政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/140730
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50922448      Online Users : 986
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > MBA Program > Theses >  Item 140.119/140730


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140730


    Title: Z世代即期食品消費驅動力分析： 以便利商店為例
    Driving Force Analysis for Generation Z to Purchase Expiring Products ── A Case Study of Convenience Stores
    Authors: 彭琳
    Peng, Lin
    Contributors: 黃正忠
    傅浚映
    彭琳
    Peng, Lin
    Keywords: 綠色消費
    Z世代
    即期品
    糧食
    便利商店
    永續發展目標
    Green consumption
    Generation Z
    Expiring products
    Food
    Convenience store
    SDGs
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-07-01 16:35:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在農業技術日漸發達的現在，全球仍有無數人口深陷食物匱乏的困境中，不患寡而患不均。在台灣，甚少聽聞糧食不足的問題，糧食議題主要是來自食物供應鏈的浪費，造成能源與水源的浪費，與處理廚餘造成的環境議題。
    Z世代消費者年紀大約在12歲至27歲之間，在台灣約為422萬人，佔台灣總人口約18%。這群年輕的消費者對科技應用熟悉，重視企業形象，願意以金錢支持在社會議題上耕耘的企業，與X與Y世代消費者消費習性上有明顯差異。
    本研究的目的是為了找出便利商店推動即期食品計畫時採用的措施影響了Z世代消費者哪些消費驅動力。先從文獻整理中將零售業者措施分成四大類，Z世代消費者購買環境友善產品的驅動力分為六大類。
    針對Z世代消費者採用問卷調查法，以李克特量表測試消費者對便利商店推廣即期食品的措施是否與對環境議題的認知程度、環境友善態度、個人行為對企業的影響力、重要他人的態度、價格因素、便利性等六大驅動力有關。
    本研究統計分析結果為：（1）Z世代消費者對環境議題的認知程度、環境友善態度、價格因素、便利性會與消費者的購買行為有正相關，（2）便利商店在產品相關措施與Z世代消費者的環境友善態度、個人行為對企業的影響力、重要他人的態度有正相關，（3）便利商店的科技應用與Z世代消費者環境友善態度有正相關。
    本研究結論為：（1）Z世代消費者確實會因為對環境議題的重視或是具有環境友善態度而購買即期食品，但需要依靠企業在線上或線下行銷時宣導議題，（2）Z世代消費者不認為購買行為會促使企業開展更多解決糧食議題的行動，因為企業目前缺乏和消費者溝通食物供應鏈改善情況的管道，（3）目前Z世代消費者很難區分便利商店業者針對糧食議題的作法與常規行銷活動的差別，所以會懷疑企業是否在進行漂綠行為，目前僅即期品地圖這樣的創新作為讓Z世代消費者感受到企業誠意。
    本研究對政府與企業的建議為：（1）企業應在行銷素材中加入更多環境議題元素，強化Z世代消費者對相關議題的了解，（2）企業應將內部於食物供應鏈各個層面的措施完整向Z世代消費者揭露。
    基於本研究為針對Z世代曾在便利商店購買即期食品的消費者實施問卷調查法，因此本問卷的研究限制為無法推論至所有世代消費者、無法推論至所有零售通路、無法推論至所有即期食品種類。
    本研究針對後續研究建議為：（1）改變研究方法，從問卷調查法轉為質性訪談法，（2）以不同零售通路作為研究標的，（3）以不同種類的即期食品作為研究標的。
    Nowadays, agricultural technology is evolving day by day. However, there are people worldwide suffering from food scarcity. In Taiwan, it seems that the issue of food insufficiency is not an important problem. Food issues are mainly from the waste in the food supply chain, resulting in a waste of energy and water, and environmental issues caused by handling food waste.
    Gen Z consumers are about 12 to 27 years old, and there are about 4.22 million people in Taiwan, accounting for about 18% of the total population. Gen Z consumers are familiar with technology applications, value good corporate image, and are willing to spend money on buying products from companies that work on social issues. It is significantly different from the shopping trends of X- and Y-generation consumers.
    The purpose of this case study is to analyze driving force for generation Z to purchase expiring products, and how convenience stores implement plans to strengthen the driving force.
    This study first divides the measures of retailers into four categories from the literature, and the driving force of consumers to purchase environmentally-friendly products is divided into six categories. Then, a questionnaire survey tested consumers on the Likert scale. Six driving force includes awareness of environmental issues, environmentally friendly attitudes, influence on the enterprise, attitudes of significant others, price, and convenience.
    The statistical analysis results of this study are as follows: (1) Gen Z consumers` awareness of environmental issues, environment-friendly attitude, price, and convenience are positively correlated with consumers` purchasing behavior. (2) Product-related factors are positively related to Gen Z consumers` environmentally friendly attitude, influence on the enterprise and attitudes of significant others. (3) The application of technology is positively related to Gen Z consumers’ environment-friendly attitude.
    The conclusions of this case study are: (1) Gen Z consumers do buy expiring products because they care about environmental issues or have an environmentally friendly attitude. However, companies have to promote the issues while they sell products online or offline. (2) Gen Z consumers do not believe that purchasing behavior will push companies to take more actions to solve food issues, because companies currently lack channels to communicate with consumers about the improvement of the food supply chain. (3) It is difficult for Gen Z consumers to distinguish between the food safety campaign and regular marketing activities. Therefore, the campaign is little more than greenwashing to improve the oil company`s image. At present, only innovations such as the online map make consumers feel the campaign is not greenwashing.
    The following recommendations are to the government and enterprises. (1) Enterprises should add more environmental issues elements to their marketing materials to strengthen consumers` understanding of relevant issues. (2) Enterprises should disclose all internal measures of the food supply chain to consumers.
    Consideration should be given to the limitations of this study. The case study cannot infer to all generations of consumers, to all retail channels, and to all expiration date-based products.
    The following suggestions should be considered in future research. (1) Future research can use different research methods. (2) Future research can be conducted in different retail channels. (3) Future research can be conducted in different types of expiring products.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    公平交易委員會，2021。「便利」生活，平均每人每年逛超商137次，每次消費84.16元。https://www.ftc.gov.tw/internet/main/doc/docDetail.aspx?uid=126&docid=16790，擷取日期：2022年3月20日。
    王清懿，2021。統一超商銷售策略關鍵成功因素之研究。龍華科技大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文。
    行政院性別平等會，2022。現住人口數按性別及年齡分。https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_Query.aspx?sn=Jvwu1Ndiotx2AzKr6MD1kg%40%40&statsn=EcfUJy%24sRRPbnOe4TvO%24Jg%40%40，擷取日期：2022年3月17日。
    行政院農業委員會，2020。農業指標。https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/indicator/Indicator.aspx，擷取日期：2022年2月11日。
    行政院環境保護署，2018。惜食百分百，廚餘零廢棄.。https://enews.epa.gov.tw/Page/3B3C62C78849F32F/42628ac5-2345-4367-ab85-9bdade74509a，擷取日期：2022年6月26日。
    行政院環境保護署，2022。惜食推廣種子店家。https://eeis.epa.gov.tw/front/information/Detail.aspx?id=75，擷取日期：2022年2月22日。
    行政院環境保護署督察總隊，2021。全民響應綠色飲食，每人廚餘量日減4成。https://enews.epa.gov.tw/Page/3B3C62C78849F32F/e0e26be2-fec7-4fd7-aa7b-89ae61eb6196，擷取日期：2022年2月11日。
    行政院環境保護署廢管處，2017。搶救剩食大作戰 環保署力推剩食循環經濟。https://enews.epa.gov.tw/Page/3B3C62C78849F32F/ee64cb1c-4e2e-4ce6-bc41-86dadc81840d，擷取日期：2022年3月21日。
    吳岱軒，2016。以電商平台模式改善食物供應鏈浪費問題之研究。國立臺灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    李奇樺，2013。綠色生活－介紹綠色消費與認識環境標誌。https://record.epa.gov.tw/Epaper/10273/ep-4.html，擷取日期：2022年3月21日
    林芊妤，2020。堆肥、設生質能源廠 環保署推廚餘多元處理。https://e-info.org.tw/node/226231，擷取日期：2022年2月27日。
    林素滿，2019。消費者對醜蔬果的知識、態度及購買行為之研究。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    食力，2022。每月平均減少300公噸食物浪費！全家超商用什麼招數解決剩食問題？。https://www.storm.mg/lifestyle/4154507?page=1，擷取日期：2022年6月26日
    國家發展委員會，2022。總人口成長趨勢。https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/chart.aspx?c=2&uid=62&pid=60，擷取日期：2022年3月17日。
    統一超商，2022。統一超商永續發展。https://www.7-11.com.tw/company/csr/esgfocus_02.aspx，擷取日期：2022年6月27日。
    許郁舷，2014。從眾行為對購買意圖與決策影響之研究－以節能產品為例。國立宜蘭大學未出版碩士論文。
    陳惠娟，2020。即期鮮食於固定時間折扣促銷對消費者知覺價值與購買意願之影響－以F便利商店為例。輔仁大學未出版碩士論文。
    童宇聲，2022。人格特質、綠色消費認知、綠色消費態度對綠色消費行為影響之研究。崇右影藝科技大學經營管理系未出版碩士論文。
    黃彥文，2007。大學生綠色消費行為之研究－以台北市立教育大學學生為例。臺北市立教育大學環境教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
    黃思敏，2021。不能送養豬場 六成廚餘如何去化？ 環保署急調度掩埋、焚化、高效處理廠。https://e-info.org.tw/node/232116，擷取日期：2022年2月27日。
    黃珮蓁，2019。成為廚餘以前——從食物浪費到惜食的實踐。https://wuo-wuo.com/topics/enviromental/99-kitchen-waste-recycling/942-zeczec-5358，擷取日期：2022年2月22日。
    黃聖偉，2015。有效日期制度之下食物價值的兩難與反思。國立政治大學社會學系未出版碩士論文。
    詹皓宇，2021。台灣剩食供需管理策略─手機APP剩食交易平台之應用設計。國立臺北大學未出版碩士論文。
    蔣濬浩，2021。台灣黑豬被退場？「新廚餘禁令」掀三大政策角力。https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/82944，擷取日期：2022年2月22日。
    聯合國，2015。目標12： 採用可持續的消費和生產模式。 https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/zh/sustainable-consumption-production/，擷取日期：2022年3月16日。
    聯合國，2015。目標2：消除飢餓，實現糧食安全，改善營養狀況和促進可持續農業。https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/zh/hunger/，擷取日期：2022年3月16日。
    聯合國經濟和社會事務部，2022。消除饑餓、實現糧食安全、改善營養狀況和促進可持續農業。https://sdgs.un.org/zh/goals/goal2，擷取日期：2022年3月18日。
    聯合國經濟和社會事務部，2022。確保採用可持續的消費和生產模式。https://sdgs.un.org/zh/goals/goal12，擷取日期：2022年3月18日。
    謝怡君，2012。即期品對消費者購買決策之影響。國立中興大學未出版碩士論文。
    謝進錦，2021。科技應用於便利商店展店時之關鍵因素探討-以臺灣F公司為例。國立臺北科技大學管理學院工業工程與管理EMBA專班未出版碩士論文。
    鄺子芸，2015。原賦效果對於即期品評價的影響。國立臺北大學未出版碩士論文。

    二、英文文獻
    Aday, S. and Aday, M. S. 2020. Impact of COVID-19 on the food supply chain. Food Quality and Safety, 4(4), 167-180.
    Agrebi, S. and Jallais, J. 2015. Explain the intention to use smartphones for mobile shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 16-23.
    Akhtar, R., Sultana, S., Masud, M. M., Jafrin, N. and Al-Mamun, A. 2021. Consumers` environmental ethics, willingness, and green consumerism between lower and higher income groups. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 168, 13, Article 105274.
    Atkinson, L. and Rosenthal, S. 2014. Signaling the Green Sell: The Influence of Eco-Label Source, Argument Specificity, and Product Involvement on Consumer Trust. Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 33-45.
    Bellemare, M. F. 2015. Rising Food Prices, Food Price Volatility, and Social Unrest. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(1), 1-21.
    Brown, T. J., Barry, T. E., Dacin, P. A. and Gunst, R. F. 2005. Spreading the word: Investigating antecedents of consumers` positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2), 123-138.
    Bulut, Z. A., Cimrin, F. K. and Doagn, O. 2017. Gender, generation and sustainable consumption: Exploring the behaviour of consumers from Izmir, Turkey. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(6), 597-604.
    Chang, H. H. and Su, J. W. 2022. Sustainable consumption in Taiwan retailing: The impact of product features and price promotion on purchase behaviors toward expiring products. Food Quality and Preference, 96, 9, Article 104452.
    Chen, Y. S. 2010. The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307-319.
    Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J. and Carson, S. 2001. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511-535.
    Collart, A. J. and Interis, M. G. 2018. Consumer Imperfect Information in the Market for Expired and Nearly Expired Foods and Implications for Reducing Food Waste. Sustainability, 10(11), 17, Article 3835.
    Dabija, D. C., Babut, T., Dinu, V. and Lugojan, M. I. 2017. CROSS-GENERATIONAL ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION SEARCHING BASED ON SOCIAL MEDIA IN ROMANIA. Transformations in Business & Economics, 16(2), 248-270.
    Djafarova, E. and Bowes, T. 2021. `Instagram made Me buy it`: Generation Z impulse purchases in fashion industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 9, Article 102345.
    Donovan, R. J., Rossiter, J. R., Marcoolyn, G. and Nesdale, A. 1994. STORE ATMOSPHERE AND PURCHASING BEHAVIOR. Journal of Retailing, 70(3), 283-294.
    Duffett, R. 2020. The YouTube Marketing Communication Effect on Cognitive, Affective and Behavioural Attitudes among Generation Z Consumers. Sustainability, 12(12), 25, Article 5075.
    ECLB-COVID19 Consortium. 2020. Effects of COVID-19 Home Confinement on Eating Behaviour and Physical Activity: Results of the ECLB-COVID19 International Online Survey. Nutrients, 12(6), 13, Article 1583.
    Farr-Wharton, G., Foth, M. and Choi, J. H. J. 2014. Identifying factors that promote consumer behaviours causing expired domestic food waste. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(6), 393-402.
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2022. Food Loss and Food Waste. Retrieved February, 22, from https://www.fao.org/food-loss-and-food-waste/flw-data
    Fry, R. and Parker, K. 2018. Early Benchmarks Show ‘Post-Millennials’ on Track to Be Most Diverse, Best-Educated Generation Yet: A demographic portrait of today’s 6- to 21-year-olds. Retrieved February, 4, from https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/11/15/early-benchmarks-show-post-millennials-on-track-to-be-most-diverse-best-educated-generation-yet/
    Grewal, D. Krishnan, R., Baker, J., and Borin, N. 1998. The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers` evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 331-352.
    Hamprecht, E. Corsten, D., Noll, M., and Meier, E. 2005. Controlling the sustainability of food supply chains. Supply Chain Management-an International Journal, 10(1), 7-10.
    Helmefalk, M. and Hulten, B. 2017. Multi-sensory congruent cues in designing retail store atmosphere: Effects on shoppers` emotions and purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 1-11.
    Herbon, A. 2018. Optimal Pricing and Replenishment of an Expiring Inventoried Product under Heterogeneous Consumer Sensitivities. Decision Sciences, 49(3), 522-552.
    Herhausen, D. Binder, J., Schoegel, M. and Herrmann, A. 2015. Integrating Bricks with Clicks: Retailer-Level and Channel-Level Outcomes of Online-Offline Channel Integration. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 309-325.
    Hermsdorf, D., Rombach, M. and Bitsch, V. 2017. Food waste reduction practices in German food retail. British Food Journal, 119(12), 2532-2546.
    Hoogland, C. T. de Boer, J. and Boersema, J. J. 2007. Food and sustainability: Do consumers recognize, understand and value on-package information on production standards?. Appetite, 49(1), 47-57.
    International Fund for Agricultural Development, 2018. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE. Retrived March, 18, from https://twitter.com/IFAD/status/1047416935959465984/photo/1
    Janakiraman, R. and Niraj, R. 2011. The Impact of Geographic Proximity on What to Buy, How to Buy, and Where to Buy: Evidence from High-Tech Durable Goods Market. Decision Sciences, 42(4), 889-919.
    Kamenidou, I. C., Mamalis, S. A., Pavlidis, S. and Bara, E. Z. G. 2019. Segmenting the Generation Z Cohort University Students Based on Sustainable Food Consumption Behavior: A Preliminary Study. Sustainability, 11(3), 22, Article 837.
    Kareiva, P. M., McNally, B. W., McCormick, S., Miller, T. and Ruckelshaus, M. 2015. Improving global environmental management with standard corporate reporting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(24), 7375-7382.
    Kummu, M., de Moel, H., Porkka, M., Siebert, S., Varis, O. and Ward, P. J. 2012. Lost food, wasted resources: Global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Science of the Total Environment, 438, 477-489.
    Lahteenmaki, L. 2013. Claiming health in food products. Food Quality and Preference, 27(2), 196-201.
    Lakatos, E. S., Cioca, L. I., Dan, V., Ciomos, A. O., Crisan, O. A. and Barsan, G. 2018. Studies and Investigation about the Attitude towards Sustainable Production, Consumption and Waste Generation in Line with Circular Economy in Romania. Sustainability, 10(3), 25, Article 865.
    Li, J. and Wu, D. 2020. Do Corporate Social Responsibility Engagements Lead to Real Environmental, Social, and Governance Impact?. Management Science, 66(6), 2564-2588.
    Makiniemi, J. P. and Vainio, A. 2014. Barriers to climate-friendly food choices among young adults in Finland. Appetite, 74, 12-19.
    Nadanyiova, M., Gajanova, L. and Majerova, J. 2020. Green Marketing as a Part of the Socially Responsible Brand`s Communication from the Aspect of Generational Stratification. Sustainability, 12(17), 18, Article 7118.
    Nelson, G. C., Valin, H., Sands, R. D., Havlik, P., Ahammad, H., Deryng, D., Elliott, J., Fujimori, S., Hasegawa, T., Heyhoe, E., Kyle, P., Von Lampe, M., Lotze-Campen, H., d`Croz, D. M., van Meijl, H., van der Mensbrugghe, D., Muller, C., Popp, A., Robertson, R., Robinson, S., Schmid, E., Schmitz, C., Tabeau, A. and Willenbockel, D. 2014. Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic responses to biophysical shocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(9), 3274-3279.
    Neureiter, A. and Matthes, J. 2022. Comparing the effects of greenwashing claims in environmental airline advertising: perceived greenwashing, brand evaluation, and flight shame. International Journal of Advertising, 27.
    O`Connor, N., Farag, K. and Baines, R. 2016. What is food poverty? A conceptual framework. British Food Journal, 118(2), 429-449.
    Paul, J., Modi, A. and Patel, J. 2016. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123-134.
    Polonsky, M. J. 2011. Transformative green marketing: Impediments and opportunities. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1311-1319.
    Priporas, C. V., Stylos, N. and Fotiadis, A. K. 2017. Generation Z consumers` expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 374-381.
    Schmidt, K. 2019. Predicting the consumption of expired food by an extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Food Quality and Preference, 78, 13, Article 103746.
    Schmuck, D., J. Matthes, and B. Naderer. 2018. Misleading consumers with green advertising? An affect-reason-involvement account of greenwashing effects in environmental advertising. Journal of Advertising, 47, no. 2: 127–45.
    Song, Y., Qin, Z. Z. and Qin, Z. H. 2020. Green Marketing to Gen Z Consumers in China: Examining the Mediating Factors of an Eco-Label-Informed Purchase. Sage Open, 10(4), 15, Article 2158244020963573.
    Southgate, D. 2017. The Emergence of Generation Z And Its Impact in Advertising Long-Term Implications For Media Planning and Creative Development. Journal of Advertising Research, 57(2), 227-235.
    Su, C. H., Tsai, C. H., Chen, M. H. and Lv, W. Q. 2019. US Sustainable Food Market Generation Z Consumer Segments. Sustainability, 11(13), 14, Article 3607.
    Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H. M. and Siegrist, M. 2011. Eating green. Consumers` willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite, 57(3), 674-682.
    Tsiros, M. and Heilman, C. M. 2005. The effect of expiration dates and perceived risk on purchasing behavior in grocery store perishable categories. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 114-129.
    Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J. and Lance, C. E. 2010. Generational Differences in Work Values: Leisure and Extrinsic Values Increasing, Social and Intrinsic Values Decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117-1142.
    United Nations Environment Programme, 2021. UNEP Food Waste Index Report 2021. Retrived February, 22, from https://www.unep.org/resources/report/unep-food-waste-index-report-2021
    van Doorn, J. and Verhoef, P. C. 2011. Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(3), 167-180.
    Vermeir, I. and Verbeke, W. 2008. Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542-553.
    Vieira, V. A. 2010. Visual aesthetics in store environment and its moderating role on consumer intention. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(5), 364-380.
    Wheeler, T. and von Braun, J. 2013. Climate Change Impacts on Global Food Security. Science, 341(6145), 508-513.
    Wood, S. 2013. Generation Z as Consumers: Trends and Innovation. Institure for Emerging Issues : NC State University, 119 (9), 7767-7779.
    Yamane, T. and Kaneko, S. 2021. Is the younger generation a driving force toward achieving the sustainable development goals? Survey experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 14, Article 125932.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    109363071
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109363071
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200661
    Appears in Collections:[MBA Program] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    307101.pdf4022KbAdobe PDF2163View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback