Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141707
|
| Title: | 整體開發地區綠建築溢價之研究
Research on the premium of green buildings in overall development areas |
| Authors: | 王惟之
Wang, Wei-Chih |
| Contributors: | 孫振義
Sun, Chen-Yi
王惟之
Wang, Wei-Chih |
| Keywords: | 淨零排放
整體開發
綠建築溢價
Net zero emissions
Overall development area
Green building premium |
| Date: | 2022 |
| Issue Date: | 2022-09-02 15:19:17 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 二氧化碳及其他溫室氣體排放造成全球地表溫度持續升高，目前已有超過120個國家提出在2050年之前達到淨零排放的目標，我國國家發展委員會於2022年3月公布「臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明」，以2050年100%新建建築物及超過85%既有建築物為近零碳建築為目標，綠建築為實現淨零排放目標方式之一。
但過去研究因樣本數量有限、研究範圍過大等因素造成研究樣本間屋齡、環境因素差異過大，本研究試圖釐清如果在屋齡相近、區域環境類似情況下比較綠建築與非綠建築間之房屋價格差異，綠建築是否有溢價存在？
本研究以臺北市北投奇岩新社區，新北市新莊副都市中心地區，桃園市高速鐵路桃園車站特定區共三個整體開發地區為研究範圍，彙整2016年~2021年內政部實價登錄資料，建立特徵價格模型進行分析，實證結果顯示，臺北市北投奇岩新社區綠建築標章溢價率為3.52%，銀級溢價率為3.52%；新北市新莊副都市中心地區綠建築標章溢價率為13.63%，銀級溢價率為13.61%、黃金級13.96%；桃園市高速鐵路桃園車站特定區綠建築標章溢價率為8.55%，銀級溢價率為7.17%、黃金級18.53%，呈現綠建築標章等級越高、溢價率越高之情況，且桃園市高速鐵路桃園車站特定區綠建築標章銀級與黃金級間間溢價率差異可達2倍以上。
不同整體開發地區相同綠建築標章等級，雖然溢價率不同但溢價金額相近，因各整體開發地區綠建築標章溢價率不同，所以不同縣市及地區應考量區域環境特性、當地房價水準、周邊鄰里設施等條件分別訂定綠建築標章取得與獎勵規定。
Carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions have caused the global surface temperature to continue to rise. At present, more than 120 countries have proposed the goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050.In March 2022, National Development Council announced the "Taiwan’s Pathway to Net-Zero Emissions in 2050",with the goal of 100% of new buildings and more than 85% of existing buildings being near-zero carbon buildings by 2050.Green buildings are one of the ways to achieve the goal of net zero emissions.
However, due to factors such as the limited number of samples and the large research scope in previous studies, the age of houses and environmental factors between the study samples were too different. Compare the difference in house price between green buildings and non-green buildings under different circumstances, is there a premium for green buildings?
This research focuses on three overall development areas, namely, Beitou Qiyan New Community in Taipei City, Xinzhuang Sub-Metropolitan Area in New Taipei City, and High-speed railway Taoyuan station specific area in Taoyuan, established an hedonic price model for analysis, and the empirical results show that the premium rate of green building labels in Beitou Qiyan New Community is 3.52%, and the premium rate of Silver level is 3.52%. The premium rate of green building label in Xinzhuang Sub-Metropolitan Area is 13.63%, the premium rate of Silver level is 13.61%, and the premium rate of Gold level is 13.96%. The premium rate of the green building label in the High-speed railway Taoyuan station specific area is 8.55%, the premium rate of Silver level is 7.17%, and the premium rate of Gold level is 18.53%, showing that the higher the green building label level, the higher the premium rate. The difference in the premium rate between the green building label Silver and Gold in High-speed railway Taoyuan station specific area can be more than 2 times.
Different overall development areas have the same green building label grade. Although the premium rate is different, the premium amount is similar. Because the green building label premium rate is different in each overall development area, different counties and regions should consider the regional environmental characteristics, local housing prices, surrounding areas. Neighborhood facilities and other conditions are separately stipulated for obtaining and rewarding green building labels. |
| Reference: | (一) 專書
內政部建築研究所，2019，『綠建築評估手冊─基本型』，臺北：內政部建築研究所究所。
內政部建築研究所，2022，『綠建築評估手冊─建築能效評估系統』，臺北：內政部建築研究所究所。
(二) 期刊論文
江穎慧、莊喻婷、張金鶚，2017，「臺北市公共自行車場站對鄰近住宅價格之影響」，『運輸計畫季刊』，46(4), 399-428。
李泓見、張金鶚、花敬群，2006，「台北都會區不同住宅類型價差之研究」，『台灣土地研究』，9(1), 63-87。
胡志平，2010，「台灣高鐵通車營運對住宅價格之衝擊影響分析－以新竹車站為例」，『建築與規劃學報』，11(2), 77-88。
孫振義、曹妤，2019，「綠建築評估項目對住宅不動產估價調整率之影響」，『住宅學報』，28(1)：27-50。
張心穎，2008，「綠建築之發展與前景」，『臺灣經濟研究月刊』，31(8), 56-61。
陳奉瑤、梁仁旭，2018，「綠建築標章之溢價率分析—以新北市住宅大樓為例」，『台灣土地研究』，21(1)：61-85。
彭建文、楊宗憲、楊詩韻，2009，「捷運系統對不同區位房價影響分析－以營運階段為例」，『運輸計畫季刊』，38(3), 275-296。
黃亮達、胡憲倫，2002，「綠建築指標評估系統推廣和應用之研究」，『建築與規劃學報』，31(1), 55-73。
楊宗憲、蘇倖慧，2011，「迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究」，『住宅學報』，20(2), 61-80。
(三) 碩、博士論文
宋豐荃，2014，鄰近公園有助提升房價嗎？－大小公園對高低房價影響程度之研究，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文：臺北。
彭逸瑋，2013，綠建築對不動產價格之影響，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文：臺北。
楊雅婷，2019，綠認證對辦公大樓租金之影響－以台北市為例，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文：臺北。
(四) 其他
孫振義、黃志弘、溫靖儒、廖偉慈、陳胤光，2018，綠建築之造價成本分析比較研究，內政部建築研究所委託研究報告。
國家發展委員會、行政院環境保護署、經濟部、科技部、交通部、行政院農業委員會、金融監督管理委員會，2022，臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明。
張世典、陳錦賜，2000，綠建築獎勵條例及獎勵措施之研究，內政部建築研究所研究計畫報告。
陳瑞鈴、鄭明仁、羅仁豪、徐秀梅、吳宗穎，2011，綠建築之建造成本調查研究－以學校類為例，內政部建築研究所協同研究報告。
二、 外文文獻
Aroul, R. and Hansz, J. A, 2012, “The value of" Green:" Evidence from the first mandatory residential green building program”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 34(1), 27-50.
Balaban, O.and de Oliveira, J. A. P., 2017,” Sustainable buildings for healthier cities: assessing the co-benefits of green buildings in Japan.” Journal of cleaner production, 163, 68-78.
Bond, S. A. and Devine, A, 2016,”Certification matters: is green talk cheap talk?.” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 52(2), 117-140.
Chegut, A., Eichholtz, P., and Kok, N.,2014,” Supply, demand and the value of green buildings.”, Urban Studies, 51(1), 22-43.
Das, P. and Wiley, J. A, 2014, ”Determinants of premia for energy-efficient design in the office market”, Journal of Property Research, 31(1), 64-86.
Deng, Y., Li, Z. and Quigley, J. M., 2012,” Economic returns to energy-efficient investments in the housing market: evidence from Singapore”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(3), 506-515.
Fuerst, F. and Van de Wetering, J., 2015, “How does environmental efficiency impact on the rents of commercial offices in the UK?”, Journal of Property Research, 32(3), 193-216.
Fuerst, F., Oikarinen, E. and Harjunen, O. , 2016, ”Green signalling effects in the market for energy-efficient residential buildings”, Applied Energy, 180, 560-571.
IPCC , 2021, ”Climate change 2021：The physical science Basis summary for policymakers .“
Jones, C. A., Oyedokun, T. B. and Dunse, N., 2018, ”The impact of green premium on the development of green-labelled offices in the UK”, Journal of Sustainable Real Estate,10.
Kats, G., 2003, “ Green building costs and financial benefits” pp. 2-8 Boston, MA: Massachusetts technology collaborative.
Kats, G., 2006, “ Greening America`s Schools: Costs and Benefits” American Federation of Teachers, et al. Capital E.
Lancaster, K. J. ,1966,” A new approach to consumer theory” Journal of political economy, 74(2), 132-157.
Rosen, S., 1974, ”Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition”, Journal of political economy,82(1), 34-55.
UNEP , 2021, ”Global status report for building and construction .“
三、 網頁參考資料
財團法人台灣綠建築中心，http://gb.tabc.org.tw/。
內政部不動產交易實價查詢服務網，https://lvr.land.moi.gov.tw/。
新北市住宅價格指數，https://i.land.ntpc.gov.tw/iland/index.php/2019-01-11-06-17-43/blog-with-right-sidebar/2019-01-14-02-57-01。
美國LEED，https://www.usgbc.org/leed。
英國BREEM，https://www.breeam.com/。
日本CASBEE，https://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/。
新加坡建設局BCA，https://www1.bca.gov.sg/。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系碩士在職專班
108923014 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108923014 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202201275 |
| Appears in Collections: | [地政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 301401.pdf | | 5407Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 172 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
