English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50934436      Online Users : 934
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/140779


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140779


    Title: 歐盟母性保護制度之經驗分析
    Experiences of Maternity Protection in the EU
    Authors: 陳靜慧
    Chen, Ching-hui
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 母性保護;性別實質平等;懷孕歧視;產假;育嬰假;性別刻板印象;多元性別
    Maternity protection;Substantive gender equality;Pregnancy discrimination;Maternity leave;Parental leave;Gender stereotypes;Gender pluralism
    Date: 2019-06
    Issue Date: 2022-07-04 13:01:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 母性保護（Maternity Protection）制度提供準母親和為母親者特別保護，惟母性保護制度是否有助於提升女性的地位而促進性別實質平等，或者其本身就構成性別歧視，存有爭議。就此歐盟採取的態度是承認女性生育能力造成其在職場上受不利益的事實，故有必要適度採取母性保護措施。本文以產假及育嬰假為中心，探討歐盟母性保護措施是否能有效防制懷孕與生育歧視，進而促進性別實質平等。首先介紹歐盟與產假及育嬰假有關之規範框架，接著分析歐盟法院與此議題相關之判決，再以此為基礎綜合評析歐盟法制的優缺，並思考歐盟經驗對我國之啟示。
    Maternity protection at the workplace is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it needs to protect pregnant women and women workers who recently gave birth from discrimination; On the other hand, it might reinforce gender stereotypes and turn them into less attractive within the labour market. This paper aims to analyze how EU supports substantive gender equality through maternity protection measures, especially with regard to maternity and parental leave. This paper will first introduce the EU framework, then explore the significant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) related to pregnancy and rights associated with maternity and parental leave, and finally examine the law on pregnancy discrimination, maternity and parental leave in Taiwan to evaluate whether the EU experience in this field can provide any lessons for Taiwan.
    Relation: 華岡法粹, No.66, pp.93-142
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法學院] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2348View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback