政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/141025
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造访人次 : 51254723      在线人数 : 812
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/141025


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141025


    题名: 品牌供應商之綠色併購
    Bidding for Green: the Suppliers of Global Brands
    作者: 陸則壬
    Lu, Tse-Jen
    贡献者: 陳嬿如
    陸則壬
    Lu, Tse-Jen
    关键词: 併購
    綠色併購
    供應鏈
    品牌客戶
    碳排放
    碳風險
    巴黎協定
    Mergers and Acquisitions
    Green mergers and acquisitions
    Supply chain
    Brand customers
    Carbon emissions
    Carbon risk
    Paris Agreement
    日期: 2022
    上传时间: 2022-08-01 17:19:40 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 過去對於公司碳排放與併購的研究，均傾向於公司會進行併購的決策係為了將其面臨的碳風險分散或移轉到環境成本較低的國家。然而近年來投資人碳風險意識與碳排放政策監管幅度已大幅提升，使得市場上主要品牌公司除關注自身碳排放外，亦須開始管控其供應商碳排放，外在環境變遷對於品牌客戶之供應商產生莫大的生存壓力，使其必須即刻做出行動。
    本研究使用2013年至2015年與2017年至2019年共2,680供應商併購的樣本進行研究，並利用巴黎協定此影響全球碳排放政策與碳風險意識之廣泛外生衝擊與供應商之客戶碳排放屬性進行雙重差分法研究，結果發現相較於低碳排產業客戶之供應商，具高碳排產業客戶之供應商，在碳排放管控壓力增加時，宥於面臨較大的品牌客戶壓力，會進行更多氣候綠色併購，並發現其併購後環境績效會更明顯的上升，惟在進行高氣候綠色程度併購時，高碳排產業客戶之供應商之財務績效表現，相對於低碳排產業客戶之供應商表現差。
    Previous studies on carbon emissions and merger and acquisition (M&As) tended to conclude that companies making M&As in order to diversify or transfer their carbon risks to countries with lower environmental costs. However, in recent years, the carbon risk awareness of investors and the degree of emission regulation policy have changed significantly, making major brand companies pay attention to their own carbon emissions, but also to control the carbon emissions of their suppliers. Under the enormous pressure, suppliers must act immediately to survive.
    Using a sample of 2,680 mergers and acquisitions of suppliers from 2013 to 2015 and 2017 to 2019. This study leverages the Paris Agreement, a broad exogenous shock affecting global carbon policy and carbon risk awareness, to conduct a difference-in-difference study on purpose of suppliers’ M&As decisions, finding that compared with suppliers of customers in low carbon emission industry, suppliers with customers in high carbon emission industry face greater pressure from brand customers and conduct more climate green mergers and acquisitions. Moreover, their environmental performances will increase significantly after M&As. However, in higher degree of climate green mergers and acquisitions, post-merger financial performance of suppliers with high carbon emission industry customers is worse than that of suppliers of low carbon emission industry customers.
    參考文獻: Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hémous, D., Martin, R., and Van Reenen, J. (2016). Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry. Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 1-51.
    Ahern, K. R., Daminelli, D., and Fracassi, C. (2015). Lost in translation? The effect of cultural values on mergers around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 165-189.
    Albort-Morantm, G., Leal-Millán, A., and Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016). The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4912-4917.
    Ben-David, I., Jang, Y., Kleimeier, S., and Viehs, M. (2021). Exporting pollution: where do multinational firms emit CO2?. Economic Policy, 36(107), 377-437.
    Bolton, P., and Kacperczyk, M. T. (2022). Global Pricing of Carbon-Transition Risk. Working Paper.
    Bolton, P., and Marcin Kacperczyk. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk?. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549.
    Bonaime, A., Gulen, H., and Ion, M. (2018). Does policy uncertainty affect mergers and acquisitions?. Journal of Financial Economics, 129(3), 531-558.
    Bose, S., Minnic, K., and Shams, S. (2021). Does carbon risk matter for corporate acquisition decisions?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 70, 102058.
    Brunnermeier, S. B., and Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 278-293.
    Buckley, P. J., Forsans, N., and Munjal, S. (2012). Host–home country linkages and host–home country specific advantages as determinants of foreign acquisitions by Indian firms. International Business Review, 21(5), 878-890.
    Calel, R., and Dechezlepretre, A. (2016). Environmental policy and directed technological change: evidence from the European carbon market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98 (1), 173-191.
    Cooper, S. A., Raman, K.K., and Yin, J. (2018). Halo effect or fallen angel effect? Firm value consequences of greenhouse gas emissions and reputation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(3), 226-240.
    Dai, R., Duan, R., Liang, H., and Ng, L. (2021). Outsourcing Climate Change. European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance Working Paper.
    Dai, R., Liang, H., and Ng, L. (2021). Socially responsible corporate customers. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 598-626.
    DePamphilis, D. (2017). Mergers, Acquisitions, and Other Restructuring Activities: An Integrated Approach to Process, Tools, Cases, and Solutions (9th Edition). Academic Press.
    Desyllas, P., and Hughes, A. (2009). The Revealed Preferences of High Technology Acquirers: An Analysis of the Characteristics of Their Targets. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(6), 1089-1111.
    Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., and Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 673-714.
    Ederington, J., and Minier, J. (2003). Is environmental policy a secondary trade barrier? An empirical analysis. Canadian Journal of Economics, 36(1), 137-154.
    Engle, R. F., Giglio, S., Kelly, B., Lee, H,. and Stroebel, J. (2020). Hedging Climate Change News. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1184-1216.
    Erel, I., Liao, R. C., and Weisbach, M. S. (2012), Determinants of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 67(3), 1045-1082.
    Filip, A., Lobo, G. J., Paugam, L., and Stolowy, H. (2022). Disclosures About Key Value Drivers in M&A Announcement Press Releases: An Exploratory Study. Abacus, 58(1), 62-104.
    Hanna, R. (2010). US Environmental Regulation and FDI: Evidence from a Panel of US-Based Multinational Firms. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3), 158-89.
    Harrington, W., Morgenstern, R.D. and Nelson, P. (2000). On the accuracy of regulatory cost estimates. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(2), 297-322.
    Huang. X., Hu, Z., Liu, C., Yu, D., and Yu, L. (2016). The relationships between regulatory and customer pressure, green organizational responses, and green innovation performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(4), 3423-3433.
    Li, D., and Zeng, T. (2020). Are China’s intensive pollution industries greening? An analysis based on green innovation efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259(20), 120901.
    Li, K., Mai, F., Shen R., and Yan, X. (2021). Measuring Corporate Culture Using Machine Learning. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(7), 3265-3315.
    Li, X., and Zhou, Y. M. (2017). Offshoring Pollution while Offshoring Production?. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2310-2329.
    Malhotra, Shavin., and Gaur, A. S. (2014). Spatial geography and control in foreign acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2), 191-210.
    Pankratz, N. M. C., and Schiller, C. (2021). Climate Change and Adaptation in Global Supply-Chain Networks. European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance Working Paper.
    Porter, M. E., and van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
    PwC research (2021). PwC’s Global investor survey: The economic realities of ESG. Retrieved May 28, 2022, from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/corporate-reporting/assets/pwc-global-investor-survey-2021.pdf
    Rabier, M. R. (2017). Acquisition Motives and the Distribution of Acquisition Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38(13), 2666-2681.
    Rexhäuser, S., Rammer, C. (2014). Environmental Innovations and Firm Profitability: Unmasking the Porter Hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 57, 145-167.
    Salvi, A., Petruzzella, F., and Giakoumelou, A. (2018). Green M&A Deals and Bidders’ Value Creation: The Role of Sustainability in Post-Acquisition Performance. International Business Research, 11(7), 96.
    Saunila M., Ukko, Juhani., and Rantala, T. (2018). Sustainability as a driver of green innovation investment and exploitation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 631-641.
    Schiller, C. (2018). Global Supply-Chain Networks and Corporate Social Responsibility. 13th Annual Mid-Atlantic Research Conference in Finance (MARC) Paper.
    Sundgren, S., Mäki, J., and Somoza-López, A. (2018). Analyst Coverage, Market Liquidity and Disclosure Quality: A Study of Fair-value Disclosures by European Real Estate Companies Under IAS 40 and IFRS 13. The International Journal of Accounting, 53(1), 54-75.
    World Economic Forum (2021). Net-Zero Challenge: The supply chain opportunity. Retrieved May 28, 2022, from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Net_Zero_Challenge_The_Supply_Chain_Opportunity_2021.pdf
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    1108710
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109357025
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200695
    显示于类别:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    702501.pdf3542KbAdobe PDF20检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈