI-CORRUPTION DAY 2021: TACKLING INTERLINKED CORRUPTION AND DEMOCRACY CRISES. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.transparency.org/en/news/international-anti-corruption-day-2021-summit-for-democracy-civil-society
Transparency International (2021c). ADDRESSING CORRUPTION AS A DRIVER OF DEMOCRATIC DECLINE: POSITIONS TOWARDS SUMMIT FOR DEMOCRACY 2021. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.transparency.org/en/publications/summit-for-democracy-2021-addressing-corruption-democratic-decline
Transparency International (2021d). WHAT IS CORRUPTION? . Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.transparency.org/en/what-is-corruption
Teremetskyi, V., Y. Duliba, V. Kroitor, N. Korchak & O. Makarenko (2021). Corruption and strengthening anti-corruption efforts in healthcare during the pandemic of Covid-19. Medico-Legal Journal, 89(1), 25-28.
U4 CHr. Michelsen Institute (2020a). Corruption in the time of COVID-19: A double-threat for low income countries. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.u4.no/publications/corruption-in-the-time-of-covid-19-a-double-threat-for-low-income-countries#recommendations-for-development-actors
U4 CHr. Michelsen Institute (2021b). The Universal Periodic Review process A strategy to tackle health sector corruption. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.u4.no/publications/the-universal-periodic-review-process#annex
U4 CHr. Michelsen Institute (2021c). Mitigating corruption risks in Covid-19 vaccine rollout . Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.u4.no/publications/mitigating-corruption-risks-in-covid-19-vaccine-rollout#background.
United Nations (2020). UN E-Government Survey 2020. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2020.
United Nations (2021). Corruption and COVID-19:CHALLENGES IN CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://www.unodc.org/documents/Advocacy-Section/COVID-19-Crisis-responserecovery-WEB.pdf
Williams-Elegbe, S. (2018). Systemic corruption and public procurement in developing countries: are there any solutions?. Journal of Public Procurement. 18(2), 131-147
World Justice Project (2022). Anti-Corruption and Open Government. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://worldjusticeproject.org/world-justice-challenge-2022/anti-corruption-and-open-government |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政學系
109256020 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109256020 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [公共行政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 602001.pdf | | 2978Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
