English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50936109      Online Users : 953
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/140772


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140772


    Title: 同性生活伴侶之平等權問題--以歐洲法院、德國聯邦憲法法院及德國聯邦行政法院之判決為中心
    Equality for Life Partnership--Using the Judgments of European Court of Justice, Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and Federal Administrative Court of Germany as Examples
    Authors: 陳靜慧
    Chen, Ching-hui
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 同性生活伴侶;婚姻;平等權;性傾向;制度性保障
    Life partnership;Marriage;Equality;Sexual orientation;Institutional protection
    Date: 2010-01
    Issue Date: 2022-07-04 13:00:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 德國自同性生活伴侶法制化後，對於是否給予同性生活伴侶與婚姻配偶相同之地位一直有爭議。本文以德國基本法之平等權為中心，首先探討禁止同性婚姻之合憲性。其次檢討同性生活伴侶制度應如何形塑，方符合基本法之意旨。就此係以同性生活伴侶之遺屬是否能如同婚姻配偶之遺屬，請求遺屬照護年金之議題為例，分析德國聯邦憲法法院及德國聯邦行政法院相關判決之見解，以及歐洲法院依據歐盟法規定，對相類似案件所採取之立場為何。最後提出德國法院應如何調控同性生活伴侶與婚姻制度兩者之關係，始能兼顧既不牴觸歐盟法，又符合基本法意旨的要求。
    Since 1 August 2001, Germany has allowed registered partnerships for same-sex couples with the Life Partnership Act. It is, however, highly controversial, whether these partnerships could be granted equal rights to those given to married couples. This paper studies this issue in view of the right of equality. First, it begins with the constitutionality of prohibition of same-sex marriage according to the German Basic Law. The next section explores the constitutionality of the substance of the Life Partnership Act. It is a question of whether same-sex couples could not be granted equal rights to those given to married couples in an effort to observe the ”special protection” which the German constitution provided for marriage and the family. The third section discusses the issue of withholding certain privileges, such as pension rights for widow(er)s. It reviews the subject matter by analyzing of the judgments of European Court of Justice, Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and Federal Administrative Court of Germany. The fourth and final section draws conclusions on the topic.
    Relation: 東吳法律學報, Vol.21, No.3, pp.161-195
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6416/SLR.201001.0161
    DOI: 10.6416/SLR.201001.0161
    Appears in Collections:[法學院] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2243View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback