政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/141717
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51139936      線上人數 : 860
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141717


    題名: 影響臺灣選民投票行為之產業因素分析：以2008、2012以及2016總統選舉為例
    An Analysis of the Industry Factors Affecting the Voting Behavior of Taiwan’s Voters: The Presidential Elections in 2008. 2012 and 2016.
    作者: 張元祥
    Chang, Yuan-Hsiang
    貢獻者: 蔡佳泓
    Tsai, Chia-hung
    張元祥
    Chang, Yuan-Hsiang
    關鍵詞: 投票行為
    系絡
    產業環境
    工業
    服務業
    三角貿易
    Voting behavior
    Context
    Industrial environment
    Industry
    Service industry
    Triangular trade
    日期: 2022
    上傳時間: 2022-09-02 15:21:25 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 影響選民投票行為的因素，一直是政治行為領域研究中的重要課題。除了選民教育程度、政黨支持、年齡、統獨立場，以及對於經濟的回顧與展望等個體影響變數外，近年關心的焦點擴大到選民所處的系絡，主要的原因是「選民並非離群獨居」，會受到其所處環境的影響。本研究即是希望透過分析我國2008、2012以及2016總統選舉，來瞭解選民所處的產業環境，對於選民的投票行為是否會產生影響。
    本研究認為，臺灣是高度依賴進出口貿易的國家，經濟與產業的興衰，也直接影響選民的工作機會與未來發展，另一方面，產業發展有區域的群聚效應，而形成系絡，當國家重大經貿政策發生轉變，也會造成產業群聚的「受益者」與「受害者」，進而影響選民的投票行為。本研究分析選民所處的工業與服務業環境，檢視選民所處的產業環境對於投票行為之影響。
    研究分析結果顯示，當選民所處的產業環境，三角貿易活動越興盛，選民傾向支持反對加速兩岸經貿整合的候選人，服務業活動越興盛，選民傾向投給支持兩岸發展交流的候選人。但是，當兩岸加速交流與整合影響選民對於未來的預期時，選民的態度與投票行為也可能會改變。
    整體而言，選民所處產業特性會影響選民的投票行為，在本研究的實證分析中獲得支持。而利用選民所處的環境來進行選民投票行為的分析研究，必能使投票行為的研究面向更為充實。
    The factors that affect voters` voting behavior has always been a major topic in political science. In addition to the individual influencing variables such as education level, political party support, age, unification field, and economic review and outlook, the focus of attention in recent years has expanded to the context of voters. The main reason is that voters are not isolated and will be affected by the environment, in which they are located, will be affected by the environment in which it is located. The purpose of this study is to analyze the 2008, 2012 and 2016 presidential elections in Taiwan to understand whether the industrial environment of voters has an impact on voters` voting behavior.
    The author argues that Taiwan is a country that is highly dependent on import and export trade. The rise and fall of the economy and industry also directly affects the job opportunities and future development of voters. Changes in major national economic and trade policies will also create "beneficiaries" and "victims" of industrial clusters, which in turn affect voters` voting behavior. This study analyzes the industrial and service environment of voters, and examines the impact of voters` industrial environment on voting behavior.
    This works shows that when voters are in an industrial environment, the more prosperous triangular trade is, the more likely they are to support candidates who oppose accelerating cross-strait economic and trade integration, and the more prosperous the service industry is, the more likely they are to vote for candidates who support cross-strait development and exchanges. However, when the accelerated exchanges and integration across the Taiwan Strait affect voters` expectations for the future, voters` attitudes and voting behavior may also change.
    Overall, the characteristics of the industry in which voters are located will affect the voting behavior of voters, which is supported in the empirical analysis of this study. Introducing automation of analyzing environment of voters and voting behavior can definitely enrich the research of voting behavior more substantial.
    參考文獻: 中文部分：
    于宗先，1995，〈台灣工業空洞化之驗證〉，《自由中國之工業》，84(6):1-11。
    中華經濟研究院（連文榮），2012，〈提高陸客來台對消費與就業的帶動效果〉，《國內外及中國大陸經濟研究及策略規劃》報告。台北：財團法人中華經濟研究院。
    王振寰，1993，《資本，勞工，與國家機器》，台北：唐山出版社，1-53。
    王淑美、溫蓓章，2010，〈開放陸客來臺旅遊經濟效益分析〉，《願景基金會季刊》，11(3):133-176。
    台灣省諮議會，2000，《當前政府產業政策與台灣區域經濟均衡發展之研究》，台中：台灣省諮議會，1-2~137-140。
    朱敬一、康廷嶽，2015，〈經濟轉型中的「社會不公平」〉, 《臺灣經濟預測與政策》，45(2):1-22。
    吳惠林、周添城，1990，〈產業結構轉變與產業空洞化〉, 《自由中國之工業》，748:75-85。
    吳惠林、周添城，1990，〈台灣產業結構轉變與產業空洞化〉，《自由中國之工業》，74(4):11-25。
    吳親恩、林奕孜，2013，〈兩岸經貿開放、認同與投票選擇：2008年與2012年總統選舉的分析〉，《選舉研究》，20(2):1-36。
    何玉麗，1990，〈談產業空洞化防範之道〉，《台灣經濟研究月刊》，13(8):104-107。
    呂鴻德、羅懷家、徐立斐，2011，〈台商大陸投資：策略變遷與轉型趨勢〉，徐斯勤、陳德昇（主編），《台商大陸投資二十年經驗、發展與前瞻》。台北：成陽出版股份有限公司。
    何思因，1993，〈國會、總統的互動對美國貿易政策的影響〉，《政治學報》，1-31。
    林宏宗，2015，〈臺灣階級不平等擴大的原因與後果〉，《臺灣經濟預測與政策》，45(2):45-68。
    林宏宗、胡克威，2011，〈愛恨 ECFA：兩岸貿易與臺灣的階級政治〉，《思與言》，49(3):95-134。
    林武郎，2003，〈台灣產業空洞化問題之再探討〉，《台灣經濟論衡》，1(4):19-41。
    林祖嘉、莊奕琦，2006，〈台灣產業結構變化分析與因應策略：『去工業化與空洞化之剖析〉，《當前台灣經濟面臨之議題論文集》，台北：台灣經濟研究院，1-1~1-67。
    林照雄，1999，《台灣企業對外直接投資與產業空洞化之實證分析》，台北：台北銀行經濟研究室。
    林照雄，2001，〈台灣企業對外直接投資與產業空洞化〉，《銘傳學刊》，11:81-106。
    周應龍，2012，〈台灣南部綠色政治版圖之研究〉，政治大學政治學系博士學位論文。
    周應龍，2021，〈不同社會系絡因素對臺灣選民投票抉擇的影響：以2016年總統選舉為例〉，《選舉研究》，28(1):1-52。
    夏樂生，2006，〈論大陸經貿政策演變及影響－從「戒急用忍」、「積極開放、有效管理」到「積極管理、有效開放」〉，《展望與探索》，4(3): 86-101。
    徐永明，2000，〈“南方政治”的形成？臺灣政黨支持的地域差別：1994-2000〉，《國立中山大學社會科學季刊》，2(4):167-196。
    徐斯勤，2009，〈大陸投資生命週期與管理挑戰〉，徐斯勤、陳德昇（主編），《台商大陸投資名人訪談錄》，台北：成陽出版股份有限公司。
    耿曙、陳陸輝，2003，〈兩岸經貿互動與台灣政治版圖：南北區塊差異推手？〉，《問題與研究》，42(6):1-27。
    黃長玲，2008，〈分裂社會下的體制發展與爭議：台灣與南韓民主化經驗的比較〉，《蕃薯與泡菜：亞洲雙龍台韓經驗比較》，彭慧鸞主編，台北：亞太文化學術交流基金會。
    黃紀，2000，〈實用方法論芻議〉，《政治學報》，31: 107-139。
    黃信豪，2006，〈多層模型於選民投票行為研究的應用：以2004年總統選舉為例〉，《東吳政治學報》，22: 161-204。
    黃健群，2010，〈後ECFA時代　兩岸商機無限〉，《海基會交流雜誌》第122期。
    楊鈞池，2001，〈後冷戰時期日本聯合政府之研究〉，國立臺灣大學政治學系博士學位論文。
    陳玉芳，2014，〈從普查結果探討三角貿易變遷與發展態勢〉，《主計月刊》，702:12-17。
    陳陸輝、耿曙、王德育，2009，〈兩岸關係與2008年臺灣總統大選：認同、利益、威脅與選民投票取向〉，《選舉研究》，16(2):1-22。
    陳陸輝、耿曙、涂萍蘭、黃冠博，2009，〈理性自利或感性認同？影響臺灣民眾兩岸經貿立場因素的分析〉，《東吳政治學報》，27(2):87-125。
    陳陸輝、陳映男、王信賢，2012，〈經濟利益與符號態度：解析臺灣認同的動力〉，《東吳政治學報》，30(3):1-50。
    陳添枝，1988，〈台灣會發生產業空洞化嗎？〉，《中國論壇》，26(5):78-80。
    張永珍，2013，〈三角貿易統計簡析〉，《主計月刊》，685:76-82。
    盛治仁，2000，〈統獨不再對決¬—從2000年總統選舉看台灣社會分歧的興起及影響〉，《理論與政策》，14(2):119-139。
    盛治仁，2007，〈台灣民意對兩岸議題立場之多面向分析〉，東吳大學中國研究計畫期中研討會，5月31日，台北：東吳大學。
    梁榮輝、廖振盛，2004，〈產業西進與產業空洞化〉，《企銀季刊》，27(1):143-153。
    喬中珏、黃芳玫、羅竹平、呂雅茹，2010，〈委外生產與研發投資對台灣薪資結構之影響〉，《台灣經濟論衡》，8(11):27-51。
    董安琪，2014，〈全球化下台灣產業的轉型－空洞化抑或升級？〉，于宗先院士公共政策研討會，5月3日，台北：中央研究院。
    萬美君，2005，〈總統選舉經濟投票選民之研究〉，中正大學政治學系碩士學位論文。
    蔡易如，2000， 〈臺灣之進出口與臺灣接單海外生產對製造業表現的影響－地區別貿易效果之比較〉，《經濟研究》，54(2):243-286。
    蔡宜寧，2010，〈台灣選民經濟投票行為之研究：以四次總統大選為例〉，東吳大學政治學系碩士學位論文。
    蔡增家，2000， 〈國際匯率承諾與貨幣政策自主性：從廣場協議至羅浮宮協議〉，《問題與研究》，39(9):49-72。
    劉國華，2011，〈廣場協議對台灣匯率政策影響的政治經濟分析〉，臺灣大學政治學系碩士學位論文。
    劉錦龍，2007，〈工商及服務業普查資料於市場結構分析之應用〉, 《主計月刊》，615:23-30。
    練有為、鄭素珍，2013，〈陸客對我國貿易與就業之影響〉，《觀光與休閒管理期刊》，1(1):110-123。
    蕭怡靖、黃紀，2010，〈2008年立委選舉候選人票之分析：選民個體與選區總體的多層模型〉，《台灣政治學刊》，14(1):3-53。
    蕭新煌等著，1992，《解剖台灣經濟 : 威權體制下的壟斷與剝削》，台北：前衛出版社，9-11。
    謝寬裕，1999，〈台灣產業外移與產業空洞化之檢驗〉，《台灣經濟金融月刊》，35(8):46-65。
    蘇成田，2004，〈攜手打造觀光新形象 —觀光客倍增計畫〉，《清流》一月號。
    西文部分：
    Anderson, C. J., and J. D. Hecht. 2012. “Voting When the Economy Goes Bad, Everyone Is in Charge, and No One Is to Blame: The Case of the 2009 German Election.” Electoral Studies 31(1): 5-19.
    Bartels, Larry. 2010. “The Study of Electoral Behavior.” The Oxford Handbook of the American Elections and Political Behavior. edited by Leighley, Jan E. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 239-261.
    Bennett, Stephen Earl. 1973. “Consistency Among the Public’s Social Welfare Policy Attitudes in the 1960’s.” American Journal of Political Science 17: 544-570.
    Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Bluestone, B. and Harrison, B. 1982. The Deindustrialization of America:Plant Closings, Community Abandonment and the Dismantling of Basic Industry. New York: Basic Books.
    Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Campbell, Angus, and Robert L. Kahn. 1952. The People Elect a President. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
    Campbell, Angus, Gerald Gurin, and Warren E. Miller. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & Co.
    Chapin, Francis, Stuart. 1912. “Variability of the Popular Vote and Presidential Elections”. American Journal of Sociology 18 (2):222-240.
    Chappell, Henry W., Jr., and Linda Gonçalves Veiga. 2000. “Economics and elections in Western Europe: 1960–1997.” Electoral Studies 19 (2-3):183-197.
    Christensen, Ray. 2006. “An Analysis of the 2005 Japanese General Election: Will Koizumi`s Political Reforms Endure?” Asian Survey 46 (4):497-516.
    Davis, Otto A., Melvin J. Hinich, and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1970. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review 64: 426-428.
    Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
    Dssonncville, Ruth, and Michael S. Lewis-Beck. 2014. “Macroeconomic, Economic Crisis and Electoral Outcomes: A National European Pool.” Acta Politica 49: 372-394.
    Enelow, James M., and Melvin J. Hinich. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Erikson, Robert S., and David W. Romero. 1990. "Candidate Equilibrium and the Behavioral Model of the Vote." American Political Science Review 84: 1103-1126.
    Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Fraile, M., and M. S. Lewis-Beck. 2014. “Economic Vote Instability: Endogeneity or Restricted Variance? Spanish Panel Evidence from 2008 and 2011.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (1): 160-179.
    Goodhart, Charles A. E., and Rajendra J. Bhansali. 1970. “Political Economy.” Political Studies 18: 43-106.
    Hayes, C. Rosa., Masami Imai, and Cameron A. Shelton. 2015. “Attribution Error in Economic Voting: Evidence from Trade Shocks.” Economic Inquiry 53(1): 258-275.
    Holbrook, T. M. 2012. “Incumbency, National Conditions, and the 2012 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45(4): 640-643.
    Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. 1993. “Citizens, Contexts and Politics.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. Ada W. Finifter. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
    Johnson, M., W. Phillips Shively. and R. M. Stein. 2002. “Contextual data and the study of elections and voting behavior: connecting individuals to environments.” Electoral Studies 21 (2): 219-233.
    Johnston, Ron. and Charles Pattie. 2006. Putting Voters in their Place: Geography and Elections in Great Britain. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Jones, Kelvyn, Ronald J. Johnston, and Charles J. Pattie. 1992. “People, Places and Regions: Exploring the Use of Multi-Level Modelling in the Analysis of Electoral Data.” British Journal of Political Science 22(3): 343-380.
    Key, V.O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Kinder, Donald R. and D. Roderick Kiewiet. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23(3): 495-526.
    Kinder, Donald R. and D. Roderick Kiewiet. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: the American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11 (2): 129-161.
    Kuklinski, James H. and Darrell M. West. 1981. “Economic Expectations and Voting Behavior in United States Senate and House Elections.” The American Political Review 75 (2): 436-477.
    Kramer, G. H. 1971. “Short-term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896-1964.” American Political Science Review 65 (1): 131-143.
    Lau, Richard R. and David O. Sears, 1981. “Cognitive Links between Economic Grievances and Political Responses.” Political Behavior 3: 279-302.
    Lazarsfeld, Paul F., B. Berelson and H. Gaudet. 1944. The People Choice: How The Voter Make Up His Mind in Presidential Campaign. New York and London: Columbia University Press.
    Lee, Nam Young. 1998. “Regionalism and Voting Behavior in South Korea.” Korea Obeserver 29(4): 611-633.
    Lee, Pei-Shan and Hsu Yung-Ming. 2002. “Southern Politics? Regional Trajectories of Party Development in Taiwan.” Issues & Studies. 38(2): 61-84.
    Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1986.“Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (2): 315-346.
    Lewis-Beck, Michel S. 1988a. “Economics and the American Voter: Past, Present, Future.” Political Behavior 10 (1): 5-21.
    Lewis-Beck, Michel S. 1988b. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. An Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Brad Lockerbie. 1989. “Economics, Votes, Protests: Western European Cases.” Comparative Political Studies. 22: 155-177.
    Lewis-Beck, Michel S. and Mary Stegmaier. 2019. “Economic Voting.” edited by Congleton, Roger D., Bernard Grofman and Stefan Voigt. The Oxford handbook of public choice. First edition. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 247-265.
    Lewis-Beck, Michel S. and R. Nadeau. 2012. “PIGS or Not? Economic Voting in Southern Europe.” Electoral Studies 32: 489-493.
    Lewis-Beck, Michel S. and Maria Celeste Rattob. 2013. “Economic voting in Latin America: A general model.” Electoral Studies 31 (3): 472-477.
    Linn, Nagler, and Morales. 2010. “Economics, Elections, and Voting Behavior.” in Leighley, Jan E. The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior.
    Marsh, Michael. 2002. “Electoral Context.” Electoral Studies 21(2): 207-217.
    Marsh, M., and S. Mikhaylov. 2012. “Economic Voting in a Crisis: The Irish Election of 2011.” Election Studies 31(1): 478-484.
    McQuarrie, Michael. 2017. “The revolt of the Rust Belt: place and politics in the age of anger.” The British Journal of Sociology 68: 120-152.
    Merriam, Charles E. and Hardd Gosnell. 1924. Non-Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Merrill, Samuel III., Bernard Grofman. 2009. A Unified Theory of Voting Directional and Proximity Spatial Models. Cambridge University Press.
    Miller, Arthur H. 1993. “Economic, Character, and Social Issues in the 1992 Presidential Election.” American Behavioral Scientist 37: 315-327.
    Miller, Arthur H. and Martin P. Watternberg. 1985. “Policy and Performance Evaluations of Presidential Candidates, 1952-1980.” American Political Science Association 79 (2): 359-372.
    Mulgan, Aurelia G. 1997. “Electoral Determinants of Agrarian Power: Measuring Rural Decline in Japan.” Political Studies 45(5): 875-899.
    Nannestad, P. and M. Paldam. 1994. “The VP-Function: A Survey of the Literature of Voter and Popularity Functions after 25 years.” Public Choice 79: 213-245.
    Nie, Norman H., with Kristi Anderson. 1974. “Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure.” Journal of Politics 36: 541-591.
    Nie, Norman H., Sidney Verba, and John R. Petrocik. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Page, Benjamin I., and Calvin C. Jones. 1979. "Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote." American Political Science Review 73: 1071-1089.
    Pomper, Gerald M. 1972. “From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956-1968.” American Political Science Review 66: 415-428.
    Rabinowitz, George. 1978. “On the Nature of Political Issues: Insights from a Spatial Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 22: 793-817.
    Rabinowitz, George., Stuart Elaine Macdonald. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting” American Political Science Review 83: 93-121.
    Rice, Stuart A. 1928. Quantitative Methods in Politics. New York: Knopf.
    Sears, David O., Richard R. Lau, Tom R. Tyler, and Harris M. Allen, Jr. 1980. "Self-interest Vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting." American Political Science Review 74:670-84.
    Sniderman, P. M. and R. A. Brody. 1977. “Coping: The Ethic of Self-Reliance.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (3): 501-521.
    Stipak, Brian, and Carl Hensler. 1982. “Statistical Inference in Contextual Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (1): 151-75.
    Trubowitz, Peter. 1996. “Political Conflict and Foreign Policy in the United States: A Geographical Issues.” in G. John Ikenberry, (ed.). American Foreign Policy: Theoretical Issues. New York: HarperCollins. pp.395-411.
    Trubowitz, Peter. 1998. Defining the National Interest: Conflict in American Foreign Policy. Chicago & London: New York:.
    Tufte, E. R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. New York: Princeton University Press.
    Weisberg, Herbert F., and Jerrold G. Rusk. 1970. “Dimensions of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 64: 1167-1185.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    政治學系
    98252501
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098252501
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201489
    顯示於類別:[政治學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    250101.pdf4476KbAdobe PDF20檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋