Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142080
|
| Title: | 結合遊戲化與角色代入之晨間習慣養成 APP 設計與使用者研究
Integrate Gamification and Avatar Identification into App Design : A Case of Building the Morning Routine |
| Authors: | 何宜臻
He, Yi-Jen |
| Contributors: | 陳聖智
Chen, Sheng-Chih
何宜臻
He, Yi-Jen |
| Keywords: | 晨間習慣
習慣養成
遊戲化
角色代入
以使用者為中心
Morning routine
Habit formation
Gamification
Avatar identification
User-centered design |
| Date: | 2022 |
| Issue Date: | 2022-10-05 09:04:31 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 近年，因新冠肺炎(COVID-19)，遠距工作改變了大眾的生活模式，長時間置身 家中如何保持生產力成為討論話題，其中，晨間習慣及其產生的儀式感持續受到 視 與實踐。因此，本研究擬 出一款協助使用者培養晨間習慣的 APP。
本研究以使用者為中心的設計為主軸，透過文獻與案例分析探討習慣養成、遊戲 化、角色代入與人本設計等相關領域，了解其於干預措施的應用。同時，以晨間習慣 養成為主題進行使用者洞察研究，深度訪談 5 位具有晨間習慣養成經驗的對象，以及 5 位曾經想要培養晨間習慣、沒有晨間習慣養成經驗的對象， 繪晨間習慣養成者的 人物誌輪廓，並了解晨間習慣於不同階段的痛點與需求，依此 出結合 22 項遊戲技 巧與 6 項角色代入設計要點的解決方案，應用於晨間習慣 APP 的原型設計當中。
為了解本研究 APP 的易用性、有用性、有趣性，以及角色功能對於晨間習慣養 成之影響，本研究透過可互動原型和影片原型對 5 位受測者進行測試與評估，測試過 程中，使用放聲思考法、觀察法以及半結構式訪談，最後依據測試結果得出晨間習慣 養成 APP 的優化方向與設計建議:(1)運用柔和的色系，建立適合早晨的視覺風格; (2)運用成就的視覺化標示，促進使用者持續執行晨間習慣;(3)運用角色動態與 互動設計，讓使用者更加專注於執行晨間習慣;(4)運用社群功能，激發使用者不同 的晨間習慣靈感;(5)運用合作功能，增加使用者執行晨間習慣的動力;(6)結合角 色代入， 升使用遊戲化 APP 的內在動機。
總結以上，本研究成果為:(1)發掘晨間習慣養成的痛點與需求，運用以使用者 為中心的設計，建立相應之解決方案;(2)設計結合遊戲化與角色代入之晨間習慣養 成 APP 原型，完成原型測試以了解其易用性及有用性;(3) 出結合遊戲化與角色 代入之晨間習慣養成 APP 的六項設計建議，有助於推動相關 APP 之研究與互動設計。
In recent years, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a global effect on people`s lifestyles. Working from home is becoming the new normal. " How to Improve Productivity When Working Remotely " has become a trending topic. On top of that, people has attached great importance to morning routine, since a good morning routine is linked to less stress and boosted mood and energy throughout the day. Therefore, This study proposes an app to help users build a morning routine.
User-centered design is taken as the main axis of this research. Literature and case study were performed based on habit formation, gamification, avatar identification and human- centered design. Next, to find out the needs and pains, 5 respondents who have experience in building a morning routine and 5 respondents who want to build a morning routine but haven`t formed the habit joined the interviews. After the convergence of the study, 22 game elements and 6 design points of avatar identification were proposed to develop a prototype of app.
In order to understand how the "usefulness", "usability", "enjoyable", and the avatar design of this study app influence morning routine, 5 respondents joined the evaluation of the interactive prototype and video prototype. The testing methods including thinking aloud, observation and semi-structured interview were used: (1) Using soft colors to establish a visual style suitable for morning; (2) Using visual markers of achievement to promote users` continuous implementation of morning routines; (3) Using character dynamics and interactive design to make users more focused on implementing morning routines; (4) Using community functions to inspire users` different morning routines; (5) Using cooperation functions to increase users` motivation to implement morning routines; (6) Combine with avatar identification to enhance the internal motivation of using the gamification app.
To sum up, the results of this study are as follows: (1) Identify the pain points while
building a morning routine. Offer solutions by adopting user-centered design. (2) Integrate gamification and avatar Identification into app design. The attributes, "usefulness", "usability", and "enjoyable", had received good results in the user evaluation.. (3) Provides six design points of habit forming app, which will help promote the research and interactive design of the app. |
| Reference: | 中文部分
1. Duolingo, Inc.（2011）。 Duolingo 多鄰國。取自 https://reurl.cc/ZA64yW
2. Fourdesire 四合願（2014）。Walkr。取自https://reurl.cc/mG4ZmM
3. Fourdesire 四合願（2017）。記帳城市。取自https://reurl.cc/3jp3ql
4. Fourdesire 四合願（2018）。Plant Nanny 植物保姆。取自https://reurl.cc/3jp3lj
5. HabitRPG, Inc.（2022）。Habitica。取自https://habitica.com/static/home
6. SeekrTech 時刻科技（2022）。Forest 專注森林。取自https://www.forestAPP.cc/
7. SeekrTech 時刻科技（2022）。SleepTown 睡眠小鎮。取自https://reurl.cc/g0pQK7
8. Y–1（2020）。forest專注森林產品分析報告。取自https://reurl.cc/q5lGNn
9. 內政部（2022）。重要性別統計資料庫。取自https://reurl.cc/6Z6KZr
10. 方裕民（2003）。人與物的對話—互動介面設計理論與實務。臺北市：田園城市文化。
11. 王鼎鈞（譯）（2017）。遊戲化實戰全書（原作者：周郁凱）。臺北市：城邦文化出版（原著出版年：2015）。
12. 王薌君（譯）（2020）。原型設計：善用原型設計和使用者測試創造成功產品。（原作者：McElroy, K.）。臺北市：碁峰資訊股份有限公司（原著出版年：2016）。
13. 成玲（譯）（2008）。100天變成晨型人的方法（原作者：稅所弘）。臺北市：大塊文化（原著出版年：2008）。
14. 成玲（譯）（2009）。晨型人的新生活實踐術（原作者：稅所弘）。臺北市 : 商周出版（原著出版年：2008）。
15. 江卷靜（2017）。探討持續使用「運動Gamification APP」的因素關係。國立中正大學企業管理系研究所未出版碩士論文。
16. 江啟先、耿慶瑞、鄭弘毅（2014）。探討虛擬代言人, 自我指涉訊息, 與產品連結對消費者態度之影響-平衡理論觀點。管理與系統，21(4)，667-687。
17. 何謙（2021）。通用玩家—角色互動對數位遊戲享樂感與欣賞評價之影響——以社交模擬遊戲《動物森友會》為例。國立政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程未出版碩士論文。
18. 吳佳欣（譯）（2019）。這就是服務設計！｜服務設計工作者的實踐指南（原作者：Stickdorn, M., Hormess, M., Lawrence, A., & Schneider, J.）。臺北市：碁峰資訊（原著出版年：2018）。
19. 吳岱芸（2015）。從遊戲到遊戲化：行銷溝通遊戲化理論初探。新聞學研究，(124)，215-251。
20. 吳國慶（譯）（2013）。人本X互動設計（原作者：Pratt, A., & Nunes, J.）。新北市：松崗（原著出版年：2012）。
21. 宋禹璇（2016）。以科技接受模型探討運動APP遊戲化元素對使用者行為的影響：以Nike+Running為例。國立臺中科技大學多媒體設計系碩士班未出版碩士論文。
22. 林希中（2014）。從遊戲化觀點探討生產力APP對學業拖延的改善成效。國立臺北科技大學創新設計研究所未出版碩士論文。
23. 林庭寬（2019）。遊戲化設計、成人英語學習焦慮、學習動機與學習成效關係之研究。國立高雄大學亞太工商管理學系碩士班未出版碩士論文。
24. 韋杰岱（譯）（2021）。思考整理學（原作者：外山滋比古）。臺北市：究竟（原著出版年：2021）。
25. 連宜萍（譯）（2013）。遊戲化的時代：從思考.設計到行銷,都要玩遊戲! = Gamification（原作者：井上明人）。臺北市：時報。（原著出版年：2012）。
26. 郭庭瑄（譯）（2019）。 起床後的黃金1小時（原作者：Benjamin Spall & Michael Xander）。臺北市：臉譜出版（原著出版年：2018）。
27. 陳宜秀（譯）（2014）。設計的心理學：人性化的產品設計如何改變世界（原作者：Norman, Donald A.）。臺北市：遠流（原著出版年：2013）。
28. 陳冠宏（2021）。Side Project 專注旅人產品設計日記#1。取自https://reurl.cc/DyVqbO
29. 陳建雄（譯）（2009）。互動設計：跨越人—電腦互動。（原作者：Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H.）。臺北縣：全華（原著出版年：2003）。
30. 陳炫碩、張耿郡、詹智超 (2017)。行動應用程式的持續使用行為之研究。商管科技季刊，18(3)，315-348。
31. 陳純德（2021）。漫談 NFT 與 VTuber: 數位發展新趨勢。臺灣經濟研究月刊，44(8)，8-106。
32. 楊仁和（譯）（2016）。使用者故事對照（原作者：Patton, J.）。臺北市：碁峰資訊。（原著出版年：2014）
33. 葉思義、宋昀璐（2004）。數位遊戲設計：遊戲設計知識全領域。臺北市：碁峰資訊。
34. 詹慕如、劉軒妤（譯）（2018）。使用者體驗願景設計：仔細觀察使用者，企劃出愉快的使用經驗（原作者：山崎和彥、上田義弘、郷健太郎、高橋克実、早川誠二、柳田宏治）。臺北市：財團法人中衛發展中心（原著出版年：2012）。
35. 劉津、李月（2015）。別做天兵設計！傾聽、思考、表達，滿足使用者體驗的0盲點設計關鍵。臺北市：電腦人文化。
36. 劉嘉雯、游功揚、呂汶蓁、陳富美（2021）。品牌關係品質對口碑宣傳意願的影響：虛擬代言人特性的角色。管理資訊計算，10，155-164。
37. 蔡世偉（譯）（2019）。原子習慣：細微改變帶來巨大成就的實證法則（原作者：Clear, J.）臺北市：方智（原著出版年：2018）。
38. 衡書鵬、周宗奎、孫麗君（2017）。視頻遊戲中的化身認同。心理科學進展，25(9)，1565-1578。
39. 賴郁婷（譯）（2015）。健康活力到100歲的關鍵就在「早晨」（原作者：白澤卓二）。臺北市：春天出版社（原著出版年：2012）。
40. 蘇蘅（2019）。傳播研究方法新論。臺北市：雙葉書廊。
英文部分
1. Baccon, L. A., Chiarovano, E., & MacDougall, H. G. (2019). Virtual reality for teletherapy: Avatars may combine the benefits of face-to-face communication with the anonymity of online text-based communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(2), 158-165.
2. Beck, A. L., Chitalia, S. & Rai, V. (2019). Not so gameful: A critical review of gamification in mobile energy applications. Energy Research & Social Science, 51, 32-39.
3. Berger, A., Schlager, T., Sprott, D. E., & Herrmann, A. (2018). Gamified interactions: Whether, when, and how games facilitate self-brand connections. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(4), 652-673.
4. Birk, M. V., Atkins, C., Bowey, J. T., & Mandryk, R. L. (2016). Fostering Intrinsic Motivation through Avatar Identification in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 chi conference on human factors in computing systems - chi ’16, 55, 2982-2995.
5. Carden, L., & Wood, W. (2018). Habit formation and change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 20, 117-122.
6. Chatbot App to promote stair-climbing habits among office workers: Exploratory randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(5), 1-10.
7. Chen, V. H. H., & Koek, W. J. D. (2020, September). Understanding flow, identification with game characters and players’ attitudes. In International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 1-4).
8. Chen, Y. (2015). Exploring Design Guidelines of Using User-Centered Design in Gamification Development: A Delphi Study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(13), 1170-1181.
9. Clarke, G., Kehoe, J., & O`Broin, D. (2017, October). The Effects of Gamification on the Formation of a Habit of Studying in Tertiary Level Students. In European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 871-880). Academic Conferences International Limited.
10. Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 245-264.
11. Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D., & Noessel, C. (2014). About face: the essentials of interaction design. John Wiley & Sons.
12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.
13. Design council. (2009). What is the framework for innovation? Design Council`s evolved Double Diamond. Retrieved from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond
14. Deterding, S. (2011, May). Situated motivational affordances of game elements: A conceptual model. In Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts, a workshop at CHI (Vol. 10, No. 1979742.1979575).
15. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9-15). ACM.
16. Douglas, B. D., & Brauer, M. (2021). Gamification to prevent climate change: A review of games and apps for sustainability. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 89-94.
17. Gardner, B., & Lally, P. (2018). Modeling habit formation and its determinants. In B. Verplanken (Ed.), The Psychology of Habit, pp. 207-229. New York, NY: Springer.
18. Gardner, B., & Rebar, A. L. (2019). Habit formation and behavior change. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.
19. Groening, C., & Binnewies, C. (2019). “Achievement unlocked!”-The impact of digital achievements as a gamification element on motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 151-166.
20. Guo, F. (2012). More than usability: The four elements of user experience. Available at https://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2012/04/more-than-usability-the-four-elements-of-user-experience-part-i.php.
21. Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The Thing and I: Understanding the relationship between the user and the product. Blythe, MA, Monk, AF, Overbeeke, K. & Wright, P.(eds) Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. In: Kluwer Academic Publishers Netherlands.
22. Hosseini, C., Humlung, O., Fagerstrom, A., & Haddara, M. (2022). An experimental study on the effects of gamification on task performance. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 999-1006.
23. Howland, G. (1998). Game Design: The Essence of Computer Games. Available at http://www.cpp-home.com/tutorials/198_1.htm.
24. Hsu, C. L., & Chen, M. C. (2018). How does gamification improve user experience? An empirical investigation on the antecedents and consequences of user experience and its mediating role. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 118-129.
25. Hsu, C.L., Chen, Y.C., Yang, T.N., & Lin, W.K. (2017). Do website features matter in an online gamification context? Focusing on the mediating roles of user experience and atti- tude. Telematics Inform, 34 (4), 196-205.
26. ISO 9241-210. (2010). Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. International Standardization Organization (ISO). Switzerland.
27. Iurchenko, A. (2017). An Exploratory Study of Health Habit Formation Through Gamification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.04418.
28. James, W. (1890). The consciousness of self. In W. James, The Principles of Psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 291–401). Henry Holt and Co.
29. Jarig Duval. (2020). Morning Routine Checklist. Available at https://reurl.cc/j1n9DD.
30. Jim Kwik. (2017). My Morning Routine. Available at https://www.jimkwik.com/podcast/kwik-brain-016-my-morning-routine-how-to-jumpstart-your-brain-day.
31. Johnson, D., Deterding, S., Kuhn, K. A., Staneva, A., Stoyanov, S., & Hides, L. (2016). Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet Interventions, 6, 89-106.
32. Kao, D., & Harrell, D. F. (2018, April). The effects of badges and avatar identification on play and making in educational games. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-19).
33. Karra, S., Karampa, V., & Paraskeva, F. (2019, April). Gamification design framework based on self determination theory for adult motivation. In International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud (pp. 67-78). Springer, Cham.
34. Kashive, N., Khanna, V. T., Kashive, K., & Barve, A. (2022). Gamifying employer branding: Attracting critical talent in crisis situations like COVID-19. Journal of Promotion Management, 28(4), 487-514.
35. Kasilingam, D. L. (2020). Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping. Technology in Society, 62, 101280.
36. Klimmt, C., Hefner, D., & Vorderer, P. (2009). The Video Game Experience as "True" Identification: A Theory of Enjoyable Alterations of Players` Self-Perception. Communication Theory, 19(4), 351-373.
37. Lally, P., & Gardner, B. (2011). Promoting habit formation. Health Psychology Review. 7(SUPPL1), 137-158.
38. Lally, P., van Jaarsveld, C. H. M., Potts, H. W. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 998-1009.
39. Lally, P., Wardle, J., & Gardner, B. (2011). Experiences of habit formation: A qualitative study. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 16 , 484-489 .
40. Lazzaro, N. (2004). Why We Play Games: Four Keys to More Emotion Without Story. In Game Developers Conference. San Jose, USA.
41. Lewis, M. L., Weber, R.,& Bowman, N. D. (2008). “They may be Pixels, but they`re MY Pixels”: Developing a metric of character attachment in role-playing video games. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11, 515-518.
42. Lieberoth, A., Holm Jensen, N., & Bredahl, T. (2018). Selective Psychological Effects of Nudging, Gamification and Rational Information in Converting Commuters from Cars to Buses: A Controlled Field Experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55, 246-261.
43. Liudmila, B. (2020). Designing identity in VTuber era. In Proceedings of Laval Virtual VRIC ConVRgence, pp. 182–184. https://doi.org/10.20870/IJVR.2020...3316
44. Livingstone, S. M. (1998). Making sense of television: The psychology of audience interpretation. New York: Routledge.
45. Louro, M.J., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007). Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 174-193.
46. Manami Sasaki. (2020). Instagram post. Available at https://www.instagram.com/sasamana1204/.
47. McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin Books, New York, NY.
48. Michie, S., Abraham, C., Whittington, C., McAteer, J., & Gupta, S. (2009). Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: A meta-regression. Health Psychology, 28, 690-701.
49. Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
50. Morganti, L., Pallavicini, F., Cadel, E., Candelieri, A., Archetti, F., & Mantovani, F. (2017). Gaming for Earth: Serious games and gamification to engage consumers in pro-environmental behaviours for energy efficiency. Energy Research and Social Science, 29(April), 95-102.
51. Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences, and cultural studies. London: Routledge.
52. Nielsen Norman Group (2000). Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/
53. Nielsen, J. (1993) Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Inc., Harcourt Brace & Company, San Diego, USA.
54. Nielsen, J. (1994, April). Usability inspection methods. In Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 413-414).
55. Nielsen, J. (2000, March 19). Why you only need to test with five users. Available at http://www.useit. com/alertbox/20000319.html
56. Oatley, K. (1994). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23, 53-74.
57. Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior, Psychol. Bull, 124(1), 54-74.
58. Pablo S. (2021). Open Peeps, Hand-Drawn Illustration Library. Available at https://www.openpeeps.com/
59. Pek, S. E., & Koh, J. H. L. (2021). Learning to design through character identification using a gamification learning app: Effects of learning quests on students’ design behaviours and performance. Available at https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-161272/v1
60. Pek, S. E., & Koh, J. H. L. (2021). Team formation using character-based gamification: Effects on online teamwork experience during COVID-19. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE). 247-252. IEEE.
61. Piao, M., Ryu, H., Lee, H., & Kim, J. (2020). Use of the healthy lifestyle coaching chatbot app to promote stair-climbing habits among office workers: exploratory randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(5), e15085.
62. Plain, C. (2007). Build an affinity for KJ method. Quality Progress, 40(3), 88.
63. Poncin, I., Garnier, M., Mimoun, M.S.B., & Leclercq, T. (2017). Smart technologies and shopping experience: are gamification interfaces effective? The case of the Smartstore. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang, 24, 320-331.
64. Renfree, IM., Harrison, D., Marshall, P., Stawarz, K., & Cox, A. (2016). Don’t kick the habit: The role of dependency in habit formation apps. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 2016, pp. 2932-2939. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
65. Richard M. Ryan, C. Scott Rigby, & Andrew Przybylski. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 344-360.
66. Roto, V. (2007). User experience from product creation perspective, InProc. workshop Towards a UX Manifesto, 1-2.
67. Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371-380.
68. Sarbadhikari SN & Sood JM. Gamification can act as a motivation for nurturing healthy habits. The National Medical Journal of India 31, no. 4 (July-August 2018): 253-254.
69. Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14-31.
70. Simple Habit, Inc. (2017). Simple Habit. Available at https://www.simplehabit.com/.
71. Soutter, A. R. B., & Hitchens, M. (2016). The relationship between character identification and flow state within video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1030-1038.
72. Swacha, J. (2021). State of research on gamification in education: A bibliometric survey. Education Sciences, 11(2), 69-84.
73. Takano, M., & Taka, F. (2022). Fancy avatar identification and behaviors in the virtual world: Preceding avatar customization and succeeding communication. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 6, 100176.
74. Takano, M., & Tsunoda, T. (2019, July). Self-disclosure of bullying experiences and social support in avatar communication: analysis of verbal and nonverbal communications. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13, 473-481.
75. Teng, C. I. (2019). How avatars create identification and loyalty among online gamers: contextualization of self-affirmation theory. Internet Research, 29(6), 1443-1468.
76. Turkay, S., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). The effects of avatar-based customization on player identification. In Gamification: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 247-272). IGI Global.
77. Ubicolor Ltd. (2017). Morning Routine Habit Tracker. Available at https://reurl.cc/Wr20G9.
78. Van Looy, J., Courtois, C., De Vocht, M., & De Marez, L. (2012). Player identification in online games: Validation of a scale for measuring identification in MMOGs. Media Psychology, 15(2), 197-221.
79. Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Jansz, J., Peters, O., & Van Noort, G. (2013). Why girls go pink: Game character identification and game-players’ motivations. Computers in ㄘHuman Behavior, 29(6), 2640-2649.
80. VandenBerghe, J. (2014). Keynote: Engines of Play. CHI Play, 14.
81. Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Digital Press.
82. Wiegman, O., Kuttschreuter, M., & Baarda, B. (1992). A longitudinal study of the effects of television viewing on aggressive and prosocial behaviors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 147-164.
83. Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2009). The habitual consumer. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(4), 579-592.
84. Wood, W., & Rünger, D. (2016). Psychology of Habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 289-314. Available at https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417.
85. Xi, N., & Hamari, J. (2020). Does gamification affect brand engagement and equity? A study in online brand communities. Journal of Business Research, 109, 449-460.
86. Xu, F., Weber, J., & Buhalis, D. (2017). Serious games and gamification of tourism. Tourism Management, 60, 244-256.
87. Yang H, Li D. (2021). Understanding the dark side of gamification health management: a stress perspective. Information Processing and Management, 58(5), 1-19. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
109464017 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109464017 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202201557 |
| Appears in Collections: | [傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 401701.pdf | | 11377Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 67 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
