English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50942005      Online Users : 999
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/140986
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140986


    Title: 現金持有與成本僵固性之關聯
    The Association between Cash Holdings and Cost Stickiness
    Authors: 廖思宇
    Liao, Si-Yu
    Contributors: 潘健民
    廖思宇
    Liao, Si-Yu
    Keywords: 超額現金
    現金持有
    成本僵固性
    Excess cash
    Cash holdings
    Cost stickiness
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-08-01 17:07:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本研究以東京證券交易所上市企業為對象,探討現金持有與成本僵固性之關聯。成本僵固性係指成本隨著成本動因不同方向的變動時,呈現不對稱比例變動的成本行為,而通常認為此一現象發生的主因是管理者對於成本投入決策之審慎態度以及調整成本的產生。與其他主要工業國家之企業相比,日本企業的現金持有一直以來比其他國家之企業還要高,而現金代表一個企業之資源的根本,企業可以產生虧損,但企業手頭上不能沒有現金,因此,企業之現金持有的多寡代表著企業面對經營環境變化時的韌性。
      本研究之實證結果顯示,與過去的文獻一致,日本企業之銷管費用普遍存有成本僵固性之現象,然而,超額現金持有與成本僵固性並沒有關聯。
    Using data from firms listed in the Tokyo Stock Exchange, this paper investigates whether corporate cash holdings affect cost stickiness. Cost stickiness refers to the asymmetric cost behaviors in relation to the change in sales. The main reason for the asymmetric cost behavior is generally considered as the cost decisions and the adjustment costs. Japanese firm have higher cash holdings compared to their counterparts in other major industrial countries. Cash is the essence resource of a firm. A firm can survive while reporting loses but may not survive without cash.
    The empirical results find cost stickiness on Japanese firms but no association between cash holdings.
    Reference: Anderson, M. C., R. D. Banker, and S. N. Janakiraman. 2003. Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research 41 (1): 47-63.
    Anderson, M. C., R. D. Banker, R. Huang, and S. N. Janakiraman. 2007. Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 22 (1): 1-28.
    Balakrishnan, R., M.J. Petersen, and N. S. Soderstrom. 2004. Does capacity utilization affect the ”stickiness” of cost? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 19 (3): 283-300.
    Balakrishnan, R., and T. S. Gruca. 2008. Cost stickiness and core competency: A note. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (4): 993-1006.
    Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, and L. Chen. 2013. Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs, and cross-country differences in cost behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics 55 (1): 111-127.
    Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, M. Ciftci, and R. Mashruwala. 2014. The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research 26 (2): 221-242.
    Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, and J. M. Plehn-Dujowich. 2010. Demand uncertainty and cost behavior. Accounting Review 89 (3): 839-865.
    Banker, R. D., and L. Chen. 2006. Predicting earning using a model of cost variability and cost stickiness. Accounting Review 81 (1): 285-307.
    Banker , R. D., R. Huang, and Y. Yan. 2022. Flexible or Rigid? Evidence on Managerial Ability and Cost Structure. Baruch College Zicklin School of Business Research Paper No. 2019-05-01, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3374478 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3374478
    Basu, S., L. S. Hwang, T. Mitsudome, and J. Weintrop. 2007. Corporate governance, top executive compensation and firm performance in Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 15 (1): 56-79.
    Bates, T., K. Kahle, and R. Stulz. 2009. Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? Journal of Finance 64 (5): 1985-2021.
    Belghitar, Y., and J. Khan. 2013. Governance mechanisms, investment opportunity set and SMEs cash holdings. Small Business Economics 40 (1): 59-72.
    Chen, C. X., H. Lu, and T. Sougiannis. 2012. The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research 29 (1): 252-282.
    Cooper, R. W., and R. S. Kaplan. 1998. The Design of Cost Management Systems: Text, Cases, and Readings (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Donaldson, G. 1961. Corporate Debt Capacity: A study of corporate debt policy and the determination of corporate debt capacity. Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76 (2): 323-329.
    Harford, J., S. Klasa, and W. F. Maxwell. 2014. Refinancing risk and cash holdings. Journal of Finance 69 (3): 975-1012.
    He, D., J. Teruya, and T. Shimizu. 2010. Sticky selling, general, and administrative cost behaviour, and its changes in Japan. Global Journal of Business Research 4 (4): 1-10.
    Kato, K., M. Li, and D. J. Skinner. 2017. Is Japan really a “buy”? The corporate governance, cash holdings and economic performance of Japanese companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 44 (3): 480-523.
    Kim, M., and J. P. Kinsey. 2010. An additional source of financial analysts’ earnings forecast errors: Imperfect adjustments for cost behavior. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 25 (1): 27-51.
    Mikkelson, W. H., and M. M. Partch. 2003. Do persistent large cash reserves hinder performance? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38 (2): 275-294.
    Miller, M. H., and D. Orr. 1966. A model of the demand for money by firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (3): 413-435.
    Modigliani, F., and M. H. Miller. 1963. Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. American Economic review 53 (3): 433-443.
    Myers, S.C., and N. Majluf. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firm have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13 (2): 187-221.
    Nakano, M., and P. Nguyen. 2012. Board size and corporate risk taking: Further evidence from Japan. Coporate Governance: International Review 20 (4): 369-387.
    Noreen, E. 1991. Conditions under which activity-based cost systems provide relevant costs. Journal of Management Accounting Research 3 (4): 159-168.
    Opler, T., L. Pinkowitz, R. M. Stulz, and R. Williamson. 1999. The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics 52 (1): 3-46.
    Palazzo, B. 2012. Cash holdings, risk, and expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics 104 (1): 162-185.
    Pinkowitz , L., R. M. Stulz, and R. Williamson. 2016. Do U.S. firms hold more cash than foreign firms do? Review of Financial Studies 29: 309-48.
    Pinkowitz, L., and R. Williamson. 2001. Bank power and cash holdings: Evidence from Japan. Review of Financial Studies 14 (3-4): 1059-1082.
    Rountee, B., J. P. Weston, and G. Allayannis. 2008. Do investors value smooth performance? Journal of Financial Economics 90: 237-251.
    Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1993. Liquidation values and debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach. Journal of Finance 47 (4): 1343-1366.
    Sunder, L. S., and S.C. Myers. 1999. Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics 51 (2): 219-244.
    Weiss, D. 2010. Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. Accounting Review 85(4): 1441-1471.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    109353024
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109353024
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200614
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    302401.pdf1501KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback