English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113485/144472 (79%)
Visitors : 51390054      Online Users : 697
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142162


    Title: 國際法委員會《驅逐外國人草案》之研析
    Authors: 陳麗宇
    Chen, Li-Yu
    Contributors: 陳純一
    Chen, Chun-I
    陳麗宇
    Chen, Li-Yu
    Keywords: 國際法委員會
    驅逐
    外國人
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-10-05 09:24:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 全球化的今日，隨著國際間便捷的交通和頻繁的交流，每一個人都有成為外國人的機會，保護外國人的權利實是國際法迫切而必要之焦點。縱然國境管制係國家本於主權的權利，驅逐外國人則是主權的展現，然而，外國人的身分不表示被屏除於國際人權法的保障之外，也不代表國家得以任意驅逐之。是此，如何權衡國家的驅逐權和國際法對人權的保護，是首要而核心的問題。
    鑑於國際法委員會對驅逐外國人之主題曾進行龐大且深入的研究，2014年提出《驅逐外國人草案(Draft articles on the expulsion of aliens)》，反映並整理出當前國際法相關規則和依據，具有相當重要性和研究價值。
    本研究欲以《驅逐外國人草案》為基礎，探究當今國際法和國際人權法上驅逐外國人之相關規則，並藉國際法庭之案例和各國評論了解相關實踐現況或困難，期望在草案內涵之外，能對議題的發展有更實質的了解。最後，對照《驅逐外國人草案》和相關公約內涵，提出我國驅逐外國人法制和執行上的六項建議，以期對我國移民行政和立法發展上有所助益。
    Reference: 一、 中文

    中文專書

    1. 陳純一 (修訂). 丘宏達（編）（2013），《現代國際法》，修訂三版，臺北：三民書局。
    2. 李震山（編）（2001），《人性尊嚴與人權保障》，修訂再版，臺北市：元照。
    3. 法務部（編）（中華民國107年12月），《公民與政治權利國際公約、經濟社會文化權利國際公約 一般性意見 》，修訂二版，法務部。
    4. 監察院（編）（2012），《監察院（101）調查報告0025》。

    中文書之篇章

    1. 李建良（2014），〈論國際條約的國內法效力與法位階定序〉，收於：憲法解釋之理論與實務 (第八輯) (上冊)》，頁175-275，新學林。

    中文期刊文章

    1. 李立如（2019），〈憲法解釋中的家庭圖像與其規範地位〉，《臺大法學論叢》，第48卷3期，頁967-1021。
    2. 李震山（2004），〈憲法意義下之“家庭權”〉，《中正大學法學集刊》，16期，頁61-104。
    3. 林鈺雄（2015），〈司法互助是公平審判的化外之地？以歐洲人權法院的兩則標竿裁判為借鑑〉，《歐美研究》，第45卷第4期，頁517-570。
    4. 翁燕菁（2013），〈不歧視原則之經濟社會權利保障效力：歐洲人權公約當代課題〉，《歐美研究》，43卷3期，頁637-707。
    5. 許義寶（2005），〈論驅逐出國處分之停止執行〉，《警學叢刊》，35卷6期，頁273-288。
    6. 傅玫玲（2019），〈臺灣法院通譯現況與挑戰－問題分析與解決之道〉，《南臺財經法學》，5期，頁213-250。
    7. 蔡震榮（2007），〈由限令出國處分論訴願之停止執行〉，《法令月刊》，58卷5期，頁4-20。
    8. 蔡震榮（2009），〈自外籍配偶家庭基本權之保障論驅逐出國處分－評台北高等行政法院95年度訴字第2581號判決〉，《法令月刊》，60卷8期，頁21-37。
    9. 鄧衍森（2020），〈禁止酷刑公約國際標準之探討〉，《法學叢刊》，第65卷第1期，頁19-50。
    10. 戴瑀如（2017），〈婚姻與家庭權作為基本人權保障的範圍與限制：論締結婚姻組成家庭權與尊重家庭生活關係的分野〉，《司法院大法官106年度學術研討會 — 憲法解釋與憲法上未來列舉之權利》，56-84。

    中文博碩士學位論文

    1. 吳晉瑋（2019），《外國人國境管制之行為形式及救濟制度》，國立政治大學法學院碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    2. 李婉琦（2021），《驅逐出國及收容法律問題之研究》，東海大學法律學系碩士論文。
    3. 許義寶（2007），《外國人入出國與居留之研究—以我國法制為探討中心》，國立中正大學法律研究所博士論文。

    二、 外文

    Books

    1. Chittharanjan Felix Amerasinghe. (1967). State responsibility for injuries to aliens, by C. F. Amerasinghe. Oxford: Clarendon P.
    2. Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir. (2003). Equality and non-discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights (Vol. 74): Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
    3. Henry Campbell Black. (1968). Black`s Law Dictionary: Revised Fourth Edition.
    4. Edwin Borchard. (1915). The diplomatic protection of citizens abroad: Banks law publishing Company.
    5. Ian Brownlie. (2003). Principles of public international law / by Ian Brownlie (6th ed. ed.). Oxford ;: Oxford University Press.
    6. Guy S Goodwin-Gill. (1978). International law and the movement of persons between states: Oxford University Press.
    7. Hurst Hannum. (1987). The Right to Leave and Return in International Law and Practice: Brill Nijhoff.
    8. Jean-Marie Henckaerts. (1995). Mass expulsion in modern international law and practice: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
    9. M. E. MacGlashan J. C. Adlam. (1988). Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Reports: Volume 16, : Cambridge University Press.
    10. Robert Jennings and A Watts. (1992). Oppenheim`s International Law, (9th ed. Vol. vol. I Peace).
    11. Hans Kelsen and Robert W. Tucker. (1966). Principles of international law / by Hans Kelsen (2nd ed., rev. and edited by Robert W. Tucker. ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    12. Richard B Lillich. (1984). The human rights of aliens in contemporary international law: Manchester University Press.
    13. Guy S. Goodwin-Gill and Jane McAdam. (2007). The refugee in international law (3rd ed. ed.): Oxford University Press.
    14. Global Commission on International Migration. (2005). Migration in an Interconnected World: New Directions for Action. Report of the Global Commission on International Migration.
    15. Richard Plender. (1988). International migration law (Vol. 2): Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
    16. Ivan Anthony Shearer. (1971). Extradition in international law: Manchester University Press.
    17. Stefan Trechsel. (1987). Grundrechtsschutz bei der internationalen Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen.
    18. Paul Weis. (1979). Nationality and statelessness in international law / by P. Weis ; with a foreword by Hersch Lauterpacht (2nd ed.). Alphen aan den Rijn [The Netherlands] ;: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.
    19. Julia Wojnowska-Radzińska. (2015). The Right of an Alien to be Protected against Arbitrary Expulsion in International Law: Brill Nijhoff.

    Book Sections

    1. Danae Azaria. (2020). The Working Methods of the International Law Commission: Adherence to Methodology, Commentaries and Decision-Making Seventy Years of the International Law Commission: Drawing a Balance for the Future: Brill | Nijhoff.
    2. Anne F Bayefsky. (1990). The Principle of Equality Ornon-Discrimination in International Law Equality and Non-Discrimination under International Law (pp. 71-104): Routledge.
    3. International Law Commission. (1979). Report of the Working Group on review of the multilateral treaty-making process, A/CN.4/325, the Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 1979, vol. II(1).
    4. International Law Commission. (1996). Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its forty-eighth session the Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 1996, vol. II(2) (pp. 92).
    5. International Law Commission. (2000). Chapter IX. Other decisions and conclusions of the Commission, Report on the work of the fifty-second session the Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 2000, vol. II(2).
    6. International Law Commission. (2004). Annex. Syllabuses on Topics Recommended for Inclusion in The Long-Term Programme of Work of the Commission. Report on the work of the fifty-sixth session the Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 2004, vol. II(2).
    7. International Law Commission. (2004). Chapter XI. Other decisions and conclusions of the Commission, Report on the work of the fifty-sixth session the Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 2004, vol. II(2).
    8. International Law Commission. (2006). Chapter IV. Diplomatic Protection, Report on the work of the fifty-eighth session the Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 2006, vol. II(2).
    9. International Law Commission. (2007). Chapter VI. Expulsion of Aliens, Report on the work of the fifty-nineth session the Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 2007, vol. II(2).
    10. International Law Commission. (2008). Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its sixtieth session the Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 2008, vol. II(2).
    11. International Law Commission. (2014). Chapter IV. Expulsion of Aliens, Report on the work of the sixty-sixth session the Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 2014, vol. II(2).
    12. Charles-Emmanuel Côté. (2020). Introduction Non-state Actors, Changing Actors and Subjects of International Law Changing Actors in International Law, (pp. 1-24). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff.
    13. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. (1999). Progress report of the Office of the Rapporteur on migrant workers and their families in the hemisphere Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (Vol. OEA/Ser.L/V/II.106 Doc. 6 ).

    Cases

    1. Boffolo case (Mixed Claims Commission Italy-Venezuela 1903).
    2. Maal case, UN International Arbitration Award Report, Vol. X 730-733 (Commission Netherlands-Venezuela 1903).
    3. Factory at Chorzów (Merits) Judgment 13, Series A, No. 17 (PCIJ (Permanent Court of International Justice) 1928).
    4. Hans Muller of Nuremburg v. Superintendent, Presidency Jail Calcutta and Others, 1 SCR 1284 (India Supreme Court 1955).
    5. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain) (International Court of Justice (ICJ) 1970).
    6. Barton v Commonwealth of Australia, HCA 20; 131 CLR 477 (High Court of Australia 1974).
    7. Henning Becker v. Denmark, No. Application no. 7011/75 (Council of Europe: European Commission on Human Rights 1975).
    8. Shirin Aumeeruddy-Cziffra and 19 Other Mauritian Women v. Mauritius, CCPR/C/12/D/35/1978 (Human Rights Committee (HRC) 1981).
    9. Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. The United Kingdom, 15/1983/71/107-109 (European Court of Human Rights 1985).
    10. International Technical Products Corporation v. Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Award No. 186-302-3 (Iran-United States Claims Tribunal 1985).
    11. Bozano v. France, 9990/82 (European Court of Human Rights 1986).
    12. Berrehab v. the Netherlands, Application no. 10730/84 (European Court of Human Rights 1988).
    13. Soering v United Kingdom, No. Application No. 14038/88 (European Court of Human Rights 1989).
    14. Giry v. Dominican Republic, No. CCPR/C/39/D/193/1985 (UN Human Rights Committee 1990).
    15. Moustaquim v. Belgium, Application no. 12313/86 (European Court of Human Rights 1991).
    16. Beldjoudi v. France, Application no. 12083/86, (European Court of Human Rights 1992).
    17. Toonen v. Australia, Communication No. 488/1992, CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 (UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) 1994).
    18. Nasri v. France, (European Court of Human Rights 1995).
    19. Boughanemi v. France (European Court of Human Rights 1996).
    20. C. v. Belgium (European Court of Human Rights 1996).
    21. Stewart v. Canada, Communication No. 538/1993, CCPR/C/58/D/538/1993 (UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) 1996).
    22. Bouchelkia v. France (European Court of Human Rights 1997).
    23. Boujlifa v. France (European Court of Human Rights 1997).
    24. El Boujaïdi v. France (European Court of Human Rights 1997).
    25. Giosue Canepa v. Canada, Communication No. 558/1993, CCPR/C/59/D/558/1993 (UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) 1997).
    26. Dalia v. France (European Court of Human Rights 1998).
    27. Prosecutor v. Anto Furundzija (Trial Judgement), IT-95-17/1-T, (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) 1998).
    28. Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu (Trial Judgement) (International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda 1998).
    29. Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic (Trial Judgement), IT-96-21-T, (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) 1998).
    30. Baghli v. France (European Court of Human Rights 1999).
    31. Benrachid v. France (European Court of Human Rights 1999).
    32. Djaid v. France (European Court of Human Rights 1999).
    33. Farah v. Sweden (European Court of Human Rights 1999).
    34. Öztürk v. Norway (European Court of Human Rights 2000).
    35. Prosecutor v. Alfred Musema (Judgement and Sentence) (International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda 2000).
    36. Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom, Application no. 35763/97 (European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) 2001).
    37. Boultif v. Switzerland, No. 54273/00 (European Court of Human Rights 2001).
    38. Concurring Opinion of Judges Baka, Wildhaber and Lorenzen of Boultif v. Switzerland (Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights 2001).
    39. La Grand Case (Germany v. United States of America) (International Court of Justice (ICJ) 2001).
    40. Mohamed and Another v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (the Constitutional Court of South Africa 2001).
    41. Conka v. Belgium, No. 51564/99 (European Court of Human Rights 2002).
    42. Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vukovic (Appeal Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) 2002).
    43. Roger Judge v. Canada, CCPR/C/78/D/829/1998 (UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) 2003).
    44. Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America) (International Court of Justice (ICJ) 2004).
    45. Lori Berenson-Mejía v. Peru (Inter-American Court of Human Rights 2004).
    46. Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium, 13178/03 (European Court of Human Rights 2006).
    47. Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo) (International Court of Justice 2007).
    48. Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo) (International Court of Justice 2010).
    49. Stojkovic v. France and Belgium, No. Application No. 25303/08 (European Court of Human Rights 2011).
    50. Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo) (International Court of Justice 2012).
    51. Orantes-Hernandez v. Meese, 685 F. Supp. 1488 (C.D. Cal. 1988) (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California April 29, 1988).

    UN Documents

    1. UN Committee Against Torture (CAT). (1997). General Comment No. 1: Implementation of Article 3 of the Convention in the Context of Article 22. (General Comment No. 1).
    2. UN Committee Against Torture (CAT). (2017). General Comment No. 4: Implementation of Article 3 of the Convention in the Context of Article 22. (General Comment No. 4).
    3. UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD). (2004). CERD General Recommendation XXX on Discrimination Against Non Citizens.
    4. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (9 October 2015). OHCHR intervention before the European Court of Human Rights in the case of N.D. and N.T v. Spain. (Application Nos. 8675/15 and 8697/15).
    5. UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2001). Global Consultations on International Protection/Third Track: Complementary Forms of Protection. (EC/GC/01/18).
    6. General Assembly. (18 November 1981). Enlargement of the International Law Commission: amendments to articles 2 and 9 of the Statute of the Commission. (A/RES/36/39,).
    7. General Assembly. (21 November 1947). Resolution 174 (II). Establishment of an lnternational Law Commission
    8. General Assembly. (1979). Resolution 34/61, A/RES/34/61.
    9. General Assembly. (1988). Resolution 43/173, A/RES/43/173.
    10. General Assembly. (2001). Resolution 55/153, A/RES/55/153.
    11. General Assembly. (2004). Resolution 59/41, A/RES/59/41.
    12. General Assembly. (2005). Resolution 60/22, A/RES/60/22.
    13. General Assembly. (2007). Resolution 62/66, A/RES/62/66.
    14. General Assembly. (2007). Resolution 62/149, A/RES/62/149.
    15. General Assembly. (2012). Resolution 67/92, A/RES/67/92.
    16. General Assembly. (2014). Resolution 69/119, A/RES/69/119.
    17. General Assembly. (2017). Resolution 72/117, A/RES/72/117.
    18. General Assembly. (2020). Resolution 75/137, A/RES/75/137.
    19. International Law Commission. (2007). ILC Report, chap. VI, paras. 188–265. (A/62/10). United Nations
    20. International Law Commission. (2007). Second Report on the Expulsion of Aliens. (UN Doc. A/CN.4/573 ). United Nations
    21. International Law Commission. (2007). Third Report on the Expulsion of Aliens. (UN Doc. A/CN.4/581). United Nations
    22. International Law Commission. (2008). Fourth Report on the Expulsion of Aliens. (UN Doc. A/CN.4/594). United Nations
    23. International Law Commission. (2009). Fifth Report on the Expulsion of Aliens. (UN Doc. A/CN.4/611 and Corr.1). United Nations
    24. International Law Commission. (2010). Sixth Report on the Expulsion of Aliens. (UN Doc. A/CN.4/625, Add.1 and Add.2). United Nations
    25. International Law Commission. (2011). Seventh Report on the Expulsion of Aliens. (UN Doc. A/CN.4/642). United Nations
    26. International Law Commission. (2014). Comments and observations received from Governments. (A/CN.4/669).
    27. International Law Commission. (2014). Nineth Report on the Expulsion of Aliens. (UN Doc. A/CN.4/670). United Nations
    28. International Law Commission. (2014). Commentaries to the draft articles on the expulsion of aliens (A/69/10).
    29. UN 6th Committee. (2013). Summary record of the 18th meeting. (A/C.6/67/SR.18).
    30. UN 6th Committee. (2013). Summary record of the 19th meeting. (A/C.6/67/SR.19).
    31. UN 6th Committee. (2013). Summary record of the 20th meeting. (A/C.6/67/SR.20).
    32. UN 6th Committee. (2017). Summary record of the 14th meeting. (A/C.6/72/SR.14).
    33. UN 6th Committee. (2020). Summary record of the 16th meeting. (A/C.6/75/SR.16).
    34. UN Human Rights Committee. (1986). CCPR General Comment No. 15: The Position of Aliens Under the Covenant.
    35. UN Human Rights Committee. (1992). CCPR General Comment No. 20: Article 7 (Prohibition of Torture, or Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment).
    36. UN Human Rights Committee. (1995). Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee: Sweden (A/51/40).
    37. UN Human Rights Committee. (2001). Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee: Syrian Arab Republic (A/56/40).
    38. UN Human Rights Committee. (2004). CCPR General Comment No. 31: The nature of the general legal obligation imposed on States Parties to the Covenant.
    39. Chama L.C. Mubanga-Chipoya, UN. Subcommission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities. (20 June 1988). Analysis of the current trends and developments regarding the right to leave any country including one`s own, and to return to one`s own country, and some other rights or considerations arising therefrom : final report. (E/CN.4/Sub.2/1988/35).
    40. UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), (2007). Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-Refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol.
    41. UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2014). Preventing and Reducing Statelessness: The 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness.
    42. UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2019). Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status and Guidelines on International Protection Under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. (HCR/1P/4/ENG/REV. 4).
    43. UN Secretariat. (2006). Expulsion of aliens, Memorandum prepared by the Secretariat (A/CN.4/565).
    44. UN Secretariat. (2015). Topical summary of the discussion held in the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly during its sixty-ninth session, prepared by the Secretariat. (A/CN.4/678).

    Journal Articles

    1. A. R. Albrecht. (1952). The Taxation of Aliens under International Law. Brit. Y.B. Int`l L., 29, 145.
    2. Mads Andenas. (2011). International Court of Justice, Case Concerning Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo). The International and comparative law quarterly, 60(3), 810.
    3. Ruth L. Cove. (1987). State Responsiblity for Constructive Wrongful Expulsion of Foreign Nationals. Fordham Int`l L.J., 11, 802.
    4. Aoife Duffy. (2008). Expulsion to face torture? Non-refoulement in international law. International Journal of Refugee Law, 20(3), 373-390.
    5. K. C. Kotecha. (1975). The Shortchanged: Uganda Citizenship Laws and How They Were Applied to Its Asian Minority. The International Lawyer, 9(1), 1-29.
    6. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2017). Convention on International Civil Aviation and annex 9.
    7. Christine Van den Wyngaert. (1990). Applying the European Convention on Human Rights to Extradition: Opening Pandora`s Box? International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 39(4), 757-779.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法律科際整合研究所
    106652017
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106652017
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201545
    Appears in Collections:[法律科際整合研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    201701.pdf4499KbAdobe PDF2157View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback