Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141765
|
| Title: | 貪腐程度與企業避稅之關聯性；商業策略的調節效果
The Association between Corruption and Tax Avoidance；the Interaction Effect of Business Strategy |
| Authors: | 陳筱妮
Chen, Siao-NI |
| Contributors: | 何怡澄
郭振雄
陳筱妮
Chen, Siao-NI |
| Keywords: | 租稅規避
貪腐
商業策略
企業避稅
Tax avoidance
Business strategy
Corruption |
| Date: | 2022 |
| Issue Date: | 2022-09-02 15:31:39 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 企業的租稅規避行為受到企業特徵及所處法律環境的影響。本研究探討租稅規避與貪腐程度及商業策略的關係，並分析商業策略對貪腐程度與租稅規避關聯性的調節效果。
本研究以 1998 年至 2020 年間美國上市公司資料為樣本進行實證分析。以美國司法部網站公布的各州公務員貪腐定罪數據，建立兩個州層級的貪腐指標，衡量州的貪腐程度。並參考 Miles and Snow (1978, 2003) 的策略分類法，將公司分為先驅者、穩健者及分析者三種類型。
本文的實證結果發現，首先，貪腐有兩種衡量指標，第一種貪腐衡量指標為腐敗定罪數量取自然對數，其對公司避稅行為 (帳面有效稅率、五年帳面有效稅率) 造成的影響不顯著，第二種貪腐衡量指標為腐敗定罪數量除以人口數取自然對數，其與公司有效稅率呈正相關，表示貪腐程度越高，公司避稅越少；接著，先驅者公司的避稅程度會高於穩健者，顯示企業的不同策略類型對租稅規避影響存在差異；最後，相對於其他類型商業策略的企業，商業策略為先驅者類型，降低貪腐與現金有效稅率 (現金有效稅率、五年現金有效稅率) 的關聯性。
The tax avoidance behavior of enterprises is affected by the internal factors of the enterprise and the environment in which it is located. This study uses a sample of U.S. company data from 1998 to 2020 for empirical analysis. It discusses the degree of tax avoidance and corruption, as well as the relationship between tax avoidance and business strategy, and finally studies the effect of the adjustment of business strategy on the correlation between corruption and corporate tax avoidance.
Referring to the strategy taxonomy of Miles and Snow (1978, 2003), companies are divided into three types: Prospector、Defender、Analyzer. Then use the state corruption conviction data published on the website of the U.S. Department of Justice as a measure of the state`s corruption level to study the relationship with corporate tax avoidance.
There are two measures of corruption in this paper. The first measure of corruption has no significant impact on corporate tax avoidance. The second measure of corruption is positively correlated with the company’s effective tax rate, indicating that the higher the degree of corruption, the less the tax avoidance is. Then, empirical results show that, due to the differences in consideration factors caused by different strategies, prospectors are more likely to avoid taxes than defenders. Finally, when studying the correlation between corruption and corporate tax avoidance, business strategy is used as a moderator. Since the correlation between corruption and corporate tax avoidance is not significant, the more tax avoidance characteristics of pioneer companies will be affected. |
| Reference: | 參考文獻
Al-Hadi, A., Taylor, G., & Richardson, G. (2022). Are corruption and corporate tax avoidance in the United States related? Review of Accounting Studies, 27(1), 344–389.
Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2014). Enforcement and public corruption: Evidence from the American states. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 30(2), 307-.
Archambeault, W. G., & Elmore, A. E. (1983). Federal prosecution of public officials. American Journal of Police, 3(1), 17–36.
Bame-Aldred, C. W., Cullen, J. B., Martin, K. D., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2013). National culture and firm-level tax evasion. Journal of Business Research, 66(3), 390–396.
Bentley, K. A., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2013). Business Strategy, Financial Reporting Irregularities, and Audit Effort. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2), 780–817.
Brushwood, J., Dhaliwal, D., Fairhurst, D., & Serfling, M. (2016). Property crime, earnings variability, and the cost of capital. Journal of Corporate Finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 40, 142–173.
Cazier, R. A., Rego, S. O., Tian, X. (Shaolee), & Wilson, R. J. (2009). Early Evidence on the Determinants of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 1578485). Social Science Research Network.
Chen, C. J., Ding, Y., & Kim, C. (2010). High-level politically connected firms, corruption, and analyst forecast accuracy around the world. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1505–1524.
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61.
Cho, H., Choi, S., Lee, W.-J., & Yang, S. (2019). Regional Crime Rates and Corporate Misreporting (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2791512). Social Science Research Network.
Conant, J. S., Mokwa, M. P., & Varadarajan, P. R. (1990). Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures-based study. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5), 365–383.
Dent, J. F. (1990). Strategy, organization and control: Some possibilities for accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1), 3–25.
Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61–82.
Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2010). The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. Accounting Review, 85(4), 1163–1189.
Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2019). When Does Tax Avoidance Result in Tax Uncertainty? Accounting Review, 94(2), 179–203.
Guenther, D. A., Matsunaga, S. R., & Williams, B. M. (2017). Is Tax avoidance related to firm risk? Accounting Review, 92(1), 115–136.
Gupta, S., & Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(1), 1–34.
Hambrick, D. C. (1983). Some Tests of the Effectiveness and Functional Attributes of Miles and Snow’s Strategic Types. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 5–26.
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 50(2), 127–178.
Hanlon, M., & Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1), 126–141.
Higgins, D., Omer, T. C., & Phillips, J. D. (2013). The influence of a firm’s business strategy on its tax aggressiveness (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 1727592). Social Science Research Network.
Hsu, P.-H., Moore, J. A., & Neubaum, D. O. (2018). Tax avoidance, financial experts on the audit committee, and business strategy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 45(9–10), 1293–1321.
Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Rajan, M. V. (1997). The Choice of Performance Measures in Annual Bonus Contracts. The Accounting Review, 72(2), 231–255.
Langfield-Smith, K. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: A critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 207–232.
Lisowsky, P. (2010). Seeking shelter: Empirically modeling tax shelters using financial statement information. The Accounting Review, 85(5), 1693–1720.
Liu, C., & Mikesell, J. L. (2019). Corruption and tax structure in American states. American Review of Public Administration, 49(5), 585–600.
Liu, X. (2016). Corruption culture and corporate misconduct. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(2), 307–327.
Lopo Martinez, A., & Ferreira, B. A. (2019). Business strategy and tax aggressiveness in Brazil. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(4), 522–535.
Maass, A. (1987). Public policy by prosecution. The Public Interest, 89(89), 107–107.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science (Providence, R.I.), 2(1), 71–87.
McGuire, S. T., Omer, T. C., & Wang, D. (2012). Tax Avoidance: Does Tax-Specific Industry Expertise Make a Difference? The Accounting Review, 87(3), 975–1003.
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562.
Mills, L., Erickson, M. M., & Maydew, E. L. (1998). Investments in tax planning. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 20(1), 1.
Parsons, C., Sulaeman, J., & Titman, S. (2014, August 14). Peer effects and corporate corruption. The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.
Phillips, J. D. (2003). Corporate tax-planning effectiveness: The role of compensation-based incentives. Accounting Review, 78(3), 847–874.
Porter, M. E. (1983). Cases in competitive strategy / Michael E. Porter. Free Press.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–453.
Segev, E. (1987). Strategy, strategy making, and performance—An empirical investigation. Management Science, 33(2), 258–269.
Seifzadeh, P. (2011). Business strategy and the synergistic combination of exploration and exploitation. University of Western Ontario Working Paper.
Smith, J. D. (2016). US political corruption and firm financial policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 121(2), 350–367.
Snow, C. C., & Hambrick, D. C. (1980). Measuring organizational strategies: some theoretical and methodological problems. The Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 527–538.
Thomas, A. S., Litschert, R. J., & Ramaswamy, K. (1991). The performance impact of strategy - manager coalignment: An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 509–522.
Treacy, M. (1995). The discipline of market leaders: Choose your customers, narrow your focus, dominate your market. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Wenzel, M. (2005). Motivation or rationalisation? Causal relations between ethics, norms and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(4), 491–508.
Wilson, R. J. (2009). An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 969–999. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
109255030 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109255030 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202201429 |
| Appears in Collections: | [財政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 503001.pdf | | 2727Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 76 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
