English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51092751      Online Users : 912
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140688


    Title: 廣告的關鍵字效應:認知與策略
    The Keyword Effects of Advertisements: Perceptions and Strategies
    Authors: 黃薏庭
    Huang, I-Ting
    Contributors: 何靜嫺
    Ho, Shirley J.
    黃薏庭
    Huang, I-Ting
    Keywords: 關鍵字搜尋
    廣告
    產品特性
    訊息不完全
    Keyword search
    Advertisement
    Product ingredient
    Incomplete information
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-07-01 16:26:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文研究了消費者的關鍵詞搜尋對市場結構、廠商定價與廣告策略的影響。消費者在搜尋時使用特定成分或性質作為關鍵詞的動機取決於他們接收到的廣告數量。我們考慮有關廠商產品成分或性質的完全與不完全訊息,再將模型擴展到三家廠商的案例,並討論廠商位置變化對投放廣告之動機的影響。我們的研究結果表明,當市場上有兩家廠商時,如果某一廠商是唯一一家擁有達特定標準之成分或性質的廠商,就會發布廣告,且其動機隨著市場規模和產品價值的增加而增加。其次,廠商是否了解競爭對手的產品資訊會影響其透過廣告誤導競爭對手的策略和動機,若廠商具備達特定標準之成分或性質,便會發布廣告,且廣告數量會隨著競爭對手的信念而增加。最後,我們比較完全與不完全訊息下的價格和廣告策略,並發現在不完全訊息下,廠商的價格和廣告數量都較高。
    This paper examines the effects of consumers’ “keyword search” on market structures as well as firms’ pricing and advertising strategies. Consumers’ incentives to use a specific ingredient as keyword in searches depend on the amount of advertisements they receive from firms. We consider both complete and incomplete information about firms’ product ingredients. We also extend the model to three-firm cases and investigates how firm’s incentives to advertise changes with the opponents’ location. Our results first show that when there are two firms in the market, a firm will post advertisements if it is the only firm that has enough ingredients, and the incentive for advertisements to cause keyword effects is increasing with the market size and product values. Second, whether firms know competitors’ information about product ingredients will affect their strategies and motivations to mislead their competitors by advertisements. Our result shows that if firms have sufficient ingredients, they will advertise, and the levels of advertisements will increase with the opponent’s beliefs. Third, we compare the results of price and advertisement
    strategies with complete information and incomplete information and find that both firms’ prices and the levels of advertisements are higher under incomplete information.
    Reference: 1. Afzal, S., and Khan, J. R. (2015). Impact of online and conventional advertisement on consumer buying behaviour of branded garments. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 4(1), 125-135.
    2. Aguirre, E., Mahr, D., Grewal, D., De Ruyter, K., and Wetzels, M. (2015). Unraveling the personalization paradox: The effect of information collection and trust-building
    strategies on online advertisement effectiveness. Journal of retailing, 91(1), 34-49.
    3. Apffelstaedt, A., and Mechtenberg, L. (2021). Competition for context-sensitive consumers. Management Science, 67(5), 2828-2844.
    4. Baye, M. R., and Morgan, J. (2001). Information gatekeepers on the internet and the competitiveness of homogeneous product markets. American Economic Review, 91(3),454-474.
    5. Blume, L., Brandenburger, A., and Dekel, E. (1991). Lexicographic probabilities and choice under uncertainty. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 61-79.
    6. Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., and Shleifer, A. (2013). Salience and consumer choice. Journal of Political Economy, 121(5), 803-843.70
    7. Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., and Shleifer, A. (2016). Competition for attention. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(2), 481-513.
    8. Burton, S., and Lichtenstein, D. R. (1988). The effect of ad claims and ad context on attitude toward the advertisement. Journal of Advertising, 17(1), 3-11.
    9. Bushong, B., Rabin, M., and Schwartzstein, J. (2021). A model of relative thinking. The Review of Economic Studies, 88(1), 162-191.
    10. Campbell, D., Hutchinson, W. G., and Scarpa, R. (2006). Lexicographic preferences in discrete choice experiments: Consequences on individual-specific willingness to pay
    estimates.
    11. Chen, N., Li, A., and Yang, S. (2021). Revenue maximization and learning in products ranking. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 316-317.
    12. Chen, Y., Wang, W., Liu, Z., and Lin, X. (2009). Keyword search on structured and semistructured data. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data, 1005-1010.
    13. Chu, E., Baid, A., Chai, X., Doan, A., and Naughton, J. (2009). Combining keyword search and forms for ad hoc querying of databases. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM
    SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data, 349-360.
    14. Coffman, J., and Weaver, A. C. (2010). A framework for evaluating database keyword search strategies. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on
    Information and knowledge management, 729-738.
    15. Duan, H., Zhai, C., Cheng, J., and Gattani, A. (2013). Supporting keyword search in product database: a probabilistic approach. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 6(14), 1786-1797.
    16. Eliaz, K., and Spiegler, R. (2011). Consideration sets and competitive marketing. The Review of Economic Studies, 78(1), 235-262.
    17. Eliaz, K., and Spiegler, R. (2011). On the strategic use of attention grabbers. Theoretical Economics, 6(1), 127-155.
    18. Ellison, G. (2005). A model of add-on pricing. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 585-637.
    19. Ellison, G., and Ellison, S. F. (2009). Search, obfuscation, and price elasticities on the internet. Econometrica, 77(2), 427-452.
    20. Fan, Z. P., Li, G. M., and Liu, Y. (2020). Processes and methods of information fusion for ranking products based on online reviews: An overview. Information Fusion, 60, 87-97.
    21. Fan, Z. P., Xi, Y., and Liu, Y. (2018). Supporting consumer’s purchase decision: a method for ranking products based on online multi-attribute product ratings. Soft Computing, 22(16), 5247-5261.
    22. Farquhar, P. H., and Pratkanis, A. R. (1993). Decision structuring with phantom 71 alternatives. Management Science, 39(10), 1214-1226.
    23. Gabaix, X., and Laibson, D. (2006). Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 505-540.
    24. Heath, C., and Soll, J. B. (1996). Mental budgeting and consumer decisions. Journal of consumer research, 23(1), 40-52.
    25. Jansen, B. J., and Schuster, S. (2011). Bidding on the buying funnel for sponsored search and keyword advertising. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(1), 1-18.
    26. Jeong, Y., and King, C. M. (2010). Impacts of website context relevance on banner advertisement effectiveness. Journal of Promotion Management, 16(3), 247-264.
    27. Kong, S., Huang, Z., Scott, N., Zhang, Z. A., and Shen, Z. (2019). Web advertisement effectiveness evaluation: Attention and memory. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 25(1),
    130-146.
    28. Kőszegi, B., and Szeidl, A. (2013). A model of focusing in economic choice. The Quarterly journal of economics, 128(1), 53-104.
    29. Lal, R., and Matutes, C. (1994). Retail pricing and advertising strategies. Journal of business, 345-370.
    30. Latifa, S., and Calicioglub, C. (2020). Impact of Social Media Advertisement on Consumer Purchase Intention with the Intermediary Effect of Brand Attitude. International Journal of Innovation, 11-12.
    31. Liu, F., Yu, C., Meng, W., and Chowdhury, A. (2006). Effective keyword search in relational databases. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference
    on Management of data, 563-574.
    32. Lo, S. K., Hsieh, A. Y., and Chiu, Y. P. (2014). Keyword advertising is not what you think: Clicking and eye movement behaviors on keyword advertising. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 13(4), 221-228.
    33. Luchikhina, L. V., Mendel, O. I., and Antonov, D. A. (2014). Knee osteoarthritis combination therapy with hyaluronic acid, chondroitine sulfate and glucosamine after
    arthroscopic lavage: long-term results. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 22, S480.
    34. Malik, M. E., Ghafoor, M. M., and Iqbal, H. K. (2014). The impact of advertisement and consumer perception on consumer buying behavior. International Review of Social
    Sciences and Humanities, 6(2), 55-64.
    35. Malik, M. E., Ghafoor, M. M., Iqbal, H. K., Ali, Q., Hunbal, H., Noman, M., and Ahmad, B. (2013). Impact of brand image and advertisement on consumer buying behavior. World Applied Sciences Journal, 23(1), 117-122.
    36. Nasution, M. K. (2017). Modelling and simulation of search engine. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 12078.
    37. Ntoulas, A., Cho, J., and Olston, C. (2004). What`s new on the Web? The evolution of the 72 Web from a search engine perspective. In Proceedings of the 13th international
    conference on World Wide Web, 1-12.
    38. O`Donoghue, T., and Rabin, M. (2001). Choice and procrastination. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 121-160.
    39. Ostrizek, F., and Shishkin, D. (2021, July). Screening with frames. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 739-740.
    40. Pažėraitė, A., and Gedvilaitė, R. (2016). Content marketing elements and their influence on search advertisement effectiveness: theoretical background and practical insights. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai. Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, 2016,
    (75), 97.
    41. Piccione, M., and Spiegler, R. (2012). Price competition under limited comparability. The quarterly journal of economics, 127(1), 97-135.
    42. Ragunathan, T., Battula, S. K., Jorika, V., Mounika, C., Sruthi, A. U., and Vani, M. D. (2015). Advertisement posting based on consumer behaviour. Procedia Computer Science, 50, 329-334.
    43. Rai, N. (2013). Impact of advertising on consumer behaviour and attitude with reference to consumer durables. International Journal of Management Research and Business
    Strategy, 2(2), 74-79.
    44. Ramu, M. (2020). An empirical study on the effects of advertisement on consumer behaviour.
    45. Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of consumer research, 16(2), 158-174.
    46. Sorokina, D., and Cantu-Paz, E. (2016). Amazon search: The joy of ranking products. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 459-460.
    47. Stolz, A., and Hepp, M. (2015). Adaptive faceted search for product comparison on the web of data. In International Conference on Web Engineering, 420-429. Springer, Cham.
    48. Truong, Y., McColl, R., and Kitchen, P. (2010). Practitioners’ perceptions of advertising strategies for digital media. International Journal of Advertising, 29(5), 709-725.
    49. Tversky, A., and Simonson, I. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. Management science, 39(10), 1179-1189.
    50. Yang, Y., Lu, Q. S., Tang, G., and Pei, J. (2015). The impact of market competition on search advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 30, 46-55.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    109258006
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109258006
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200609
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    800601.pdf1628KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback