政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142687

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142687

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50835105 Online Users : 966

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Department of Sociology > Theses > Item 140.119/142687

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142687

Title:	代間關係與「孝順的錢」：台灣家庭中「孝親費」的社會意義 Intergenerational Relations and “the money of filial piety”: The social significance of the “siao cin fei” in Taiwanese families
Authors:	白子萱 Bai, Zi-Shan
Contributors:	鄭力軒 Cheng, Li-Hsuan 白子萱 Bai, Zi-Shan
Keywords:	孝親費孝道文化父系文化關係工作奉養 Filial piety fee Filial piety culture Patriarchal culture Relational work Parents care
Date:	2022
Issue Date:	2022-12-02 15:27:56 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究欲透過Zelizer的關係工作的概念，來檢視台灣社會中金錢與家庭關係的互動過程。這些子女以孝親費作為媒介，透過儀式性的給錢方式、依據不同孝親費邏輯來標記金錢的用途，同時透過不同的標記來界定代間關係的邊界。研究也發現，孝親費的實踐邏輯可以分為兩種：「義務」與「回饋」。進一步檢視形成不同邏輯的原因，與家庭經濟狀況以及台灣的文化制度──父系文化與孝道文化有很大的關係。當代台灣社會經歷社會變遷與世代推移，不同世代對於孝親費的認知也有所轉變，當父母與子女對於孝親費的認知有所不同時，可能會引發緊張與衝突，這也展示了世代的認知不同。在處理這些緊張與衝突的過程中，「義務」形式的孝親費邏輯通常會選擇妥協或是爆發嚴重的情感衝突；而在「回饋」的孝親費邏輯中，通常則是能夠理性地溝通與協商以達到共同理解的結果。這展示了當代台灣社會的子女在不同情境下，是如何看待金錢與家庭的親密關係，而這些子女同時也是以孝親費作為媒介，在不同邏輯下導致的緊張、衝突、協商與妥些的過程中，進而完成關係工作。本研究也指出，孝道文化與父系文化不僅會影響孝親費的認知邏輯，在當代台灣社會也有可能淡化的現象，包括像是「出嫁女兒如同潑出去的水」、「奉養孝順」的傳統觀念可能正在逐漸轉變，而在文化制度影響淡化的趨勢下，甚至還出現有別於傳統社會義務觀念的「代間權力反轉」與「代間財富流動向下」現象。 This study aims to examine the interactive process of money and family relations in Taiwanese society through Zelizer`s concept of relational work. Taiwanese adult children use a “filial piety fee” as a medium to mark the earmarking money through ceremonial ways of giving money based on different filial piety fee logics. These adult children also use different marks to define the boundaries of intergenerational relationships. This study also found that the money derived from filial piety can be divided into two logical concepts: “obligation” and “reward”. To examine the reasoning behind this, the different logical notions are related to both a given family`s financial situation and Taiwan`s cultural system, which are characterized by a patriarchal culture and a filial piety culture. As time goes by and social changes take place in contemporary Taiwanese society, the rationale for filial piety fees has changed. When parents and adult children have different perceptions of filial piety fees, tensions and conflicts are likely to arise. Such tensions and conflicts show that the perceptions of generations differ from each other. In the process of dealing with these tensions and conflicts, adult children governed by the concept of “duty” filial piety fees either compromise or tend to get involved in a serious emotional conflict. By contrast, adult children acting in accord with the concept of “reward” filial piety fees usually deal with tensions and conflicts through rational communication and negotiation to achieve a common understanding with their parents. The study shows that Taiwanese adult children face the intimacy of family and money in different situations. It also shows that based on the two logical concepts resulting in either tension and conflict or negotiation, these adult children may use filial piety fees as a means of working out their relationships with their parents. The study also indicates that the culture of filial piety and patriarchy not only affects the logical concepts of the filial piety fee, but that its significance may also be diminishing in contemporary Taiwanese society; thus traditional concepts such as “a married daughter, splashed water” and “filial piety” may be changing. Under the trend of gradually weakening cultural institutions, such phenomena as “intergenerational power reversal” and “the downward flow of intergenerational wealth” no longer have the force of social obligations.
Reference:	一、中文文獻 Rchard Swedberg著，周長城等譯，2007。《經濟社會學原理》。台北：巨流。王德睦，2009。〈人口〉，《社會學與台灣社會》。台北：巨流。江貞吟，2021。〈做男人：宗族裡的男子氣概與性別象徵〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》。33(4):737-785。江燦騰，1995。〈海峽兩岸春節年俗的變革與新貌〉，《歷史月刊》。2月號：48-54。伊慶春，1997。〈都市與家庭生活〉，章英華、蔡勇美編，《台灣的都市社會》。台北：巨流出版社。伊慶春，2014。〈台灣家庭代間關係的持續與改變：資源與規範的交互作用〉，《社會學研究》。3:189-215。伊慶春、陳玉華，1998。〈奉養父母方式與未來奉養態度之關聯〉，《人口學刊》。19:1-32。伊慶春、張英華，2008。〈父系家庭的持續與變遷：台灣家庭社會學研究，1960-2000〉，見謝國雄主編，《群學爭鳴》。台北：群學。阮昌銳，2017。《傳薪集：臺灣原住民與民俗研究期刊論文彙編》。台北：山海文化雜誌社。李慈穎，2007。〈女同志成家路迢迢〉，見謝國雄主編，《以身為度、如是我做——田野工作的教與學》。台北：群學。利翠珊，2007。〈華人已婚女性代間矛盾情感之特色與測量〉，《中華心理衛生學刊》。20:357-386。利翠珊、張妤玥，2010。〈代間照顧關係：台灣都會地區成年子女的質性訪談研究〉，《中華心理衛生學刊》。23:99-124。吳家瑜、趙淑珠，2004。《以多重觀點建構代間矛盾經驗之新嘗試》，〈中華心理衛生學刊〉。17:75-111。呂寶靜(1999)：〈性別與家庭照顧：一個女性主義的觀點〉，見王雅各(編)：《性屬關係─性別與社會、建構》。台北：心理。林玉茹，2014。〈過新年：從傳統到現代臺灣節慶生活的交錯與嫁接（1890-1945）〉，《臺灣史研究》。21(1):1-43。林如萍，2012。〈台灣家庭的代間關係與互動類型之變遷趨勢〉，見伊慶春、章英華主編，《台灣的社會變遷 1985～2005：家庭與婚姻，台灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之一》。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。林津如，2007。〈父系家庭與女性差異認同：中產階級職業婦女家務分工經驗的跨世代比較〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》。68:1-73。胡幼慧、周雅容，1996。〈代際的交換與意義：台灣老年婦女的家庭變遷研究〉，《臺灣社會學刊》。20:1-48。高淑貴、林如萍，1998。〈農村老人與成年子女之代間交換〉，《農業推廣學報》。15:77-105。陳其南，1990。《家族與社會：台灣與中國社會研究的基礎理念》。台北：聯經。陸洛、陳欣宏，2002。〈台灣變遷社會中老人的家庭角色調適及代間關係之初探〉，《應用心理研究》。14:221-249。陳寅真、林如萍，2022。〈已婚成年子女與父母的代間矛盾類型〉，《老年學研究》。1:140-173。畢恆達，1996。〈詮釋學與質性研究〉見胡幼慧主編《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。湯志傑，2009。〈新經濟社會學的歷史考察：以鑲嵌的問題史為主軸（上）〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》。29:135-193。黃秋華，2016。〈中流砥柱：嬰兒潮世代的家庭代間支持類型分析〉，《人類發展與家庭學報》。17:50-66。黃秋華、林如萍，2018。〈成年子女與嬰兒潮世代父母的代間經濟支持交換：生命事件的影響〉，《人類發展與家庭學報》。19:15-43。莊英章，1972。〈臺灣農村家族對現代化德適應－一個田野調查實例的分析〉，《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》。34: 85-98。彭淑華，2006。〈台灣女性單親家庭生活處境之研究〉，《東吳社會工作學報》。14:25-62。葉光輝，1995。〈孝道困境的消解模式及其相關因素〉，《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》。79:87-118。葉光輝，1997。〈台灣民眾之孝道觀念的變遷情形〉，見張苙雲、呂玉瑕、王甫昌主編，《九○年代的台灣社會：社會變遷基本調查研究系列二（下）》。台北：中研院社研所籌備處。葉光輝，2009a。〈台灣民眾的代間交換行為：孝道觀點的探討〉，《本土心理學研究》。31:97-141。葉光輝，2009b。〈華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻〉，《本土心理學研究》32:101-148。齊力，2005。〈質性研究方法概論〉，見齊力、林本炫主編，《質性研究方法與資料分析》。高雄：高雄復文圖書出版社。劉千嘉，2019。〈高齡親代與中壯子代之經濟依附行為探討：親子與家戶的分析〉，《人口學刊》。59:89-129。蔡宏進，2004，臺灣的人口與人力研究，台北：唐山。二、英文文獻 Caldwell, Jhon, 1982. Theory of Fertility Deline. NY: Academic Press. Chen Y-h, Roscoe p, 2017. Practice and meaning of non-professional stock-trading in Taiwan: a case of relational work. 46(3-4): 576-600. Cohen, Myron, 1970. Developmental process in the Chinese domestic group. In M. Freedman, (ed.), Family and kinship in Chinese society. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Granovetter, Mark, 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology. 91:481-520. Lynd, Roberts S., 1932. Family Members as Consumers. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 160(1): 86-93. Mauss, Marcel, 2002. The Gift: The form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. UK: Routledge. McGarry, K., Schoeni, R.F. 1995. Trasfer Behavior in the Health and Retirement Study: Measurenment and the Redistribution of Resources within the Family. The Jourmal of Human Resources. 30:S184-S226. Bandelj , Nina, 2020. Relational Work in the Economy. Annual Review of sociology. 46:251-272. Rossi & Rossi, 1990. Of Human Bonding, NY: Aldine de Gruyter. Galen, Ruben van and Pearl A. Dykstra, 2006. Solidarity and Conflict Between Adult Children and Parents: A Latent Class Analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family. 947-960. Wolf, Margery, 1972. Women and the Family in Rural Taiwan. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Yi, C. C., Lin, J. P., 2009, “Types of relations between adult children and elderly parents in Taiwan: Mechanisms accounting for various relational types.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 40(2): 305-324. Zelizer, Viviana A., 1994. Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. NJ: Princeton University Press. Zelizer, Viviana A., 2005. The Purchase of Intimacy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Zelizer, Viviana A., 2010. The Social Meaning of Money. N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學社會學系 108254018
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108254018
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202201719
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Sociology] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
401801.pdf		1387Kb	Adobe PDF2	88	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback