English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51715825      Online Users : 611
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/14181


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/14181


    Title: 民刑分立之後--民初大理院民事審判法源問題再探
    Authors: 黃源盛
    Huang, Yuan-Sheng
    Date: 2007-09
    Issue Date: 2008-12-12 14:27:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 傳統中國舊制的法典編纂體例，究竟是「民刑不分」？抑或「民刑有分」？還是「不分之中又有分」？是個相當富爭議性的課題。本文，首先談及晚清中國法制如何從「民刑混沌」衍化到「民刑分立」；接著，側重在論述民國初年（一九一二～一九二八）的大理院，於當時民刑分立體制仍屬新建以及民事法典尚未齊備等條件下，如何進一步透過對於《大清現行刑律》等相關民事規定、習慣法乃至於條理的運用，以作為民事審判的法源依據。此外，特別從當代法學方法以及英美判例法體系比較等觀點，檢討大理院判例的性質。最後得出大理院判例不僅帶有「條理」的法源性質，更具有「裁判的準立法機能」，可以提供「創新規範、闡釋法律及漏洞補充」等作用。
    The compilation style of the traditional Chinese code of laws is a quite controversial issue. One could pose the questions:    “Was it divided between civil law and criminal law or not”? “Even though civil law and criminal law were not formally divided, were they not divided in many aspects”? First, this article refers to how    the old law system was transformed into new ones in the late Qing Dynasty. The old Qing Code (Da Qing L u Li) was not divided into civil law and criminal law. The new Qing Code contained a penal code (Da Qing Xin Xing Lu) and a civil code (Da Qing Min Lu). Secondly, this article describes how the Supreme Court (Dali Yuan) referred to and made use of the civil regulations, customs, and methods of the old Qing Code (Da Qing Xian Xing Xing Lu) as the legal source of civil cases in the early Republican period (1912-1927). At that time, the Chinese Government had not yet enacted a new civil code. President Yuan Shihkai (1859-1916) permitted the use of the old Qing Code for most legal cases. Thirdly, we review the legal decisions of the Dali Yuan in terms of the legal methods of the time, and compare it with the case law system. Finally, we arrive at the conclusion that the legal decisions of the Dali Yuan were important in creating new norms in interpreting and in filling the gaps in the existing law code.
    Relation: 政大法學評論,98,1-159
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2972View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback