政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/143816

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/143816

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51053071 線上人數 : 911

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/143816

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143816

題名:	我國銀行業者因應金融科技浪潮之數位轉型需求的新資訊系統建置個案研究 – 以台北富邦銀行與國泰世華銀行為例 A Case Study of the New Information System Construction of Taiwan`s Banks in Response to the Digital Transformation Needs of the FinTech Wave – The Cases of Taipei Fubon Bank and Cathay United Bank
作者:	黃俊方 Huang, Chun-Fang
貢獻者:	吳豐祥 Wu, Fong-Siang 黃俊方 Huang, Chun-Fang
關鍵詞:	銀行業金融科技數位轉型新核心資訊系統資訊系統開發流程專案管理風險控管 Banking FinTech Digital Transformation New Core Information System Information System Development Process Project Management Risk Control
日期:	2023
上傳時間:	2023-03-09 18:33:07 (UTC+8)
摘要:	金融科技的出現對傳統金融業造成莫大的衝擊，尤以對銀行業者之衝擊最為顯著，Bank3.0和Bank4.0的出現使得傳統分行作為主要媒介的金融服務轉而被各式行動裝置取代，人們不再需要分行，而是更隨時隨地的體驗金融服務，數位轉型也因此成為各家銀行在未來發展的首要目標。當前大多探討銀行業者在數位轉型成效的文獻主要以消費者體驗、監理環境、內部資源使用、組織、科技賦能等面向出發，甚少從基礎資訊設備的角度來進行探討。近年來，各家銀行業者紛紛對其核心資訊系統進行革新，為了解決開發效率不足的問題並適應更開放的金融環境，各式新興科技和技術的應用成為銀行業者汰換原系統的重要考量，其中如中台技術、雲端、容器化等技術之應用，使得銀行在原本的系統運作方式上產生劇變。而金融科技浪潮後，大量的新興金融科技公司和科技巨頭如雨後春筍般地加入金融產業內，他們擁有更加靈活的開發效能以及成熟的科技應用，能夠滿足消費者即時的需求變化，兩者的參與加深了銀行業者在轉型過程的危機意識。南山人壽在2018年為新核心資訊系統的建置拉開序幕，儘管最後因建置過程中的種種缺失而致以失敗告終，卻為金融業者在新核心資訊系統的建置拉起警訊。而當前在金融產業的核心系統建置上，又以銀行業者最為迫切，數家銀行業者陸續在近幾年完成系統的轉換，也在過程中面臨了如時程延宕或團隊衝突等問題。回應了由於使用年限長的特性，造成在建置新核心資訊系統上，專案管理者及團隊大多較無經驗，而衍生了專案管理上的風險。本研究以新核心資訊系統作為銀行業者在數位轉型的新資訊系統建置目標，透過探討其考量因素、建置流程、以及專案管理的風險控管檢視銀行業者在建置上的模式。以三個構面對台北富邦銀行與國泰世華銀行進行深入的個案探討，整合訪談內容及次級資料，分析銀行業者在面對金融科技浪潮的影響下，如何考量新核心資訊系統的特性及管理行動。本研究所得到的主要結論如下：結論一、因應金融科技的浪潮，銀行業者在新核心資訊系統的建置上，會透過核心系統與周邊系統的交互運作、獨立部門的設立、內部開發和外部導入並行模式的採行、週期性會議的舉行、以及微服務導向的作為等方式，來降低專案的目標複雜性並提升成功率。結論二、因應金融科技的浪潮，銀行業者在新核心資訊系統的建置上，會因「以客戶為中心」的服務理念，而強調各種新科技的運用與整合，也會在外部合作廠商的選擇上，以其科技能力的高低做為評選的關鍵。結論三、因應金融科技的浪潮，銀行業者在新核心資訊系統的建置上，會因為「策略發展方向」和「目標」的不同，而在專案管理重點和程式語言的選擇上有所不同。結論四、因應金融科技的浪潮，銀行業者在新核心資訊系統的建置上，會透過完整之系統整合測試、壓力測試和平行測試以及多管道、高頻率的溝通來維護客戶在系統上線後的權益，此外，也會逐步降低對外部廠商的依賴性，以提升員工在系統維護上的主導性。結論五、因應金融科技的浪潮，銀行業者在新核心資訊系統的建置上，會受到組織環境風險、階段需求風險、時程控制風險、團隊風險、以及技術複雜風險的影響，惟不同的業者在組織環境風險以及階段需求風險上所重視的方向會有所不同。結論六、因應金融科技的浪潮，銀行業者在新核心資訊系統的建置上，會強調風險因子的識別，監督與管控風險機制的建立，與系統化風險管理工具的運用，以提升系統建置的成效。本論文最後說明本研究在學術上與實務上的貢獻，以及後續的研究建議。 The emergence of FinTech has caused a great impact on the traditional financial industry, especially for banks, which are the first to bear the brunt. The digital transformation has become the primary goal of banks in the future. The emergence of Bank 3.0 and Bank 4.0 has led to a shift from traditional branches as the main medium for financial services to various mobile devices. People no longer need branches, but more digital services anytime and anywhere, so digital transformation has become the primary goal of all banks in the future. Most of the current literature on the effectiveness of digital transformation in the banking industry focuses on consumer experience, supervisory environment, internal resource usage, organization, and technology empowerment, but rarely from the perspective of information infrastructure. In recent years, banks have been innovating their core information systems. In order to solve the lack of development efficiency and adapt to the more open financial environment, the application of various emerging technologies and techniques has become an important consideration for banks to replace their original systems, among which such as Middle Platform, cloud, containerized applications have significantly changed the way banks operate their systems. In the wake of the fintech wave, a large number of emerging fintech companies have sprung up to meet the changing needs of consumers in real time through more flexible development performance and sophisticated technology applications, heightening the awareness of crisis among bankers in the transformation process. Nan Shan Life Insurance Company kicked off its new core information system in 2018, but although it ended up as a failure, it was a wake-up call for the financial industry to build a new core information system. Several banks are completing the conversion and are facing problems such as delays and overloads in the process. This is in response to the long service life span of the original core information system, which has caused project managers and teams to be inexperienced in the implementation of the system and has led to project management risks. This study examines the new core information system as a new information system implementation target for bankers in the digital transformation, and examines the model of bankers` implementation by exploring its considerations, implementation process, and risk control of project management. We conducted a three-dimensional case study of Taipei Fubon Bank and Cathay United Bank to analyze the characteristics and management actions of the new core information system in the face of the FinTech wave by integrating the interviews and secondary data. The following conclusions are presented: 1. In response to the wave of FinTech, banks are building new core information systems to reduce the complexity and increase the success rate of their projects through the interaction between core and peripheral systems, the establishment of independent departments, the adoption of parallel models for internal development and external import, the holding of periodic meetings, and the adoption of microservice-oriented practices. 2. In response to the wave of FinTech, banks will emphasize the use and integration of various new technologies in the establishment of new core information systems based on the "customer-centric" service concept, and will also choose external partners based on their technological capabilities. 3. In response to the wave of FinTech, bankers have chosen different project management priorities and programming languages for their new core information systems depending on the "strategic development direction" and "objectives". 4. In response to the wave of FinTech, bankers will build new core information systems through complete system integration testing, stress testing and parallel testing, as well as multi-channel and high-frequency communication to protect customers` rights and interests after the system goes online. 5. In response to the wave of FinTech, bankers will be affected by organizational environment risk, stage demand risk, schedule control risk, team risk, and technology complexity risk in building new core information systems, but the direction of organizational environment risk and stage demand risk will be different for different banks. 6. In response to the wave of FinTech, banks will emphasize the identification of risk factors, the establishment of risk monitoring and control mechanisms, and the use of systematic risk management tools in the establishment of new core information systems to enhance the effectiveness of system construction.
參考文獻:	英文文獻 Atkinson, R. (1999), Project Management: Cost, Time and Quality, Two Best Guesses and A Phenomenon, Its Time to Accept Other Success Criteria, International Journal of Project Management, 17 (6), 337-342. Boehem, B. (1989), Software Risk Management Tutorial, IEEE Computer Society Press. Boehm, B. W.(1991), Software Risk Management: Principles and Practices, IEEE Software, 8, 2-41. Boyce, C., and Neale, P. (2006), Conducting In-depth Interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Pathfinder International. Watertown, MA: Pathfinder International. Brandl, B., and Hornuf, L. (2017), Where Did FinTechs Come From, and Where Do They Go? The Transformation of the Financial Industry in Germany after Digitalization. Financial Intermediation Versus Disintermediation: Opportunities and Challenges in the FinTechs Era, 1(2), 6-17. Buschmann, F., (2009), Learning form Failure, Part 1: Scoping and Requirements Woes, Software, IEEE, 26(6), 68-69. Cerveny, R.P., Garrify, E.J., and Sanders, G.L. (1995), The Application of Prototyping to Systems Development: A Rationale and Model, Journal of Management Information Systems, 42(1), 50-61. Conboy, K. (2009), Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development, Information Systems Research, 20, 329-354. Creswell, J. W. (2013), Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. California: Sage. Debbie Tesch, Timothy J. Kloppenborg & Mark N. Frolick, (2007), It Project Risk Factors: The Project Management Professionals Perspective, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47, 61-69. DeSanctis, G., and Courtney, J. F. (1983), Toward friendly user MIS Implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26, 10, 732-738. Feiler, P.H. and Humphrey, W.S. (1992), Software Process Development and Enactment: Concepts and Definitions, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute. for Project Man-agers. Project Management Journal, 18, 57-71. Gabler, J.M. and Pickton, R.J. (1998), A New Definition of Integration, Information Management, 9(5), 20-22. Hall, Elaine M. (1988), Managing Risk: Methods for Software Systems Development. Julian, S., Dickerson, J., and Masood, S. (2015), The Future of Fintech and Banking: Digitally Disrupted or Reimagined?, Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334598542. Keil, M., Mixon, R., Saarinen, T., and Tuunainen, V. (1995b), Understanding Runaway Information Technology Projects: Results from an International Research Robgram Based on Escalation Theory, Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(3), 67-87. Kent, B., (1999), Embracing Change with Extreme Programming, IEEE Computer, 32, 70-77. Klus, M. F., Lohwasser, T. S., Holotiuk, F., and Moormann, J. (2019), Strategic Alliances between Banks and Fintechs for Digital Innovation: Motives to Collaborate and Types of Interaction, The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 21(1), 1-23. L.F. Capretz(2010), Making Sense of Software Development and Personality Types, IT Professional, 12(1), 6-13. Liu, L.C., and Horwitz, E. (1989), A Formal Model for Software Project Management, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 15(10), 1280-1293. Mead, W. (2016), Banking and the E-book Moment, in Chishti, S., and Barberis, J., (ed.), The Fintech Book: The Financial Technology Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and Visionaries, Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. and Alexander L. (1995), In-depth Interviewing, Second Edition. South Melbourne: Longman. Neuman, W.L. (1997), Social Research Methods Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 3rd Edition, Allyn and Bacon, Boston. Posten R.M.(1984), Determining a Complete of Software Development Standard Is the Cube the Answer?, IEEE Software, 1(3), 87-89. Pyra, J. and Trask, J.(2002), Risk Management Post Analysis: Gauging the Success of a Simple Strategy in a Complex Project, Project Management Journal, 33(2), 41-48. R. Akbar, M. F. Hassan, S. Safdar and Quershi (2010), Clients Prospective: Realization as a New Generation Process for Software Project Development and Management, Communication Software and Networks, 2020.ICCSN’10. Second International Conference on Singapore, 191-195. Rakos, J.J.(1990), Software Project Management for Small to Medium Sized Peojects, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall. Ronald C. Nyhan(2000), Changing the Paradigm: Trust and its Role in Public Sector Organizations, SAGE Journals, 30. Ronald P. Higuera and Yacov Y. Haimes(1996), Software Risk Management, Software Engineering Institute（SEI）. Royce, W.W., 1970, Managing the Development of Large Software Systems, IEEE WESCON. Rubenstein, A., and Geisler, E. (2003). Installing and Managing Knowledge Management Systems. Hartford, CT: Greenwood. Scheer（1992）, August-Wilhelm, Architecture of Integrated Information System, Springe – Verlag. Slevin, D.P., and Pinto, J.K. (1986). The Project Implementation Profile: New Tool for Project Managers. Project Management Journal, 17(4), 57–70. Statista(2022)，Fintech Financial Technlology Sector Revenue Worldwide in 2017 and 2018, with a Forecast until 2024，Retrieved form https://www.statista.com/statistics/1214244/global-fintech-revenue/ Statista(2022)，Number of Fintech Startups Worldwide from 2018 to 2021, by region，Retrieved form https://www.statista.com/statistics/893954/number-fintech-startups-by-region/ Statista(2022)，Total Value of Investments into FinTech Companies Worldwide from 2010 to H1 2022，Retrieved form https://www.statista.com/statistics/719385/investments-into-fintech-companies-globally/ Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1987), Behavior in Escalation Situations: Antecedents, Prototypes and Solutions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 39–78. Steffey, Robert W., & Anantatmula, Vittal S.(2011), International Project Proposal Analysis: Risk Assessment Using Radial Maps, Project Management Journal, 42(3), 62-74. Tayor S.J. and Bogdan R. (1984), Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods, Second Edition. London: Wilsy. The Global Financial Centres Index. (2022), The Global Financial Centres Index 32，Retrieved form https://www.longfinance.net/media/documents/GFCI_32_Report_2022.09.22_v1.0_.pdf The Institute of Risk Management.(2002), A Risk Management Standard. from https://www.theirm.org/media/4709/arms_2002_irm.pdf. Timothy K. (2007), IT Project Risk Factors: The Project Management Professionals Perspective, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 61-69. Wallace, L., Keil, M. and Rai, A.(2004), How Software Project Risk Affects Rroject Performance: n Investigation of the Dimensions of Risk and an Exploratory Model, Decision Science, 35(2), 289- 321. World Economic Forum. (2015), The Future of Financial Services. Yin, R. K. (2009), Case study research: Design and methods. California: Sage. Zhu, K., Kraemer, k., and Xu, S. (2014), Electronic Business Adoption by European Firms: a Cross-Country Assessment of the Facilitators and Inhibitors. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 251-268. 中文文獻 Brett King，譯者孫一仕、周羣英、林凱雄，2018，“Bank4.0：金融常在，銀行不再？”，財團法人台灣金融研訓院。 Brett King，譯者孫一仕、施祖琪、蕭俊傑，2013，“Bank3.0—銀行轉型未來式”，財團法人台灣金融研訓院。 IBM. (2017)，實現明日之夢-銀行業的數據化重塑，Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/NP42R4PZ IBM. (2020)，Bank4.0行動方案藍圖，取自 https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/Q5BMQBDJ Sarah. (2021), asana，瀑布專案管理法全攻略，Retrieved from https://asana.com/zh-tw/resources/waterfall-project-management-methodology 中央銀行秘書處（2019），央行理監事會後記者會參考資料，七、金融科技發展與銀行經營型態的演變。取自：https://www.cbc.gov.tw/tw/cp-357-104330-37238-1.html。王宏仁（2020），iThome，轉型必要之痛，取自 https://www.ithome.com.tw/voice/140585 王志峰（2022），擁抱開放架構，賦能資訊轉型，取自 https://s.itho.me/ccms_slides/2022/11/1/d07ebec9-429f-406e-9f53-66def9b16442.pdf 台灣金融服務業聯合總會（2022年9月），金融建言白皮書，取自 https://www.tfsr.org.tw/Uploads/files/111年金融建言白皮書-2022_10_13_修.pdf 台灣銀行家（2022），9成銀行啟動數位轉型AI、大數據成重點技術，取自https://taiwanbanker.tabf.org.tw/paperDetail?id=3970 行政院研究發展考核委員會（2006），風險管理作業手冊第二版。何翠婷、盧韻雅（2015），《Bank3.0》及《Digital Bank》帶動金融創新。財金資訊季刊，No.83，頁17-21。吳仁和（2021），物件導向系統分析與設計：結合MDA與UML，七版，元照出版。吳其勳（2008），IThome，當核心系統不再是核心，取自 https://www.ithome.com.tw/voice/48113 吳東憲、林信惠（2015），以風險管理與知識整合確保大型資訊專案之績效- 以新建製造工廠為例，商略學報，頁 251-266。吳金良（2014），資訊軟體開發之風險管理探討，國立臺北科技大學工業工程與管理學系EMBA碩士論文。吳秋婷（2011），新一代銀行核心帳務系統軟硬體整合作業之研究，台灣土地銀行，取自https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwio0_Y2Oj7AhUyL6YKHUFbCZQQFnoECBQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Freport.nat.gov.tw%2FReportFront%2FReportAssistant%2Fprint%2Fdetail%3Fsysid%3DC10000520&usg=AOvVaw1YDaEI08bOzmtnhjwHB5-r 李沃牆（2017），英國普惠金融經驗-以政策行動成功拉升銀行帳戶人數，台灣銀行家月刊，第89期，頁82-83。李政男（2017），金融科技發展對銀行業與推動銀行3.0之影響，國立屏東大學國際貿易學系碩士論文。李智仁（2018），風險管理於專案延宕與因應策略之應用 – 以某銀行系統建置案為例，實踐大學企業管理學系在職專班碩士論文。李嘉仁（2004），資訊系統整合因素之研究以ERP系統與現場資訊系統整合為例，中原大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。李靜宜（2021），IThome，玉山銀行如何打造新一代核心系統，微服務架構轉換經驗大公開，取自https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/148584 沈舉三（2019），資策會，系統整合：整什麼？合什麼？，取自 https://www.iii.org.tw/Focus/FocusDtl.aspx?fm_sqno=12&f_sqno=B1DVEYzDvX0hiwqcXvSK5g__ 林佩璇（2000），個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用，中正大學教育學研究所主編，質的研究方法，高雄：麗文文化。林岳龍、蕭育仁、陳冠臻、林士傑（2017），How Digital Banking Affects Output and Performance at European Commercial Banks。財務金融學刊，第27卷4期，頁89-110。林金定、顏嘉楓、陳美花（2005），質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析，身心障礙研究季刊，第3卷第2期，頁122-136。林信惠、黃銘祥、王文良（2010），軟體專案管理，台北市：智勝文化。林慧玲（2009），銀行核心系統導入策略之影響因素研究，嘉義大學管理學系在職專班碩士論文。林靜宜（2021），iThome，玉山銀行如何打造新一代核心系統：微服務架構轉換經驗大公開，取自https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/148584 金純瑩（2010），ERP系統與MES系統整合之研究—以某光電公司為例，中華大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。金融監督管理委員會（2016）。金融科技發展策略白皮書柯王孫鵬、許丁惠、蔡吉勝、周怡婷（2005），應用整合性資訊架構於資訊系統之系統分析與設計，建國科大學報，第24卷第2期。香港金融管理局. （2022）. 章書桓（2016），台灣地區銀行發展-數位銀行之關鍵因素，國立中央大學企業管理學士碩士論文。郭宗勳（2013），整合性軟體專案風險評估模式之建立與應用，國立屏東科技大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。郭政堂（2018），資訊系統開發敏捷度架構之探討與說明，國立台灣大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。陳文玲（1999），ARIS應用於中小企業流程與資訊模型整合之研究-以凌巨科技公司為應用對象，CALS 1999學術暨實務研討會論文集，頁237-241。陳向明（1999），質的研究方法與社會科學研究，中國大陸出版。陳韋蘋（2017），金融數位浪潮下銀行之經營績效分析 -以台灣商業銀行為例，淡江大學財務金融學系碩士論文。陳楊迦妃（2021），探討網路數位下的銀行監理政策，國立清華大學經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。麥肯錫（2017），台灣刻不容緩的數位課題，取自 http://mckinseychina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/McKinsey_Taiwans-Digital-Imperative-CN.pdf 曾正華（2012），軟體專案延宕關鍵因素之探討，國立臺北科技大學工業工程與管理學系EMBA碩士論文。曾淑峰、黃彥穎（2003），Building IT Vendor Evaluation Model-A Core Banking System Experience，資訊管理學報，第10卷1期，頁23-46。費肇寧（2007），企業之應用系統於大型主機及開放系統應用之研究﹣以銀行之核心系統為例，台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。黃明祥（2011），系統分析與設計，台中市：滄海書局。楊惠芬（2002），國泰世華銀行核心系統轉換明年如期上線絕對沒有問題，取自https://blog.xuite.net/tom.banking/01/21142689-國泰世華銀行勤業科技（2016），全球金融科技中心評估報告，取自 https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tw/Documents/financial-services/tw-around-world-21hubs-tc.pdf 勤業科技（2019），銀行與資本市場產業趨勢展望，取自 https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/financial-services/articles/bank-capital-outlook.html 勤業科技（2022），勤業眾信攜手政大發布《2022台灣金融科技趨勢展望》，取自https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/about-deloitte/articles/pr20220707-fsi.html 資訊工業策進會（1994），金融資訊系統整合方案介紹。數位時代（2022），國泰世華現代化IT團隊掌握金融創新發展致勝關鍵，擁抱中台策略與開源軟體加速轉型步伐，取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/72511/cathayholdings202211 潘淑滿（2003），質性研究理論與應用，心理出版社。鄭炳強（2017），軟體工程從實務出發，台北市：智勝文化。鄭詠心（2021），台灣金融業開發行動銀行與App服務創新的流程之研究 —資源基礎與價值共創的觀點，國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產學系碩士論文。盧沛樺（2019），天下雜誌，【南山人壽啟示錄】台灣金融業最具野心的數位投資，為何變600萬保戶的夢魘？，取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5096886?template=transformers 盧沛樺（2020），天下雜誌，核心系統更換大風波台北富邦銀行怎麼了？，取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5102472?template=transformers 薛建雄（2021），資訊系統整合關鍵因素之研究-以現場監控系統為例，中原大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。謝峰林（2011），銀行系統的全貌-架構與應用系統，台北金融系統論壇，取自http://www.tbics.com/system/files/Class-BankingIT-material.pdf 謝清佳、吳琮璠（2009），資訊管理-理論與實務，台北市：智勝文化。魏瑞光（2014），企業併購後產品生命週期管理系統之整合發展影響因子的研究—以I公司為例，國立政治大學經營管理學系科技管理組碩士論文。鐘仁宏（2016），超級籃球聯賽風險管理之探討，海峽兩岸體育研究學報，第10卷，第2期，頁1-13。富邦金控（2022）2021年富邦金控年報國泰金控（2022）2021年國泰金控年報台北富邦銀行（2022）2021年台北富邦銀行年報國泰世華銀行（2022）2021年國泰世華銀行年報
描述:	碩士國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所 109364106
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109364106
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
410601.pdf		7141Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋