政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142166
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51305434      Online Users : 891
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142166


    Title: 隱私的哲學探究
    Privacy and Ethics: A Philosophical Study
    Authors: 游宜庭
    Yu, Yi-Ting
    Contributors: 鄭光明
    游宜庭
    Yu, Yi-Ting
    Keywords: 隱私
    倫理
    隱私權
    描述義隱私
    規範義隱私
    Privacy
    Privacy rights
    Ethics
    Morals
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-10-05 09:25:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「隱私」和個人在社會中的生活息息相關，是一個經常被使用於劃清個人或是小團體與大群體間的界限的詞彙。然而，無論是在哲學亦或是法學當中，皆沒有一個對隱私的決定性定義。本文旨在探討「隱私」在哲學討論中的不同面向，以釐清此概念在不同情境之下的意義，並試圖提出將「倫理（ethics）」作為隱私權是否適用在特定情境中的依據。
    本文對隱私的討論將區分為三大面向：
    一、隱私的描述性與規範性意義。
    二、隱私在物質與心理層面上的行使。
    三、隱私於個人與社會之關係。
    透過此一區分，本文試圖論證「隱私」作為一個概念與「隱私權」之間的關聯，以及論證隱私乃個人作為獨立個體而存在不可或缺的要素。同時，本文欲引進「倫理」作為判斷特定情況下個人是否享有隱私權的依據。透過提出此一評判依據，筆者期望能夠對隱私在哲學中的討論以及其應用有所貢獻。
    “Privacy” as a term is closely related to our everyday life, often used when one is in need of a space isolated from the larger part of the society. However, when it comes to its discussion, there is yet a consensus as to the definition of privacy and the realm it covers. This thesis aims to draw an outline of privacy in its philosophical discussion, and put forward three aspects that privacy considers, namely:
    1. The descriptive and normative interests of privacy
    2. The physical and psychological aspect of privacy
    3. The social and personal approach to privacy
    Through such distinctions, this thesis aims to draw the link between “privacy” and “privacy rights”. Furthermore, this thesis aims to introduce “ethics” into the discussion of privacy in order to set a criterion for privacy-applicable situations. With ethics, this thesis would like to contribute to the application of privacy, both as a philosophical concept and as a legal one.
    Reference: Allen, Anita L. (2003). Why Privacy Isn`t Everything. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Cooley, T. M. I. (1879). A Treatise on the Law of Torts: Or the wrongs which arise independently of contract. Chicago: Callaghan and Company.
    DeCew, Judith Wagner. (1997). In Pursuit Of Privacy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Levy, K., Schneier, B. (2020). Privacy threats in intimate relationships. Journal of Cybersecurity, 6(1). doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyaa006
    Locke, J. (2016). Second Treatise of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration. Goldie, M. (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1988). Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.
    MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1991). Toward A Feminist Theory Of The State. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.
    Mill, John Stuart. (2010). On Liberty. London: Penguin Books.
    Moore, Adam D. (2010). Privacy Rights: Moral And Legal Foundations. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University.
    Nussbaum, Martha C. (2000). Is Privacy Bad For Women?. Boston Review.
    Parent, W. A. (1983). Privacy, Morality, and the Law. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(4), 269–288. http://www.jstor.org/stable/226537
    Paul, Ellen Frankel, Fred Dycus Miller, and Jeffrey Paul. (2010). The Right To Privacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Schoeman, D. (1984). Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Thomas, Laurence. (2007). Contemporary Debates In Social Philosophy. (pp. 131-145). Oxford: Blackwell.
    Thomson, Judith J. (1975). The Right to Privacy, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4: 295–314
    Warren, Samuel D., and Brandeis, Louis D. (1890). The Right To Privacy. Harvard Law Review 4.5 (1890): 193.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學系
    105154003
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105154003
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201528
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Philosophy] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    400301.pdf690KbAdobe PDF2146View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback