政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/143365
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 50997500      在线人数 : 820
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 政大史粹 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/143365


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143365


    题名: 治外法權的局部存續：《中美新約》後的駐華美軍刑事案件
    The Partial Continuation of American Extraterritoriality: Jurisdiction over Criminal Case Involving American Armed Forces in China after the ＂Sino-American New Equal Treaty＂
    作者: 莊詠鈞
    Chuang, Yung-Chun
    贡献者: 政大史粹
    关键词: 中美新約;治外法權;駐華美軍;中美關係
    Sino-American New Equal Treaty;Extraterritorial Rights;American armed forces in China;Sino-American Relations
    日期: 2022-09
    上传时间: 2023-02-14 15:02:14 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 《中美新約》生效後，美國宣布放棄在華治外法權，卻同時透過《中美關於處理在華美軍人員刑事案件換文》繼續擁有駐華美軍刑事案件的管轄權。針對此現象，現有研究大約可分為兩種觀點，一種持負面看法，認為此是美國在華治外法權的「復活」；一種持正面看法，認為此是兩國政府的合法共識，也是對既定事實的「追認」。然而，兩種截然不同的觀點，卻存在同樣的問題，即兩者皆僅側重於美國在華治外法權發展中的「連續性」，但卻忽略了《中美新約》對其發展確實造成斷裂的這一事實，因而無法對美國在華治外法權之演變有完整的認識。但若將此議題放在抗戰時期中美關係發展的整體脈絡下檢視，視之為治外法權的「局部存續」，則可在補足斷裂性的同時，兼顧連續性的面向，意即《中美新約》簽訂後，治外法權雖仍存在，但是受到了一定程度的限縮與干預。至於中方何以同意治外法權以局部存續形式存在，將是本文欲回答的核心問題。
    The United States relinquished extraterritorial rights in China when the ＂Sino-American New Equal Treaty＂ became effective in 1943, but through an exchange of notes on military jurisdiction, the United States still retained jurisdiction over criminal offenses committed by American armed forces in China. Regarding this phenomenon, existing research can be roughly divided into two viewpoints. Some scholars view the United States` continued jurisdiction over crimes by American military personnel in China negatively as a ＂resurrection＂ of American extraterritorial rights. Others view it more positively as the recognition of already-established facts resulting from the legitimate consensus of the two countries` governments. However, these two opposing viewpoints share the same problem; that is, both focus only on the continuity of American extraterritorial rights in China while ignoring the fact that the ＂Sino-American New Equal Treaty＂ was also a significant rupture within development of American extraterritoriality in China. As a result, previous scholarship has yet to provide a complete understanding of the evolution of American extraterritorial rights in China. However, if we focus on the evolution of American extraterritorial power in China and the overall context of Sino-US relations during the Anti-Japanese War, we can see this as the partial continuation of extraterritorial rights, a concept that highlights the Sino-American New Equal Treaty as a moment of rupture while also taking into account aspects of continuity. After the signing of the ＂Sino-US New Equal Treaty＂, the United States continued to have extraterritorial jurisdiction in China, but it was limited and subject to a certain extent of interference. The reasons that China allowed the partial continuation of American extraterritoriality will be the core issue addressed in this article.
    關聯: 政大史粹, 37, 59-78
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30384/CHNCCU.202209_(37).0002
    DOI: 10.30384/CHNCCU.202209_(37).0002
    显示于类别:[政大史粹] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2163检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈