政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142216
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51117767      線上人數 : 882
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142216


    題名: 再造首都城市：以柏林為例
    Reconstructing the Capital City: A Case Study of Berlin
    作者: 張方馨
    Chang, Fang-Hsin
    貢獻者: 冷則剛
    Leng, Tse-Kang
    張方馨
    Chang, Fang-Hsin
    關鍵詞: 城市規劃
    首都重建
    行政官僚
    洪堡論壇
    德國認同
    Urban planning
    Capital city reconstruction
    Administrative bureaucracy
    Humboldt forum
    German identity
    日期: 2022
    上傳時間: 2022-10-05 09:37:55 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文認為，透過城市規劃，賦予國家首都的城市景觀政治性、象徵性意義，同時反映出國家權力關係、形塑記憶、歷史與國家認同。在近代歐洲城市中除了柏林，沒有一個國家首都有重建的機會。因此本文試想分析德國統一、政府搬遷回柏林後，對城市建設與政治遺產再造的過程，瞭解政府主導的重要性，以及統一後德國的新城市形象。
    本文首先從實現德國統一的法規與整合的行政體系，作為城市規劃的基本框架，亦是負責城市規劃的關鍵行為者行動的前提，推動其提出柏林作為新首都的願景與採用的策略。可以發現傳統歐洲城市是城市規劃的主軸，忽略城市經歷東西德分裂的過去，以普魯士時代的延續取得社會共識、集體認同。
    接下來從總體城市規劃，以及波茨坦廣場在城市文化景觀的變化，並加以了解對城市結構、建築的空間政治意義。當代德國對過去歷史的官方論述與實踐，更清晰可見於政治遺產再造－共和國宮到柏林宮－，以及借柏林宮為據點的洪堡論壇作為新型態的文化博物館，顯示柏林以文化城市發展的可能。
    本文發現政府、行政官僚由上至下主導首都重建過程，選擇以傳統歐洲城市為範本改變城市景觀、空間與建築的樣貌，利用戰前歷史作為東、西方間曾共享的榮光與記憶，進而構成屬於當代德國認同。
    This thesis argues that through urban planning, the urban landscape of the national capital is given political and symbolic meanings. The process of reconstruction reflects national power relations, shaps memory, history and national identity. In modern European cities, apart from Berlin, no national capital has the opportunity to be reconstruct. This thesis attempts to analyze the process of urban construction and political heritage reconstruction after the relocation of the central government back to Berlin. This thesis also plans to understand the importance of government leadership, and to conform the image of a new city in reunified Germany.
    This thesis begins with the analysis of Germany`s unified regulations and integrated administrative system as the basic framework for urban planning. This thesis tries to identify the actions of key actors responsible for urban planning. This thesis finds out that the traditional European city is the main axis of urban planning. Planners tries to integrate the division of East and West Germany, and achieve social consensus and collective identity with the continuation of the Prussian era.
    Secondly, from the Berlin master plan of the inner city, and changes of Potsdamer Platz, we understand the spatial and political meaning of urban structure and architecture. The official discourse and practice of past history in contemporary Germany can be found in the process of the reconstruction of political heritage: the Palace of the Republic to the Berlin Palace. Furthermore, the Humboldt Forum, which is based on the Berlin Palace as a new cultural museum, shows the possibility of Berlin`s development as a cultural city.
    This thesis finds out that the government and administrative bureaucrats dominated the reconstruction process of the capital city from top to bottom. They used the traditional European cities as a model to change the appearance of urban landscape, space and architecture. Berlin utilizes pre-war history as the glory and memory shared between East and West, and reconstruct a new German identity.
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻
    吳叡人（譯）（2010）。想像的共同體：民族主義的起源與散布。台北：時報文化。(Andersen, Benedict, 2006)
    沈祉杏（2003）。穿．牆．故．事：再造柏林城市。台北：田園城市文化出版。
    肖靖（2015）。波茨坦廣場的”批判性重建”與後柏林牆時代的城市復興：以索尼中心為例， Der Zug，2，43-51。
    彼得．施奈德（2015）。歐洲灰姑娘的分裂與蛻變、叛逆與創新。台北：麥田。
    侯松、謝潔怡（2014）。反思與重構：遺產、博物館再審視―勞拉簡史密斯教授專訪。東南文化，238，11-16。
    張廷、楊東霞、談瀛洲（譯）（2006）。城市文化。台北：行人文化。(Zukin, Sharon, 1995)
    張省卿（2018）。論柏林洪堡廣場與台北自由廣場之空間轉型正義，雕塑研究，22，2-78。
    畢然、郭金華（譯）（2002）。論集體記憶。上海: 上海人民出版社。(Halbwachs, Maurice, 1925)
    陳延輝（2006）。德國人國家認同的建構。台灣國際研究季刊，2（3），91-118。
    葉至誠（2017）。社會科學概論。台北：揚智文化。
    潘君瑤（2021）。遺產的社會建構：話語、敘事與記憶。民族學刊，66，41-51。
    潘璐（譯）（2016）。回憶空間：文化記憶的形式與變遷。北京：北京大學出版社。(Assmann, Aleida, 2009)
    戴麗娟（譯）（2012）。記憶所繫之處。台北：行人文化。(Nora, Pierre, 1989)
     
    二、外文部分
    Ashworth G. J., & Graham, Brian. (2005). Introduction: Senses of place, senses of time and heritage. In Ashworth G. J., & Graham Brian (eds.), Senses of Place: Senses of Time (pp. 3-12). NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
    Ashworth, G. J., Graham, Brian, & Tunbridge, John. (2000). Introduction: Heritage and geography. In Ashworth G. J., Graham Brian, & Tunbridge John (eds.), A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture and Economy (pp. 1-7). NY: Oxford University Press.
    Assmann, Jan, & Czaplicka, John. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, 65, 125-133.
    Assmann, Jan. (2008). Communicative and cultural memory. In Astrid, Erll, & Ansgar Nünning (eds.), Cultural Memory Studies. An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook (pp. 109-118). NY: De Gruyter.
    Binder, Beate. (2001a). Capital under construction: History and the production of locality in contemporary Berlin. Ethnologia Europaea, 31(2), 19-40.
    Binder, Beate. (2001b). Political stage-setting: The symbol transformation of Berlin. In Bo, Strath (ed.), Myth and Memory in the Construction of Community: Historical Patterns in Europe and Beyond (pp.137-155). Bruxellex: PIE Lang.
    Blockmans, Wim P. (2003). Reshaping cities: The staging of political transformation. Journal of Urban History, 30, 7-20.
    Campbell, Scott. (2000). The changing role and identity of capital cities in the global era. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Association of American Geographers, Pittsburgh.
    Cochrane, Allan, & Passmore, Adrian. (2001). Building a national capital in an age of globalization: The case of Berlin. Area, 33(4), 341-352.
    Colomb Claire. (2007). Requiem for a lost palast. ‘revanchist urban planning’ and ‘burdened landscapes’ of the German Democratic Republic in the New Berlin. Planning Perspectives, 22(3), 283-323.
    Colomb, Claire. (2008). Staging urban change, reimaging the city:The politics of place marketing in the ‘New Berlin’(1989-2004) (Doctoral Thesis, University of London, UK). Retrived from https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin =uk.bl. ethos.635430.
    Costabile-Heming, Carol Anne. (2017). The reconstructed city palace and humboldt forum in Berlin: Restoring architectural identity or distorting the memory of historic spaces? Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 25(4), 441-454.
    de Frantz, Monika. (2004). The ‘new’ Berlin: multiple spatial conceptions of the capital city in the ‘Palast der Republik’/’Stadtschloss’ debate.” In Eckhardt, Frank (ed.), Urbanism and Globalization: The European City in Transition (pp. 261-278). Peter Lang.
    De Soto, Hermine G. (1996). (Re) inventing Berlin: dialectics of power, symbols and pasts, 1990–1995. City & Society,8(1), 29-49.
    Delanty, Gerard, & Jones, Paul R. (2000). European identity and architecture. European Journal of Social Theory, 59(4), 453-466.
    Dellenbaugh-Losse, Mary. (2013). (Re)Presentation of “the” past in Berlin-Mitte after German reunification, and its implications for cultural production through appropriation of space. Politics of Memory, 2, 1-18.
    Dellenbaugh-Losse, Mary. (2020). Inventing Berlin, Switzerland: Springer.
    Dempsey, Anna M. (1990). Berlin traditions and Potsdamer Platz: Architectural reconstruction and the transformation of a public place. Cultural Transformation in East Germany after 1990. Ger Foreign Lang, 2, 81-102.
    Eckardt, Frank. (2005). In search for meaning: Berlin as national capital and global city. Journal of Contemporary European Studie,13(2), 189-201.
    Ekici, Didem. (2007). The surfaces of memory in Berlin. Journal of Architectural Education. 25-34.
    Gottmann, Jean. (1983). The role of capital cities. Ekistics, 44(264), 240-43.
    Graham, Brian. (2002). Heritage as Knowledge: Capital or Culture? Urban. Studies, 39(5), 1003-1017.
    Grésillon, Boris. (1999). Berlin, cultural metropolis: changes in the cultural geography of Berlin since reunification. Ecumene, 6(3), 284-294.
    Hain, Simone. (2013). Berlin`s urban development discourse. symbolic action and the articulation of hegemonic interests. In Bernt, Matthias, Grell, Britta & Holm, Andrej (eds.), The Berlin Reader: A Compendium on Urban Change and Activism. (pp. 157-181). Germany: transcript Verlag.
    Hall, Peter. (2006). Seven types of capital city. In Gordon, David (ed.), Planning Twentieth Century Cities (pp.8-14). NY: Rouledge.
    Hall, Stuart. (1999). Whose heritage? un-settling ‘the heritage’, re-imagining the post-nation. Third Text, 13(49), 10-13.
    Hall, Thomas. (2003). Planning Europe`s Capital Cities: Aspects of Nineteenth-Century Urban Development. NY: Routledge.
    Halsall, Robert. (1996). Architectural debates in post‐unification Berlin: An aesthetic “Historians’ Debate? Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 4(1), 91-108.
    Harris, Chauncy D. (1991). Unification of Germany in 1990. Geographical Review, 81(2), 170-182.
    Harrison, Rodney. (2010). What is Heritage? In Harrison, Rodney (ed.), Understanding the Politics of Heritage (pp. 5-42). NY: Palgrave.
    Harrison, Rodney. (2013). Introduction: Heritage everywhere. In Harrison, Rodney (ed.), Heritage: Critical Approaches (pp. 1-12). London and New York: Routledge.
    Harvey, David C. (2001). Heritage pasts and heritage presents: Temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7(4), 319-338.
    Harvey, David C. (2008). The history of heritage. In Graham, Brian, & Howard, Peter (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity (pp. 19-36). England: Ashgate.
    Häußermann, Hartmut, & Kapphan, A. (2004). Berlin: From divided into fragmented city. The Greek Review of Social Research, 113, 25-61.
    Häußermann, Hartmut, & Strom, Elizabeth. (1994.) Berlin: The once and future capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 18(2), 335-346.
    Huyssen, Andreas. (1997). The voids of Berlin. Critical Inquiry, 24(1), 57-81.
    Koepnick, Lutz. (2001). Redeeming history? Foster`s dome and the political aesthetic of the Berlin Republic. German Studies Review,24(2), 303-323.
    Laurajane, Smith. (2006.) Uses of Heritage. USA: Routledge.
    Laurajane, Smith. (2017). Heritage, identity and power. In Hsiao, Hsin-Huang, Foong Hui Yew, & Peycam Philippe (eds.), Ctizens, Civil Society and Heritage-making in Asia (pp. 15-39). NY: ISEAS.
    Lehrer, U. (2003). The spectacularization of the building process: Berlin, Potsdamer Platz. Genre: Forms of Discourse and Culture, 34(3-4), 383-404.
    Light, Duncan, & Young, Craig. (2013). Urban space, political identity and the unwanted legacies of state socialism: Bucharest`s problematic Centru Civic in the post-socialist era. Nationalities Papers, 41(4), 515-535.
    Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge University Press.
    Macdonald, Sharon. (2008). Difficult heritage: Negotiating the Nazi Past in Nuremberg and beyond (pp.1-24). Oxon: Routledge.
    Marcuse, Peter. (1998). Reflections on Berlin: The meaning of construction and the construction of meaning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22(2), 331-338.
    McDowell, Sara. (2008). Heritage, memory and identity. In Graham, Brian, & Howard Peter (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity (pp. 37-54). England: Ashgate.
    Molnar, Virag. (2010). The cultural production of locality: Reclaiming the ‘European City’ in Post-Wall Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(2), 281-309.
    Neill, William J.V. (1997). Memory, collective identity and urban design: The future of berlin’s palast der republik. Journal of Urban Design, 2(2), 179-190.
    Neill, William J.V. (2003). Urban Planning and Cultural Identity. Taylor & Francis Group.
    Pan, Lu. (2016). City of divided memories: Two kinds of Berlin nostalgia. In Pan, Lu (ed.), In-visible Palimpses: Memory, Space and Modernity in Berlin and Shanghai.
    Pugh, Emily. (2014). Divided capital. In Pugh, Emily. (ed.), Architecture, Politics, and Identity in Divided Berlin (pp. 1-18). Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Radleyt, Alan. (2020). Introduction: Why cultural memory and heritage? In Radleyt, Alan (ed.), Critical Perspectives on Cultural Memory and Heritage (pp. 1-9). UCL Press.
    Russell, Frieda. (2017). Building a castle of humanism and oblivion: The Humboldt forum and its struggle with German national identity. (Master’s Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands). Retrived from https://uva.academia.edu/FriedaRussell.
    Sather-Wagstaff, Joy. (2015). Heritage and memory. In Waterton, Emma, & Watsonedt, Steve (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research (pp. 191-204). UK: Palgrave
    Schramm, Katharina. (2015). Heritage, power and ideology. In Waterton, Emma and Watsonedt, Steve (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Researc. Palgrave Macmillan, London. 442-457.
    Sonne, Wolfgang. (2006). Berlin: Capital under changing political systems. In Gordon, Gordon (ed.), Planning Twentieth Century Cities (pp. 196-212). NY: Rouledge.
    Spittler, Ulla, & Knischewski, Gerd. (1995). Redefining German identity: Case studies in Berlin. Journal of Area Studies, 3(7), 100-113.
    Tölle, Alexander. (2010). Urban identity policies in Berlin: From critical reconstruction to reconstructing the Wall. Cities, 27(5), 348-357.
    Tinius, Jonas, & von Zinnenburg Carroll, Khadija. (2020). Phantom palaces: Prussian centralities and Humboldtian spectres. In Bach, Jonathan, & Murawski, Michał (eds.), Re-Centring the City. Global Mutations of Socialist Modernity (pp. 90-103). London.
    Urban, F. (2003). Picture Postcards of urbanity: Reflections on Berlin`s inner city and the 1999 Master Plan. Journal of Architectural Education, 57(1), 68-73.
    Vale, Lawrence. (2008). Architecture, Power and National Identity. New York: Routledge.
    Van der Wusten, Herman. (2000). The cityscapes of european capital cities. GeoJournal, 5(1), 129-133.
    von Bose, Friedrich. (2013). The making of Berlin’s Humboldt-Forum: Negotiating history and the cultural politics of place. Fterlives, 11.
    Von Buttlar, Adrian. (2007). Berlin’s Castle versus Palace: A proper past for Germany’s future? Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism, 4(1), 2-29.
    Weizman Ines. (2013), Palast der Republik. Journal of Cultural Education, 67(1), 135-137.
    Weszkalnys, Gisa. (2010). Constructing a future Berlin. In Weszkalnys, Gisa (ed.), Alexanderplatz: Transforming Place in a Unified Germany (pp. 31-67). Berghahn Books.
    Wilson, Ross J. (2018). Heritage and politics. In López Varela, Sandra L. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences.
    Wollmann, Hellmut. (2021). Transformation of public administration in East Germany following unification. In Derlien, H. U. (ed.), Public Administration in Germany (pp 253-269). Palgrave Macmillan.
    Wu, Zongjie, & Hou, Song. (2015). Heritage and Discourse. In Waterton E., & Watson S. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research (pp 37–51). Palgrave Macmillan

    (三)網際網路
    Association Berliner Scholosses. Palace history. Retrieved from Association Berliner Scholosses E.V.: https://berliner-schloss.de/en/palace-history/short-architectural-history/ . (accessed December 3, 2021).
    Chase, Jefferson. (2017). Berlin squabbles over cross on City Palace reconstruction.” DW: https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-squabbles-over-cross-on-city-palace-reconstruction/a-38924363. (accessed December 3, 2021).
    DW. (2002). The people behind the Palace. DW: https://www.dw.com/en/the-people-behind-the-palace/a-406492. (accessed January 22, 2022).
    Germany Federal Foreign Office. The two plus Four Treaty in UNESCO´s Memory of the World Register. Retrieved from Germany Federal Foreign Office: https://archiv.diplo.de/arc-en/the-political-archive/two-plus-four-treaty/2174656?openAccordionId=item-2175488-0-panel. (accessed April 17, 2022).
    Grenie, Elizabeth. (2021). 洪堡論壇：確認殖民遺產？ DW: Grenierhttp://85.217.170.64/zh/%E6%B4%AA%E5%A0%A1%E8%AE%BA%E5%9D%9B%E7%A1%AE%E8%AE%A4%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E9%81%97%E4%BA%A7/a-59275413. (accessed January 22, 2022).
    Humboldt Forum Culture, 2019. A palace in Berlin for the Whole World. https://www.preussischer-kulturbesitz.de/fileadmin/user_upload_SPK/documents/mediathek/humboldt-forum/rp/Humboldt_Forum_Mag_En.pdf(accessed January 22, 2022).
    Senate Department for Urban Development, Building and Housing. (2007). The capital city agreement. Retrieved from https://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/planen/ hauptstadt/ dokumentation/en/politischer_wille/hauptstadtvertrag.shtml. (accessed April 17, 2022).
    The Official Website of Berlin. The Berliner schloss. Retrieved from The Official Website of Berlin: https://www.berlin.de/berlin-im-ueberblick/en/history/the-imperial-capital/. (accessed December 3, 2021).
    Williams, Carol. J. (2001). Getting at the heart of Berlin. Los Angles Times: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-jan-26-mn-17298-story.html. (accessed January 22, 2022).
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治學系
    105252013
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105252013
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201655
    顯示於類別:[政治學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    201301.pdf1810KbAdobe PDF20檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋