政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/141565
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51114320      線上人數 : 819
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/141565


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141565


    題名: CAMELS指標探討對銀行信用風險之研究
    無
    作者: 陳鈺晶
    Chen, Yu-Ching
    貢獻者: 呂桔誠
    林士貴
    陳鈺晶
    Chen, Yu-Ching
    關鍵詞: 銀行經營管理
    銀行信用風險
    主成分分析
    CAMELS指標
    金融危機
    Banking Management
    Banking Risk
    Principal Component Analysis
    CAMELS Rating
    Financial Crisis
    日期: 2022
    上傳時間: 2022-09-02 14:49:50 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 國內近年興起金融科技革新與金融機構整併潮，同時銀行放款在疫情使然的經濟環境和消費習慣變遷下持續成長，改變銀行經營模式和資產結構，增加金融業前景的不確定性。故本研究從CAMELS指標出發，以針對CAMELS指標和銀行經營與信用風險的相關國外文獻作為基礎彙整出常用的CAMELS指標變數，將本研究樣本劃分為金融危機與一般情況並對其進行主成分分析，萃取其解釋能力，再以迴歸模型比較CAMELS指標對信用風險在不同經濟環境的解釋程度，以便從公開資料了解銀行財務健全狀況和CAMELS指標解釋能力的差異。經實證結果發現，CAMELS指標中的資本適足率、資產品質、管理能力和管理能力的主成分在金融危機期間具有較高貢獻度，一般情況時CAMELS指標貢獻度較平均，且不同期間下對信用風險變數的解釋能力均具有統計的顯著性，並且在常用信用風險衡量變數中，以槓桿比率的被解釋程度最高。
    Owing to the prosperous financial technology as well as the rising of merging and acquisition between financial institutions in recent years, the asset structure and managing strategy of banks has been changed gradually, while the economic circumstance, in addition to the consumption habit were strike by the occurrence of the epidemic. This study attempts to develop a set of CAMELS proxy by reviewing relating literature, while proceeding principle component analysis to extract the explanatory to the principle component for the use in multiple regression, in order to detect the potential risk in the rousing domestic loan, as well as comparing the difference between Financial Crisis and general condition. The empirical result indicates that, for the CAMELS proxy variables, the four categories as known as capital adequacy (C), asset quality (A) and managerial quality (M) shows higher contribution when it comes to the explanatory ability on the banking risk proxy variables during the Financial Crisis, while the CAMELS proxy variables shows the equivalent contribution in general condition. The outcome presents statistical significance, especially on the interpretation of the leverage ratio.
    參考文獻: 中文參考文獻
    1. 中央銀行（2021）。金融穩定報告，15。
    2. 沈中華 （2002），金控公司的銀行與獨立銀行CAMEL比較：1997~ 1998， 台灣金融財務季刊，3(2)，73-94。
    3. 中央存款保險公司（2021）。存款保險差別費率制度評估，存保季刊，34(2)，95-133。
    4. 縣市別金融統計（2022年6月14日）。金融監督管理委員會銀行局。
    https://www.banking.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=157&parentpath=0,4&mcustomize=bstatistics_view.jsp&serno=201105120013
    英文參考文獻
    1. Abad-González, J., et al. (2018), Banking solvency determinants in the EU: a model based on stress tests. Applied Economics Letters, 25(18), 1296-1300.
    2. Abedifar, P., et al. (2013), Risk in Islamic banking. Review of Finance, 17(6), 2035-2096.
    3. Acharya, V. V., et al. (2018), Lending implications of US bank stress tests, Costs or benefits? , Journal of Financial Intermediation, 34, 58-90.
    4. Affes, Z. and R. Hentati-Kaffel (2019), Predicting US banks bankruptcy: logit versus Canonical Discriminant analysis, Computational Economics, 54(1), 199-244.
    5. Ahmadian, A. and G. Mahsa (2015), Modeling of Banks Bankruptcy in Iran (Multivariate Statistical Analysis), Journal of Money and Economy, 10(2), 1-24.
    6. Alqahtani, F., et al. (2017), Reprint of economic turmoil and İslamic banking: evidence from the gulf cooperation council, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 42, 113-125.
    7. Ashcraft, A. B. (2008), Are bank holding companies a source of strength to their banking subsidiaries?, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40(2‐3), 273-294.
    8. Baek, S., et al. (2015), Capital structure and monitoring bank failure, Journal of Accounting and Finance, 15(4), 95.
    9. Beck, T., et al. (2013), Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(2), 433-447.
    10. Berger, A. N., et al. (2020), Did TARP reduce or increase systemic risk? The effects of government aid on financial system stability, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 43, 100810.
    11. Betz, F., et al. (2014), Predicting distress in European banks, Journal of Banking & Finance, 45, 225-241.
    12. Bitar, M., et al. (2017), Political systems and the financial soundness of Islamic banks, Journal of Financial Stability, 31, 18-44.
    13. Bourkhis, K. and M. S. Nabi (2013), Islamic and conventional banks` soundness during the 2007–2008 financial crisis, Review of Financial Economics, 22(2), 68-77.
    14. Canbas, S., et al. (2005), Prediction of commercial bank failure via multivariate statistical analysis of financial structures: The Turkish case, European Journal of Operational Research, 166(2), 528-546.
    15. Duchin, R. and D. Sosyura (2014), Safer ratios, riskier portfolios: Banks׳ response to government aid, Journal of Financial Economics, 113(1), 1-28.
    16. Evanoff, D. D. and L. D. Wall (2001), Sub-debt yield spreads as bank risk measures, Journal of Financial Services Research, 20(2), 121-145.
    17. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (2022, April 12). Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
    https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/safety/manual/
    18. Gunther, J. W. and R. R. Moore (2003), Loss underreporting and the auditing role of bank exams, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 12(2), 153-177.
    19. Irene, P. F., et al. (2014), Financial performance after the Spanish banking reforms: A comparative study of 19 commercial banks. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 4(2), 15.
    20. Klomp, J. and J. De Haan (2012), Banking risk and regulation: Does one size fit all? , Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3197-3212.
    21. Klomp, J. and J. De Haan (2014), Bank regulation, the quality of institutions, and banking risk in emerging and developing countries: an empirical analysis, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(6), 19-40.
    22. Maghyereh, A. I. and B. Awartani (2014), Bank distress prediction: Empirical evidence from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, Research in International Business and Finance, 30, 126-147.
    23. Mare, D. S. (2015), Contribution of macroeconomic factors to the prediction of small bank failures, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 39, 25-39.
    24. Mohammad Bitar, M. K. H., Thomas Walker (2017), Political systems and the financial soundness of Islamic banks, Journal of Financial Stability, 31, 18-44.
    25. Oliveira, A., et al. (2015), Bank Failure and the Financial Crisis: an Econometric Analysis of US Banks, University of Porto.
    26. Olson, D. and T. Zoubi (2017), Convergence in bank performance for commercial and Islamic banks during and after the Global Financial Crisis, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 65, 71-87.
    27. Podpiera, J. and M. I. Ötker (2010), The Fundamental Determinants of Credit Default Risk for European Large Complex Financial Institutions, International Monetary Fund.
    28. Pompella, M. and A. Dicanio (2017), Ratings based Inference and credit risk: detecting likely-to-fail banks with the PC-Mahalanobis method, Economic Modelling, 67, 34-44.
    29. Rashid, A. and S. Jabeen (2016), Analyzing performance determinants: Conventional versus Islamic Banks in Pakistan, Borsa Istanbul Review, 16(2), 92-107.
    30. Wang, M. and X. Sun (2019). Identity of large owner, regulation and bank risk in developing countries, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 59, 106-133.
    31. Wanke, P., et al. (2016), Financial distress and the Malaysian dual baking system: A dynamic slacks approach, Journal of Banking & Finance, 66, 1-18.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融學系
    108352026
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108352026
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201179
    顯示於類別:[金融學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    202601.pdf2016KbAdobe PDF20檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋