English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50924318      Online Users : 896
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140731


    Title: 企業專案之社會投資報酬效益分析- 以大腹翁小腹婆第一期專案為例
    Social Return of Investment for a Corporate Project – A Case of the 2016~2018 Weight Loss Contest
    Authors: 宮睿駿
    Kung, Jui-Chun
    Contributors: 別蓮蒂
    Bei, Lien-Ti
    宮睿駿
    Kung, Jui-Chun
    Keywords: 企業社會責任
    社會投資報酬率
    Corporate Social Responsibility
    Social return on investment
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-07-01 16:35:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之主題為計算國泰金控於2016所舉辦的「第一期大腹翁小腹婆專案」之社會投資報酬率 (Social Return On Investment, 簡稱SROI)。研究結果顯示,第一期大腹翁小腹婆專案的SROI值為4.43元,且由於整個專案是以前三年的投入來創造後續20年的效益,代表在此專案中每投入1元的成本,累積20年的效益可為社會以及環境帶來4.43元的成效。

    本研究之特色在於,有別於以往國內學術界與SROI相關的研究,其計算的主題大多是以一項短期的活動為主,此次研究的專案為國內首個結合員工減重、太陽能建置、以及長者健康的階段性大型專案,此專案進行的方式是由國泰金控舉辦減重競賽,並承諾只要員工每減一公斤就會捐出100元,以當作建置太陽能板的資金,並將太陽能板的售電收入扣除維運、稅務等必要成本後,再次投入弘道老人福利中心的長者生命回顧活動。透過三大階段活動環環相扣的方式,來達到「員工減重、大地減碳、長者健康」等三赢的效果,進一步擴大減重競賽的社會影響力。另外,此專案的時間範疇一共長達23年,包含2016至2018年的國泰金控減重競賽以及後續20年的太陽能板發電與長者生命回顧活動,而本研究的研究時間2021年,是位於整個專案計劃的第7年,因此屬於包含評估型和預測型SROI方法的混合型SROI研究。故未來欲舉辦減重競賽、投資太陽能板、與非營利機構合作或是需要計算長期活動SROI值之相關企業或團體,皆能夠以本研究為借鏡,進而掌握舉辦相關活動時可能受到影響的利害關係人和可能產生的影響力。

    此外,本研究也點出以SROI評估社會影響力的優缺點。其中優點包含有效掌握活動中的每一個環節以及有效挖掘利害關係人之內心感受,而缺點則包含了解影響力的過程較耗費時間、影響力貨幣化的方式可能過度主觀,以及SROI量化的計算邏輯可能導致操作者傾向以績效考量等問題。最後,本研究也針對本專案計算SROI時可能會碰到的問題與限制,提出一些建議與方向,以供未來的研究者能夠更快的掌握計算時須注意的事項。
    The goal of this study is to calculate the social return on investment (SROI) ofthe 2016~2018 Weight Loss Contest for Cathay Financial Holdings Co., Ltd. The results found that the SROI value of the the project is 4.43, which means that investing 1 NTD in this project can generate 4.43 NTD for the society.

    Different from previous studies related to SROI which were often based on a short-term activity, the project in this study consists of three phases: weight loss contests, solar energy construction, and the activities for the elderly, that are spread over a span of 23 years.

    The whole project of Weight Loss Contest involved several stakeholders and partners. First, Cathay Financial Holdings Co., Ltd.held weight loss contests from 2016 to 2018 and promised that as long as employees lose one kilogram, it would donate 100 NTD as the fund for the solar energy construction. Afterwards, it would use the profit it gained from the solar panels to invest in the activities for the elderly at HonDao Senior Citixen’s Weldare Foundation. By doing so, the three phases of the project would be linked to each other, and the cost of the third phase can be automatically generated during the process of the project.
    As a result, groups that want to host weight loss contests, invest in solar panels, cooperate with non-profit organizations, or need to calculate the SROI value of long-term activities in the future can use this study as a reference to understand the possible impact generated by those activities.

    In addition, this study not only points out the advantages and disadvantages of SROI but also provides some suggestions for future researchers to better deal with the issues and limitations that may be encountered when calculating SROI.
    Reference: 一、 中文參考文獻
    CSRone永續智庫 (2017),SVI執行長Nicholls來台推廣 社會價值量化呈現,https://csrone.com/topics/4227,擷取日期:2021年6月20日。
    CSRone永續智庫 (2017),利用SROI管理與創新CSR活動 澳洲橄欖球聯盟NRL社區經營,https://csrone.com/topics/4229,擷取日期:2021年7月2日。
    CSRone永續智庫 (2021),2021臺灣暨亞洲永續報告現況與趨勢, https://csrone.com/reports/4280,擷取日期:2021年7月5日。
    中華民國中央銀行全球資訊網 (2021),新台幣/美元 銀行間收盤匯率,https://www.cbc.gov.tw/tw/lp-645-1-116-20.html,擷取日期:2021年12月5日。
    中華民國經濟部 (2021),公司法第1條,https://gcis.nat.gov.tw/elaw/lawDtlAction.do?method=lawToCons&pk=19&art=1&dash=0,擷取日期:2021年7月20日。
    中華郵政(股)公司 (2022),郵政儲金利率表(年息),https://ipost.post.gov.tw/pst/index.html ,擷取日期:2022年2月19日。
    全球華人股份有限公司 (2021),社會工作人員/督導的平均薪資範圍,https://www.jobsalary.com.tw/salarysummary.aspx?codeNo=280114,擷取日期:2021年12月10日。
    吳宗昇 (2017),社會發展政策中長期個案計畫應用社會報酬率(SROI)評估之分析—以辦理原住民相關職業訓練為例,臺灣公共治理指標調查及公共治理相關議題研究,頁10。
    吳宗昇、周宗穎、張抒凡 (2013),公益創投的嘗試與探索:公益2.0案例的SROI成效評估,社區發展季刊,143 期,頁95-127。
    吳宗昇和李俊達 (2018),政策的社會效益評估:SROI的應用與反思,國土及公共治理季刊,第六卷,第三期,頁40-49。
    李宜樺、吳佳餘、朱恩言 (2017),公共服務影響評估工具-「社會投資報酬率(SROI)」介紹,國土及公共治理季刊,第五卷,第一期,頁30-32。
    李宜樺和張瑞婷 (2020),資誠企業永續發展新訊,與投資人有效溝通的永續語言:SASB 準則,https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/sustainability-news/sustainability-news-200413.html,擷取日期:2021年7月17日。
    李宜樺和蔡佳芸 (2021),SROI透視永續影響力,https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/sustainability-news/sustainability-news-210312.html,擷取日期:2021年7月2日。
    李振北 (2020),【互動圖表】分析全球近60,000本CSR報告數據,掌握各國永續報告之發展脈絡,永訊智庫,https://www.sustaihub.com/articles/blog/global-csr-report-data-analysis-2020/,擷取日期:2021年6月4日。
    林珮萱 (2019),搞懂CSR 關鍵20問一次解答 從釐清概念到提供落實策略,https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/39488,擷取日期:2021年7月18日。
    金融監督管理委員會 (2020),「公司治理 3.0- 永續發展藍圖」,https://www.sfb.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=95&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202008250004&dtable=News,擷取日期:2021年7月4日。
    財團法人台灣產業服務基金會 (2015),專案報導:企業社會責任報告書 (Corporate Sustainability Reports),台灣產業服務基金會 (ftis.org.tw),擷取日期:2021年7月4日。
    高于翔 (2019),淨灘活動之社會投資報酬率-以龍門海灘淨灘活動為例,國立政治大學企業管理研究所 (MBA學位學程) 碩士學位論文。
    張抒凡 (2013),如何評估社會企業的績效?社會創新方案的SROI評估,天主教輔仁大學社會學系碩士班碩士論文。
    產業永續發展整合資訊網 (2020),「氣候相關財務揭露(TCFD)」介紹,https://proj.ftis.org.tw/isdn/Message/MessageView/245?mid=47&page=1,擷取日期:2021年7月18日。
    陳定銘和倪嘉苓 (2018),社會企業社會影響力評估指標之分析,頁5。
    陳厚儒 (2017),台灣企業永續發展從哪裡來?又從哪裡去?(系列二之一),CSRone,https://csrone.com/topics/4431,擷取日期:2021年6月5日。
    陳嬿竹 (2019),社會報酬率(SROI)使用之原則與限制與我國企業導入現況,https://portal.stpi.narl.org.tw/index/article/10514,,擷取日期:2021年7月2日。
    資誠聯合會計師事務所 (2018),TIMM管理架構 創造EPS+ESG全面影響力,https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/40566,擷取日期:2021年6月20日。
    鉅亨 (2000),美元/台幣 USD/TWD,https://invest.cnyes.com/forex/detail/USDTWD/history,擷取日期:2021年12月5日。
    臺灣證券交易所公司治理中心 (2018),企業社會責任簡介,https://cgc.twse.com.tw/front/responsibility ,擷取日期:2021年6月4日。

    二、 英文參考文獻
    Anderson, C. L. & Bieniaszewska, R. L. (2005). The role of corporate social responsibility in an oil company`s expansion into new territories. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12(1), pp. 1-9.
    Beal, D., Eccles, R., Hansell, G., Lesser, R., Unnikrishnan, S., Woods, W., & Young, D. (2017). Total Societal Impact: A New Lens for Strategy, pp.14-21.
    Bowen, H. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, Harper Brothers, pp.14-22.
    Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34 (4), pp. 39-48.
    CDSB (2019). CDSB Framework: Advancing and Aligning Disclosure of Environmental Information, CDP Worldwild, Retrieved from https://www.cdsb.net/what-we-do/reporting-frameworks/environmental-information-natural-capital on July 18, 2021.
    CDSB & SASB, (2019). TCFD Implementation Guide, Retrieved from https://www.sasb.org/knowledge-hub/tcfd-implementation-guide/ on July 17, 2021.
    Clark, C., Rosenzweig, W., Long, D., & Olsen, S. (2004). Double Bottom Line Project Report: Assessing Social Impact in Double Bottom Line Ventures, The Rockefeller Foundation, pp.6-8.
    Committee for Economic Development. (1971). Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations, Committee for Economic Development, pp.11-16.
    Davis, K. P. & Blomstorm, R. L. (1966). Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility. McGraw-Hill, p.7.
    Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: the role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), pp.224-241.
    Durand, R., Rodgers, Z., & Lee, S. (2019). Social Impact Assessment Strategy Report, p.15.
    Eilbirt, H. & Parket, R. (1973). The current status of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 16(4), pp.5–14.
    Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, New Society, pp.73-94.
    Epstein, M. J. & Yuthas, K. (2014). Measuring and Improving Social Impacts: A Guide for Nonprofits, Companies, and Impact Investors, Berrett-Koehler, pp.18-21.
    Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over social responsibility. California Management Review, 2(4), pp. 54-61.
    Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman Publishing Inc., p.25.
    Friedman M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine. p.126
    Gair, C. (2002). A report from the good ship SROI. The Roberts Foundation, Retrieved from http://www.socialreturns.org/docs/ good_ship_sroi_gair.pdf on July 1, 2021.
    GRI (2020). GRI Database, Retrieved from https://database.globalreporting.org/ on July 17, 2021.
    GRI (2021). GRI and SASB reporting ‘complement each other’ Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/about-gri/news-center/gri-and-sasb-reporting-complement-each-other/ on July 18, 2021.
    Husted, B. W. (2003). Governance choices for corporate social responsibility: To contribute, collaborate or internalize? Long Range Planning, 36(5), pp.481–498.
    IIRC (2013). International <IR> Framework, IIRC, Retrieved from https://integratedreporting.org/resource/international-ir-framework/ on July 17, 2021.
    International Finance Corporation (2013). How IFC measures development results. The World Bank, Retrieved from https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/357751468326410586/pdf on June 20, 2021.
    KPMG (2014). A New Vision of Value Connecting: Corporate and Societal Value Creation, KPMG, Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2014/10/a-new-vision-of-value-v1.pdf on June 20, 2021.
    KPMG (2020). The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020. Retrieved from https://home.kpmg/be/en/home/insights/2020/12/sus-the-kpmg-survey-of-sustainability-reporting-2020.html on June 4,2021.
    McGuire, J.W. (1963). Business and Society, The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp.140-147.
    Mirvis, P. & Googins, B. (2006). Stages of corporate citizenship. California Management Review, 48(2), pp.104–126.
    Nicholls, J., Lawlor, E., Neitzert, E., & Goodspeed, T. (2012). A Guide to Social Return on Investment, London: Office of the Third Sector, The Cabinet Office, pp.8-10.
    Porter, M. E. & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), pp.56–68.
    Porter, M. E. & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), pp.78–92.
    PwC (2013). Measuring and Managing Total Impact: A New Language for Business Decisions, PwC, Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/sustainability/publications/total-impact-measurement-management/assets/pwc-timm-report.pdf on June 20, 2021.
    Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of corporate moral development. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(4), pp.273–284.
    Rotheroe, N., & Richards, A. (2007). Social return on investment and social enterprise: transparent accountability for sustainable development. Social Enterprise Journal, 3(1), pp.31-48.
    Siltaloppi, J., Rajala, R., & Hietala, H. (2020). Integrating CSR with business strategy: a tension management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, pp.1-21.
    Social Ventures Australia. (2014). Forecast Social Return on Investment, Australian Government Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, p57.
    Steiner, G. A. (1972). Social Policies for Business. California Management Review, 15(2), pp.17-24.
    Székely, F., & Knirsch, M. (2005). Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, 23(6), pp.628-647.
    Wainwright, S. (2002). Measuring Impact: A guide to resources, National Council for Voluntary Organizations, p.27.
    Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), pp.539–552.
    Wheeler, D., Fabig, H., & Boele, R. (2002). Paradoxes and dilemmas for stakeholder responsive firms in the extractive sector: Lessons from the case of Shell and the Ogoni. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), pp.297–318.
    World Bank Group (2017). Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices. World Bank Group, Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54ff9c5ce4b0a53decccfb4c/t/59b7f2409f8dce5316811916/1505227332748/CarbonPricing_ on April 27, 2022.
    Yang, L. & Guo, Z. (2014). Evolution of CSR concept in the West and China. International Review of Management and Business Research,3(2), pp.819.
    Yates, B. T. & Marra, M. (2017). Social return on investment (SROI): problems, solutions and is SROI a good investment?. Evaluation and Program Planning, 64, pp.136-144.
    Yuan, W., Bao, Y., & Verbeke, A. (2011). Integrating CSR initiatives in business: An organizing framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), pp.75–92.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    109363075
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109363075
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200619
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    307501.pdf3742KbAdobe PDF2132View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback