English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51675150      Online Users : 480
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142630


    Title: 政府與非營利組織協力關係之研究: 以臺灣海洋廢棄物治理平台為例
    Understanding the Collaborative Relationship between Governments and Nonprofit Organizations:A Case Study on the Marine Debris Governance Platform in Taiwan
    Authors: 李昱姍
    Contributors: 張鎧如
    李昱姍
    Keywords: 協力治理
    環境協力治理
    協力關係存續
    海洋廢棄物治理平台
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-12-02 15:18:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   隨著環境資源的開發與運用,人們對於海洋的使用與依賴也越來越深,同時也造成了海岸與海洋生態系統的沈重負擔。面對日益嚴重的海洋廢棄物與汙染之問題,難以單靠政府的力量完善治理海洋環境,因此,環保署於2017年時與環保團體共同建置「臺灣海洋廢棄物治理平台」(下稱海廢治理平台),透過政府部門的公權力來制定海洋廢棄物管制之相關政策,並利用非營利團體長期關注海洋環境的經驗與國際參與的靈活度,攜手維護海洋原有的美麗面貌。
      而本研究欲探討,透過政府與非營利組織的協力,海廢治理平台中成員的互動情形,包含海洋廢棄物治理平台之運作架構與模式、影響海洋廢棄物治理平台運作過程的因素以及哪些因素將會造成協力關係的存續或斷裂。為回答研究問題,本研究採取個案研究法與深度訪談法進行資料蒐集。訪問參與在海廢治理平台內的政府機關以及非營利組織,運用協力觀點探究海洋廢棄物治理中公部門與非營利組織行動者間的協力互動過程與平台協力運作之關係。
      本研究發現,海廢治理平台主要運作模式是透過平台會議與工作小組會議,定期就海洋廢棄物議題進行討論。在協力的運作過程中,「領導要素」與「溝通要素」扮演著重要的關鍵,如同潤滑油般幫助協力關係能夠順暢的運行。而協力關係的存續或斷裂會受到方案推動成效、獲取意見與資訊、方案可行性、尊重與溝通等因素之影響,可能加深協力關係的穩固程度或使協力關係走向終結。
    Reference: 王千文、陳敦源(2012)。形式上還是實質上的 「公私協力」:全民健康保險總額支付制度個案分析。公共行政學報,42,99-137。
    江念慈、卓正中、高瑞新(2020)。以海域空間規劃治理金廈海域之初探性研究 以海漂垃圾為例。航運季刊,29(3),1-27。
    行政院環境保育署(2018)。臺灣海洋廢棄物治理行動方案(第一版)。2022年4月25日,取自https://www.epa.gov.tw/DisplayFile.aspx?FileID=342D427F38733A29&P=28e6ec81-484b-4aa1-bbfa-06cc01af516b
    行政院環境保育署(2020)。臺灣海洋廢棄物治理行動方案(第二版)。2022年4月25日,取自https://www.epa.gov.tw/DisplayFile.aspx?FileID=D983E1C3CE1726FB&P=eb64d54a-d652-4d31-bf33-d3f4f18dd4b5
    李長晏(2007)。中臺灣跨域治理案例之探討:以大甲溪流域管理為例。中國地方自治,60(5),16-34。
    李長晏(2009)。從協力治理模式探討淡水河流域的管理。中國地方自治,62(10),3-19。
    李長晏、林煥笙(2009)。中央與地方協力夥伴關係之分析-以台中縣潭子段旱溪整治工程為例。公共行政學報,31,49-100。
    李柏諭(2011)。跨部門治理的理論與實踐:以蓮潭國際文教會館的委外經驗為例。公共行政學報,40,41-76。
    周怡(2014)。海洋廢棄物的法制規範。臺灣海洋法學報,11,81-103。
    周素卿(2015)。民間組織參與流域綜合治理的經驗。臺灣社會研究季刊,100,283-289。
    林易萱(2009)。私有地上的生態保育:以雙連埤的協力治理為例。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文,未出版,臺北。
    林淑馨(2010)。質性研究:理論與實務。臺北: 巨流圖書股份有限公司。
    林淑馨(2016)。非營利組織概論 (增訂二版)。臺北: 巨流圖書股份有限公司。
    林煥笙、喬憲新(2015)。地方政府跨部門協力網絡的運作分析—以臺北市與新北市雙城共飲翡翠水為例。文官制度,7(4),73-119。
    邱文彥(2016)。海洋立法與海洋治理的挑戰。航運季刊,25(1), 1-25。
    孫本初、郭昇勳(2000)。公私部門合夥理論與成功要件之探討。考銓季刊,22,95-108。
    財團法人綠色和平基金會(2018),繼氣候災難之後的海洋塑膠危機,取自:
    https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/4810/%E7%B9%BC%E6%B0%A3%E5%80%99%E7%81%BD%E9%9B%A3%E4%B9%8B%E5%BE%8C%E7%9A%84%E6%B5%B7%E6%B4%8B%E5%A1%91%E8%86%A0%E5%8D%B1%E6%A9%9F/
    張力亞、戴榮賦、黃資媛(2019)。大學與地方社群的協力合作策略與挑戰:以埔里空污減量為例。中國行政評論,25(2),31-56。
    張晏瑲(2011)。海洋治理-以美國、加拿大及澳洲為例。臺灣海洋法學報,10(1), 48-74。
    張紹勳(2004)。研究方法。臺中市:滄海。
    許耿銘、林淑娟(2015)。公私協力推動環境犯罪防治之研究-大台南環檢警結盟之個案分析。中國行政評論,21(2),75-105。
    陳向明(2009)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。
    陳定銘、賴彥澄(2011)。非營利組織實踐協力治理環境之研究:以阿里山有機部落為例,臺灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會年會,臺北。
    陳品涵(2017)。貢寮區水梯田保育之研究-公私協力的視角。東海大學行政管理暨政策學系碩士學位論文,未出版,臺中。
    陳重安(2011)。政府契約委外的再檢視:目標、理論應用、績效衡量、與知識論基礎。公共行政學報,40,111-145。
    陳敦源、張世杰(2010)。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度季刊,2 (3),17-71。
    彭渰雯、林依依、楊和縉(2018)。協力決策後的績效弔詭:以性別影響評估和生態檢核表為例。公共行政學報,54,41-78。
    曾冠球(2008年5月)。公私合夥:「臺北市民生活網」的經驗借鏡,夥伴關係與永續發展國際學術研討會,臺中。
    曾冠球(2011)。協力治理觀點下公共管理者的挑戰與能力建立。文官制度季刊,3(1),27-52。
    曾雯雯(2021)。探討「臺灣海洋廢棄物治理平台」 公私夥伴關係之合作與衝突。中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士學位論文,未出版,高雄。
    鈕文英(2017)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。臺北:雙葉書廊。
    黃昭儒(2015)。中石化安順廠汙染整治問題之協力治理分析。臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士學位論文,未出版,臺北。
    萬文隆(2004)。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊,37(4),17-23。
    葉如萍(2019)。海洋空間規劃架構下的協作規劃網絡:以澎湖南方四島國家公園為例。科技部補助專題研究計畫報告(編號:MOST 108-2635-H-006-002-),未出版。
    蘇文信(2006)。社區林業發展之研究─以協力關係觀點。世新大學行政管理學系碩士學位論文,未出版,臺北。
    Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.
    Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2012). Stewards, mediators, and catalysts: Toward a model of collaborative leadership. The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 2.
    Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16-32.
    Bakker, Y. W., de Koning, J., & van Tatenhove, J. (2019). Resilience and social capital: The engagement of fisheries communities in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 99, 132-139.
    Bardach, E. (2001). Developmental dynamics: Interagency collaboration as an emergent phenomenon. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(2), 149-164.
    Bartz, C. R. F., Baggio, D. K., Ávila, L. V., & Turcato, J. C. (2021). Collaborative Governance: An International Bilbiometric Study of the Last Decade. Public Organization Review, 21(3), 543-559.
    Bell, E., & Scott, T. A. (2020). Common institutional design, divergent results: A comparative case study of collaborative governance platforms for regional water planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 111, 63-73.
    Berardo, R., Fischer, M., & Hamilton, M. (2020). Collaborative governance and the challenges of network-based research. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(8), 898-913.
    Beyers, F., & Heinrichs, H. (2020). Global partnerships for a textile transformation? A systematic literature review on inter-and transnational collaborative governance of the textile and clothing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121-131.
    Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O`Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 547-558.
    Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science 357(6352).
    Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of Cross‐Sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44-55.
    Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647-663.
    Cain, B. E., Gerber, E. R., & Hui, I. (2020). The challenge of externally generated collaborative governance: California’s attempt at regional water management. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(4-5), 428-437.
    Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2014). Deliberation and decision in collaborative governance: A simulation of approaches to mitigate power imbalance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 495-518.
    Coe, J. M., & Rogers, D. (2012). Marine Debris: Sources, Impacts, and Solutions. Berlin:Springer Science & Business Media.
    Collier, D., & Mahoney, J. (1996). Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics, 49(1), 56-91.
    Dobbin, K. B., & Lubell, M. (2021). Collaborative governance and environmental justice: Disadvantaged community representation in California sustainable groundwater management. Policy Studies Journal, 49(2), 562-590.
    Doberstein, C. (2016). Designing collaborative governance decision-making in search of a ‘collaborative advantage’. Public Management Review, 18(6), 819-841.
    Emerson, K., & Gerlak, A. K. (2014). Adaptation in Collaborative Governance Regimes. Environmental Management, 54(4), 768-781.
    Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 717-747.
    Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29.
    Fisher, J., Stutzman, H., Vedoveto, M., Delgado, D., Rivero, R., Quertehuari Dariquebe, W., Seclén Contreras, L., Souto, T., Harden, A., & Rhee, S. (2020). Collaborative governance and conflict management: Lessons learned and good practices from a case study in the Amazon Basin. Society & Natural Resources, 33(4), 538-553.
    Freeman, J. (1997). Collaborative governance in the administrative state. UCLA L. Rev., 45, 1.
    Gazley, B. (2010). Linking collaborative capacity to performance measurement in government—nonprofit partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4), 653-673.
    Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341-354.
    Gutiérrez, N. L., Hilborn, R., & Defeo, O. (2011). Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature, 470(7334), 386-389.
    Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. (1998). Distinguishing trust and power in interorganizational relations: Forms and facades of trust. Trust Within and Between Organizations, 64-87.
    Head, B. W. (2014). Evidence, uncertainty, and wicked problems in climate change decision making in Australia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(4), 663-679.
    Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711-739.
    Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2016). Investigating collaborative processes over time: A 10-year study of the South Florida ecosystem restoration task force. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 180-200.
    Hodson, M., Kasmire, J., McMeekin, A., Stehlin, J. G., & Ward, K. (2020). Urban platforms and the future city: Transformations in infrastructure, governance, knowledge and everyday life. London:Routledge.
    Hrelja, R., Pettersson, F., & Westerdahl, S. (2016). The qualities needed for a successful collaboration: A contribution to the conceptual understanding of collaboration for efficient public transport. Sustainability, 8(6), 542.
    Hughes, O. (2010). Does governance exist? (pp. 103-120). London:Routledge.
    Hughes, S., & Pincetl, S. (2014). Evaluating collaborative institutions in context: the case of regional water management in southern California. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(1), 20-38.
    Hui, I., Ulibarri, N., & Cain, B. (2020). Patterns of participation and representation in a regional water collaboration. Policy Studies Journal, 48(3), 754-781.
    Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2004). Doing things collaboratively: realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? IEEE Engineering Management Review, 32(4), 11-20.
    Imperial, M. T. (2005). Using Collaboration as a Governance Strategy: Lessons From Six Watershed Management Programs. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281-320.
    Imperial, M. T., Johnston, E., Pruett‐Jones, M., Leong, K., & Thomsen, J. (2016). Sustaining the useful life of network governance: life cycles and developmental challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 135-144.
    Innes, J. E., Booher, D. E., & Di Vittorio, S. (2010). Strategies for megaregion governance: Collaborative dialogue, networks, and self-organization. Journal of the American planning association, 77(1), 55-67.
    Isely, E. S., Steinman, A. D., Isely, P. N., & Parsell, M. A. (2014). Building partnerships to address conservation and management of western Michigan’s natural resources. Freshwater Science, 33(2), 679-685.
    Ismanto, D. R. H., & Fitriati, R. (2020). Collaborative Governance of Coral Reef Management and Rehabilitation in Tsunami Disaster Mitigation Efforts. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 10(1), 1-14.
    Ivery, J. M. (2010). Partnerships in transition: Managing organizational and collaborative change. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20(1), 20-37.
    Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29-45.
    Jones, P. J., Lieberknecht, L. M., & Qiu, W. (2016). Marine spatial planning in reality: Introduction to case studies and discussion of findings. Marine Policy, 71, 256-264.
    Kalesnikaite, V. (2019). Keeping cities afloat: Climate change adaptation and collaborative governance at the local level. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(4), 864-888.
    Keast, R., & Mandell, M. (2014). The collaborative push: moving beyond rhetoric and gaining evidence. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(1), 9-28.
    Kenward, R., Whittingham, M., Arampatzis, S., Manos, B., Hahn, T., Terry, A., Simoncini, R., Alcorn, J., Bastian, O., & Donlan, M. (2011). Identifying governance strategies that effectively support ecosystem services, resource sustainability, and biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(13), 5308-5312.
    Kettl, D. F. (2006). Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public Administration Review, 66, 10-19.
    Kiparsky, M., Milman, A., Owen, D., & Fisher, A. T. (2017). The importance of institutional design for distributed local-level governance of groundwater: The case of California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. Water, 9(10), 755.
    Kjaer, A. M. (2004). Governance in the 21st century. Cambridge:Polity Press.
    Koebele, E. A. (2019). Policy learning in collaborative environmental governance processes. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(3), 242-256.
    Koontz, T. M., & Newig, J. (2014). From planning to implementation: Top‐down and bottom‐up approaches for collaborative watershed management. Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), 416-442.
    Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66, 111-121.
    Kossmann, C. M., Behagel, J. H., & Bailey, M. (2016). Action and inertia in collaborative governance. Marine Policy, 72, 21-30.
    Kyriazi, Z., Maes, F., Rabaut, M., Vincx, M., & Degraer, S. (2013). The integration of nature conservation into the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy, 38, 133-139.
    Leach, W. D., & Pelkey, N. W. (2001). Making watershed partnerships work: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(6), 378-385.
    Leach, W. D., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005). Are trust and social capital the keys to success? Watershed partnerships in California and Washington. Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management, 233-258.
    Lindgren, A. Y., Reed, M. G., & Robson, J. P. (2021). Process Makes Perfect: Perceptions of Effectiveness in Collaborative Environmental Governance. Environmental Management, 67(2), 228-241.
    Lowndes, V., & Skelcher, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi‐organizational partnerships: an analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76(2), 313-333.
    Lubell, M. (2005). Do Watershed Partnerships Enhance Beliefs. Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management, 201.
    Mandarano, L. A. (2009). Social network analysis of social capital in collaborative planning. Society and Natural Resources, 22(3), 245-260.
    McGuire, M., & Agranoff, R. (2011). The limitations of public management networks. Public Administration, 89(2), 265-284.
    Melnychuk, N., & de Loë, R. (2020). Legitimacy assessment throughout the life of collaborative water governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 30(1), 14-28.
    Mitchell, G. E., O’Leary, R., & Gerard, C. (2015). Collaboration and performance: Perspectives from public managers and NGO leaders. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 684-716.
    Molenveld, A., Voorberg, W., Van Buuren, A., & Hagen, L. (2021). A qualitative comparative analysis of collaborative governance structures as applied in urban gardens. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1683-1704.
    Morris, M., & de Loë, R. C. (2016). Cooperative and adaptive transboundary water governance in Canada’s Mackenzie River Basin: status and prospects. Ecology and Society, 21(1).
    Nambisan, S. (2009). Platforms for collaboration. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(3), 44-49.
    Nel, J. L., Roux, D. J., Driver, A., Hill, L., Maherry, A. C., Snaddon, K., Petersen, C. R., Smith‐Adao, L. B., Van Deventer, H., & Reyers, B. (2016). Knowledge co‐production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans. Conservation Biology, 30(1), 176-188.
    Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: a framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269-297.
    Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009). Environmental governance: participatory, multi‐level–and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 197-214.
    Newig, J., & Koontz, T. M. (2014). Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: the EU`s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(2), 248-267.
    O`Toole Jr, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2004). Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4), 469-494.
    O’leary, R., & Vij, N. (2012). Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going? The American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 507-522.
    Ottens, M., & Edelenbos, J. (2018). Political leadership as meta-governance in sustainability transitions: A case study analysis of meta-governance in the case of the Dutch national agreement on climate. Sustainability, 11(1), 110.
    Page, S. B., Stone, M. M., Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. C. (2015). Public value creation by cross‐sector collaborations: A framework and challenges of assessment. Public Administration, 93(3), 715-732.
    Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2020). Governance, politics and the state. London:Bloomsbury Publishing.
    Programme, U. N. E. (2009). Marine litter: a global challenge. UNEP.
    Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
    Purdy, J. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409-417.
    Retzlaff, R., & LeBleu, C. (2018). Marine Spatial Planning: Exploring the role of planning practice and research. Journal of Planning Literature, 33(4), 466-491.
    Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667.
    Richie, L., Oppenheimer, J. D., & Clark, S. G. (2012). Social process in grizzly bear management: lessons for collaborative governance and natural resource policy. Policy Sciences, 45(3), 265-291.
    Rigg, C., & O`Mahony, N. (2013). Frustrations in collaborative working: Insights from institutional theory. Public Management Review, 15(1), 83-108.
    Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234-258.
    Salignac, F., Marjolin, A., Noone, J., & Carey, G. (2019). Measuring dynamic collaborations: Collaborative health assessment tool. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78(2), 227-249.
    Santos, C. F., Agardy, T., Andrade, F., Crowder, L. B., Ehler, C. N., & Orbach, M. K. (2021). Major challenges in developing marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 132, 103-248.
    Scott, T. (2015). Does collaboration make any difference? Linking collaborative governance to environmental outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(3), 537-566.
    Scott, T. A., & Thomas, C. W. (2017). Unpacking the collaborative toolbox: Why and when do public managers choose collaborative governance strategies? Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 191-214.
    Siddiki, S. N., Carboni, J. L., Koski, C., & Sadiq, A. A. (2015). How policy rules shape the structure and performance of collaborative governance arrangements. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 536-547.
    Skelcher, C. (2000). Changing images of the state: overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration, 15(3), 3-19.
    Smouts, M. C. (1998). The proper use of governance in international relations. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 81-89.
    Sotarauta, M., & Suvinen, N. (2019). Place leadership and the challenge of transformation: policy platforms and innovation ecosystems in promotion of green growth. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1748-1767.
    Soyez, D., & Schulz, C. (2008). Facets of an emerging environmental economic geography (EEG). Geoforum, 1(39), 17-19.
    Stamoulis, K. A., & Delevaux, J. M. (2015). Data requirements and tools to operationalize marine spatial planning in the United States. Ocean & Coastal Management, 116, 214-223.
    Sterling, E. J., Betley, E., Sigouin, A., Gomez, A., Toomey, A., Cullman, G., Malone, C., Pekor, A., Arengo, F., & Blair, M. (2017). Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 209, 159-171.
    Stern, M. J., & Coleman, K. J. (2015). The multidimensionality of trust: Applications in collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 28(2), 117-132.
    Sullivan, A., White, D. D., & Hanemann, M. (2019). Designing collaborative governance: Insights from the drought contingency planning process for the lower Colorado River basin. Environmental Science & Policy, 91, 39-49.
    Sullivan, H. (2015, 4). The craft and graft of collaboration. Presented at the IRSPM Conference, Birmingham.
    Taylor, B., & de Loe, R. C. (2012). Conceptualizations of local knowledge in collaborative environmental governance. Geoforum, 43(6), 1207-1217.
    Thomas, L. D., Autio, E., & Gann, D. M. (2014). Architectural leverage: Putting platforms in context. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 198-219.
    Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20-32.
    Tonelli, D. F., Sant’Anna, L., Barcelar Abbud, E., & Aparecida de Souza, S. (2018). Antecedents, process, and equity outcomes: A study about collaborative governance. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1469381.
    Trouwborst, A. (2011). Managing marine litter: exploring the evolving role of international and European law in confronting a persistent environmental problem. Merkourios-Utrecht J. Int`l & Eur. L., 27, 4.
    Ulibarri, N. (2015). Collaboration in federal hydropower licensing: Impacts on process, outputs, and outcomes. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 578-606.
    Ulibarri, N., Emerson, K., Imperial, M. T., Jager, N. W., Newig, J., & Weber, E. (2020). How does collaborative governance evolve? Insights from a medium-n case comparison. Policy and Society, 39(4), 617-637.
    Van Buuren, A., & Nooteboom, S. (2010). The success of SEA in the Dutch planning practice: How formal assessments can contribute to collaborative governance. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(2), 127-135.
    Van Oortmerssen, L. A., van Woerkum, C. M., & Aarts, N. (2014). The visibility of trust: Exploring the connection between trust and interaction in a Dutch collaborative governance boardroom. Public Management Review, 16(5), 666-685.
    Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2010). Introducing the Theory of Collaborative Advantage. London: Routledge.
    Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration review, 62(5), 527-540.
    Watson, N., Deeming, H., & Treffny, R. (2009). Beyond Bureaucracy? Assessing Institutional Change in the Governance of Water in England. Water Alternatives, 2(3).
    Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334-349.
    Weber, E. P., Lovrich, N. P., & Gaffney, M. J. (2007). Assessing collaborative capacity in a multidimensional world. Administration & Society, 39(2), 194-220.
    Weible, C., Sabatier, P. A., & Lubell, M. (2004). A comparison of a collaborative and top‐down approach to the use of science in policy: Establishing marine protected areas in California. Policy Studies Journal, 32(2), 187-207.
    Wesselink, A., Paavola, J., Fritsch, O., & Renn, O. (2011). Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: practitioners` perspectives. Environment and Planning A, 43(11), 2688-2704.
    Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283-290.
    Zhang, D., Fan, F., & Park, S. D. (2019). Network analysis of actors and policy keywords for sustainable environmental governance: Focusing on Chinese environmental policy. Sustainability, 11(15), 4068.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    公共行政學系
    109256016
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109256016
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201670
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    601601.pdf5237KbAdobe PDF2155View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback