政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/141665

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/141665

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50923792 Online Users : 906

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Law > Master of Laws Program for Executives > Theses > Item 140.119/141665

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141665

Title:	論我國附條件交易之市場發展與問題探析 A Study of Developments and Obstacles in Repo Market of Taiwan
Authors:	張惠婷 Chang, Hui-Ting
Contributors:	馮震宇張惠婷 Chang, Hui-Ting
Keywords:	附條件交易附買回附賣回債券影子銀行金融海嘯前手息案買賣說融資說款券同步交割保管條債券存摺擔保品管理 collateral management repurchase Agreement(Repo, RP) reverse repurchase agreement (RS) bond shadow banking financial crisis legal issue with tax application for bond yield derivative financing method of Repo outright trading method of Repo DVP settlement Repo Receipt
Date:	2022
Issue Date:	2022-09-02 15:10:33 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	附條件交易橫跨資本市場及貨幣市場，是我國債票券之重要次級市場交易工具，市場參與者可透過該交易進行資金之融通與貸放；附條件交易亦是央行調節貨幣市場流動性之主要手段，讓央行有效地宣示市場利率目標，故附條件交易同時為市場貨幣政策之重要機制。因此，建立健全的附條件市場機制，不僅有利於資本市場的活絡，亦可達到穩定市場資金流動及利率水位之目標，對於我國整體金融市場之發展，扮演重要的角色。附條件交易源於歐美市場，並隨著時代發展演進，該交易型態結合了證劵出借、槓桿投資基金融資及借劵、交易商間附買回交易、以及附買回交易融資，已建立完整而複雜且各型態互相串聯之市場運作模式，因此也被列名為影子銀行(或稱影子金融)體系的一環，並迅速發展。2008年金融海嘯爆發，附條件交易被視為造成風暴的主要交易工具，世界各國之金融監理單位改以高度監理的態度，規範附條件交易市場，希望達到保護投資人並兼顧市場效率及穩定，以防止金融危機再度產生。根據本研究發現，健全之附條件交易市場架構，應具備五個要素，包括完整的法令規範、明確的會計處理原則、款券同步交割DVP體系、擔保品價值重估機制以及搭配保證金制度。然而，我國之附條件交易因僅限於債券與票券為交易標的，市場規模較小，除了曾經發生楊瑞仁國票案之重大違約事件外，目前僅有附條件交易之標的債券孳息衍生之前手息案，曾引發國內就附條件交易之法律性質探討，惟市場未對於我國附條件交易之作業架構及未來發展性，進行進一步檢討分析。本研究針對我國附條件交易實務提出兩大議題：(一)探討國內未走向全面款券同步交割DVP體系之原因與障礙、(二)探討保管條(債券存摺)取代標的證券交付所產生之擔保性不足以及無法落實擔保品管理之發展。本研究認為我國附條件交易在國內體制下運行已多年，市場應已更宏觀的角度去思考附條件交易之未來發展，以及藉由附條件交易之活絡促進債券市場發展的可能性。藉由分析國外附條件交易制度與市場管理規範作為他山之石，並檢視我國票券市場之作業經驗，主管機關應協助市場進行以下改造升級：首先，應將附條件交易導入款券同步之交割模式，以建立健全且透明的交割作業，促使證券商之金流管理更為嚴謹，進而提升附條件交易之多元性，走向不同交易型態之串接；其次，搭配前項款券交割之精神，以及債券已全面無實體發行之良好基礎，回歸附條件交易之標的證券交付應採用買賣斷而非保管條(債券存摺)，以落實對附條件交易買方之保障；最後，研議發展附條件交易之標的證券擔保品管理機制，借鏡國外第三方擔保品管理之發展經驗，促使我國債券市場落實擔保品管理的服務機制，亦可進一步活絡我國債券市場發行。我國附條件交易倘能透過上述之升級改造，將更趨健全完整、與國際交易市場接軌，並在債券擔保品發展成熟後，亦可再更進一步探討與國外擔保品掛牌交易機制之串接，使得我國金融市場之發展腳步，能不斷精進，與國際市場共同成長。 Repurchase agreement (Repo) is well performing in the capital market and money market. It is an important trading instrument in Taiwan’s secondary market for bonds and notes, through which market participants can finance and lend funds. Repo is also an important mechanism for money market that it is used for balancing the liquidity of money market, and used by Central Bank to deliver its target rate of Funds. Therefore, the establishment of a sound Repo market facility not only benefits the capital market, but stabilized the liquidity and interest rate level of the market. Repo originated in Europe and America, and it has combined securities lending segment, leverage investment fund financing and securities borrowing segment, inter-dealer repo segment, and repo financing segment. Those segments are linked and the transaction flows are interact with each other, thus Repo in general was categorized into the shadow banking system. For the financial crisis in 2008, repo was regarded as the key trading instrument that took all the blames. The monetary regulators around the world changed their attitude to regulate the Repo market with a high degree of supervision, hoping to achieve investor protection, to manage the market efficiency and stability, and also to prevent the financial crisis from happening again. According to the findings of this study, a sound market structure for Repo market should have five key elements, including comprehensive regulations, clear accounting principles, DVP system for settlement, collateral management, including margin call mechanism. However, Repo in Taiwan is limited to bonds and notes market which is relatively small, and except for the scandal of International Bills Finance Corporation in 1994, there is only one legal issue with tax application for bond yield derivative that brought up market discussion for Repo’s legal condition. Therefore, this study proposes two major discussions in Repo market of Taiwan: (1) to explore the reasons and obstacles for not moving towards DVP settlement system; and (2) to discover the legal risk of the Repo receipt and how it disable the development of collateral management in bond market of Taiwan. In this study, we believe that Repo in Taiwan has been operating for many decades but not moving forward, and it’s time for the market to consider the future development of Repo Market with a broaden perspectives, and by doing this, it might help the development of bond market at the same time. By analyzing the Repo mechanism in foreign market and reviewing the operation experience of Taiwan`s Notes market, our regulatory authorities should lead and encourage the market to make the following improvements and upgrades of Repo market: First, to make the DVP settlement as mandatory to establish a sound and transparent delivery model, which will direct securities dealers to enhance their cash flow management by escalating its control of insufficient fund. Secondly, to equally protect the buyers, Repo should make the delivery of underlying securities instead of using the Repo Receipts. Lastly, to create the collateral management mechanism subject to Repo Financing by leveraging the experience of third-party collateral management from foreign market. With above transformation for Repo in Taiwan, our Repo Market will become more sound, and be in line with the international market. Additionally, when the collateral management with bond market is mature, we can further explore the connection with the foreign collateral listing and trading mechanism, so that the development of our financial market can be continuously improving and growing together with the world.
Reference:	謝在全，民法物權論(上冊)，第七版，2020年9月。王澤鑑，債法原理—基本理論、債之發生、契約、無因管理，2021年3月。留敬中，附買回交易之法律關係及違約效果—以貨幣市場交易為中心，私立東吳大學法律研究所碩士論文，2000年6月。劉韋廷，我國金融商品稅負之探索，國立政治大學會計系碩士論文，2009年6月。李燕鈴，債券附條件交易課稅之探討，私立中原大學財經法律研究所碩士論文，2004年，6月。梅文欣，影子銀行法律問題之研究，東吳大學法學院法律學系碩士班，2013年7月。李岳庭，證券借貸與公司治理，國立台北大學法律學系碩士論文，2018年7月。陳慧明譯，附買回市場對中央銀行的啟示，國際金融參考資料第四十七輯，2002年。黃寶霞、邱至平，公債附買回交易實務–「2011年PIMCO Institute and Central Bank Week中央銀行出國報告」，2011年12月。俞明德、張嘉倩、楊智元，中華民國證券商同業公會委託專題研究「開放股票附買回/附賣回交易之可行性研究，2016年1月。曹素燕、王銘祥、陶幼卓、劉珮瑩、江慧賢、李克恭、劉應寬，固定收益商品附條件交易交易結算交割制度之研究，集保結算所，2009年12月。屠美亞、岳夢蘭，機構投資人運用跨境擔保品管理服務探討，集保結算所，2020年。李賢源、陳業寧，台灣公債OSRS式保證金交易之最適契約，中國財務學刊，第5卷(2)，1997年10月。李桐豪，債券市場發展對貨幣政策之影響，中央銀行季刊，第23卷第1期，2000年。封昌宏，債券附條件交易課稅新論，稅務旬刊，第1845期，2002年12月。王煦棋、留敬中，從美國案例探討我國附買回交易之違約效果，存款保險資訊季刊，第17卷第1期，2003年，9月。朱麗雯，債票券附買回交易買賣說與融資說，證券暨期貨月刊，第24卷第9期，2006年9月。許溪南、王家美，2008全球金融海嘯之起因、影響與教訓，證劵櫃檯，No. 144，2009年。林劭杰，台灣地區銀行業抗循環資本初探，金融聯合徵信雙月刊，第十七期，2011年。張文毅，有價證券借貸的演進、現況及建議，證劵服務期刊，第615期，2013年7月。莊萱如、甘雯綺譯，認識影子銀行的固有風險：入門與實務經驗，國際金融參考資料，第六十六輯，2014年，4月。張文毅譯，全球證劵借貸與附買回交易市場概況，證劵服務期刊，第628期，2014年8月。林主恩，美國Dodd-Frank法及Fed總體審慎措施，央行研究報告，2014年。于永寧，我國影子銀行監管法律制度的反思及重構—美國的經驗及其借鑒，法商研究，第四期，2015年。 Gilmore v. State Board of Administration of Florida, 382 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 1st DVA 1980) In re Lombard-Wall Inc., 48 B.R 986, United States District Court, S.D. New York. (1985) SEC v. Drysdale Securities Corp., 606 F. Supp. 295 (S.D.N.Y. 1985), rev’d, 785 F 2d 38 (2d Cir.) cert. Denied, 106 S. Ct. 2894 (1986). Tobias Adrian, Adam B. Ashcraft, Shadow Banking Regulation, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, no. 559 (2012) Financial Stability Board, Securities Lending and Repos: Market Overview and Financial Stability Issues—Interim Report of the FSB Workstream on Securities Lending and Repos, April 27 (2012) Peter Alfredo DiMatteo, Dodd-Frank and Repo: The Mandate to Nowhere, 10 Rutgers Business Law Review, Vol 10, no 1. p.102-122 (2013) Iris H-Y Chiu, Transcending Regulatory Fragmentation and the Construction of an Economy-Society Discourse: Implications for Regulatory Policy Derived from a Functional Approach to Understanding Shadow Banking, Journal of Corporation Law, Vol 42 . p327-358 (2016) Philipp Paech, Repo and Derivatives Portfolios Between Insolvency Law and Regulation, LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, London School of Economics and Political Science Law Department (2017) Thomas Keijser, Financial Collateral Arrangements in the European Union: Current State and the Way Forward, Uniform Law Review, Vol 22, no 1, p258-300 (2017). Paolo Saguato, The Liquidity Dilemma and the Repo Market: A Two-Step Policy Option to Address the Regulatory Void, Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance, Vol 22, no. 1, p85-146 (2017) Songjiwen Wu, Hossein Nabilou, Repo Markets Across the Atlantic: Similar but unalike, SSRN Electronic Journal (2018) Clearstream Banking S.A., Cmax product guide (2018) Jeremy C. Kress, Patricia A. McCoy & Daniel Schwarcz, Regulating Entities and Activities: Complementary Approaches to Nonbank Systemic Risk, Vol 92, no. 6, p1455-1528 (2019) Dalit Flaiszhaker, Dissonance in Global Financial Law , Deakin Law Review, Volume 24, p61-100 (2019)
Description:	碩士國立政治大學法學院碩士在職專班 104961001
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104961001
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202201349
Appears in Collections:	[Master of Laws Program for Executives] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
100101.pdf		3209Kb	Adobe PDF2	171	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback