Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143754
|
| Title: | 台灣全民健康保險制度下癌症照護轉型為價值醫療的策略：以Ｓ醫院乳癌照護為例
A Strategy for Transforming Cancer Care into Value-based Medicine under Taiwan`s National Health Insurance System: Breast Cancer Care at Hospital S |
| Authors: | 邱倫瑋
Chiou, Lun-Wei |
| Contributors: | 宋皇志
Sung, Huang-Chih
邱倫瑋
Chiou, Lun-Wei |
| Keywords: | 價值醫療
論質計酬制
包裹式支付制
乳癌照護
時間導向作業基礎成本制
策略矩陣分析法
Value-based health care
Pay for performance
Bundled payment
Breast cancer care
Time-driven activity-based costing
Strategic Matrix Analysis |
| Date: | 2022 |
| Issue Date: | 2023-03-09 18:20:05 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 健康照護體系面臨費用快速高漲與品質差距過大的問題，究其原因主要是醫療體系內所有的人在錯誤的層級上競爭。麥可・波特與伊莉莎白・泰絲柏格提出以價值為基礎的醫療照護，定義價值是每花一塊錢可以得到的健康結果，鼓勵醫療照護體系追求卓越的結果，降低系統的成本，協助病人創造最大的價值，達成健康照護的改革。
台灣全民健康保險因為全民納保的設計，除了保障全民的基本健康，也減少了民眾因病而貧的困境。然而單一保險人制度的設計，在面臨費用高漲與品質不一的問題時，並未讓醫療改革比其他國家容易。本研究參考波特與湯瑪斯・李提出邁向價值醫療的六項策略任務，藉由文獻回顧與資料收集，根據六項策略任務的核心概念設計問卷，以S醫院乳癌照護團隊核心成員為對象，收集意見，釐清個案團隊的照護模式與波特六項策略任務的異同，同時採用司徒達賢的事業策略六項構面與策略矩陣分析法，分析S醫院乳癌團隊的優劣之處，提出改善劣勢的競爭策略，作為台灣癌症照護轉型為價值醫療的參考。
台灣健保的乳癌試辦計畫證明癌症照護採用完整醫療週期的包裹式支付制，可以兼顧醫療品質與費用支出；而成本計算必須精確，可以採用時間導向作業基礎成本制；強制公布醫療結果，幫助民眾做出價值選擇，是尚未開始的重要步驟；癌症照護團隊應該屏棄傳統職能分科，邁向整合醫療單位的組織架構，結合病人與醫療團隊的目標，達到最大的價值；醫療資訊系統需要以病人為單位，收集完整資訊，方便被團隊成員與病人所用，同時促進病人成果回報與即時照護改善的功能；最後醫療機構根據資源與成本訂定最適當服務目標，推展卓越服務、擴大服務地區，將整個醫療體系的價值最大化。
台灣健保制度具有朝向價值醫療的基礎，乳癌試辦計畫值得成為醫療改革的參考模式，進而推進醫療全領域的價值。
The health care system faces problems with rapidly rising costs and disparities in quality, largely because stakeholders in the system are competing at the wrong level. Michael Porter and Elizabeth Teisberg propose value-based health care and defines value as the health outcomes achieved per dollar spent. He encourages all medical professionals to pursue excellent outcome and reduce the cost, further, to create value for patients and facilitate the health care reform.
Under National Health Insurance’s compulsory enrollment system, it not only provides the citizen’s basic health, but also ensures patients not being driven into poverty by medical bills. In the face of high costs and inconsistent quality, the design of the single insurer system does not make health care reform easier than in other countries. Porter and Thomas Lee proposed six strategic agenda to move towards value-based health care. This study conducted a literature review, data collection and questionnaire designed with reference to the six strategic agenda. The core members of the breast cancer multidisciplinary team at Hospital S were targeted to collect opinions. Based on the opinions and breast cancer care’s advantages and disadvantages at Hospital S by Seetoo’s 6-dimention strategy analysis and Strategic Metrix Analysis, a strategic planning is proposed to gain competition for the team and, taking it as a model, for transforming current cancer care into value-based health care in Taiwan.
National Health Insurance Administration’s pay-for-performance plan for the treatment of breast cancer has proved that bundled payment system for a full cycle of medical care could balance quality and expenses. Medical cost must be accurate and a time-driven activity-based costing can be adopted. Hospitals should report outcomes to the public to help patients choose programs for themselves. It is better for the care team to move from traditional functional unit towards integrated practice unit, which would help both patients and medical teams move toward same goals of health care, and finally achieve value for patients. Medical information technology platform should be patient-centered and designed for data-driven and user friendly. Finally, institution needs to integrate care delivery systems, defines the scope of services, and expands geographic reach, which would make value to be substantially increased on a large scale.
There has a foundation for the development of value-based health care under Taiwan`s National Health Insurance system. The pay-for-performance plan for breast cancer is worthy of becoming a reference model for healthcare reform. |
| Reference: | 中文：
書籍
Porter M. E. & Teisberg E. O., 李振昌、羅耀宗譯 (2014)。醫療革命：善用競爭策略，創造醫病雙贏的療護體制（Redefining health care: creating value-based competition on results）。台北市：遠見天下文化
王文科、王智弘 (1995)。教育研究法。台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司
司徒達賢（2005）。策略管理新論—觀念架構與分析方法。台北市：智勝文化事業有限公司
期刊論文
王實之，劉嘉仁，吳怡伶，趙康邑，黃遵誠，黃勝堅，(2017)。推動高價值醫療之策略的國際發展與北市聯醫的經驗。北市醫學雜誌 2017；14(SP)：1-16。https://doi.org/10.6200/TCMJ.2017.14.SP.01
李俊秀，李光申，黃勝堅，郭麗琳，(2017)。醫療費用支付制度趨勢—論量計酬轉變為以價值為支付基礎。北市醫學雜誌 2017；14(SP)：50-58。https://doi.org/10.6200/TCMJ.2017.14.sp.05
李政益，江亭誼，羅秀雲，莊人祥，吳怡君，楊祥麟，(2012)。台灣健保論質計酬支付制度之發展—以結核病為例。疫情報導 2012；28(19)：311-326。上網日期：2022年04月20日，檢自：https://www.cdc.gov.tw/File/Get/D6B-SUXzbL1EFnNOe5m-BQ
陳宗泰，鍾國彪，賴美淑，(2007)。另一種流行趨勢—論成效計酬的趨勢與展望。台灣公共衛生雜誌 2007；26(5)：353-370。https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH2007-26-05-02
謝鈺婷，管中閔，蔡蕙安，謝鈺偉，(2010)。評估健保制度中肺結核的論質計酬專案。人文及社會科學集刊 2010；22(4)：485-519。https://doi.org/10.6350/JSSP.201012.0485
周思源，林哲鈺，張金堅，林高德，(2015)。全民健保「論人計酬試辦計畫」執行經驗與省思。台灣醫界2015；58(10)：43-49
博碩士學位論文
鄭集鴻（2010）。時間導向作業基礎成本制度之應用—以血液透析中心為例。國立台灣大學管理學院高階公共管理組碩士論文，未出版。
網際網路
【大紀元2016年02月02日訊】（中央社台北2日電）. (2016). 搞懂DRGs 懶人包看這裡. 上網日期2022年04月22日，檢自：https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/16/2/2/n4631628.htm
行政院衛生署全民健康保險醫療品質委員會. (2007). 配合二代健保之論質計酬. 上網日期2022年04月12日，檢自：https://service.mohw.gov.tw/MOHW_Upload/dmc_history/UpFile/Period27/配合二代健保之論質計酬.pdf
吳明彥. (2022). 健保總額浮動點值，隱藏醫療危機. 上網日期2022年09月03日，檢自：https://health.udn.com/health/story/7421/6229299?from=udn-relatednews_ch1005
李青縈、譚淑珍、呂雪彗. (2022). 新任衛福部長薛瑞元：健保改革修法打開6%天花板. 上網日期2022年09月03日，檢自：https://wantrich.chinatimes.com/news/20220829900025-420101
沈能元、陳雨鑫、許政榆、李樹人、魏忻忻. (2022). 薛瑞元：健保部分負擔新制 今年一定會上路. 上網日期2022年09月03日，檢自：https://udn.com/news/story/122995/6535706?utm_source=lineapi&utm_medium=share
林思宇. (2015). 找回核心價值：為病人追求最大利益. 上網日期2022年09月03日，檢自：https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/20256
哈佛商業評論. (2011). 為醫界把脈. 上網日期2022年04月14日，檢自：https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/11770/how-to-solve-the-cost-crisis-in-health-care
姚景星、劉睦雄. (2002). 賽局淺說. 上網日期2022年10月15日，檢自：http://episte.math.ntu.edu.tw/articles/mm/mm_01_3_05/index.html
健保資料站. 健保署英文專書讀書會. 上網日期2022年09月17日，檢自：https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=CC1DE5219CBB0D38&topn=23C660CAACAA159D
健保資料站. 讀書趣專區. 上網日期2022年09月17日，檢自：https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=DE3E9679E433CB75&topn=23C660CAACAA159D
商業週刊1067期. (2008). 超推薦百大良醫. 上網日期2022年09月06日，檢自：https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/Archive/MagindexContent?issueNumber=1067
張思遠. (2014). 【探索12】現代醫院的起源與發展. 上網日期2022年04月20日，檢自：https://case.ntu.edu.tw/blog/?p=19659
張曉卉. (2007). 創造醫療價值，從「以病人為中心」做起. 上網日期2022年09月03日，檢自：https://www.commonhealth.com.tw/article/63426
張瓊方. (2002). 健保雙漲：開源之際，更要節流. 上網日期2022年09月03日，檢自：https://www.taiwanpanorama.com.tw/Articles/Details?Guid=abe5640a-c1b1-49cf-9cff-55124649e6b7
衛生福利部. (2020). 投資健康，110年健保費率調整為5.17%. 上網日期2022年09月03日，檢自：https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-4624-57420-1.html
衛生福利部中央健康保險署. (2009). 2009全民健康保險簡介. 上網日期2022年08月27日，檢自：https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Nhi_E-LibraryPubWeb/Periodical/P_Detail.aspx?CPT_TypeID=8&CP_ID=167
衛生福利部中央健康保險署. (2021). 2005-2018年醫院別器官移植術後存活率資訊公開(110.05.11新增). 上網日期2022年09月06日，檢自：https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=E1D93FD9DB52AD1F&topn=23C660CAACAA159D
衛生福利部中央健康保險署. (2021). 2021-2022全民健康保險年報. 上網日期2022年04月20日，檢自：https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Nhi_E-LibraryPubWeb/Periodical/P_Detail.aspx?CPT_TypeID=8&CP_ID=233
衛生福利部統計處. (2022). 中華民國109年國民醫療保健支出. 上網日期2022年09月06日，檢自：https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-5071-113.html
衛生福利部統計處. (2022). 世界抗癌日衛生福利統計通報. 上網日期2022年09月05日，檢自：https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-5112-63000-113.html
鄭閔聲. (2020). 解方》「論質支付」減少無效醫療與浪費 以醫療結果作支付依據存活率愈高醫院收入愈好. 上網日期2022年04月22日，檢自https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183021/post/202010070018/
英文：
書籍部分
Gosling, G. C., (2017). Payment and philanthropy in British healthcare, 1918-48, UK: Manchester: Manchester University Press
Porter, M. E. & Teisberg E. O. (2006). Redefining health care: creating value-based competition on results. Boston, MA. Harvard business school press
Yin, R. K., (1994). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage publications
期刊
da Silva Etges A. P. B., Cruz L. N., Notti R. K., Neyeloff J. L., Schlatter R. P., Astigarraga C. C., Falavigna M., Polanczyk C. A., (2019). An 8-step framework for implementing time-driven activity-based costing in healthcare studies. Eur J Health Econ., 2019 Nov;20(8):1133-45, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01085-8
Donovan C. J., Hopkins M., Kimmel B. M., Koberna S., Montie C. A., (2014). How Cleveland Clinic used TDABC to improve value. Healthc Financ Manage., 2014 Jun;68(6):84-8. PMID: 24968630
Eisenhardt K. M., (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 1989 Oct;14(4):532-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Fayanju O. M., Mayo T. L., Spinks T. E., Lee S., Barcenas C. H., Smith B. D., Giordana S. H., Hwang R. F., Ehlers R. A., Selber J. C., Walters R., Tripathy D., Hunt K. K., Buchholz T. A., Feeley T. W., Kuerer H. M., (2016). Value-based breast cancer care: a multidisciplinary approach for defining patient-centered outcomes, Ann Surg Oncol., 2016 Aug;23(8):2385-90, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5184-5
Kline R. M., (2020). Bundled payment models in oncology: learning to think in new ways, JCO Oncol Pract., 2021 Apr;17(4):169-72, https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00735
Martin J. A., Mayhew C. R., Morris A. J., Bader A. M., Tsai M. H., Urman R. D., (2018). Using time-driven activity-based costing as a key component of the value platform: a pilot analysis of colonoscopy, aortic valve replacement and carpal tunnel release procedures. J Clin Med Res., 2018 Apr;10(4):314-20. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3350w
Porter M. E., (2010). What is value in health care? N Engl J Med., 23;363(26):2477-81. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1011024
Porter M. E., Teisberg E. O., (2007). How physicians can change the future of health care, JAMA, 2007 Mar;297(10):1103-11, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.10.1103
Van Egdom L. S. E., Lagendijk M., van der Kemp M. H., van Dam J. H., Mureau M. A. M., Hazelzet J. A., Koppert L. B., (2019). Implementation of value based breast cancer care, Eur J Surg Oncol., 2019 Jul;45(7)1163-70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.007
Wang C. J., Cheng S. H., Wu J., Lin Y., Kao W., Lin C., Chen Y., Tsai S., Kao F., Huang A. T., (2016). Association of a bundled-payment program with cost and outcomes in full-cycle breast cancer care, JAMA Oncol., 2017 Mar;3(3):327-34, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4549
Weisbrod B. A., Fiesler R. J., (1961). Hospitalization insurance and hospital utilization, The American Economic Review, 1961 Mar;51(1):126-32, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818914
網際網路
Haas D. A., Helmers R. A., Rucci M., Brady M., Kaplan R. S., (2015). The Mayo Clinic Model for running a value-improvement program, retrieved August 21, 2022, from: https://hbr.org/2015/10/the-mayo-clinic-model-for-running-a-value-improvement-program
Kaplan R. S., Porter M. E., (2011). The big idea: how to solve the cost crisis in health care, retrieved September 9, 2022, from: https://hbr.org/2011/09/how-to-solve-the-cost-crisis-in-health-care
Minor D., Kimball, Justin Ford: Handbook of Texas Online, retrieved April 20, 2022, from: https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/kimball-justin-ford
Pendleton R. C., (2018). We won’t get value-based health care until we agree on what “value” means, retrieved April 4, 2022, from https://hbr.org/2018/02/we-wont-get-value-based-health-care-until-we-agree-on-what-value-means
Porter M. E., Baron J. F., Wang C. J., (2009). Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center: Breast cancer care in Taiwan, retrieved June 1, 2011, from https://store.hbr.org/product/koo-foundation-sun-yat-sen-cancer-center-breast-cancer-care-in-taiwan/710425?sku=710425-PDF-ENG
Porter M. E., Lee T. H., (2013). The strategy that will fix health care, retrieved April 15, 2022 from: https://hbr.org/2013/10/the-strategy-that-will-fix-health-care
Soberman M. S., (2018). Cancer as a model for value-based care, retrieved September 10, 2022, from: https://www.accc-cancer.org/docs/documents/oncology-issues/articles/2018/jf18/jf18-president.pdf?sfvrsn=75d28c8a_7
Teisberg E. O., Porter M. E., Brown G. B. (1994). Making competition in health care work, retrieved July 24, 2022, from: https://hbr.org/1994/07/making-competition-in-health-care-work
The World Bank. (2022). Current health expenditure per capita (current US$), retrieved September 10, 2022, from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.CHEX.PC.CD?end=2018&start=2000&view=chart |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
109932162 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109932162 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 216201.pdf | | 7997Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 34 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
