English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112875/143841 (78%)
Visitors : 49972561      Online Users : 277
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/142812
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142812


    Title: 特留分拋棄之方式與特留分扣減權之標的及其效力--評最高法院109年度台上字第361號民事判決
    Waiver of Compulsory Portion and Exercising the Rights of Deduction of Compulsory Portion: Commen on Supreme Court Civil Judgment 109 Tai-shang-Tzu No. 361
    Authors: 戴瑀如
    Tai, Yu-zu
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 特留分之性質;特留分扣減權之標的;特留分扣減權行使之效力;特留分之拋
    The characteristics of compulsory portion;The deduction of compulsory portion;Waiver of compulsory portion
    Date: 2022-10
    Issue Date: 2022-12-27 09:20:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以最高法院109年度台上字第361號民事判決出發,輔以法制史與外國立法例的對比關照,重行檢視有關特留分之性質,並針對特留分扣減權之標的中,就遺產分割方式與指定應繼分之差異應如何區分?侵害特留分行使扣減權之效力究屬物權效力或是債權效力?以及特留分之拋棄可否以拋棄繼承的意思表示所包括?等等問題,提出個人看法。
    This article starts from the Supreme Court, 109 Taishang Zi No. 361 Civil Judgment, supplemented by the comparison of legal history and foreign legislation, and re-examines the nature of the Compulsory portion. How should the difference between the Appointment of Share of Estates and the Appointment of the Approach of Division of Estates by the Deduction of Compulsory portion be distinguished? Is the effect of infringing the right of deduction in the exercise of the right of deduction belonging to the effect of rights in rem or the effect of rights in personam? And can the waiver of compulsory portion be included in the meaning of waiver of inheritance? And so on, put forward personal views.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, No.329, pp.147-166
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/1025593132910
    DOI: 10.53106/1025593132910
    Appears in Collections:[法學院] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2224View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback