政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142390
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51010290      線上人數 : 967
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/142390


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142390


    題名: 自檢視公司法第178條規範析論股東利益衝突之解決模式
    An Analysis of Section 178 of Taiwan Company Act and Alternating Mechanisms to Deal with Shareholders` Conflicts of Interest
    作者: 周振鋒
    Chou, Cheng-fong
    貢獻者: 法學院
    關鍵詞: 公司法第178條;利害關係;迴避表決;控制股東;股東會;受任人義務;釋字第770號解釋;商業判斷法則;少數股東多數決;不公平救濟
    Article 178 of Company Act;Conflict of interest;Abstain from voting;Controlling shareholder;Shareholders meeting;Fiduciary duty;J. Y. Interpretation No. 770;Business judgment rule;Majority of minority;Unfair prejudice
    日期: 2022-09
    上傳時間: 2022-10-11 16:41:39 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 股東遇股東會議案有自身利害關係致有害公司利益之虞時，公司法第178條（以下稱「本條」）禁止其行使表決權，避免其因私害公。但本條構成要件相當抽象，執行上易衍生爭議，又缺乏股東自身利害關係資訊提供之配套，致使本條實際發揮作用甚為有限。另法院對違反本條之認定與效果亦有分歧意見，使本條規範實益令人質疑。此外，倘大股東或控制股東對有自身利害關係議案皆應迴避，反使公司意思由少數股東決定，似有違股份有限公司之資合性質。在此些疑慮下，本文建議刪除本條，另重新思考規範解決股東之利益衝突關係。尤其在有大股東或控制股東主導的併購交易，股東之利益衝突關係甚為明顯，應有特別規範之必要。本文擬以參考國外法制規範作為借鏡，再衡酌本國法制環境後，提出本文見解與未來修法建議，期能藉本文拋磚引玉，對我國公司治理法制進步略盡綿薄貢獻。
    According to Section 178 of Taiwan Company Act (the Section), a shareholder who has a personal interest in the matter under discussion at a meeting, which may impair the interest of the company, shall abstain from voting. However, there is a doubt that the Section can function as expected in practice due to the vague languages used in the elements and no any mechanism to disclose conflicts of interest for the company and its shareholders to identify who will be interested. Furthermore, courts’ opinions split on how to apply the Section, which makes the Section unforeseeable and difficult to be complied with. It also raises a question whether the minority shareholders, instead of big shareholders or controlling shareholders who are not allowed to vote, could appropriately make fundamental decisions on behalf of the company and all shareholders as a whole. In conclusion, this Article suggests that the Section be deleted and Taiwan Company Act reconsider a new mode of regulations to deal with the conflict of interest issues involving shareholders. After surveying various institutions in foreign jurisdictions and taking the characteristics of our legal system into account, this Article concludes by proposing some recommendations for future legal reform.
    關聯: 政大法學評論, 170期, pp.129-203
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/102398202022090170003
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202022090170003
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文
    [法學院] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2289檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋