政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142884

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Master for Eminent Public Administrators > Theses > Item 140.119/142884

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142884

Title:	公部門任務編組之個案研究：以臺北市政府緊急救護審核小組為例 On Adhocracy of Public Sector : A Case Study of the Task Force of Emergency Assistance Auditing, Taipei City Government
Authors:	吳佳儀 Wu, Jia-Yi
Contributors:	江明修林佳璋吳佳儀 Wu, Jia-Yi
Keywords:	任務編組跨域治理暫時性組織 Adhocracy Task force Cross-boundary governance
Date:	2022
Issue Date:	2023-01-05 15:16:44 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	在公部門中支配專業分工之優勢，是超越機關、組織與轄區以跨「域」治理協調與合作，因應臺北市政府緊急救護審核小組（以下簡稱審核小組）解決複雜且多元的特殊問題，不同於傳統單獨治理，而是倡議多元聯合治理，故成立正式組織來完成任務。因此，審核小組自第11屆臺北市議會推動「珍惜救護資源」的角色，以「追求社會公平正義」為目標，由臺北市府消防局擔任召集人，相關局處副首長及專家擔任成員，首長及專家擔任成員，下設六個工作小組，希望透過跨域整合平台解決特殊問題。「任務編組」之亮點在跨都會區、行政區域廣納專業領域之意見，係透過專案甚或者特殊問題而成立審核小組，在任務完成的時候，就應當立刻解散，若必要延長時，顯示該政策平台具有特殊之意義。本論文以「個案研究法」、「實地觀察法」及「深度訪談法」蒐集資料探討組織結構之功能及運作之相關理論，研究者設計之訪談題綱，立意選擇三位審核小組成員進行深度訪談，並輔以審核小組每月例行會議進行實地觀察。本論文根據研究發現研提建議，可行部分包含審核小組與公益團體協力合作之運作模式、公私協力之運作模式及跨越理論與實際鴻溝之運作模式，促使更聚焦於核心任務，而在未來研究方向，本論文建議可進行跨局處瞭解及當初決策者的訪問，深入瞭解組織結構之功能及運作的動態關係，其次，未來就弱勢族群緊急救護的困境，可整體評估個案進行分析管理，及審核小組所屬任務編組之運作，成立跨域治理與公益團體經營模式之參考，使審核小組能成為政策平台之幕後推手。 The advantage of professional division of labor in the public sector goes beyond the coordination and cooperation of organizations, organizations and jurisdictions.Task Force of emergency assistance auditing, Taipei City Government.formal organization was established to solve complex and diverse special problems, unlike traditional separate governance, and instead to advocate multi-joint governance. Since the 11th session of the Taipei City Council, the Audit Group has promoted the role of "saving resources" with the aim of "seeking social equity and justice". The Fire Department of the City Government serves as the convernor, with the Deputy Heads and Experts of the relevant bureauxs and departments as members of the six working groups, aims to solve special problems through a cross-district integration platform. The highlights of the Task Force are that cross-metropolitan and administrative districts can collect views from professional fields, and set up audit teams through projects or even special issues. When the task is completed, it should be disbanded immediately, and if necessary, it shows that the policy platform is of special significance. In this paper, case study method, field observation method and in-depth interview method are used to discuss the theory of organization structure function and operation. The questionnaire designed by the researchers was chosen to conduct in-depth interviews with three members of the audit team and to assist the audit team in conducting on-site observations at their monthly meetings. Based on the findings of the study, this paper suggests that the feasibility part includes the mode of operation of the audit team in collaboration with public interest organizations, The mode of operation of public-private partnerships and the mode of operation that transcends the theoretical and practical divide have led to a greater focus on nuclear tasks. In the future, it is suggested that cross-departmental understanding and interviews with policymakers be conducted to understand the functional and operational dynamics of the organizational structure. Secondly, the future situation of emergency relief for vulnerable ethnic groups can be analyzed and managed as a whole. Operations of the Task Force of the Audit Team The reference to the establishment of cross-district governance and business models of public interest organizations enables the audit team to act as a driving force behind the policy platform.
Reference:	中文部分王文科 ( 1986 )。教育研究法。台北：五南。王仕圖、吳慧敏 ( 2003 )。深度訪談與案例演練。載於齊力，林本炫編，質性研究方法與資料分析。嘉義：南華大學教育社會研究所。尤重道 ( 2014 )。行政命令之概念。法務通訊，2014.10，3-6。王應棠 ( 2010 ) 。研究訪談的特性：哲學詮釋學的觀點，教育與多元文化研究，2010.05，4-5。江明修、曾冠球 ( 2009 )。政府再造：跨部門治理的觀點。國家菁英季刊，5(1)，97-122。李允傑（2011）。政策管理與執行力：跨域治理觀點。T&D 飛訊季刊，17，45- 53。李長吉、金丹萍 ( 2011 )。個案研究法研究評述。常州工學院學報，29(6)，107-111。李長晏 ( 2008 )。台灣地區自治團體跨區域管理機制之探析。研習論壇月刊，91，123-144。李長晏（2012）。從空間夥伴治理觀點探析金門縣地方區域發展的提升策略。空大行政學報，23，124-152。李長晏、詹立煒 ( 2004 )。跨域治理的理論與策略途徑之初探。中國地方自治，57(3)，4-31。李經遠、李棟榮 ( 2003 )。矩陣式組織結構下角色衝突、組織承諾、離職意願關連性研究―以工業技術研究院員工為例。中華管理學報，4(1)，21-44。呂昭輝 ( 2011 )。「行政院營造國際生活環境推動小組」運作成效之研究。國立台灣大學國家發展學系碩士論文，未出版，台北。林水波、李長晏 ( 2005 )。跨域治理。台北：五南。林淑馨 ( 2018 )。公共管理概論。台北：巨流。林淑馨 ( 2018 )。寫論文，其實不難（二版，2018年8月）。高雄：巨流。吳定 ( 2022 )。公共政策（二版二刷）。台北：五南。吳定、張潤書、陳德禹、賴維堯、許立一 ( 2020 )。行政學(上)。台北：國立空中大學。胡龍騰、曾冠球、張智凱、黃榮志 ( 2013 )。電子化跨域治理影響因素之研究：多個案之探索。公共行政學報，45，1-39。吳濟華、柯志昌 ( 2013 )。高雄市發展成為區域產業營運總部策略研究。城市學學刊，4（1），1-43。吳濟華、柯志昌、葉晉嘉 ( 2007 )。區域治理與治理機制探討：高高屏地區個案分析。地方自治與民主發展。臺灣經驗的省思學術研討會，台中。侯勝宗 ( 2012 )。見所未見：詮釋性個案研究方法探索，組織與管理，5(1)，111-153。孫本初 ( 2010 )。新公共管理。台北：一品。陳士伯 ( 1992 )。臺北市政府任務編組組織功能之研究。臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會市政建設專題研究報告(第139輯)。台北：臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。陳定國 ( 1997 )。企業管理。台北：三民。陳明通 ( 1998 )。臺北市政府任務編組設立與運作之檢討。臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會市政建設專題研究報告(第278輯)。台北：臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。陳敦源 ( 1998 )。跨域管理：部際與府際合作。載於黃榮護（編），公共管理（227-269頁）。台北：商鼎。彭文賢 ( 1986 )。矩陣式組織結構的彈性設計，行政學報，18，83-97。喬憲新 ( 2009 )。台灣地方政府跨域治理之研究－以台北縣市共飲翡翠水為例。國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文，未出版，台北。黃商戊 ( 1976 )。專案組織之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。黃朝盟、黃東益、郭昱瑩 ( 2018 )。行政學。台北：東華。張康之、李聖鑫 (2008)。任務型組織及其構成要素(A)，學習論壇，24(4)，42-43。詹鎮榮 ( 2019 )。論自治條例與中央法律之關係―地方立法權行駛之回顧與展望。中國地方自治，72(3)，3-33。葉重新 ( 2001 )。教育研究法。台北：心理。劉宜君、陳敦源、林昭吟、賴怡樺 ( 2018 )。專業職能分歧作為另類的跨域治理議題：以衛生福利部為例之初探研究，文官制度季刊，10(2)，21-52。簡正鎰 ( 2005 )。進行質性訪談研究有關倫理議題之探討，輔導季刊41(1)，47-48。薛妙詣 ( 2004 )。任務編組管理之研究－以臺北市政府為例。國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班經營管理組碩士論文，未出版，新竹。蕭元哲、吳明上、黃冠華、侯尊堯、方信淵 ( 2006 )。高雄市2009年世運會組織委員會之組織結構設計挑戰。公共組織變革管理個案學術研討會論文。台北。英文部分 Alter, C. And Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together.London：Sage. Barr, H. (1998 ). Competent to collaborate: Towards a competency-based model for interprofessional education. Journal of interprofessional care, 12(2), 181-187. Bouckaert G., Peters, B. G. & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations: Shifting patterns of public management. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Corey, G.,Corey, M.S.,Callanan, P. (2003).Issues & ethics in the helping professions.Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole. Creswell, J.W. (1998).Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications. Cutcliffe, J.R.,Ramcharan, P. (2002).Leveling the playing field? Exploring the merits of the ethics-as-process approach for judging qualitative research proposals.Qualitative health research,12(7),1000-1010. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp.645-672). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gore, Al (1993).Report of the national performance review:creating a government that works better&costs Less. Washington D.C,:The White House. Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London : Sage. Jun, Jong S. (1986). Public administration: design and problem solving. New York: Macmillan. Kettl, D. F. (2006). Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public administration review. 66(S1), 10-19. Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-depth nterviewing, (2nd Ed). South Melbourne: Longman. Mintzberg, Henry(1981). Organization design/fashion or fit?. Harvard business review, 103-116. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage. Peters , Thomas J.(1979). Beyond the matrix organization. Business horizons, 15-17. Power, C. H. (1990) “Modernism, postmodernism and organization” in Hassard, J&Pym,D (Eds.), The theory and philosophy of organizations - critical issues and new perspectives(pp.109-124). London: Rout ledge. Radin, B. A. (1996). Managing Across Boundaries, in Donald F. Kettl & H. Brinton Milward, (Eds.), The State of Public Management. Baltimore, Maryland:John Hopkins Unviersity Press. Robbins , Stephen P. (1990). Organization theory: structure design and applications. Prentice Hall International Inc. Senge, Peter M. (1990). The Fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday. Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods (2nd Ed). London: Wilsy. Weber, Max(1992). Bureaucracy. Jay M. Shafritz and Albert C. Hyde, 3rd ed., classics of public administration, Pacific Grove: Books/Cole Publishing Company.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程 108921037
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108921037
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202201729
Appears in Collections:	[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
103701.pdf		4019Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...