政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142392
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51093133      Online Users : 878
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142392


    Title: 取代效果、效率效果與產品創新
    Replacement Effect, Efficiency Effect and Product Innovation
    Authors: 廖郁萍
    Liao, Yu-ping
    Contributors: 經濟系
    Keywords: 獨佔之持續;取代效果;效率效果;產品創新
    Persistence of monopoly;Replacement effect;Efficiency effect;Product innovation
    Date: 2022-06
    Issue Date: 2022-10-11 16:42:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 根據Arrow (1962)率先提出的取代效果，既存獨佔廠商從事製程創新的動機較潛在進入廠商來得低(不論創新之幅度)。根據Gilbert and Newbery (1982)率先提出的效率效果，前者從事創新的動機較後者來得高(非大幅度之創新)或一樣高(大幅度之創新)。本文採用Hotelling線性城市模型來描述新舊產品之差異(水平和垂直)，以探討既存獨佔廠商和潛在進入廠商從事產品創新之相對動機大小，且探討所獲致的結論是否不同於Arrow (1962)和Gilbert and Newbery (1982)所獲致的結論。數值分析結果顯示，此問題的答案為「是，且就性質上來說，是大幅度的不同」。關鍵原因有二。一與區分非大幅度創新和大幅度創新之標準有關，另一與獲取創新的既存獨佔廠商之選擇有關。
    The Arrow (1962) replacement effect shows that an incumbent monopolist has less incentive to pursue process innovations than a potential entrant, no matter what the innovation size. In contrast, the Gilbert and Newbery (1982) efficiency effect shows that the incumbent’s incentive to pursue a non-drastic innovation is higher and that both firms have equal incentives to pursue a drastic innovation. Hotelling’s linear city model is used in this study to describe horizontal and vertical differentiation between old and new products. The purpose is to examine the relative incentives of the incumbent monopolist vs a potential entrant to pursue product innovations and whether the results differ from those obtained by Arrow and those obtained by Gilbert and Newbery. The results of the numerical analysis show large qualitative difference. There are two key reasons for this; one is related to the criterion used to classify innovations as non-drastic or drastic, and the other is related to the innovating incumbent’s choice.
    Relation: 應用經濟論叢, 111期, pp.227-266
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.53106/054696002022060111006
    DOI: 10.53106/054696002022060111006
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Economics] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2150View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback