政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142789
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51680635      線上人數 : 494
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/142789


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142789


    題名: 律師（法律）執業之界定及發展
    Definition and Development of Lawyer`s Practice of Law
    作者: 姜世明
    貢獻者: 法律系
    關鍵詞: 法律壟斷;律師執業;法律服務;司法接近;跨領域執業;非經核准執行法律業務;替代經營架構
    legal monopoly;justice access;multidisciplinary practice (MDP);unauthorized practice of law (UPL);alternative business structures (ABS);reserved legal activities;legal tech startups
    日期: 2018-12
    上傳時間: 2022-12-27 09:05:56 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 法律服務具有公益性及獨立性，其形態有別於追求利潤最大化之商業經營模式。除傳統訴訟律師之外，律師可得執業範圍依隨各國法律規定而有所不同。律師執業範圍，目前所面臨之問題包括：如何對外擴張律師可得參與之任務？對內如何固守既有執業領域不被其他專門職業者所取代？而在資訊時代，律師工作任務亦出現新的危機或契機。另因應數位化、全球化等因素帶來之影響，律師（法律）服務之發展策略大致可歸納為兩條路徑：一、跨專業領域合作；二、法律服務技術創新。各國對於律師（法律）服務型態之監理模式亦存在不同程度的轉變，例如，德國的律師壟斷主義，自 20 世紀末開始鬆動。英國則傾向法律執業自由化，容許非律師人士經由「替代經營模式」（Alternative Business Structures, ABS）之核准登記制度，直接或間接參與法律服務或律師事務所之經營。美國雖仍以法律執業壟斷化為基本原則，但在符合一定規定下有限度地開放律師或事務所得從事與律師業務相關之服務。各國發展情形不一，均有借鏡之價值。
    Legal service goes far differently from the maximum-interest-pursuing business model due to its nature of public interest as well as independence. in order to assure people of middle class can access to justice under sufficient legal protection, and to response to the impact drove by digitalization, globalization, etc., two strategic paths are possibly relied on: (1) Cross-discipline cooperation, (2) Legal-Tech innovation. Further, regulator’s concentration regarding legal practice varies in different jurisdictions. For instance, in Germany, the legal monopolism has been loosened since the end of the 20th century and the revolution towards more liberal legal practice is underway. The British regulators, for another example, take the position of liberalization, which means non-lawyers are allowed to participate in legal services, directly or indirectly, through the ABS application and registration system. In the United States, legal monopoly is still the dominant principle currently. Lawyers or legal firms are allowed, however, to conduct law-related services, either performed by lawyer or non-lawyer, subject to some limitations. In short, any legal services should be conducted according to professional judgment by law without any other interference. Also, it is required to take reasonable measures to assure that a person obtaining the law-related services knows that the services are not legal ones.
    關聯: 律師法學期刊, No.1, pp.1-21
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2184檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋