政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/140707

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/140707

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51101791 在线人数 : 950

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 國際事務學院 > 外交學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/140707

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140707

题名:	超越集體行動的邏輯：國內政治和與俄羅斯的地理鄰近性對北約責任分擔的影響 Beyond the Logic of Collective Action: The Effects of Domestic Politics and Geographic Proximity to Russia on NATO`s Burden Sharing
作者:	李育儒 Lee, Yu-Ju
贡献者:	陳秉逵 Chen, Ping-Kuei 李育儒 Lee, Yu-Ju
关键词:	北約集體行動邏輯搭便車層次分析力量損失梯度 NATO The logic of collective action Free riding Levels of analysis The loss of strength gradient
日期:	2022
上传时间:	2022-07-01 16:30:22 (UTC+8)
摘要:	北約責任分擔的問題在其成立後的70年後仍未解。依據Olson的集體行動邏輯（Logic of Collective Action, LSG），北約內各個成員國在政治和經濟上的差異，會促使小國「搭便車」。但近年來，似乎沒有「小國剝削大國」（exploitation of the great）的跡象。在2020年，有十個北約成員國的國防開支超過其GDP的2%，其中就有六個成員國是小國，而其中又有5個成員國在地理上與俄國有地理鄰近性。這些有達到北約國防開支目標的國家普遍將俄國視為威脅、普遍的支持北約、執政黨也一致的支持提高國防開支。本論文以LSG作為主軸，結合Waltzian的Levels of Analysis和Boulding的Loss of Strength Gradient來進行更全面的研究。本文的結論是：北約成員國如果將俄國視為威脅，也支持北約，且又與俄國有地理鄰近性，則該成員國越有可能會達到北約2%的標準。本文將以波蘭和德國作為研究案例來佐證其論述，也會個別討論英國和美國間的「特殊關係」來說明其對英國在國防開支上的影響。 NATO’s burden sharing problem is almost as long as its existence, it remains unresolved and still haunts the alliance to this day. Olson’s logic of collective action is the dominant theory on alliance burden sharing, which predicts that disparities in NATO members’ economies will incentivize smaller members to free ride. However, there has not been obvious signs of “exploitation of the great” in recent years. In 2020, of the 9 non-US NATO members that had exceeded the 2 percent pledge made in 2014 Wales Summit, of which, 6 were small economies. On closer inspection, 5 of the 6 small economies meeting the 2 percent target were all in close geographic proximity to Russia. In addition, member states that display higher threat perception of Russia, stronger support of NATO, and having cohesive ruling coalitions in favor of increasing defense spending, tend to have higher military expenditure. This thesis uses Olson’s Logic of Collective Action as its backbone, incorporates Waltzian’s Levels of Analysis and Boulding’s Loss of Strength Gradient (LSG) for a more comprehensive study. It concludes that NATO members with higher threat perception of Russian, strong domestic support of NATO, and are in close geographic proximity to Russia, are more likely to have higher defense expenditure, bringing it closer to the 2 percent pledge. This thesis will use Germany and Poland as case studies to help demonstrate its findings. It will also look at the exception, the United Kingdom, and its “special relationship” with the US.
參考文獻:	Ahmed, J. (2019). The theoretical significance of foreign policy in international relations - an analyses. Journal of Critical Reviews, 1-4. Armstrong, S. (2019, June 4). Al Jazeera. Retrieved from UK defence cuts cast doubt over ‘special relationship’ with US: https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2019/6/4/uk-defence-cuts-cast-doubt-over-special-relationship-with-us Babones, S. (2018). What is NATO good for? The National Interest, 1-5. Bartlett, C. (1992). The Special Relationship: A Political History of Anglo-American Relations Since 1945. New York: Longman. Beale, J. (2020, November 19). Defense funding boost ‘extends British influence’, says PM. Retrieved from BBC News: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-54988870 Bialos, J. P. (2016). How to fix NATO’s chronic burden-sharing problem. The National Interest, 1-7. Béraud-Sudreau, L., & Giegerich, B. (2017, February 14). Counting to two: Analysing the NATO defence-spending target. Retrieved from Military Balance Blog. Bettman, A. (2020, January 27). Poland calls for NATO ‘readiness’ on Russia. Retrieved from EUobserver: https://euobserver.com/justice/147271 Boulding, K. (1962). Conflict and Defense. New York: Harper and Brothers. Brazell, E. (2018, May 15). Angela Merkel fails to meet NATO spending target as Germany’s defence minister admits budget is unlikely to be reached in future. Retrieved from VT: https://vt.co/news/us/angela-merkel-fails-to-meet-nato-spending-target-as-germanys-defence-minister-admits-budget-is-unlikely-to-be-reached-in-future Bremer, S. A. (1992). Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816-1965. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 309-341. Brown, D. (2022, February 23). Ukraine conflict: Where are Russia’s troops? Retrieved from BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60158694 Britannica. (2022, January 25). Decline of the House of Lords. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Parliament/Decline-of-the-House-of-Lords Buchholz, K. (2022, May 11). Will NATO Expand North? Retrieved from Statista: https://www.statista.com/chart/26674/european-countries-by-year-of-joining-nato/ Burns, C., & Morrison, H. (2021, September 21). BBC. Retrieved from UK-US special relationship: A short history: https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-35783309 Buzan, B. (2004). The United States and the Great Powers: World Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Polity Press Ltd. Cameron, D. (2014, September 4). GOV.UK. Retrieved from Strengthening the NATO alliance: article by David Cameron and Barack Obama: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/strengthening-the-nato-alliance-article-by-david-cameron-and-barack-obama Cameron, D. (2014, September 5). GOV.UK. Retrieved from NATO Summit 2014: PM speaks at North Atlantic Council meeting: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nato-summit-2014-pm-speaks-at-north-atlantic-council-meeting Carpenter, G. (2010). Obama’s Security Strategy is Clueless. The National Interest, 1-4. Carpenter, T. G. (2017). Trump Must Stand His Ground with NATO. The National Interest, 1-5. Carnegie Endowment For International Peace. (2018, March 28). Consequences for NATO. Retrieved from Carnegie Endowment For International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/2018/03/28/consequences-for-nato-pub-75881 Cavanagh, N. (2022, March 10). Logistics: the hidden challenge for Putin’s military. Retrieved from Yahoo News: https://news.yahoo.com/logistics-the-hidden-challenge-for-putins-military-155316923.html Center for Insights in Survey Research. (2017, August 10). Public Opinion in Germany. Retrieved from Center for Insights in Survey Research: https://www.iri.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy/iri.org/2017-9-14_germany_poll_presentation.pdf Chivvis, C. S. (2016, June 24). U.S. News. Retrieved from The Future of Transatlantic Security: https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-06-24/how-the-brexit-vote-could-impact-nato-and-defense-policy?context=amp Cienski, J. (2015, August 19). The world according to Duda. Retrieved from Politico: https://www.politico.eu/article/duda-tusk-poland-foreign-policy-germany-nato/ Cimbala, S. J., & Forster, P. K. (2017). The US NATO and military burden sharing: post-Cold War accomplishments and future prospects. Defense & Security Analysis, 1-16. Chollet, D., Keil, S., & Skaluba, C. (2020, October 14). Rethink and replace two percent. Retrieved from Atlantic Council: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/nato20-2020/rethink-and-replace-two-percent/ Coffey, L. (2012, July 11). Keeping America safe: Why U.S. bases in Europe remain vital. Retrieved from The Heritage Foundation: https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/keeping-america-safe-why-us- bases-europe-remain-vital Conservatives. (2019, November 19). Our largest boost to our Nation’s Defence in a Generation. Retrieved from Conservatives: https://www.conservatives.com/news/record-defence-spending-boost Clements, B. (2019, December 4). British Politics and Policy at LSE. Retrieved from The British public and NATO: still a strong alliance?: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-british-public-and-nato/ Czulda, R., & Madej, M. (2015). Newcomers No More? Contemporary NATO and the Future of the Enlargement from the Perspective of ‘post Cold War’ members. Warsaw, Prague, Brussels: Information Center in Progue, Latvian Institute of International Affairs in Riga, and Atlantic Treaty Association in Brussels. Danchev, A. (2007). Tony Blair’s Vietnam: The Iraq War and the ‘Special Relationship’ in Historical Perspective. Review of International Studies, Vol.33, 190-203. Daniels, S., & Hicks, K. (2018). Redefining NATO Security Investment: Moving Beyond 2 Percent. War on the Rocks, 1-7. Defence24. (2020, June 26). Duda and Trump Paving the Way Towards Increased US Presence in Poland. Specifics and Cost not Known. Retrieved from Defence 24: https://defence24.com/duda-and-trump-paving-the-way-towards-increased-us-presence-in-poland-specifics-and-cost-not-known-commentary Delcker, J. (2018, July 7). Angela Merkel: NATO must refocus on Russia threat. Retrieved from Politico: https://www.politico.eu/article/angela-merkel-nato-summit-defense-spending-must-refocus-on-russia-threat/ Demarest, G. (2013). Risk Distance: The Loss of Strength Gradient and Colombia’s Geography of Impunity. Kansus: University of Kansas. Demarest, G., Welch, I., & Bartles, C. (2016). Risk distance. Infinity Journal, 4-10. Retrieved from Military Strategy Magazine: https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/risk-distance/ Devlin, K. (2015, March 19). Anti-Russian views on the rise in Poland. Retrieved from Pew Research Center: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/03/19/anti-russian-views-on-the-rise-in-poland/ Dobson, A., & Marsh, S. (2014). Anglo-American Relations: End of a Special Relationship? The International History Review, 673-697. Dorman, A. M., Uttley, M. R., & Wilkinson, B. (2016). The Curious Incident of Mr Cameron and the United Kingdom Defence Budget: A New Legacy? The Political Quarterly, 87(1), 46-53. Dowdy, J. (2017, November). More tooth, less tail: Getting beyond NATO’s 2 percent rule. Retrieved from Mckinsey&Company: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/more-tooth-less-tail-getting-beyond-natos-2-percent-rule Dunn, D. H. (2008). The Double Interregnum: UK-US Relationships Beyond Blair and Bush. International Affairs, 84(6), 1131-1143. Dumbrell, J. (2001). A Special Relationship: Anglo-American Relations in the Cold War and After. Macmillan Press Ltd. Dumbrell, J. (2009). The US-UK Special Relationship: Taking the 21st-Century Temperature. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 64-78. DW News. (2014, September 27). Germany’s von der Leyen admits major Bundeswehr shortfalls. Retrieved from DW: https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-von-der-leyen-admits-major-bundeswehr-shortfalls/a-17959798 Eichenberg, R. C. (1989). Public Opinion and National Security in Western Europe: Consensus Lost? Palgrave MacMillan. Ellyatt, H. (2022, March 9). Putin’s always wanted to weaken the West. He’s done the exact opposite. Retrieved from CBNC: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/09/russia-ukraine-putin-always-wanted-to-weaken-west-hes-done-the-opposite.html Emmott, R. (2019, November 6). Germany commits to NATO spending goal by 2031 for first time. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-nato-idUSKBN1XH1IK Esipova, N., & Ray, J. (2016, April 4). Eastern Europeans, CIS Residents See Russia, U.S. as Threats. Retrieved from Gallup: https://news.gallup.com/poll/190415/eastern-europeans-cis-residents-russia-threats.aspx European Horizons. (2017, December 14). Three Key Defense Issues to Watch in German Politics. Retrieved from Huffpost: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/three-key-defense-issues-to-watch-in-german-politics_b_5a32fad5e4b0e7f1200cf977 Fagan, M. (2018, July 9). Pew Research Center. Retrieved from NATO is seen favorably in many member countries, but almost half of Americans say it does too little: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/07/09/nato-is-seen-favorably-in-many-member-countries-but-almost-half-of-americans-say-it-does-too-little/ Folvarčný, A., & Kopeček, L. (2020). Which conservatism? The identity of the Polish Law and Justice party. Sciendo, 16(1), 1-30. Frizzelle, B. (2018). What makes a reliable ally? A fresh perspective on NATO, strategic culture and collective defense. War On the Rocks, 1-9. Gaston, S. (2019, December 3). BFPG. Retrieved from Public opinion on global threats and the future of NATO: https://bfpg.co.uk/2019/12/public-opinion-on-global-threats-future-of-nato/ Gebauer, M., Müller, P., & Schult, C. (2018, July 20). What did Merkel pledge in Brussels? Retrieved from Spiegel: https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/nato-spending-debate-what-did-angela-merkel-pledge-in-brussels-a-1219458.html Gebauer, M. (2019, November 7). Germany Remains Tepid on NATO 2-Percent Goal. Retrieved from Spiegel International: https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-government-clash-over-nato-2-percent-goal-a-1295429.html Gerdziunas, B. (2018, June 20). Germany no longer seen as ‘threat’ in Poland: poll. Retrieved from Politico: https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-poland-no-longer-seen-as-threat-poll/ GOV.UK. (2014, September 5). GOV.UK. Retrieved from Policy paper: The Wales Declaration on the Transatlantic Bond: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nato-summit-2014-wales-summit-declaration/the-wales-declaration-on-the-transatlantic-bond GOV.UK. (2016, July 9). GOV.UK. Retrieved from NATO Summit, Warsaw: PM’s press conference: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nato-summit-warsaw-pms-press-conference-9-july-2016 GOV.UK. (2022, January 25). How government works. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/how-government-works#who-runs-government Hallams, E., & Schreer, B. (2012). Towards a ‘post-American’ alliance? NATO burden-sharing after Libya. International Affairs, 313-327. Hansler, J. (2018, July 11). Merkel responds to Trump:’I have witnessed’ Germany under Soviet control. Retrieved from CNN: https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/11/politics/angela-merkel-east-germany-nato-trump/index.html Haynes, W. (2019). Explaining the poverty of Germany’s strategic debate. War on the Rocks, 1-11. Heffer, G. (2018, July 2). Sky News. Retrieved from US steps up pressure on UK military spending-but Downing St won’t commit: https://news.sky.com/story/us-steps-up-pressure-on-uk-military-spending-but-downing-st-wont-commit-11423801 Henley, J. (2022, May 12). Why are Sweden and Finland not yet in Nato and does the alliance want them? Retrieved from The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/12/why-are-sweden-and-finland-not-yet-in-nato-and-does-the-alliance-want-them Hennigan, W. J. (2018). President Trump Says NATO Allies Owe the US Money. He’s Wrong. Retrieved from Time: https://time.com/5335111/donald-trump-nato-spending-facts/ Hillison, J. R. (2014). Stepping Up: Burden Sharing by NATO’s Newest Members. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College Commandant. HM Government. (2016, December). HM Government. Retrieved from National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/575378/national_security_strategy_strategic_defence_security_review_annual_report_2016.pdf Horsley, S., & Neuman, S. (2018, July 11). Trump blasts allies at NATO summit. Retrieved from NPR: https://www.npr.org/2018/07/11/627932769/trump-unloads-on-nato-secretary-general-over-defense-spending Holsti, K. J. (1991). Peace and War: Armed COnflicts and International Order 1648-1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hugos, M. (2022, March 16). Russian logistics for the invasion of Ukraine. Retrieved from SCM Globe: https://www.scmglobe.com/russian-logistics-for-the-invasion-of-ukraine/ Hussein, M., & Haddad, M. (2021, September 10). Infographic: US military presence around the world. Retrieved from Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/10/infographic-us-military-presence-around-the-world-interactive International Institue for Strategic Studies. (2015). The Military Balance 2015. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1-22. IPSOS. (2019, December 3). IPSOS. Retrieved from NATO seen as force for good, but support is low: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-and-polls/NATO-Seen-As-Force-For-Good-But-Support-is-Low Jakobsen, J. (2018). Is European NATO really free-riding? Patterns of material and non-material burden-sharing after the Cold War, European Security, 27:4, 490-514, DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2018.1515072 Khalilzad, Z. (2017). 3 NATO Reforms Allies Should Expect From the Trump Administration. The National Interest, 1-5. Knight, B. (2020, June 16). US military in Germany: What you need to know. Retrieved from DW: https://www.dw.com/en/us-military-in-germany-what-you-need-to-know/a-49998340 Komorowski, B. (2014, June 3). President Komorowski: Russia has No Rights to Block Deployment of NATO Troops and Infrastructure in Poland. Retrieved from Atlantic Council: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/natosource/president-komorowski-russia-has-no-right-to-block-deployment-of-nato-troops-and-infratructure-in-poland/ Kramer, F. D., & Becker, J. (2012). Saving NATO. The National Interest, 1-4. Kucharczyk, J. (2017). Exploiting Political Polarization in Poland. National Endowment for Democracy, 1-31. Kühn, U. (2015, November 3). With or without you: Germany and NATO. Retrieved from War on the Rocks: https://warontherocks.com/2015/11/with-or-without-you-germany-and-nato/ Kunertova, D. (2020). Can the new ‘magi’ save NATO? War on the Rocks, 1-9. Kunz, B. (2018). The Real Roots of Germany’s Defense Spending Problem. War on the Rocks, 1-9. Lemire, J., & Reichmann, D. (2020, June 25). 1,000 more U.S. troops to Poland as Trump and Duda discuss NATO’s eastern flank. Retrieved from Military Times: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/06/24/1000-more-us-troops-to-poland-as-trump-and-duda-discuss-natos-eastern-flank/ Lepgold, J. (1998). NATO`s Post-Cold War Collective Action Problem. International Security, 78-106. Lichbach, M. I. (1998). The Rebel’s Dilemma. The University of Michigan Press. Lute, D., Chalmers, M., & Dempsey, J. (2015, September 17). The cost of European security. Retrieved from Carnegie Europe: https://carnegieeurope.eu/2015/09/17/cost-of-european-security-event-4995 Major, C. (2015, April 14). Time to Scrap NATO’s 2 Percent Pledge? Judy Dempsey’s Strategic Europe. Retrieved from Carnegie Europe: http://carnegieeurope.eu/ strategiceurope/?fa=59918. Mason, R., & Jones, H. (2016, July 8). The Guardian. Retrieved from Cameron to reassure Nato over UK’s defence spending at summit: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/08/david-cameron-nato-summit-warsaw-uk-commitment-defence-spending Markowitz, J. N., & Fariss, C. J. (2017). Power, proximity, and democracy: Geopolitical competition in the international system. SAGE journals, 1-16. May, T. (2017, September 28). GOV.UK. Retrieved from PM: Britain is unconditionally committed to the defence and security of Europe: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-britain-is-unconditionally-committed-to-the-defence-and-security-of-europe Mearsheimer, J. (2014). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Company. Milevski, L. (2018). Poland’s Diplomatic Efforts to Assure Extended Deterrence within NATO, From Crimea to Warsaw and Beyond. 1-14. NATO. (2020). Defense Expenditure of NATO Countries (2013-2020). NATO Public Diplomacy Division NATO. (2022, January 12). NATO on the map. Retrieved from NATO: https://www.nato.int/nato-on- the-map/#lat=43.02441521453798&lon=19.286083843907424&zoom=-1&layer-5 North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2014, October 6). NATO will defend every Ally, NATO Secretary General stresses in Poland. Retrieved from North Atlantic Treaty Organization: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_113578.htm NPR. (2022, April 26). Putin wanted a militarily weaker Ukraine. He got the opposite. Retrieved from NPR: https://www.npr.org/2022/04/26/1094854213/putin-ukraine-stronger-military Obama, B. (2014). Transcript: Obama addresses NATO strength at March 26 news conference in Brussels. Retrieved from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/transcript-obama-addresses-nato-strength-at-march-26-news-conference-in-brussels/2014/03/26/ade45c16-b4f2-11e3-b899-20667de76985_story.html Olson, M., & Zeckhauser, R. (1966). An Economic Theory of Alliances. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 48(3), 266-279. doi:10.2307/1927082 Oneal, J. R. (2009). The theory of collective action and burden sharing in NATO. International Organization, 379-402. Palowski, J. (2016, January 19). Andrzej Duda Presents Three Main Pillars of the NATO Summit in Warsaw. Retrieved from Defence 24: https://defence24.com/andrzej-duda-presents-three-main-pillars-of-the-nato-summit-in-warsaw Picheta, R., & Pettersson, H. (2022, February 10). Here’s where Alliance forces are deployed across Eastern Europe. Retrieved from CNN: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/10/europe/nato-troops-eastern-europe-map-intl-cmd/index.html Pitts-Tucker, A. (2020). Analysing the ‘Special Relationship’ between the US and UK in a Transatlantic Context. E-International Relations, 1-10. Plümper, T., & Neumayer, E. (2015). Free-riding in alliances: Testing an old theory with a new method. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 32(3), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894214522916 Poushter, J. (2016, June 13). Pew Research Center. Retrieved from Europeans Face the World Divided: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2016/06/13/europeans-see-isis-climate-change-as-most-serious-threats/ President.PL. (2018, July 11). President Duda talked with President Trump at NATO summit. Retrieved from President.PL: https://www.president.pl/news/president-duda-talked-with-president-trump-at-nato-summit,36760 Rabe, P. (2022). Airspace security - Nothing escapes the German air force. Retrieved from Bundeswehr: https://www.bundeswehr.de/en/airspace-security-nothing-escapes-the-german-air-force-5067216 Raynova, D., & Kearns, I. (2015, February). The Wales Pledge Revisited: A Preliminary Analysis of 2015 Budget Decisions in NATO Member States. Retrieved from European Leadership Network: www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/medialibrary/20 15/02/20/04389e1d/ELN%20NATO%20Budgets%20Brief.pdf. Reality Check Team. (2020, July 30). Trump: What does the US contribute to NATO in Europe. Retrieved from BBC News: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-44717074 Reuters. (2018, July 11). Merkel recalls own East German youth in riposte to Trump. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nato-summit-merkel-east/merkel-recalls-own-east-german-youth-in-riposte-to-trump-idUSKBN1K11GE Reuters. (2019, November 11). Poland says France’s Macron comments on NATO ‘dangerous’: FT. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-poland-nato-idUSKBN1XL13B Reuters. (2019, November 19). Polish PM: questioning NATO treaty a threat to collective defence. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-poland-politics-nato-idUSKBN1XT1AV Reuters. (2020, July 14). Trump congratulates Polish President Duda’s ‘historic’ re-election. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-poland-election-trump-idUSKCN24E32E Reuters. (2020, November 10). Polish president ratifies defence deal with the U.S. Retrieved from Reuters : https://www.reuters.com/article/us-poland-usa-defence-idUSKBN27P2HX Reuters. (2022, March 3). Poland to ramp up defence spending, army as Ukraine war rages. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/poland-ramp-up-defence-spending-army-ukraine-war-rages-2022-03-03/ Rizzo, R. (2017). NATO allies should not be judged on defense spending alone. National Interest. Romeo, L. (2022, March 3). Has war in Ukraine revived NATO? Retrieved from France 24: https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20220303-has-war-in-ukraine-revived-nato Rogers, J. (2019, December 4). YouGov. Retrieved from The British public still believes in NATO - even if most of us can`t say what it does: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/international/articles-reports/2019/12/04/british-public-still-believes-nato-even-if-most-us Sabbagh, D. (2022, March 8). Russia ‘solving logistics problems’ and could attack Kyiv within days - experts. Retrieved from The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/08/russia-solving-logistics-problems-and-could-attack-kyiv-within-days-experts Sakaguchi, D. (2011). Distance and military operations: Theoretical background toward strengthening the defense of offshore islands. NIDS Journal of Defense and Security, 1-23. Sanders, L., & Martin, D. (2017, September 24). German election - where do political parties stand on foreign policy and security? Retrieved from DW: https://www.dw.com/en/german-election-where-do-political-parties-stand-on-foreign-policy-and-security/a-40501361 Sandler, T. (2004). Global Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. Schreer, B. (2019). Trump, NATO and the Future of Europe’s Defense. The RUSI Journal, 10-17. Schultz, T. (2020, July 2). What Poland wants when it comes to US troops. Retrieved from Atlantic Council: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/what-poland-wants-when-it-comes-to-us-troops/ Shalal, A., & Alkousaa, R. (2018, May 14). NATO spending target not some ‘fetish’ for Germany: Merkel. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-military-idUSKCN1IF1TN Shea, J. (2020, December 16). The Foreign Policy Centre. Retrieved from The UK and European defence: Will NATO be enough?: https://fpc.org.uk/the-uk-and-european-defence-will-nato-be-enough/ Sheahan, M., & Marsh, S. (2022, February 27). Germany to increase defence spending in response to ‘Putin`s war’ - Scholz. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/germany-hike-defense-spending-scholz-says-further-policy-shift-2022-02-27/ Sieradzka, M. (2019, November 3). DW. Retrieved from After 20 years in NATO, Poland still eager to please: https://www.dw.com/en/after-20-years-in-nato-poland-still-eager-to-please/a-47862839 Simmons, K., Stokes, B., & Poushter, J. (2015, June 10). NATO Public Blame Russia for Ukrainian Crisis, but Reluctant to Provide Military Aid. Retrieved from Pew Research Center: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/06/10/nato-publics-blame-russia-for-ukrainian-crisis-but-reluctant-to-provide-military-aid/ Sloan, S. (2014). NATO summit: messaging to Moscow and burden-sharing. War on the Rocks, 1-6. Sloan, S. R. (2018). A Way Forward for NATO Allies: Cope With Trump While Preparing For A Post-Trump Future. War on the Rock, 1-7. Smith, A., Williams, A., & Eckardt, A. (2018, April 26). NATO ally Germany urged by U.S. to up its military spending. Retrieved from NBC: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/nato-ally-germany-urged-u-s-its-military-spending-n869206 Spirtas, M. (2016, July 2). RAND Corporation. Retrieved from Why Brexit Won’t Necessarily Hurt NATO: https://www.rand.org/blog/2016/07/why-brexit-wont-necessarily-hurt-nato.html Sprenger, S. (2018, January 4). Trump might get pushback from Germany on NATO spending after all. Retrieved from Navy Times: https://www.navytimes.com/global/europe/2018/01/03/trump-might-get-pushback-from-gemany-on-nato-spending-after-all/?contentQuery=%7B%22section%22%3A%22%2Fhome%22%2C%22exclude%22%3A%22%2Fglobal%2Feurope%22%2C%22from%22%3A805%2C%22size%22%3A10%7D&contentFea Staudenmaier, R. (2022, April 7). Ukraine war sparks major shift in Germany’s energy opinions. Retrieved from DW: https://www.dw.com/en/ukraine-war-sparks-major-shift-in-germanys-energy-opinions/a-61401277 Stewart, H. (2017, January 27). The Guardian. Retrieved from Theresa May says Nato has 100% support of Donald Trump: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/27/theresa-may-white-house-visit-donald-trump-nato Szczerbiak, A. (2014, September 8). Russia’s borders: competing visions for Europe have made Poland arch-critics of Putin. Retrieved from The Conversation: https://theconversation.com/russias-borders-competing-visions-for-europe-have-made-poland-arch-critics-of-putin-31332 Szczerbiak, A. (2015, August 7). Poland’s new hawkish president could be shape of things to come from Warsaw. Retrieved from The Conversation: https://theconversation.com/polands-new-hawkish-president-could-be-shape-of-things-to-come-from-warsaw-45792 Szczerbiak, A. (2015). What does Law and Justice`s election victory in Poland mean for Europe? LSE, 1-4. Szopa, M. (2020, 5 14). President Signs the Polish National Security Strategy. New Threats & Back to the Roots. Retrieved from Defence 24: https://defence24.com/president-signs-the-polish-national-security-strategy-new-threatsback-to-the-roots-commentary Taiwan News. (2017, March 20). Merkel disputes Trump’s NATO debt claim. Retrieved from Taiwan News: https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3121409 Techau, J. (2015). The Politics of 2 Percent: NATO and the Security Vacuum in Europe. Carnegie Europe, 1-22. The International Republican Institute. (2017). Public opinion in Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic and Slovakia. Center For Insights in Survey Research, 1-53. The White House. (2020, June 24). Joint Statement by President Donald J. Trump and President Andrzej Duda. Retrieved from Statements & Releases: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/joint-statement-president-donald-j-trump-president-andrzej-duda/ Trump Administration Criticizes NATO Members for Failing to Meet Defense Spending Guideline; United States Joins Other NATO Members in Supporting Montenegro`s Membership in the Organization. (2017). American Journal of International Law, 111(3), 756-764. doi:10.1017/ajil.2017.47 UK Parliament. (2001). www.parliament.uk. Retrieved from Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Second Report: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmfaff/327/32703.htm UK Parliament. (2022, January 25). UK Parliament. Retrieved from The two-House system: https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/role/system/ United States Army. (1962). Terrain factors in the Russian campaign: historical study. Washington: Department of the Army. Vershinin, A. (2021, November 23). Feeding the bear: A closer look at Russian army logistics and the fait accompli. Retrieved from War on the Rocks: https://warontherocks.com/2021/11/feeding-the-bear-a-closer-look-at-russian-army-logistics/ Vershinin, A. (2022, March 10). Russia’s logistical problems may slow down Russia’s advance - But they are unlikely to stop it. Retrieved from Modern War Institute: https://mwi.usma.edu/russias-logistical-problems-may-slow-down-russias-advance-but-they-are-unlikely-to-stop-it/ Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Webb, K. (2007). The continued importance of geographic distance and Boulding’s loss of strength gradient. Comparative Strategy, 295-310. Wither, J. K. (2017, April). Marshall Center Security Insight. Retrieved from A Secure Brexit? UK Security and Defense and the Decision to Leave the European Union: https://www.marshallcenter.org/en/publications/security-insights/secure-brexit-uk-security-and-defense-and-decision-leave-european-union-0 Yle. (2022, May 9). Yle poll: Support for Nato membership soars to 76%. Retrieved from Yle: https://yle.fi/news/3-12437506 Zeneli, V. (2017). Why NATO’s European members can no longer expect America to pick up the bill. The National Interest, 1-6. Zunneberg, C. (2017, July 26). Europe in the German federal elections: What do the manifestos say? Retrieved from European Council on Foreign Relations: https://ecfr.eu/article/commentary_europe_in_the_german_federal_elections_manifestos_7219/
描述:	碩士國立政治大學外交學系 107253022
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107253022
数据类型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202200463
显示于类别:	[外交學系] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
302201.pdf		3836Kb	Adobe PDF2	127	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈