Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141412
|
| Title: | 為了房子而活還是為了生活而活？關於台灣人的住房品質及非住房的生活品質的關係之研究
Living for a house or living for your life? A study on the relationship in Taiwan between quality of housing and non-housing quality of life |
| Authors: | 梁禮堯
Leung, Lai-Yiu |
| Contributors: | 朱琇妍
Chu, Shiou-Yen
梁禮堯
Leung, Lai-Yiu |
| Keywords: | 消費行為
非住房生活品質
排擠效應
住房質量差異
住房使用權選擇
住房政策
Consumption behavior
Non-housing quality of life
Crowding-out effect
Disparity in quality of housing
Housing tenure choices
Housing policy |
| Date: | 2022 |
| Issue Date: | 2022-08-01 19:04:23 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文旨在研究台灣人目前的住房狀況如何影響他們在收入約束下的非住房生活質量。對於目前的整體住房狀況，相信大家在住房財務負擔和物理的住房條件方面都經歷了住房質量的差異：從房地產學的角度來看，每棟公寓的位置、面積、樓層、樓齡、景觀、佈局等都是獨一無二的。因此，每個物業的價值無疑也是獨一無二的。這代表每個人居住在其住宅單位的費用皆不同，並且生活在獨特的物理住房條件中。換句話說，當一個人正在經歷當前的住房狀況時，他或她在非住房生活質量上的支出受到當前經歷的住房狀況的支出的影響。為了了解這種關係，我設計了一份網絡調查問卷，並隨機分發給18至49歲的台灣人。實證結果顯示，在「當前住房狀況」這概念下衍生的自變量，住房費用和實際住房環境，在解釋一個人的非住房生活質量的變化方面密不可分。此外，本文也帶出了一個政策含義，政府主導的社會住房，包括出租或出售給公眾的，可能是解決當今台灣住房問題的最佳政策解決方案之一。希望這些發現可能對台灣未來的公共政策研究有所幫助。
This paper aims to study how the current housing condition that Taiwanese are experiencing affects their non-housing quality of life under an income constraint. Regarding the overall current housing condition, everyone is believed to experience the disparity in the quality of housing in terms of housing financial burden and physical housing condition: from a real estate point of view, each tenement is unique in terms of location, size, floor, building age, view, layout, etc.; therefore, the value of each tenement is undoubtedly unique. This indicates that everyone pays differently for living in his or her residential tenement and lives in a unique physical housing condition. In other words, while an individual is experiencing the current housing condition, his or her spending on non-housing quality of life is affected by the spending on the currently experienced housing condition. To understand this relationship, an online survey questionnaire was designed and distributed randomly to Taiwanese who were 18 to 49 years old. The empirical findings indicate that both housing expenses and physical housing environment, which are the independent variables derived from the concept of ‘the current housing condition’, are inseparable in explaining the changes of one’s non-housing quality of life. In addition, there is a policy implication that government-led social housing, including both rented or sold to the public, may be one of the optimal policy solution to the housing problem nowadays in Taiwan. Hopefully, these findings may be useful for future public policy studies in Taiwan. |
| Reference: | Bibliography in English
Beer, A., Faulkner, D., Paris, C., & Clower, T. (2011). Housing transitions through the life course: Aspirations, needs and policy. Policy Press.
Böheim, R., & Taylor, M. P. (2002). Tied down or room to move? Investigating the relationships between housing tenure, employment status and residential mobility in Britain. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 49(4), 369-392.
Cagetti, Marco, Mariacristina De Nardi et al., “Entrepreneurship, frictions, and wealth,” Journal of Political Economy, 2006, 114 (5), 835–870.
Chen, W., Wu, X., & Miao, J. (2019). Housing and subjective class identification in urban China. Chinese Sociological Review, 51(3), 221-250.
Clark, W. A. (2013). Life course events and residential change: Unpacking age effects on the probability of moving. Journal of Population Research, 30(4), 319-334.
Clark, W. A. & Huang, Y. (2003). The life course and residential mobility in British housing markets. Environment and Planning A, 35(2), 323-339.
Clark, W. A., & Lisowski, W. (2017). Decisions to move and decisions to stay: Life course events and mobility outcomes. Housing Studies, 32(5), 547-565.
Cutler, David M. &Katz, L. F. (1992), “Rising Inequality? Changes in the Distribution of Income and Consumption in the 1980s,” American Economic Review, 82(2), 546-551.
Dietz, R. D., and D. R. Haurin. 2003. The social and private micro-level consequences of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics 54 (3):401–50
Dwyer, R. E. (2009). The McMansionization of America? Income stratification and the standard of living in housing, 1960–2000. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 27(4), 285-300.
Elsinga, M. & Hoekstra, J. (2005). Homeownership and housing satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20(4), 401-424.
Evans, D. S., & Jovanovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of political economy, 97(4), 808-827.
Featherstone, M. (2007). Consumer culture and postmodernism. Sage.
Feijten, P. & Mulder, C. H. (2002). The timing of household events and housing events in the Netherlands: A longitudinal perspective. Housing studies, 17(5), 773-792.
Feijten, P., Mulder, C. H., & Baizán, P. (2003). Age differentiation in the effect of household situation on first-time homeownership. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 18(3), 233-255.
Feijten, P. & Mulder, C. H. (2005). Life-course experience and housing quality. Housing Studies, 20(4), 571-587.
Fereidouni, H. G., & Tajaddini, R. (2017). Housing wealth, financial wealth and consumption expenditure: The role of consumer confidence. Journal of Real Estate Finance & Economics, 54, 1–21.
Foye, C., Clapham, D., & Gabrieli, T. (2018). Home-ownership as a social norm and positional good: Subjective wellbeing evidence from panel data. Urban Studies, 55(6), 1290-1312.
Galindo da Fonseca, J., & Pannella, P. (2019). The housing boom and selection into entrepreneurship. Cahier de recherche, (2019-03).
Gentry, W. M., & Hubbard, R. G. (2005). "Success Taxes," Entrepreneurial Entry, and Innovation. Innovation policy and the economy, 5, 87-108.
Hancock, K. E. (1993). `Can pay? Won`t pay? or Economic Principles of` Affordability`. Urban Studies, 30(1), 127-145.
Hogwood, B. W., & Peters, B. G. (1983). Policy dynamics. Wheatsheaf Books.
Holtz-Eakin, D., Joulfaian, D., & Rosen, H. S. (1994). Sticking it out: Entrepreneurial survival and liquidity constraints. Journal of Political economy, 102(1), 53-75.
Horioka, C. Y. (1988). Saving for housing purchase in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2(3), 351-384.
Hu, F. (2013). Homeownership and subjective wellbeing in urban China: Does owning a house make you happier?. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 951-971.
Hu, M., & Wang, X. (2020). Homeownership and household formation: no homeownership, no marriage?. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 35(3), 763-781.
Kan, K. (2000). Dynamic modeling of housing tenure choice. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(1), 46-69.
Kramer, C., & Pfaffenbach, C. (2016). Should I stay or should I go? Housing preferences upon retirement in Germany. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(2), 239-256.
Kendig, H. L. (1984). Housing careers, life cycle and residential mobility: Implications for the housing market. Urban Studies, 21(3), 271-283.
Kulu, H., & Milewski, N. (2007). Family change and migration in the life course: An introduction. Demographic research, 17, 567-590.
Kutty, N. K. (2005). A new measure of housing affordability: Estimates and analytical results. Housing policy debate, 16(1), 113-142.
Li, L., & Wu, X. (2014). Housing price and entrepreneurship in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(2), 436-449.
Li, S. M., & Li, L. (2006). Life course and housing tenure change in urban China: A study of Guangzhou. Housing Studies, 21(5), 653-670.
Liu, L., Wang, Q., & Zhang, A. (2019). The impact of housing price on non-housing consumption of the Chinese households: A general equilibrium analysis. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 49, 152-164.
Megbolugbe, I. F., & Linneman, P. D. (1993). Home ownership. Urban Studies, 30(4-5), 659-682.
Mok, D. K. Y. (2005). The life stages and housing decisions of young households: an insider perspective. Environment and Planning A, 37(12), 2121-2146.
Moriizumi, Y. (2003). Targeted saving by renters for housing purchase in Japan. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(3), 494-509.
Morrow-Jones, H. A., & Wenning, M. V. (2005). The housing ladder, the housing life-cycle and the housing life-course: Upward and downward movement among repeat home-buyers in a US metropolitan housing market. Urban Studies, 42(10), 1739-1754.
Mulder, C. H., & Wagner, M. (1998). First-time home-ownership in the family life course: A West German-Dutch comparison. Urban studies, 35(4), 687-713.
Mulder, C. H., & Wagner, M. (2001). The connections between family formation and first-time home ownership in the context of West Germany and the Netherlands. European Journal of Population/Revue europeenne de demographie, 17(2), 137-164.
Mulder, C. H. (2006). Home-ownership and family formation. Journal of housing and the built environment, 21(3), 281-298.
Neri, S., & Iacoviello, M. (2007). The Role of Housing Collateral in an Estimated Two-Sector Model of the US Economy. In 2007 Meeting Papers (No. 245). Society for Economic Dynamics.
Quadrini, V. (2000). Entrepreneurship, saving, and social mobility. Review of economic dynamics, 3(1), 1-40.
Ren, H., Folmer, H., & Van der Vlist, A. J. (2018). The impact of home ownership on life satisfaction in urban China: a propensity score matching analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(2), 397-422.
Rohe, W. M., & Stegman, M. A. (1994). The effects of homeownership: On the self-esteem, perceived control and life satisfaction of low-income people. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(2), 173-184.
Ronald, R. (2008). The ideology of home ownership: Homeowner societies and the role of housing. Springer.
Rossi, P. H., & Weber, E. (1996). The social benefits of homeownership: Empirical evidence from national surveys. Housing policy debate, 7(1), 1-35.
Singer, H. W. (1937). Income and rent: A study of family expenditure. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 145-154.
Sheiner, L. (1995). Housing prices and the savings of renters. Journal of Urban Economics, 38(1), 94-125.
Spain, D. (1990). The effect of residential mobility and household composition on housing quality. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 25(4), 659-683.
Stone, M. E. (2006). What is housing affordability? The case for the residual income approach. Housing policy debate, 17(1), 151-184.
Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class, an economic study of institution, reprinted 1912, New York: The Macmillan Company
Vidal, S., Huinink, J., & Feldhaus, M. (2017). Fertility intentions and residential relocations. Demography, 54(4), 1305-1330.
Wan, J. (2015). Household savings and housing prices in China. The World Economy, 38(1), 172-192.
Weber, M., Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology: Essays in Sociology. Oxford university press.
Wei, S. J., Zhang, X., & Liu, Y. (2017). Home ownership as status competition: Some theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 127, 169-186.
Winke, T. (2021). Housing affordability sets us apart: The effect of rising housing prices on relocation behaviour. Urban Studies, 58(12), 2389-2404.
Bibliography in Chinese
譚立德譯(2007).實踐理性：關於行為理論. 北京：三聯. (原書Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l`action. Paris: Éditions de l`École des hautes études en sciences sociales.)
李雲婷(2003). 應用華人家庭動態資料庫探討台灣地區新家戶形成之研究. 成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文.
華昌宜. (1994). 台灣應有的住宅目標. 住宅學報, (2), 133-134.
張君玫．黃鵬仁譯(Robert Bocock原著)(1995). 消費. 台北：巨流.
曾平毅. (1994). 都會區擁屋力之初探. 都市與計劃, 21(2), 173-190.
章定煊，2019，「房市不等於股市：火車頭已經變火燒頭」，檢自好房網 News。https://news.housefun.com.tw/news/article/143727236629.html
瀏覽日期：2021年 9月 10日。
蔡宏昭. (1991). 生活經濟學. 台北：遠流.
蔡春燕. (2003). 台灣消費社會之形成: 家戶所得與消費關聯性的階層及城鄉分析 (Doctoral dissertation, 撰者).
劉永祥、楊茲珺，2009，「票選 10 大民怨，最恨高房價」，蘋果日報。
https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/20091130/3YFADFBCJ54CIOOITEHOGZL6O4/
瀏覽日期：2021年9月4日。
薛立敏. (1996). 台灣地區合理房價之探討. 行政院經建會。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程(IMES)
109266009 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109266009 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202200769 |
| Appears in Collections: | [應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程 (IMES)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 600901.pdf | | 3595Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
