政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/141465
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50942641      Online Users : 987
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141465


    Title: 債務不履行體系再建構之初探─以「違反義務」為中心
    A Preliminary Study on the Reconstitution of the System Regarding Non-Performance of Obligations--Focusing on the Concept of Breach of Duty
    Authors: 許政賢
    Hsu, Cheng-Hsien
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 賠償;損害賠償;違反義務;債法現代化;債務不履行體系
    Remedies;Compensation;Breach of duty;Modernization of the law of obligations;System of remedies
    Date: 2017-07
    Issue Date: 2022-08-23 14:43:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國民法債編自 2000 年 5 月間修訂施行後，國際上民事法之發展，以 2002 年德國新債法之施行最受關注，相關修法經驗，對於債編之再修訂，應具參考價值。德國新債法之改革動力，其一乃考量與國際趨勢之接軌，其二乃嘗試與區域法律之融合。就技術層面而言，簡化、易於掌握之方向自始明確，而以「違反義務」為核心概念，則為宏觀國際發展趨勢後之微觀設計，深值重視。我國債編之再修訂，既有接軌國際之考量，亦有融合國內之必要，在債務不履行體系之再建構上，似得基於符合時代潮流之債法原則、債法體系之簡化及債法之現代化等因素，在核心概念選定及架構重整等大方向上，參考德國經驗而斟酌修訂。
    On 1 January 2002 the new German Law of Obligations (GLO) came into force. Due to its historical reputation GLO had widely known. The sources of GLO include the transposition of several EC Directives and the codification of some parts of the existing German law. It is appropriate to claim that the new system regarding non-performance of obligations is one of the most relevant issues of GLO. The very general concept of the new system is "breach of duty" which is regarded as a fundamental change on the base of non-performance of obligations. According to the new system the prerequisites for the obligor，s remedies depend on the type of remedy, including: compensation (in lieu of performance, for delay, etc.), other possible remedies (e.g.: removal of a defect, delivery of new goods without defects, and termination as well) It is argued that the purpose of the new system was mainly to make the understanding of GLO easier. In this article the basic framework of the new system is briefly introduced and analyzed. It is the hope of the author that this framework could be transformed as the reference model for the revision of new Taiwanese Law of Obligations. Especially, the introduction of "breach of duty" could contribute to the establishment of the foundation for the entire law of obligations.
    Relation: 法令月刊, Vol.68, No.7, pp.51-71
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    18.pdf304KbAdobe PDF2204View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback