English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51659067      Online Users : 553
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141342


    Title: 國民小學校長分布式領導、學校組織公平與教師組織承諾關係之研究
    A Study on the Relationship among Principal Distributed Leadership, School Organizational Justice and Teacher Organizational Commitment in Elementary Schools
    Authors: 洪國芳
    Hung, Kuo-Fang
    Contributors: 秦夢群
    Chin, Meng-chun
    洪國芳
    Hung, Kuo-Fang
    Keywords: 國民小學校長
    分布式領導
    組織公平
    教師組織承諾
    Elementary school principa
    distributed leadership
    organizational justice
    teacher organizational commitment
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-08-01 18:48:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本研究旨在探討國民小學校長分布式領導、學校組織公平與教師組織承諾之關係,並依據研究所得出之結論,提出相關之建議,使校長瞭解對其運用分布式領導、學校組織公平與教師組織承諾間之關聯性,以此作為經營校內人力與維持組織間穩定之參考。本研究使用問卷調查法,蒐集新北市國民小學教師知覺其校長之領導方式、校內組織公平程度與自身對組織承諾之相關資料,透過統計之方式分析三個變項之間的關聯,歸納以下重要結論:
    一、國民小學教師知覺校長分布式領導屬於中高程度,以「領導能量的開發與投入」知覺程度最高。
    二、國民小學教師知覺學校組織公平屬於中高程度,以「互動公平」知覺程度最高。
    三、國民小學教師知覺教師組織承諾屬於中高程度,以「努力意願」知覺程度最高。
    四、國民小學教師對校長分布式領導之知覺程度在教師「性別」、「年齡」、「年資」、「教育程度」、「擔任職務」與「校長性別」之背景變項中有顯著差異。
    五、國民小學教師對學校組織公平之知覺程度在教師「性別」、「年齡」、「年資」、「擔任職務」與「校長性別」之背景變項中有顯著差異。
    六、國民小學教師對教師組織承諾之知覺程度在教師「性別」、「年齡」、「年資」、「教育程度」、「擔任職務」與「校長性別」之背景變項中有顯著差異。
    七、校長分布式領導、學校組織公平與教師組織承諾整體之間具有高度正相關。
    八、校長分布式領導與學校組織公平可以預測教師組織承諾。
      依據上述研究結果提出相關建議,提供教育主管機關、國民小學校長、學校教育人員實務應用與未來研究之參考。
      The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship among principals` distributed leadership, school organizational justice and teachers` organizational commitment in elementary schools, and to put forward relevant suggestions based on the conclusions of this study. To make principals understand the relationship among the application of distributed leadership, school organizational justice and teacher organizational commitment, as a reference for managing school manpower and maintaining inter-organizational stability. In this study, questionnaire survey was used to collect data about teachers` perception of principal`s leadership style, fairness of school organization and their own commitment to the organization. The correlation among the three variables was statistically analyzed, and the following conclusions were concluded:

    1. Elementary school teachers` perception of principal distributed leadership was medium to high, with the highest perception of development and investment of leadership energy.
    2. Elementary school teachers` perception of school organizational justice is medium to high, and the perception of interactive justice is the highest.
    3. Teachers` perceived organizational commitment of elementary school teachers was medium to high, and their perceived willingness to work hard was the highest.
    4. There were significant differences among the background variables of teachers` gender, age, seniority, education level, position and principal`s gender.
    5. There are significant differences among the background variables of teachers` gender, age, seniority, position and principal`s gender.
    6. There are significant differences among the background variables of teachers` gender, age, seniority, education, position and principal`s gender in the degree of teachers` perceived organizational commitment.
    7. There is a highly positive correlation among principal distributed leadership, school organizational justice and teacher organizational commitment.
    8. Principal distributed leadership and school organizational justice can predict teacher organizational commitment.
      In addition, according to the conclusions, the recommendations were given to provide suggestions for the practical application and future research of education authorities, primary school principals and school education personnel.
    Reference: 中文部分
    108課綱資訊網。12年國教課程綱要-108課綱重點。  https://12basic.edu.tw/12about-3-1.php
    丁學勤(2016)。國小教師對組織公平、校長領導的認知與組織公民行為關係之研究─不同理論模式之比較。教育行政論壇,8(2),95-122。
    王于甄(2018)。教師組織承諾、工作滿意度與組織公民行為之關係研究:結合後社分析與結構方程模式之應用。國立政治大學。臺北市。
    王環鈴、王文科、王智弘(2011)。國民小學為例學校分布式領導與創新經營之研究:以台中市國民小學為例。彰化師大教育學報,20,1-20。
    周碧惠(2017)。高等教育學務人員專業能力、組織承諾與工作滿意度關係之研究。國立政治大學。臺北市。
    林文律(1999)。從校長必備能力看校長培育。現代教育論壇,5,168-178。
    林忠仁(2010)。國民小學校長分佈領導、灰猩猩效應與教師專業學習社群關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
    林素霞(2015)。大學組織公平與行政人員組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學。臺北市。
    林奕成(2018)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與學校效能關係之研究。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
    池柏勳(2019)。新北市國民中小學特殊教育教師情緒勞務、工作滿意度與組織承諾相關之研究。國立政治大學。臺北市。
    吳政達(2005)。心理契約、組織公平、組織信任與組織公民行為關聯性之研究─以台灣地區國民中小學學校組織為例。科技部專案研究報告  (計畫編號:NSC94-2413-H-004-009)。
    吳政達、湯家偉、羅清水(2007)。心理契約、組織公平、組織信任與組織公民行為結構關係之驗證:以台北地區國民中學學校組織為例。教  育政策論壇,10(1),133-159。
    吳清山、林天祐(2011)。協作領導。教育研究月刊,210,117-118。
    吳清山、林天祐(2014)。教育U辭書。臺北市:高等教育。
    吳國男(2013)。國民中學組織公平、教師工作價值觀與組織效能關係研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    邱春堂(2010)。國民小學校長社會資本、教導型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
    邱子豪(2012)。台南市公立國民小學組織公平、認知信任、情感信任對組織承諾之關係。國立台南大學,臺南市。
    李重毅(2013)。校長分布式領導、教師專業社群運作與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    李奕芸(2018)。臺北市國民小學校長分布式領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    沈娟娟(2011)。國民中學校長授能領導與兼任行政職務教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學。臺北市。
    余泯蓁(2018)。新北市國民中學校長知識領導、學校內部行銷與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立政治大學。臺北市。
    呂佳盈(2019)。我國高中職以下學校校長分布式領導之後設分析研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    呂紹弘(2020)。國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    何嘉惠(2018)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師彰權益能與教學創新關係之研究。臺北市立大學,臺北市。
    何建霖(2008)。國民小學學校分佈式領導、教師同僚專業互享與學生學習表現之研究。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
    卓政欽、郭宏偉(2015)。組織公平與組織公民行為之關係:以工作滿足為中介變數。資訊管理計算,4(1),263-276。  http://www.asmr-journal.com/harper.html
    范熾文(2001)。學校行政革新-領導、課程與教學。臺北市:商鼎文化。
    范熾文(2002)。國小校長領導行為,教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    胡士雄(2016)。越南胡志明市高級中學校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    徐吉春(2014)。分散式領導理論內涵之研究。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
    張明輝(2005)。永續領導與學校經營。臺灣教育,635,8-12。
    張奕華(2009)。分散式領導、教師學術樂觀與學生學習成就關係之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(計畫編號:NSC98-2410-H004  -011)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    張奕華、顏弘欽(2012)。學校分散式領導構面之探析:領導者、追隨者與情境三元互動之檢證。教育實踐與研究,25(2),225-254。
    張碧榮(2012)。北北基地區國民小學校長正向領導和教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    張素花(2012)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師情緒勞務對教師教學效能影響之研究。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
    陳心瑩(2013)。基隆市國民小學學校組織公平、教師組織公民行為與教師中做投入關係之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    陳娟惠(2016)。大學中階行政主管轉型領導、組織承諾與工作滿意度關係之研究。國立政治大學。臺北市。
    陳麗英(2019)。國民中學兼任行政職教師知覺組織公平、組織承諾與離職意圖之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    許聰顯(2014)。國民小學校長分布式領導、學校組織公平與教師組織公民行為之關係。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    教師介聘他縣市服務網。https://tasweb.kh.edu.tw/110
    教育部統計處109年國民小學校別資料。
    https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/Default.aspx
    秦夢群(2019)。教育領導理論與應用(三版)。臺北市:五南。
    黃宗顯(2008)。學校領導:新理論與實踐。臺北市:五南。
    黃敏榮(2013)。高級中等學校分布式領導、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    黃玉貞(2013)。國民小學分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    黃明裕(2017)。國小教師知覺校長分布式領導、教師幸福感與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    廖俊銘(2017)。雙北地區國民小學學校內部行銷、教師組織承諾與學校競爭優勢關係之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    趙志林(2018)。臺北市國民小學校長真誠領導、教師正向心理資本與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立政治大學。臺北市。
    董子毅(2010,12月)。教師流動的組織觀。臺灣師資培育電子報,15。
    https://teacher.edu.tw/
    新北市110學年度國民小學教師市內介聘達成名冊。https://www.gdps.ntpc.edu.tw/p/406-1000-5699,r55.php
    新北市政府教育局(2021),教育統計年報(109)。https://www.ntpc.edu.tw/home.jsp?id=dc5b21213dfb17e5。
    蔡玲玲(2014)。私立高中職學校校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    蔡琦姻(2016)。大學組織氣候對行政人員組織公民行為影響之研究:以組織承諾為中介變項。國立政治大學。臺北市。
    鄧竹君(2015)。國民中學教師個人與組織適配、組織承諾對組織公民行為影響之研究。國立政治大學。臺北市。
    劉姿君(2016)。大臺北地區國民小學分布式領導對教育成效影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    劉乙儀(2017)。幼兒園園長分布式領導、教師領導與教師專業發展關係之研究—以中彰投地區為例。國立臺中教育大學。臺中市。
    盧衍宇(2014)。從組織公正理論觀點論學校行政。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(12),151-154。
    賴志峰(2008)。分佈式領導理論之探究—學校領導者、追隨者和情境的交互作用。國民教育研究學報,20,87-113。
    賴志峰(2009a)。教師領導的理論及實踐之探析。教育研究與發展期刊,5(3),113-144。
    賴志峰(2009b)。中小學分佈式領導風格量表之檢證。初等教育學刊,34,25-52。
    賴姿伶(2012)。大學行政人員工作特性、組織公平與工作滿意度之研究。國立東華大學,花蓮市。
    謝傳崇、王瓊滿(2011)。國民小學校長分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為對學生學習表現影響之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,28(1),35-66。
    謝文全(2014)。教育行政學(四版)。臺北市:高等教育。
    羅昌龍(2018)。臺北市國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    蘇嘉偉(2009)。組織公平與組織信任、組織承諾、組織公民行為間的影響─以中部某大學為例。逢甲大學,臺中市。

    外文部分
    Adams, J. S.(1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422-36.
    Adams, J. S.(1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. BerKowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 267-299. New York: Academic Press.
    Ambrose, M. L.(2002). Contemporary justice research: A new look at familiar questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 803-812.
    Ali, H. M., & Yangaiya, S. A.(2015). Distributed leadership and empowerment influence on teachers organizational commitment. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(1), 73-73.
    Akdemir, Ö. A., & Ayik, A.(2017). The impact of distributed leadership behaviors of school principals on the organizational commitment of teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12), 18-26.
    Becker, H. S.(1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32-40.
    Blau, P. M.(1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
    Barnard, C. I.(1968). The functions of the executive ,11. Harvard university press.
    Buchanan, B., II.(1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 533-546.
    Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S.(1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations ,1, 43-55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Bies, R. J.(1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior ,9 ,289-319. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Barry, D. (1991). Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 20(1), 31-47.
    Brown, R. B. (1996). Organizational commitment: Clarifying the concept and simplifying the existing construct typology. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 230-251.
    Baldwin, S. (2006). Organisational justice. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.
    Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed Leadership in Organizations: A Review of Theory and Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 251-269.
    Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
    Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2012). Distributed leadership in action: leading high-performing leadership teams in English schools. School Leadership and Management, 32(1): 21-36.
    Buluc, B., & Gunes, M. (2014). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational commitment in primary schools. The Anthropologist, 18(1), 145-152.
    Bush, T., & Ng, A. (2019). Distributed leadership and the Malaysia Education Blueprint. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 279-295.
    Campbell, J. P.,& Prichard, R. D.(1976). Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology ,131-146. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
    Clift, R. T., & Thurston, T. W. (1995). Distributed leadership: School improvement through collaboration. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Colquitt, J.A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
    Conger, J. A., & Pearce, C. L. (2003). A landscape of opportunities: Future research on shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership , 285-303. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Inc.
    Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
    DeCotiis, T. A., Summers, T. P. (1987). A path analysis of a model of the antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment. Human Relations, 40(7), 445-470.
    Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Singleton, C. A. (2006). Organizational commitment of teachers in urban schools: Examining the effects of team structures. Urban Education, 41, 603–627.
    Duif, T., Harrison, C., van Dartel, N., & Sinyolo, D. (2013). Distributed Leadership in Practice: a Descriptive Analysis of Distributed Leadership in European Schools. European Policy Network of School Leadership.
    Devos, G.,Tuytens, M., & Hulpia, H.(2014).Teachers’organizational commitment: Examining the mediating effects of distributed   leadership. American Journal of Education, 120(2), 205-231.
    Demir, K. (2016). Relations between teachers’ organizational justice perceptions and organizational commitment and job satisfaction in the school: A meta-analysis.
    Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D.(1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
    Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75,51-59.
    Eberlin, R. J.,& Tatum, B. C. (2008). Making just decisions: organizational justice,decision making, and leadership. Management Decision, 46(2), 310-329.
    Fink, S. L. (1992). High commitment workplaces. New York: Quorum Books.
    Gibb, J. R., Miller, L. F., & Platts, G. N. (1951). Dynamics of participative groups. St. Louis, MO: John S. Swift.
    Grusky, O.(1966). Career mobility and organzational commitment.Administrative Science Quarterly, 488-503.
    Graen, G.(1976) Role-making processes within complex organizations.In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology ,1201-1245. Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Greenberg, J. (1987). A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories. The Academy of Management Review ,12(1), 9-22. Academy of Management. https://www.jstor.org/stable/257990
    Greenberg, J. (1988b). Cultivating an image of justice: Looking fair on the job. Academy of Management Executive, 2,155-157.
    Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432.
    Greenberg, J. (2004). Stress fairness to fare no stress: Managing workplace stress by promoting organizational justice. Organizational Dynamics,33(4), 352-365.
    Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: a new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration. 28(3), 317-38.
    Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451.
    Halpin, A. W., & Winer, B. J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. Leader behavior: Its description and measurement, 39-51.
    House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1975). Path-goal theory of leadership. Washington Univ Seattle Dept Of Psychology.
    Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). The management of organizational behaviour, Upper Saddle River N. J.: Prentice Hall.
    Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 260–279.
    Hollenbeck, J., Ilgen, D., Sego, D., Hedlund, J., Major, D., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel Theory of Team Decision Making: Decision Performance in Teams Incorporating Distributed Expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 292-316.
    Hudy, M. J. (1995). Antecedents of organizational commitment: A multi foci conceptualization. Unpublished master`s thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
    Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2004). Organizational justice in schools: no justice without trust. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 250-259.
    Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495-513.
    Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: according to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172-188. doi: 10.1108/09578230810863253
    Harris, A. (2009). Distributed Leadership in Schools: Developing tomorrow`s leaders.
    Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership different perspectives / edited by Alma Harris. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
    Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2009). The influence of distributed leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 40-52.
    Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291-317.
    Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2009). The influence of distributed leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 40-52.
    Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2010). How distributed leadership can make a difference in teachers` organizational commitment? A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 565-575.
    Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers’ organizational commitment: Examining the source of the leadership. function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(5), 728-771.
    Harris, A. (2012). Leading system-wide improvement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15(3), 395-401.
    Harris, A. (2013). Distributed school leadership: Developing tomorrow`s leaders. Routledge.
    Hammershaimb, L.(2018). Distributed leadership ineducation.Journal of Online Higher Education, 2(1).
    Jacobs, G. E. (2010). The relationship between distributed leadership as practiced by principals and the organizational commitment of teachers.
    Jameel, A. S., Mahmood, Y. N., & J Jwmaa, S. (2020). Organizational justice and organizational commitment among secondary school teachers.
    Jang, J., Lee, D. W., & Kwon, G. (2021). An analysis of the Influence of organizational justice on organizational commitment. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(2), 146-154.
    Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 319–333.
    Kanter, Rosabeth M. (1968). "Commitment and Social Organization: A Study of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian Communities." American Sociological Review ,33,499-517.
    Konovsky, M. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 489-511.
    Leventhal G, Karuza J, Fry W (1980), ‘Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences’, in Mikula G (ed.), Justice and Social Interaction, Springer‐Verlag.
    Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. S. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research ,27-55.
    Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
    Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American sociological review, 89-108.
    Louis, K. S. (1998). Effects of teacher quality of work life in secondary schools on commitment and sense of efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 1–27.
    Li, A.,& Cropanzano, R. (2009). Fairness at the group level: Justice climate and intraunit justice climate. Journal of Management, 35(3), 564-599.
    Lahtero, T. J., Lång, N., & Alava, J. (2017). Distributed leadership in practice in Finnish schools. School Leadership & Management, 37(3), 217-233.
    Liu, Y., & Watson, S. (2020). Whose leadership role is more substantial for teacher professional collaboration, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A lens of distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-29.
    Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247.
    Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employeeorganization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171-193.
    Meyer, John P., Natalie J. Allen, and Ian R. Gellatly. (1990). "Affective and Continuance Commitment to the Organization: Evaluation of Measures and Analysis of Concurrent and Time-Lagged Relations." Journal of Applied Psychology 75,710-20.
    Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
    Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845-855.
    McFarlin, Dean & Paul Sweeney. 1992. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
    Morrow, P. C. (1993). The theory and measurement of work commitment. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Mascall, B., Leithwood, K. A., Straus, T., & Sacks, R. (2008). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 214-228.
    Miller, B. K., Konopaske, R., & Byrne, Z. S. (2012). Dominance analysis of two measures of organizational justice. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(3),264-282.
    Nemeth, C. J., & Staw, B. M. (1989). The tradeoffs of social control and innovation in groups and organizations. In advances in experimental social psychology ,22, 175-210. Academic Press.
    Niehoff, B.P. & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior.
    Niehoff, Brian P. & Robert H. Moorman.(1996). Exploring the relationships between top management behaviors and employee perceptions of fairness. International Journal of Public Administration, 19, 941-961.
    Nguni, S., Sleegers, P., & Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17,   145–177.
    Parsons(1951). T. The social system.New York:Free Press.
    Parsons(1951). T., Shils, E. A..& OldsJ. Values, motives, and systems of action. In T. Parsons & E.A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theorl of action,45-275. New York: Harper & Row.
    Porter, L., Steers, R., Mowday, R., & Boulian, P. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on trust, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142
    Putti, J. M., Aryee, S., & Phua, J. (1990). Communication relationship satisfaction and organizational commitment.Group & Organization Studies, 15(1), 44-52.
    Pillai, R., Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (1999). Leadership and organizational justice: Similarities and differences across cultures. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(4), 763-779.
    Pearce, C. L., and J. A. Conger. 2003. Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Reddin, W. J. (1967). The 3-D management style theory. Training and Development Journal, 21(4), 8-17.
    Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadershipn student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects ofleadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.
    Ross, L., Lutfi, G. A., & Hope, W. C. (2016). Distributed leadership and teachers’ affective commitment. NASSP Bulletin, 100(3), 159-169.
    Salancik, G. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behaviour and belief. In B. M. Steward & G. R. Salancik (Eds), New directions in organizational behaviour ,1-54. Chicago: St. Clair.
    Sheppard B, Lewicki R and Minton J (1992), Organizational Justice: The Search for Fairness in the Workplace, Lexington.
    Storey J (2000), Human Resource Management: A Critical Text (2nd ed.), Thomson Learning.
    Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30, 23-28.
    Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Spillane, J. P., & Diamond, J. B. (2007a). Taking a distributed perspective. In J. P.Spillane & J. B. Diamond(Eds.).Distributed leadership in practice,1-15. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Spillane, J. P., & Diamond, J. B. (2007b). A distributed perspective on and in practice. In J. P. Spillane & J. B. Diamond(Eds.).Distributed leadership in practice,146-166. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Stevenson, H. P. (2007). A case study in leading schools for social justice: when morals and markets collide. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(6),769-781.
    Sun, A., & Xia, J.(2018). Teacher-perceived distributed leadership, teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: A multilevel SEM approach using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 86-97.
    Samancioglu, M., Baglibel, M., & Erwin, B. J. (2020). Effects of Distributed Leadership on Teachers` Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment andOrganizational Citizenship. Pedagogical Research, 5(2).
    Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations. Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative.
    Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology in business settings ,77-98. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Turan,S.(1998).Measuring Organizational Climate andOrganizational Commitment in the Turkish Educational Context. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, St. Louis, MO.
    Tsui, K. T., & Cheng, Y. C. (1999). School organizational health and teacher commitment: A contingency study with multi-level analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5, 249–268.
    Torrance, D. (2013). Distributed leadership: challenging five generally held assumptions. School Leadership & Management, 33(4), 354-372.
    Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus: EMAL. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146.
    Torres, D. G. (2018). Distributed leadership and teacher job satisfaction in Singapore. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(1), 127-142.
    Tamghe, C. D. D. K.(2019).Organizational justice and organizational commitment of public secondary school teachers in Cameroon.Journal of Education and Practice, 10(36), 157-166.
    Ucar, R. (2021). The Effect of School Principals` Distributed Leadership Behaviours on Teachers` Organizational Commitment. International Education Studies, 14(5), 19-30.
    Van Avermaet, E., McClintock, C., & Moskowitz, J. (1978) Alternative approaches to equity: Dissonance reduction, pro-social motivation and strategies accommodation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 419-437.
    Whisenant, W. (2005). Organizational justice and commitment in interscholastic sports. Sport, Education and Society, 10(3), 343-357.
    Williams, C. G. (2011). Distributed leadership in South African schools: Possibilities and constraints. South African Journal of Education, 31(2), 190-200.
    Whyte, W.H.(2013).The organization man. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Yavuz, M. (2010). The effects of teachers perception of organizational justice and culture on organizational commitment. African Journal of Business Management, 4(5), 695-701.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    學校行政碩士在職專班
    108911013
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108911013
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200912
    Appears in Collections:[學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101301.pdf7911KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback