English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51599351      Online Users : 794
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141202


    Title: 探討擬社會關係的形成與效果:Instagram中大型網紅與微網紅之比較
    Examining the Antecedents and Efficacy of Parasocial Relationships with Macro- and Nano-Influencers on Instagram
    Authors: 柯承佑
    Ko, Cheng-You
    Contributors: 林芝璇
    Lin, Jhih-Syuan
    柯承佑
    Ko, Cheng-You
    Keywords: Instagram 網紅行銷
    擬社會關係
    來源可信度
    贊助透明
    自我接露
    相似度
    購買行為
    Instagram influencer marketing
    Parasocial relationship
    Source credibility
    Similarity
    Sponsorship transparency
    Self-disclosure
    Purchase behavior
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-08-01 18:17:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 有鑑於Instagram網紅在Z世代中廣受歡迎,以及近年來網紅行銷的蓬勃發展,使用者與網紅間的擬社會關係(Parasocial Relationships, PSR)備受關注。本研究首先探討PSR的形成,並分析此關係對於消費者實際購買行為的中介效果,最後將不同種類的網紅可能產生的調節效果納入考量。為此,本研究共收集451份來自臺灣Z世代的有效問卷,邀請參與者提供一名正在追蹤的Instagram網紅並回報對其可信度、專業知識、吸引力、相似性、真實性、贊助透明度和自我揭露等七大面向之衡量,並根據粉絲人數將參與者提及的網紅,由研究者將其歸類為中大型網紅或微網紅。研究結果顯示,PSR會中介前述七大面向和使用者實際購買行為之間的關係。同時,網紅類型對於使用者的感知真實性及感知自我揭露具有調節效果。當兩者較低時,使用者與微網紅的PSR略強於與中大型網紅的關係;當兩者增加時則反之。研究結果亦顯示,無論網紅類別,感知可信度及感知相似性皆是PSR形成的主要因素。總歸而言,本研究除了分析PSR的形成及其與購買行為之間的關係,更進一步分析PSR是否會因網紅類別而有差異,以驗證及延伸現有文獻,並提供與未來研究方向及網紅行銷相關之建議。
    Considering the popularity of Instagram influencers among Gen Zs as well as the growth of influencer marketing, the current research examines how the intimate and one-sided friendship—parasocial relationship (PSR)—is formed, how this relationship relates to purchase behavior of the followers, and the moderating role of influencer types. A total of 451 Taiwanese Gen Zs participated in the online survey. They were instructed to report the perceived trustworthiness, expertise, attractiveness, similarity, authenticity, sponsorship transparency, self-disclosure, PSR, and purchase behavior with regard to the influencer that they selected. The influencers were then categorized into macro-influencers and nano-influencers based on their number of followers. The findings suggest that PSR mediated the positive relationships between the antecedents and purchase behavior. Influencer types moderated the relationships between two antecedents (i.e., perceived authenticity and self-disclosure) and PSR. When perceived authenticity and self-disclosure were at a low (high) level, participants’ PSRs with nano-influencers were stronger (weaker) than that with macro-influencers. In addition, perceived trustworthiness and perceived similarity were the dominant predictors of PSRs for both macro-influencers and nano-influencers. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings and directions for future research are discussed.
    Reference: Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When Social Media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008
    Aw, E. C. X., & Chuah, S. H. W. (2021). “Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy. Journal of Business Research, 132, 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.025
    Aw, E. C. X., & Labrecque, L. I. (2020). Celebrity endorsement in social media contexts: Understanding the role of parasocial interactions and the need to belong. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-10-2019-3474
    Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 635-657. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12106
    Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, M., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2021). Understanding influencer marketing: The role of congruence between influencers, products and consumers. Journal of Business Research, 132, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.067
    Belanche, D., Flavián, M., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Followers’ reactions to influencers’ instagram posts. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 24(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/sjme-11-2019-0100
    Boerman, S. C. (2020). The effects of the standardized Instagram disclosure for micro- and meso-influencers. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.015
    Breves, P., Amrehn, J., Heidenreich, A., Liebers, N., & Schramm, H. (2021). Blind trust? The importance and interplay of parasocial relationships and advertising disclosures in explaining influencers’ persuasive effects on their followers. International Journal of Advertising, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1881237
    Campbell, C., & Evans, N. J. (2018). The role of a companion banner and sponsorship transparency in recognizing and evaluating article-style native advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 43, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.02.002
    Campbell, C., & Farrell, J. R. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, 63(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003
    Carter, D. (2016). Hustle and Brand: The sociotechnical shaping of Influence. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 205630511666630. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116666305
    Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2017). Antecedents of consumer intention to follow and recommend an Instagram account. Online Information Review, 41(7), 1046–1063. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-09-2016-0253
    Chan, K. K., & Misra, S. (1990). Characteristics of the opinion leader: A new dimension. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673192
    Chan, R. Y. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers` green purchase behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 18(4), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1013
    Choi, S. M., & Rifon, N. J. (2012). It is a match: The impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 29(9), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20550
    Chu, S. C., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Electronic word-of-mouth in social networking sites: A cross-cultural study of the United States and China. Journal of Global Marketing, 24(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2011.592461
    Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing, 34(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21001
    Cohen, E. L., & Tyler, W. J. (2016). Examining perceived distance and personal authenticity as mediators of the effects of ghost-tweeting on parasocial interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(5), 342–346. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0657
    Cohen, J., Weimann-Saks, D., & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2017). Does character similarity increase identification and persuasion? Media Psychology, 21(3), 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1302344
    Cornwell, T. B. (2019). Less “sponsorship as advertising” and more sponsorship-linked marketing as authentic engagement. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1588809
    De Cicco, R., Iacobucci, S., & Pagliaro, S. (2020). The effect of influencer–product fit on advertising recognition and the role of an enhanced disclosure in increasing sponsorship transparency. International Journal of Advertising, 40(5), 733–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1801198
    De Jans, S., Van de Sompel, D., De Veirman, M., & Hudders, L. (2020). #Sponsored! How the recognition of sponsoring on Instagram posts affects adolescents’ brand evaluations through Source Evaluations. Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106342
    De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
    Demir, M., Şimşek, Ö. F., & Procsal, A. D. (2012). I am so happy ‘cause my best friend makes me feel unique: Friendship, personal sense of uniqueness and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1201–1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9376-9
    Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2015). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
    Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
    Duck, S., & Barnes, M. K. (1992). Disagreeing about agreement: Reconciling differences about similarity. Communication Monographs, 59(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376262
    Duffy, B. (2015). Amateur, autonomous, and collaborative: Myths of aspiring female cultural producers in web 2.0. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 32(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2014.997832
    Ermec Sertoglu, A., Catlı, O., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). Examining the Effect of Endorser Credibility on the Consumers’ Buying Intentions: An Empirical Study in Turkey. International Review of Management and Marketing, 4(1), 66–77.
    Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2017). Connecting with celebrities: How consumers appropriate celebrity meanings for a sense of belonging. Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1274925
    Evans, N. J., Phua, J., Lim, J., & Jun, H. (2017). Disclosing Instagram influencer advertising: The effects of disclosure language on advertising recognition, attitudes, and behavioral intent. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2017.1366885
    Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Yuan, Y. (2021). Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102371
    Federal Trade Commission. (2017a). CSGO Lotto Owners Settle FTC’s First-Ever Complaint Against Individual Social Media Influencers. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2017/09/csgo-lotto-owners-settle-ftcs-first-ever-complaint-against-individual-social-media-influencers
    Federal Trade Commission. (2017b). FTC Staff Reminds Influencers and Brands to Clearly Disclose Relationship. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2017/04/ftc-staff-reminds-influencers-brands-clearly-disclose-relationship
    Federal Trade Commission. (2019). Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/disclosures-101-social-media-influencers
    Fehr, B. (2008). Friendship formation. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 29–54). Psychology Press.
    Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/209380
    Fu, S., Xu, Y., & Yan, Q. (2017). Enhancing the parasocial interaction relationship between consumers through similarity effects in the context of social commerce. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 27(2), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254x.2017.1384045
    Geyser, W. (2021, December 29). The state of Influencer Marketing 2022: Benchmark Report. Influencer Marketing Hub. Retrieved July 5, 2022, from https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-benchmark-report/
    Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0403_04
    Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships, 409-427.
    GWI. (2022a). Social media use by generation. Globalwebindex. https://www.gwi.com/reports/social-media-across-generations
    GWI. (2022b). The biggest social media trends for 2022. Globalwebindex. https://www.gwi.com/reports/social
    Hartmann, T. (2008). Parasocial interactions and paracommunication with new media characters. In Mediated Interpersonal Communication (1st ed., pp. 177–199). essay, Routledge.
    Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2005). Young adults` wishful identification with television characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media Psychology, 7(4), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0704_2
    Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1991). Perceiving and responding to mass media characters. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 63–101). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
    Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
    Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press.
    Hudders, L., De Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2021). The commercialization of social media stars: A literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 327–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925
    Hwang, K., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.029
    Igartua, J. J., & Guerrero-Martín, I. (2022). Personal migrant stories as persuasive devices: Effects of audience–character similarity and narrative voice. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.8237
    Interactive Advertising Bureau. (2018). Inside influence: Why publishers are increasingly turning to influencer marketing and what that means for marketers. Interactive Advertising Bureau. https://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads /2018/01/IAB_Influencer_Marketing_ for_Publishers_2018-01-25.pdf.
    Janssen, L., Schouten, A. P., & Croes, E. A. (2021). Influencer advertising on Instagram: Product-influencer fit and number of followers affect advertising outcomes and influencer evaluations via credibility and identification. International Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1994205
    Jarzyna, C. L. (2020). Parasocial interaction, the covid-19 quarantine, and digital Age Media. Human Arenas, 2020. 1–17.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00156-0
    Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A., & Ryu, E. (2019). Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37(5), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-09-2018-0375
    Jin, S. A. A., & Phua, J. (2014). Following celebrities’ tweets about brands: The impact of Twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers’ source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.827606
    Joseph, W. B. (1982). The credibility of physically attractive communicators: A review. Journal of Advertising, 11(3), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1982.10672807
    Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the “match-up” hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When Beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673175
    Kareklas, I., Muehling, D. D., & Weber, T. J. (2015). Reexamining health messages in the digital age: A fresh look at source credibility effects. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018461
    Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., & Parkinson, J. (2020). When less is more: The impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3-4), 248–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2020.1718740
    Ki, C. W., Cuevas, L. M., Chong, S. M., & Lim, H. (2020). Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102133
    Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H. Y. (2021). Trust me, Trust Me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024
    Kim, S. J., Maslowska, E., & Tamaddoni, A. (2019). The paradox of (dis)trust in sponsorship disclosure: The characteristics and effects of sponsored online consumer reviews. Decision Support Systems, 116, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.10.014
    KOL Radar. (2021, August 31). 2021 百大影響力網紅數據洞察報告書x數位時代. KOL Radar. Retrieved September 21, 2021, from https://www.kolradar.com/reports/2021-top100-kol
    Kurtin, K. S., O`Brien, N. F., Roy, D., & Dam, L. (2019). Parasocial Relationships with Musicians. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 8(2), 30–50.
    Le, K., & Aydin, G. (2022). Impact of the pandemic on social media influencer marketing in fashion: A qualitative study. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/qmr-11-2021-0133
    Lee, J. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2021). Perceived authenticity of social media influencers: Scale development and validation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 822–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-12-2020-0253
    Lee, S. S., & Johnson, B. K. (2022). Are they being authentic? the effects of self-disclosure and message sidedness on sponsored post effectiveness. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1986257
    Leite, F. P., & Baptista, P. D. P. (2022). The effects of social media influencers’ self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: The role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 30(3), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2021.1935275
    Li, Y., & Peng, Y. (2021). Influencer marketing: Purchase intention and its antecedents. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(7), 960–978. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-04-2021-0104
    Lim, X. J., Radzol, A. R. M., Cheah, J. H., & Wong, M. W. (2017). The impact of social media influencers on purchase intention and the mediation effect of customer attitude. Asian Journal of Business Research, 7(2), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.170035
    Lin, H. C., Bruning, P. F., & Swarna, H. (2018). Using online opinion leaders to promote the hedonic and utilitarian value of products and services. Business horizons, 61(3), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.010
    Lou, C. (2022). Social media influencers and followers: Theorization of a trans-parasocial relation and explication of its implications for influencer advertising. Journal of Advertising, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1880345
    Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
    Luo, M., & Hancock, J. T. (2020). Self-disclosure and social media: Motivations, mechanisms and psychological well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.019
    Luoma-aho, V., Pirttimäki, T., Maity, D., Munnukka, J., & Reinikainen, H. (2019). Primed authenticity: How priming impacts authenticity perception of social media influencers. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1617716
    Lyu, J., & Lehto Brewster, M. (2020). Exploring the parasocial impact of nano, micro and macro influencers. Pivoting for the Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.12254
    Mander, J., Buckle C., & Morris, T. (2020). Most important social media platforms for B2B and B2C marketers worldwide as of January 2020. GlobalWebIndex. https://www.gwi.com/reports/generation-z
    Mander, J. & Gilsenan K. (2019). Influencer marketing—Exploring the current influencer marketing landscape and its future potential. GlobalWebIndex. https://www.gwi.com/reports/influencer-marketing
    Masuda, H., Han, S. H., & Lee, J. (2022). Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121246
    McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310. https://doi.org/10.1086/209217
    Munnukka, J., Maity, D., Reinikainen, H., & Luoma-aho, V. (2019). “Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlogendorsements. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.014
    Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers` perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
    Olenski, S. (2018, April 2). Brands, branding and celebrities. Forbes. Retrieved January 2, 2022, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveolenski/2018/04/02/brands-branding-and-celebrities/?sh=5a6d8abe4db9
    Park, N., Jin, B., & Jin, S. A. A. (2011). Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1974–1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.004
    Peres, R., & Silva, M. (2021). The role of micro-influencers in the consumer decision-making process in the hospitality field. European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, 11(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2021-0010
    Perse, E. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Attribution in social and Parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016001003
    Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135–146. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488919
    Pöyry, E., Pelkonen, M., Naumanen, E., & Laaksonen, S.-M. (2019). A call for authenticity: Audience responses to social media influencer endorsements in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1609965
    Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: Collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020). ‘You really are a great big sister’ – parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in Influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3-4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2019.1708781
    Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and Guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261
    Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158709386664
    Ruppel, E. K. (2015). The affordance Utilization Model: Communication Technology use as relationships develop. Marriage & Family Review, 51(8), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2015.1061628
    Santora, J. (2022). Key influencer marketing statistics you need to know for 2022. Influencer Marketing Hub. https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-statistics/
    Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898
    Sepp, M., Liljander, V., & Gummerus, J. (2011). Private bloggers` motivations to produce content – A gratifications theory perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(13-14), 1479–1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2011.624532
    Shan, Y., Chen, K. J., & Lin, J. S. (2020). When social media influencers endorse brands: The effects of self-influencer congruence, parasocial identification, and perceived endorser motive. International Journal of Advertising, 39(5), 590–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1678322
    Sherman, E., Mathur, A., & Smith, R. B. (1997). Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: Mediating role of consumer emotions. Psychology and Marketing, 14(4), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199707)14:4<361::aid-mar4>3.0.co;2-7
    Shimp, T. A., & Kavas, A. (1984). The theory of reasoned action applied to coupon usage. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), 795. https://doi.org/10.1086/209015
    Shoenberger, H., & Kim, E. (2022). Explaining purchase intent via expressed reasons to follow an influencer, perceived homophily, and perceived authenticity. International Journal of Advertising, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2075636
    Shoenberger, H., Kim, E. A., & Johnson, E. K. (2019). #beingreal about Instagram ad models: The effects of perceived authenticity. Journal of Advertising Research, 60(2), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-2019-035
    Simon, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. Decision and organization, 1(1), 161-176.
    Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? how credibility and Parasocial Interaction Influence Purchase Intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011
    Stacey, H. (2019, May 17). Introducing Generation Z: The newest team member [Image attached] [Post]. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/introducing-generation-z-newest-team-member-helen-stacey/
    Stafford, M. R., Stafford, T. F., & Day, E. (2002). A contingency approach: The effects of spokesperson type and service type on service advertising perceptions. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673664
    Taiwan Network Information Center. (2020, December 11). Taiwan Internet Report 2020. Taiwan Network Information Center. Retrieved January 3, 2022, from https://report.twnic.tw/2020/en/TrendAnalysis_internetUsage.html
    Temperley, J. & Tangen, D. (2006). The Pinocchio factor in consumer attitudes towards celebrity endorsement: celebrity endorsement, the Reebok brand, and an examination of a recent campaign. Journal of Innovative Marketing, 2(3), 97-106.
    Tian, Q., & Hoffner, C. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903296051
    Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (1998). Matching products with endorsers: Attractiveness Versus Expertise. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(6), 576–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769810241445
    Torres, P., Augusto, M., & Matos, M. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of digital influencer endorsement: An exploratory study. Psychology & Marketing, 36(12), 1267–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21274
    Tukachinsky, R., Walter, N., & Saucier, C. J. (2020). Antecedents and effects of parasocial relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(6), 868–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa034
    Turner, J. R. (1993). Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers. Communication Quarterly, 41(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369904
    Uzunoğlu, E., & Kip, S. M. (2014). Brand communication through digital influencers: Leveraging blogger engagement. International journal of information management, 34(5), 592-602. https://DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.007
    van Driel, L., & Dumitrica, D. (2021). Selling brands while staying “authentic”: The Professionalization of Instagram influencers. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 27(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520902136
    Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., Semin-Goossens, A., Görts, C. A., & Stalpers, M. (1999). Being better than others but otherwise perfectly normal: Perceptions of uniqueness and similarity in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 6(3), 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00192.x
    Voorveld, H. A. M. (2019). Brand communication in social media: A research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1588808
    Wojdynski, B. W., Evans, N. J., & Hoy, M. G. (2018). Measuring sponsorship transparency in the age of native advertising. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 52(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12144
    Woodroof, P. J., Howie, K. M., Syrdal, H. A., & VanMeter, R. (2020). What’s done in the dark will be brought to the light: Effects of influencer transparency on product efficacy and purchase intentions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(5), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-05-2019-2362
    Yuan, C. L., Kim, J., & Kim, S. J. (2016). Parasocial relationship effects on customer equity in the social media context. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3795–3803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.071
    Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020). How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: The roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
    108461009
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108461009
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200926
    Appears in Collections:[國際傳播英語碩士學程] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100901.pdf2261KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback