政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/140993
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51709377      Online Users : 487
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140993


    Title: 審計品質指標制度之研究：全球趨勢與比較
    Research on Audit Quality Indicators: Global Trends and Comparisons
    Authors: 陳昭宇
    Chen, Chao-Yu
    Contributors: 戚務君
    Chi, Wu-Chun
    陳昭宇
    Chen, Chao-Yu
    Keywords: 審計品質指標
    AQI
    Audit Quality Indicators
    AQI
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-08-01 17:11:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 審計品質向來是審計研究之重要議題，然而學術界及產業界對於如何定義審計品質至今尚未達成共識。在此背景下，世界各國的監管機構陸續著手推動審計品質指標(Audit Quality Indicators；AQI)，期許透過量化與審計品質相關之因素，以協助衡量審計品質之優劣；惟綜觀各國審計品質指標制度，即使制度名稱相同，但其指標組成、規範方式以及預期使用者都有著顯著的差異。以下條列本論文的主要研究貢獻。首先，本研究綜整各國審計品質指標之歷史脈絡，以及推動審計品質指標具代表性國家之制度與規範。其次，本文對這些國家的審計品質指標進行比較分析，探究其制度之異同。最後則針對我國推動審計品質指標制度提供相關建議。
    Audit quality has always been an important issue in audit research. However, there have not yet reached a consensus on the definition of audit quality. In this context, regulatory around the world have been promoting Audit Quality Indicators (AQI) to help measure audit quality by quantifying the factors related to audit quality. Despite the name, there are significant differences in the component, approach and potential users of AQI. The following are the main research contributions of the study. First, the study summarizes the historical context, the systems and standards of AQI in representative countries. Second, the study compares and analyzes AQI of those countries to explore the similarities and differences of their systems. Last but not the least, the study provide suggestions for promoting AQI system in Taiwan.
    Reference: 立法院，2021，立法院公報第110卷第33期委員會紀錄。
    立法院，2021，立法院公報第110卷第51期委員會紀錄。
    金融監督管理委員會，2020，公司治理3.0-永續發展藍圖。
    金融監督管理委員會，2020，資本市場藍圖(推動方案)。
    金融監督管理委員會，2020，108年度審計監理報告。
    金融監督管理委員會，2021，109年度審計監理報告。
    金融監督管理委員會，2021，「強化上市櫃外國公司 (KY公司)之公司治理及監理機制」專題報告。
    金融監督管理委員會，2021，審計品質指標(AQI)揭露架構。
    金融監督管理委員會，2021，審計品質指標(AQI)揭露範本。
    金融監督管理委員會，2022，會計師事務所透明度報告編製原則。
    林生傳，2003，教育研究法：全方位的統整與分析，臺北市：心理。
    馬佳琪、陳英閔，2020，出席「審計監理機關國際論壇」(IFIAR)2020年檢查工作小組會議報告，行政院所屬各機關因公出國人員出國報告書。
    黃天牧、黃仲豪、陳英閔，2018，出席「審計監理機關國際論壇」IFIAR2018年會員大會，金融監督管理委員會因公出國人員出國報告書。
    葉立誠、葉至誠，1999，研究方法與論文寫作，臺北市：商鼎文化。
    鍾怡如、陳英閔，2020，國際間審計品質指標(AQI)推動情形，證券暨期貨月刊，第三十八卷，第4期：6-18。
    Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. 2015. Practice monitoring programme 9th public reports 2015.
    Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. 2015. Deepening the audit quality conversation.
    Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. 2015. Guidance to audit committees on ACRA`s audit quality indicators disclosure framework.
    Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. 2015. Guidance to audit firms on ACRA’s audit quality indicators disclosure framework.
    Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. 2015. Sample presentation format on ACRA’s AQI disclosure framework.
    Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. 2016. Practice monitoring programme 10th public reports 2016.
    Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. 2020. Guidance to audit committees on ACRA`s revised AQI disclosure framework.
    Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. 2020. Guidance to audit firms on ACRA`s revised AQI disclosure framework.
    Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. 2020. Sample presentation format for ACRA`s revised AQI disclosure framework.
    Bedard, J.C., K. M. Johnstone, and E. F. Smith. 2010. Audit quality indicators: a status update on possible public disclosures and insights from audit practice. Current Issues in Auditing 4 (January): 12-19.
    Brown, V. L., J. L. Gissel, and D.G. Neely. 2016. Audit quality indicators: perceptions of junior-level auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal 31 (September): 949-980.
    Brown, J. O., and V. K. Popova. 2019. How do investors respond to disclosure of audit quality indicators? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 38 (November): 31-53.
    Brown, J. O., and V. K. Popova. 2021. Showcasing audit quality through voluntary public disclosure of audit quality indicators. Current Issues in Auditing 15 (May): 17-26.
    Canadian Public Accountability Board. 2014. Audit quality indicators: in search of the right measures.
    Canadian Public Accountability Board. 2016. Transparency into the audit – audit quality indicators and transparency reporting.
    Canadian Public Accountability Board. 2016. 2016 Audit quality indicators pilot project interim report.
    Canadian Public Accountability Board. 2017. CPAB audit quality indicators pilot project 2017 interim update.
    Canadian Public Accountability Board, and Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. 2018. Audit committee guide to audit quality indicators.
    Canadian Public Accountability Board. 2018. Audit quality indicators final report.
    Canadian Public Accountability Board. 2019. Audit quality indicators: how to put them to work.
    Center for Audit Quality. 2014. The CAQ approach to audit quality indicators.
    Center for Audit Quality. 2016. Audit quality indicators: the journey and path ahead.
    Center for Audit Quality. 2019. Audit quality disclosure framework.
    Comissão do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários. 2020. Guide for the application of audit quality indicators.
    Comissão do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários. 2021. Guide for the application of audit quality indicators updated in april 2021.
    Comissão do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários. 2021. Global results of the quality control system on the audit activity for the 2020/2021 cycle.
    Council of Institutional Investors. 2020. Re: PCAOB rulemaking docket no. 046: concept release, potential approach to revisions to PCAOB quality control standards.
    CFA Institute. 2020. Re: PCAOB rulemaking docket no. 046: concept release, potential approach to revisions to PCAOB quality control standards.
    DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor independence, ‘low balling,’ and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (August): 113-127.
    Dechow, P., and D. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77: 35-59.
    DeFond, M., and J. Zhang. 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 58 (November–December): 275-326.
    Deloitte デロイト トウシュ トーマツ. 2021. 監査品質に関する報告書 2021. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/jp/ja/pages/about-deloitte/articles/audit/audit-quality-report.html. Accessed: May 11, 2022.
    European Union. 2006. Directive 2006/43/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 17 may 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending council directives 78/660/eec and 83/349/eec and repealing council directive 84/253/eec.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2009. Activity report 2009.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2010. Activity report 2010.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2011. Activity report 2011.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2012. Activity report 2012.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2013. Activity report 2013.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2014. Activity report 2014.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2015. Activity report 2015.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2016. Annual report 2016.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2017. Annual report 2017.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2018. Annual report 2018.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2019. Annual report 2019.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2020. Annual report 2020.
    Federal Audit Oversight Authority. 2021. Annual report 2021.
    Federation of European Accountants. 2016. Overview of audit quality indicators initiatives.
    Financial Reporting Council. 2008. The audit quality framework.
    Financial Reporting Council. 2020. Audit quality indicators aqr thematic review.
    Francis, J. R. 2011. A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (May): 125-152.
    Harris, M. K., and L. T. Williams. 2020. Audit quality indicators: perspectives from non-big four audit firms and small company audit committees. Advances in Accounting 50 (September): 1-13.
    International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators. 2021. Internationally relevant developments in audit markets.
    Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors. 2017. Public inspections report 2017.
    Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors. 2019. Feedback report: audit quality indicators.
    Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors. 2021. Survey report: audit quality indicators.
    International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. 2014. A framework for audit quality.
    Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Autumn): 193-228.
    Knechel, W. R., G. V. Krishnan, M. Pevzner, L. B. Shefchik, and U. K. Velury. 2013. Audit quality: insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32 (November): 385-421.
    KPMG AZSA. 2021. AZSA Quality 2021/22(監査品質向上への取組). Available at: https://home.kpmg/jp/ja/home/about/azsa/stakeholders/azsa-quality.html. Accessed: May 11, 2022.
    Martin, R. D. 2013. Audit quality indicators: audit practice meets audit research. Current Issues in Auditing 7 (August): 17-23.
    Nederlandse Beroepsorganisatie van Accountants. 2014. In the public interest.
    Nederlandse Beroepsorganisatie van Accountants. 2016. NBA practice note 1135 disclosure of audit quality factors.
    Pinello, A. S., A. G. Volkan, J. Franklin, M. Levatino, and K. Tiernan. 2019. The PCAOB audit quality indicator framework project: feedback from stakeholders. Journal of Business & Economics Research 16 (February): 1-8.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2008. Discussion – treasury advisory committee’s recommendation relating to the feasibility of developing key indicators of audit quality and effectiveness. October 22-23, 2008.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2012. Strategic plan: improving the relevance and quality of the audit for the protection and benefit of investors 2012-2016.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2013. Discussion – audit quality indicators. May 15-16, 2013.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2013. Investor advisory group meeting. October 16, 2013.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2013. Discussion – audit quality indicators. November 14, 2013.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2014. Initiatives to improve audit quality -- root cause analysis, audit quality indicators, and quality control standards. June 24–25, 2014.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2015. PCAOB release no. 2015-05 (PCAOB rulemaking docket matter no. 041): concept release on audit quality indicators.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2015. Audit quality indicators – update and discussion. November 12-13, 2015.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2016. Investor advisory working group progress and update report on advisory committee on accounting profession’s recommendations. October 27, 2016.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2017. Panel discussion – audit quality indicators. November 29-30, 2017.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2018. Strategic plan 2018-2022.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2019. Strategic plan 2019-2023.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2020. Strategic plan 2020-2024.
    PwC Japan グループ. 2021. 監査品質に関する報告書 2021. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/jp/ja/about-us/member/assurance/transparency-report.html. Accessed: May 11, 2022.
    Rezaee, Z., J. Abernathy, M. Causholli, P. N. Michas, P. B. Roush, S. Rowe, and U. K. Velury. 2016. Comments of the auditing standards committee of the auditing section of the american accounting association on PCAOB concept release on audit quality indicators, No. 2015-005, July 1, 2015. Current Issues in Auditing 10 (October): 11-27.
    The Dutch Ministry of Finance. 2021. Consultatiedocument audit quality indicators.
    The Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 2018. 監査品質の指標（AQI）に関する研究報告.
    U.S. Department of the Treasury Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession. 2008. Final report.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    109353040
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109353040
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200703
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    304001.pdf5170KbAdobe PDF2204View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback