English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50967689      Online Users : 934
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/140589
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140589


    Title: 自願發布 SASB 報告書之動機探討
    Motivation for Voluntary Disclosure CSR Report in SASB - Framework
    Authors: 施諺樺
    Shih, Yen-Hua
    Contributors: 黃嘉威
    Huang, Chia-Wei
    施諺樺
    Shih, Yen-Hua
    Keywords: 自願揭露
    SASB
    ESG
    資本市場
    財務績效
    Voluntary disclosure
    SASB
    ESG
    Capital market
    Financial performance
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-07-01 16:07:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究欲探討公司自願性發布 SASB 報告書之動機。過去文獻在研究企業社會責任的自願揭露動機中,鮮少有人提及關於資本市場面的議題,因此,本研究以2017至2021年之美國上市公司為研究對象,探究在需要支付成本的情況之下,公司仍選擇自願發布 SASB 報告書之動機,並將動機分為: (1) 發布前ESG揭露程度及資本市場特性差異;(2) 發布後的增額效益兩個層面做探討。發布前部分,實證結果發現,具有較優異的ESG揭露程度、較高的機構投資人持股、較多的分析師追蹤數目以及較佳的流動性的特性為驅使公司自願發布 SASB 報告書之動機,符合自願揭露假說。而就發布後效益,本研究發現發布 SASB報告書後一年,能提升公司之ESG揭露程度、吸引更多分析師的關注以及促進了公司的流動性,機構投資人持股比例則會隨之下降。最後,公司發布 SASB 報告書對於後一年對短期績效表現(ROA)有負面影響,對長期績效(Tobin’s Q)有正面影響,代表發布 SASB 報告書可能與財務績效之間存在U型曲線關係,對企業社會責任活動的投資可能不會立即得到回報,但在累積到一定的水平後終將會得到正面效果。
    This study investigates the motivation for disclosing voluntary non-financial information by adopting SASB-framework. The study contributes to existing voluntary sustainability disclosure literature by examining whether such voluntary disclosure is associated with the capital market side. Using a sample of US-listed companies between 2017 and 2021, we explore the motivations behind companies choosing to voluntarily initiate SASB reports despite many costs such as personnel and consulting costs. We divide the motivation into two aspects: differences in characteristics of ESG disclosure capabilities and the capital market before the initiation of the SASB report and benefits of voluntary disclosure of non-financial information. Firstly, in terms of the differences in characteristics, we find that the likelihood of a firm initiating a SASB report is associated with a higher prior-year ESG disclosure capabilities, institutional investor holdings, numbers of analysts to follow, and better liquidity, echoing voluntary disclosure theory. Secondly, we also find that firms initiating SASB reports can further boost ESG disclosure capabilities, attract more analyst coverage and enhance liquidity, but the proportion of institutional investors` shareholding will decrease accordingly. Finally, firms initiating SASB reports hurt the short-term financial performance (ROA) in the following year and had a positive impact on the long-term financial performance (Tobin`s Q), which means that there may be a U-shaped curve relationship between the initiation of the SASB report and financial performance. This suggests investing in social corporate responsibility activities may not pay off immediately, but it will eventually pay off when it accumulates to a certain level.
    Reference: 郭敏華. (2001). 財務報表分析, 智勝文化.
    程心瑤. (2011). 公司治理與企業責任報告之揭露.會計評論,(52),35-76.
    Agrawal, A., & Mandelker, G. N. (1990). Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers: The case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(2), 143-161.
    Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes Ii, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5-6), 447-471.
    Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87-103.
    Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
    Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71-86.
    Beekes, W., & Brown, P. (2006). Do better‐governed Australian firms make more informative disclosures?. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(3‐4), 422-450.
    Black, B., & Kim, W. (2012). The effect of board structure on firm value: A multiple identification strategies approach using Korean data. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(1), 203-226.
    Bosworth, D., & Rogers, M. (2001). Market value, R&D and intellectual property: an empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Economic Record, 77(239), 323-337.
    Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. Accounting Review, 323-349.
    Byrd, J. W., & Hickman, K. A. (1992). Do outside directors monitor managers?: Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2), 195-221.
    Chan, K., Chung, Y. P., & Fong, W. M. (2002). The informational role of stock and option volume. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(4), 1049-1075.
    Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul, S. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597-1614.
    Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic management journal, 35(1), 1-23.
    Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2013). Green accounting: Reflections from a CSR and environmental disclosure perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(6), 443-447.
    Cho, S. J., Chung, C. Y., & Young, J. (2019). Study on the Relationship between CSR and Financial Performance. Sustainability, 11(2), 343.
    Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303-327.
    Cormier, D., & Gordon, I. M. (2001). An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
    Czerwińska, T., & Kaźmierkiewicz, P. (2015). ESG rating in investment risk analysis of companies listed on the public market in Poland. Economic Notes: Review of Banking, Finance and Monetary Economics, 44(2), 211-248.
    Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187-199.
    Depoers, F. (2000). A cost benefit study of voluntary disclosure: some empirical evidence from French listed companies. European Accounting Review, 9(2), 245-263.
    Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
    Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328-355.
    disaggregated approach. Econ Model 52(B):400–40
    disaggregated approach. Econ Model 52(B):400–40
    disaggregated approach. Econ Model 52(B):400–407
    Dye, R. A. (2001). An evaluation of “essays on disclosure” and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 181-235.
    Eccles, N. S., & Viviers, S. (2011). The origins and meanings of names describing investment practices that integrate a consideration of ESG issues in the academic literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 389-402.
    Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
    El-Gazzar, S. M. (1998). Predisclosure information and institutional ownership: A cross-sectional examination of market revaluations during earnings announcement periods. Accounting Review, 119-129.
    Francis, J. R., Reichelt, K., & Wang, D. (2005). The pricing of national and city‐specific reputations for industry expertise in the US audit market. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 113-136.
    Friedman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Estados Unidos: Prentice-Hall, 50.
    Galbreath, J. (2010). Drivers of corporate social responsibility: The role of formal strategic planning and firm culture. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 511-525.
    Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5-31.
    Han, J. J., Kim, H. J., & Yu, J. (2016). Empirical study on relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Korea. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1(1), 61-76.
    Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317-349.
    Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365-383.
    Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 405-440.
    Heiner, R. A. (1983). The origin of predictable behavior. The American Economic Review, 73(4), 560-595.
    Hooks, J., & van Staden, C. J. (2011). Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures. The British Accounting Review, 43(3), 200-213.
    Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure–Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455-476.
    Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 235-256.
    Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724.
    Lang, M., & Lundholm, R. (1993). Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 246-271.
    Leftwich, R. W., Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1981). Voluntary corporate disclosure: The case of interim reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 50-77.
    Li, X., & Yang, H. I. (2016). Mandatory financial reporting and voluntary disclosure: The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on management forecasts. The Accounting Review, 91(3), 933-953.
    Lindenberg, E. B., & Ross, S. A. (1981). Tobin`s q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business, 1-32.
    Lys, T., Naughton, J. P., & Wang, C. (2015). Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 56-72.
    Madison, N., & Schiehll, E. (2021). The effect of financial materiality on ESG performance assessment. Sustainability, 13(7), 3652.
    Masum, M. H., Uddin, M. M., Ahmed, H., & Uddin, M. H. (2019). Corporate social responsibility disclosures and corporate performence: evidence from the listed companies in Bangladesh. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18(2), 1-16.
    McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
    Miller, G. S., & Piotroski, J. D. (2000). Forward-looking earnings statements: Determinants and market response. Available at SSRN 238593.
    Mittal, R. K., Sinha, N., & Singh, A. (2008). An analysis of linkage between economic value added and corporate social responsibility. Management Decision.
    Moore, G. (2001). Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the UK supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3), 299-315.
    Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2015). Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 128-149.
    Nguyen, D. T., Hoang, T. G., & Tran, H. G. (2022). Help or Hurt? The Impact of ESG on Firm Performance in S&P 500 Non-Financial Firms. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(2), 91-102.
    Nollet J, Filis G, Mitrokostas E (2016) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: a non-linear and
    Nollet J, Filis G, Mitrokostas E (2016) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: a non-linear and
    Nollet J, Filis G, Mitrokostas E (2016) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: a non-linear and
    Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52, 400-407.
    Peiris, D., & Evans, J. (2010). The relationship between environmental social governance factors and US stock performance. The Journal of Investing, 19(3), 104-112.
    Pflugrath, G., Roebuck, P., & Simnett, R. (2011). Impact of assurance and assurer`s professional affiliation on financial analysts` assessment of credibility of corporate social responsibility information. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 239-254.
    Poddi, L., & Vergalli, S. (2009). Does corporate social responsibility affect the performance of firms? (No. 832-2016-55420).
    Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 237-265.
    Preston, L. E., & O`bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419-429.
    Rezaee, Z., & Tuo, L. (2017). Voluntary disclosure of non-financial information and its association with sustainability performance. Advances in Accounting, 39, 47-59.
    Richardson, A. J., & Welker, M. (2001). Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7-8), 597-616.
    Rose, C. (2016). Firm performance and comply or explain disclosure in corporate governance. European Management Journal, 34(3), 202-222.
    Shin, M. S., Kim, S. E., & Kim, B. S. (2011). The effects of corporate social responsibility expenditure on firm value. Journal of Financial Engineering, 10(1), 99-125.
    Tariq, Y. B., & Abbas, Z. (2013). Compliance and multidimensional firm performance: Evaluating the efficacy of rule-based code of corporate governance. Economic Modelling, 35, 565-575.
    Uyar, A., Karaman, A. S., & Kilic, M. (2020). Is corporate social responsibility reporting a tool of signaling or greenwashing? Evidence from the worldwide logistics sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119997.
    Van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2016). ESG integration and the investment management process: Fundamental investing reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 525-533.
    Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 97-180.
    Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
    Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Reader in Business and the Environment, 36(81), 4.
    Winship, C., & Mare, R. D. (1984). Regression models with ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 512-525.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    109357017
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109357017
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200608
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    701701.pdf2165KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback