政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142075

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/142075

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51159366 線上人數 : 912

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/142075

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142075

題名:	共同演出：人機傳播視角下初探人形機器人Pepper Performing Together : A Preliminary Study of Humanoid Robot ‘Pepper’ in the Perspective of Human-Machine Communication
作者:	黃靜妮 Huang, Jing-Ni
貢獻者:	王淑美 Wang, Su-Mei 黃靜妮 Huang, Jing-Ni
關鍵詞:	人機傳播人形機器人高夫曼物質性 Pepper Human-Machine Communication Humanoid Robots Goffman Materiality Pepper
日期:	2022
上傳時間:	2022-10-05 09:03:04 (UTC+8)
摘要:	近幾年人工智慧的發展和應用，推動了人形機器人的發展，讓我們得以在日常生活中與人形機器人近距離接觸。本研究希望能填補在人機傳播視角下，人與人形機器人的研究空白。從高夫曼的戲劇論及媒介物質性的角度切入，以軟銀公司的機器人Pepper為個案研究，通過對科技公司人員的訪談，並且實地觀察人類與Pepper的互動情形主要發現：一，人形機器人之所以能夠與人類互動，是它實現了擬人化的表演，而科技公司扮演重要推手；二，人形機器人執行任務是因果線性的時間順序，人與人的互動卻充滿變動性，過往適用於人際傳播的理論無法完全適用於人機傳播；三，人形機器人的物質性使得人形機器人不僅僅是被人類使用的工具，物質性在一定程度上共構出人與人形機器人的關係。 In recent years, the development and application of Artificial Intelligence has promoted the development of humanoid robots with which we can have close contact in our daily lives. This study aims to bridge the research gap between humans and humanoid robots from the perspective of human-machine communication. The study uses SoftBank`s robot Pepper as a case study from the perspective of Goffman`s theory of dramaturgy and the materiality of the media, and observes the interaction between humans and Pepper in the field through interviews with employees of the technology company. The study finds that, first, the humanoid robot Pepper is able to interact with humans because it performs anthropomorphically and the technology company plays an important role in controlling it; second, the humanoid robot Pepper performs tasks in a linear temporal sequence of cause and effect, while human-human interaction is full of variability and theories previously applied to interpersonal communication cannot be fully applied to human-machine communication; third, the materiality of the humanoid robot Pepper makes the humanoid robot more than a tool used by humans, and materiality shapes the relationship between humans and humanoid robots to some extent.
參考文獻:	中文部分元子、白峰（2020年1月8日）。<波士頓動力機器狗都去新西蘭放養了！網友：不努力連狗都不如>，《搜狐》。取自https://www.sohu.com/a/396685422_473283 林宗輝（2022年1月13日）。<病毒藏不住！BNT疫苗母公司靠AI 火速揪出Omicron>，《財訊》。取自https://www.wealth.com.tw/articles/2cc62d50-8dc0-4388-8748-eb2bd6f94578 林思平（2020）。<人工智慧與媒介理論：基德勒、克拉瑪與亞馬遜 Echo/Alexa>，《新聞學研究》，142: 155-199。林思平（2021）。<人工智慧與人機傳播：傳播的擴充與弔詭>，《資訊社會研究》，41: 93-132。林原民（2017）。《消費者使用機器人Pepper之意願研究》。輔仁大學碩士論文。林悅（2022年3月5日）。<AI智能防疫超給力　智能防疫消毒機器人協助成醫環境清消>，《東森新聞雲》。取自 https://www.ettoday.net/news/20220305/2201779.htm#ixzz7PRPvkO4d 牟怡、許坤（2018）。什麼是人機傳播?——一個新興傳播學領域之國際視域考察. 江淮論壇, (2), 149-154. 松尾豐著、江裕真譯（2016）。《了解人工智慧的第一本書：機器人和人工智慧能否取代人類？》。經濟新潮社。李開復、陳楸帆（2021年7月22日）。<DeepMind推出「蛋白質折疊」軟體AlphaFold，可說是AI在科學領域迄今最偉大的成就>，《關鍵新聞網》。取自https://www.thenewslens.com/article/153765/fullpage 高琳景（2021年7月20日）。<正妹博士「愛上Pepper機器人」！辭工作同居...父母崩潰：無法理解>，《東森新聞雲》。取自https://www.ettoday.net/news/20210720/2035012.htm 高夫曼著、徐江敏譯（1990）。《日常接觸》。華夏出版社。（原著Goffman Erving，Encounters，1961）高夫曼著、黃愛華、馮鋼譯（1989）。《日常生活中的自我呈現》。（原著Goffman Erving，The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life，1959）姚惠茹（2022年6月6日）。<特斯拉機器人 Optimus 將現身？馬斯克預告 AI Day 延至 9 月底>，《科技新報》。取自https://technews.tw/2022/06/06/teslas-fake-robot/ 程茜（2022年3月26日）。<戴森要造人形機器人：擴招千人、投資50億、10年落地>，《智東西》。取自https://www.163.com/dy/article/H8B59C1C051180F7.html 翁千儒（2021年4月21日）。<嬌生資訊長揭露如何靠AI加速疫苗生產效率>，《ITHOME》。取自https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/143953 黃竹（2022年6月15日）。<Google工程師指稱AI機器人有靈魂和情緒，卻遭到停職！專家：無稽之談>，《數位時代》。取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/69970/google-ai-june-14 吳姝叡、張允曦（2022年2月10日）。<自己搭電梯、送餐！　連鎖餐廳、飯店搶用「AI機器人」>，《TVBS新聞網》。取自https://news.tvbs.com.tw/life/1712354 唐主桂（2017年5月28日）。<AlphaGo完敗柯潔開發者：很多棋步我也不懂>，《中時新聞網》。取自https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20170528002653-260412?chdtv 唐士哲（2017）。<作為文化技術的媒介：基德勒的媒介理論初探>。《傳播研究與實踐》，第 7 卷第 2 期，頁 5-32。徐鵬遠（2013年11月10日）。<18世紀錶匠發明「機器人」可簡單「編程」>，《鳳凰網》。取自https://culture.ifeng.com/8/detail_2013_11/10/31118272_0.shtml 張珂（2017年11月29日）。<數百年的兇猛進化：不可不知的歷史上9種武裝機器人〉，《新浪網》。取自http://k.sina.cn/article_2198234215_8306646702200295z.html?from=finance 章戈浩、張磊（2019）。《物是人非與睹物思人：媒體與文化分析的物質性轉向》。《全球傳播學刊》，第12期。楊安琪（2020年12月30日）。<跑酷、翻滾不夠看，波士頓動力機器人熱舞跳出新高度>，《科技新報》。取自https://technews.tw/2020/12/30/boston-dynamics-robots-can-now-dance-better-than-before/ 蔡娪嫣（2021年8月21日）。<特斯拉「AI人型機器人」可能2022年問世！馬斯克稱不怕它造反，人類能輕鬆壓制>，《科技新報》。取自https://www.storm.mg/article/3895222?page=1 蔡潔儀（2022年1月18日）。<不怕打針了！　上海推「無針疫苗機器人」採高壓水柱注>，《東森新聞雲》。取自https://www.ettoday.net/news/20220118/2172056.htm#ixzz7PRO4UsyK 陳詩童（2019年3月18日）。<日寺廟推AI觀音傳道、為眾生解惑>，《公視新聞網》。取自https://news.pts.org.tw/article/425868 孫周興譯（2005）。《演講與論文集》。北京：三聯書店。陳怡安（2021年2月7日）。<美機器狗升級再進化引網驚嘆細思卻毛骨悚然>，《中時新聞網》。取自https://www.chinatimes.com/hottopic/20210207004141-260809?chdtv 葉李華（2018年6月30日）。<千年前的科幻小說？《列子》的機器人故事──談科論幻話創意>，《泛科學》。取自https://pansci.asia/archives/142452 楊谷洋（2020年7月15日）。<在陪伴、照護後，機器人真有可能成為我們的家人嗎？>，《數位時代》。取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/58483/robot-real-family 楊谷洋（2021）。《羅伯特玩真的？AI機器人時代的夢想進行式》。國立陽明交通大學出版社。楊中文（2021年1月11日）。<網民「調教」韓國美女AI機械成為「性奴」逾3萬人呼籲停止營運>，《香港01即時國際》。取自https://www.hk01.com/即時國際/572628/南韓美女ai機械人被網民調教變-性奴-逾3萬人呼籲停止營運 BBC中文網（2021年12月29日）。<亞馬遜Alexa叫10歲女孩拿銅板觸碰通電插頭>，《BBC中文網》。取自https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/science-59819735 楊又肇（2021年6月29日）。<Softbank標榜能讀懂人心的機器人Pepper已被列為停產>，《mashdigi》。取自https://mashdigi.com/softbank-has-stopped-producing-its-robotic-pepper/ 孫培元（2022）。《基於 RNN 手勢辨識之 Pepper Robot 視力檢測系統》。國立高雄科技大學碩士論文。謝薇棻（2014）。《透過Kinect驅動動畫增進Pepper機器人與使用者的親近度》。暨南國際大學碩士論文。劉玉潔（2021）。《應用消費價值理論與科技接受模式探討機器人使用意願-以Pepper機器人為例》。東吳大學碩士論文。張雅甄（2017）。《使用者對Pepper機器人的服務創新與滿意度暨持續使用意圖之研究—以服務公平性為干擾變項》。朝陽科技大學碩士論文。張朝欽（2022年4年12日）。<德URG收購Pepper機器人開發商 Q2完成交易>，《中時新聞網》。取自https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20220412003806-260410?chdtv 蕭君暉（2021年1月30日）。<鴻海代工日本軟銀Pepper機器人傳停產>，《聯合新聞網》。取自https://udn.com/news/story/7240/5566894 英文部分 Aaltonen, I., Arvola, A., Heikkilä, P., & Lammi, H. (2017, March). Hello Pepper, may I tickle you? Children`s and adults` responses to an entertainment robot at a shopping mall. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 53-54). Armitage, J. (2006). From Discourse Networks to Cultural Mathematics: An Interview with Friedrich A. Kittler. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069880 Bechade, L., Dubuisson-Duplessis, G., Pittaro, G., Garcia, M., & Devillers, L. (2019). Towards metrics of evaluation of pepper robot as a social companion for the elderly. In Advanced social interaction with agents (pp. 89-101). Springer, Cham. Bevan, C., & Stanton Fraser, D. (2015, March). Shaking hands and cooperation in tele-present human-robot negotiation. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 247-254). Bryant, L. R. (2011). The democracy of objects. Open Humanities Press. Bruno, B., Chong, N. Y., Kamide, H., Kanoria, S., Lee, J., Lim, Y., ... & Sgorbissa, A. (2017). Paving the way for culturally competent robots: A position paper. In 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 553-560). IEEE. Bullock, K. (2018). (Re) presenting ‘order’online: the construction of police presentational strategies on social media. Policing and society, 28(3), 345-359. Chang C.W., Lee, J.H. Chao, P.Y. Wang,C.Y. and Chen G.D. (2010)."Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school", Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 13-24. Chandrasekaran, B., & Conrad, J. M. (2015, April). Human-robot collaboration: A survey. In SoutheastCon 2015 (pp. 1-8). IEEE. Coole, D. H., & Frost, S. (Eds.) (2010). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392996 Westerman, D., Edwards, A. P., Edwards, C., Luo, Z., & Spence, P. R. (2020). I-It, I-Thou, I-Robot: The perceived humanness of AI in human-machine communication. Communication Studies, 71(3), 393-408. Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Westerman, D., & Spence, P. R. (2019). Initial expectations, interactions, and beyond with social robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 308-314. Fang, H. C., Ong, S. K., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2014). A novel augmented reality-based interface for robot path planning. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 8(1), 33-42. Fortunati, L., & Edwards, A. P. (2020). Opening space for theoretical, methodological, and empirical issues in human-machine communication. Human-Machine Communication, 1(1), 1. Geoghegan, B. D. (2013). After Kittler: On the cultural techniques of recent German media theory. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(6), 66-82. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2012). Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125(1), 125-130. Gunkel, D. J. (2012). Communication and artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges for the 21st century. communication+ 1, 1(1), 1-25. Guzman, A. L. (2016). The messages of mute machines: Human-Machine Communication with industrial technologies. Communication, 5(1), 1. Guzman, A. L. (2017). Making AI safe for humans: A conversation with Siri. In R. W. Gehl & M. Bakardjieva (Eds.), Socialbots and their friends: Digital media and the automation of sociality. New York, NY: Routledge. Guzman, A. L. (2018). What is human-machine communication, anyway. Human-machine communication: Rethinking communication, technology, and ourselves, 1-28. Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human–Machine Communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22(1),70-86. Guzman,.A.L. (2020) .Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human– Machine Communication research agenda. new media & society, Vol. 22(1) 70–86. Goodrich, M. A., & Schultz, A. C. (2008). Human–robot interaction: a survey. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 1(3), 203-275. Harman, G. (2002). Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. US: Open Court. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1952, 1954, 1962) Hollenbaugh, E. E. (2021). Self-presentation in social media: Review and research opportunities. Review of Communication Research, 9, 80-98. Hentout, A., Aouache, M., Maoudj, A., & Akli, I. (2019). Human–robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: a literature review of the decade 2008–2017. Advanced Robotics, 33(15-16), 764-799. Iosa, M., Morone, G., Cherubini, A., & Paolucci, S. (2016). The three laws of neurorobotics: a review on what neurorehabilitation robots should do for patients and clinicians. Journal of medical and biological engineering, 36(1), 1-11. Johanson, D. L., Ahn, H. S., MacDonald, B. A., Ahn, B. K., Lim, J., Hwang, E., ... & Broadbent, E. (2019). The effect of robot attentional behaviors on user perceptions and behaviors in a simulated health care interaction: randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(10), e13667. Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15-25. Kajita, S., Hirukawa, H., Harada, K., & Yokoi, K. (2014). Introduction to humanoid robotics (Vol. 101, p. 2014). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Kittler, F. A. (1999). Gramophone, film, typewriter (G. Winthrop-Young & M. Wutz, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1986) Kittler, F. A. (1990). Discourse networks, 1800/1900 (M. Metteer & C. Cullens, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1985) . Kittler, F. (2009). Towards an Ontology of Media. Human Geography, 26(2–3), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861300600109 Kim, K., Kang, M., Choi, Y., Jang, H., Han, J., & Han, C. (2012). Development of the exoskeleton knee rehabilitation robot using the linear actuator. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13(10), 1889-1895. Krämer, S. & Bredekamp, H. (2013). Culture, technology, cultural techniques—Moving beyond text. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(6), 30-47. Li, M., Milojević, A., & Handroos, H. (2020). Robotics in Manufacturing—The Past and the Present. In Technical, Economic and Societal Effects of Manufacturing 4.0 (pp. 85-95). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Lee, K. M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, S. R. (2006). Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people`s loneliness in human-robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(10), 962–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.002 Lynch, K. M., & Park, F. C. (2017). Modern robotics. Cambridge University Press. Siegert, B. (2020). Attached: The object and the collective. In, J. Dünne, K. Fehringer, K. Kuhn, & W. Struck (Eds.), Cultural Techniques: Assembling Spaces, Texts & Collectives (pp. 131-140). Walter de Gruyter. Makady, H., & Liu, F. (2022). The Status of Human-Machine Communication Research: A Decade of Publication Trends Across Top-Ranking Journals. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 83-103). Springer, Cham.Mason, W., Vaughan, J. W., & Wallach, H. (2014). Computational social science and social computing. Machine Learning, 95(3), 257-260. Mayor, A. (2018). Gods and robots. In Gods and Robots. Princeton University Press. Marsh, A. (2018, Sep 28). Elektro the Moto-Man Had the Biggest Brain at the 1939 World’s Fair. Retrieved from https://spectrum.ieee.org/elektro-the-motoman-had-the-biggest-brain-at-the-1939-worlds-fair McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (2006). A proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, august 31, 1955. AI magazine, 27(4), 12-12. McDowell, Z. J., & Gunkel, D. J. (2016). Introduction to" Machine Communication". communication+ 1, 5(1), 1-5. Mou, Y., & Xu, K. (2017). The media inequality: Comparing the initial human-human and human-AI social interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 432-440. Mori, M., MacDorman, K. F., & Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & automation magazine, 19(2), 98-100. Muggleton, S. (2014). Alan Turing and the development of Artificial Intelligence. AI communications, 27(1), 3-10. Natale, S., & Guzman, A. L. (2022). Reclaiming the human in machine cultures: Introduction. Media, Culture & Society, 44(4), 627-637. Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. (1994, April). Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 72-78). Nass, M. (2000). Nass C., Moon Y. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers, Journal of Social, (56), 1. Ongsulee, P. (2017). Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning. 2017 15th International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering (ICT&KE), 1-6. Pandey, A. K., & Gelin, R. (2018). A mass-produced sociable humanoid robot: Pepper: The first machine of its kind. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 25(3), 40-48. Pollmann, K., Ruff, C., Vetter, K., & Zimmermann, G. (2020, March). Robot vs. voice assistant: Is playing with pepper more fun than playing with alexa?. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction(pp. 395-397). Ramuzat, N., Forget, F., Bonnet, V., Gautier, M., Boria, S., & Stasse, O. (2020, May). Actuator model, identification and differential dynamic programming for a talos humanoid robot. In 2020 European Control Conference (ECC) (pp. 724-730). IEEE. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge, UK, 10, 236605. Rowlands, M. (2005). A materialist approach to materiality. Materiality, 72-87. Rossi, A., Holthaus, P., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K. L., & Walters, M. L. (2018, December). Getting to know Pepper: Effects of people`s awareness of a robot`s capabilities on their trust in the robot. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human-agent interaction (pp. 246-252). Sato, M., Yasuhara, Y., Osaka, K., Ito, H., Dino, M. J. S., Ong, I. L., ... & Tanioka, T. (2020). Rehabilitation care with Pepper humanoid robot: A qualitative case study of older patients with schizophrenia and/or dementia in Japan. Enfermeria clinica, 30, 32-36. Siegel, M., Breazeal, C., & Norton, M. I. (2009, October). Persuasive robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior. In 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 2563-2568). IEEE. Schmidtler, J., Knott, V., Hölzel, C., & Bengler, K. (2015). Human centered assistance applications for the working environment of the future. Occupational Ergonomics, 12(3), 83-95. Spence, P. R. (2019). Searching for questions, original thoughts, or advancing theory: Human-machine communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 285-287. Saeedvand, S., Jafari, M., Aghdasi, H. S., & Baltes, J. (2019). A comprehensive survey on humanoid robot development. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 34. Tay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T. (2014). When stereotypes meet robots: the double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human–robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 75-84. Tuomi, A., Tussyadiah, I. P., & Hanna, P. (2021). Spicing up hospitality service encounters: the case of Pepper™. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(11), 3906-3925. Trysnes, I., & Synnes, R. M. (2022). The role of religion in young Muslims’ and Christians’ self-presentation on social media. YOUNG, 30(3), 281-296. Uddin, S., Khan, A., Hossain, M. E., & Moni, M. A. (2019). Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 19(1), 1-16. Xu, K., & Lombard, M. (2016). Media are social actors: expanding the CASA paradigm in the 21st Century. In Annual conference of the international communication association (pp. 1-47). Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M. (2011). Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int. Dec;108(11):1708-13; discussion 1714. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10576.x. Epub 2011 Sep 27. PMID: 21951677.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程 107464070
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107464070
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202201645
顯示於類別:	[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
407001.pdf		12263Kb	Adobe PDF2	215	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋