政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/140571
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113393/144380 (79%)
Visitors : 51240647      Online Users : 900
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140571


    Title: 外部總經理與財務危機之關聯：論會計師產業專精度、審計經驗及任期之影響
    The relationship between external CEO and financial distress: The impact of accountants` industry expertise, audit experience, and tenure
    Authors: 吳沛穎
    Wu, Pei-Ying
    Contributors: 李佳玲
    Lee, Chia-Ling
    吳沛穎
    Wu, Pei-Ying
    Keywords: 外部總經理
    財務危機
    會計師產業專精度
    會計師審計經驗
    會計師任期
    External CEO
    Financial distress
    CPA industry specialist
    CPA audit experience
    CPA tenure
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-07-01 16:03:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去研究多以財務會計層面的比率惡化作為財務危機的預警指標，然而有鑑於財務指標屬於事後指標，近年來更加入公司治理層面的指標，以使財務危機預警模型能達到更好的預測效果。CEO是公司的重要決策者，對公司營運風險有直接的影響，本研究探討若因擔任CEO前於樣本公司任職經理人年資資歷較淺，對公司發生財務危機的影響。本文以2006年至2020年台灣上市（櫃）公司作為研究樣本，實證結果表明，台灣市場證據顯示外部CEO與公司財務危機呈顯著正相關，反映聘僱外部CEO會導致營運風險增加，對公司發生財務危機的可能性有正向的影響，本研究為財務危機預警模型提供公司治理層面之預警指標。進一步分析發現，若公司的簽證會計師審計經驗愈豐富或簽證會計師任期愈長時，能負向調節外部CEO與財務危機間的正相關；非家族企業中公司簽證會計師產業專精度愈高時，能負向調節外部CEO與財務危機間的正相關，反映公司能借助外部審計的力量有效減少代理問題的發生。本研究亦透過敏感性分析及樣本選擇性偏誤測試，顯示本研究之實證結果具有穩健性。
    In previous studies, the deterioration of financial accounting ratios has been used as an early warning indicator for financial distress. However, in view of the fact that financial indicators are lagging indicators, corporate governance indicators have been added in recent years to improve the early warning model for financial distress. As the top decision maker of a company, the CEO has a direct impact on the operational risk of the company. This study uses the characteristics of the CEO as the research target to investigate the impact of financial distress on the company if the manager has less years of experience in the sample company before becoming the CEO. The empirical results show that the market evidence in Taiwan shows a significant positive correlation between external CEOs and corporate financial distress, reflecting that the employment of external CEOs leads to an increase in operational risk and has a positive impact on the likelihood of financial distress. This study provides an early warning indicator at the corporate governance level for the financial distress early warning model. Further analysis revealed that the more experience the company`s CPA has in auditing or the longer the tenure of CPA, the more it can negatively adjust the positive correlation between external CEO and financial distress; the higher the industry expertise of CPA in non-family companies, the more it can negatively adjust the positive correlation between external CEO and financial distress, reflecting that the company can effectively reduce the occurrence of agency problems with the power of external audit. The sensitivity analysis and sample selectivity bias test also showed that the empirical results of this study were robust.
    Reference: Aktas, N., E. De Bodt, H. Bollaert, and R. Roll. 2016. CEO narcissism and the takeover process: From private initiation to deal completion. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 51 (1):113-137.
    Altman, E. I. 1968. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The journal of finance 23 (4):589-609.
    Anderson, R. C., S. A. Mansi, and D. M. Reeb. 2003. Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial economics 68 (2):263-285.
    Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. S. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (2):71-97.
    Bell, T. B., M. Causholli, and W. R. Knechel. 2015. Audit firm tenure, non‐audit services, and internal assessments of audit quality. Journal of accounting research 53 (3):461-509.
    Bliss, M. A. 2011. Does CEO duality constrain board independence? Some evidence from audit pricing. Accounting & Finance 51 (2):361-380.
    Bonner, S. E. 1990. Experience effects in auditing: The role of task-specific knowledge. Accounting review:72-92.
    Cahan, S. F., and J. Sun. 2015. The effect of audit experience on audit fees and audit quality. Journal of Accounting, auditing & finance 30 (1):78-100.
    Carcello, J. V., and A. L. Nagy. 2002. Auditor industry specialization and fraudulent financial reporting. Paper read at Symposium on Auditing Problems.
    ———. 2004. Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (2):55-69.
    Chatterjee, A., and D. C. Hambrick. 2007. It`s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (3):351-386.
    Chin, C. L., and H. Y. Chi. 2009. Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (3):729-765.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial economics 58 (1-2):81-112.
    Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of accounting and economics 20 (3):297-322.
    Dalton, D. R., M. A. Hitt, S. T. Certo, and C. M. Dalton. 2007. The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation. Academy of Management annals 1 (1):1-64.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of accounting and economics 3 (3):183-199.
    Donker, H., B. Santen, and S. Zahir. 2009. Ownership structure and the likelihood of financial distress in the Netherlands. Applied Financial Economics 19 (21):1687-1696.
    Dunn, K. A., and B. W. Mayhew. 2004. Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality. Review of Accounting Studies 9 (1):35-58.
    Elsaid, E., X. Wang, and W. N. Davidson. 2011. Does experience matter? CEO successions by former CEOs. Managerial Finance 37 (10): 915-939.
    Giannetti, M. 2011. Serial CEO incentives and the structure of managerial contracts. Journal of Financial Intermediation 20 (4):633-662.
    Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis: Pearson Education India.
    Hambrick, D. C., and P. A. Mason. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review 9 (2):193-206.
    Harris, D., and C. Helfat. 1997. Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management Journal 18 (11):895-920.
    Heckman, J. J. 1976. The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. In Annals of economic and social measurement 5 (4): 475-492.
    Hung, J.-H., W.-S. Wang, I.-C. Li, H.-J. Chen, and W.-S. Chang. 2013. 經理人過度自信對企業發生財務危機之影響: 以家族企業特性為調節效果. 臺大管理論叢 23 (2):65-96.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial economics 3 (4):305-360.
    Kallunki, J.-P., and E. Pyykkö. 2013. Do defaulting CEOs and directors increase the likelihood of financial distress of the firm? Review of Accounting Studies 18 (1):228-260.
    Kim, K.-H., and R. Buchanan. 2008. CEO duality leadership and firm risk-taking propensity. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) 24 (1).
    Krishnan, G. V. 2003a. Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (1):109-126.
    ———. 2003b. Does Big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? Accounting horizons 17:1-16.
    La Porta, R., F. Lopez‐de‐Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. The journal of finance 54 (2):471-517.
    Liao, L.-K., Y.-C. Chang, and Y.-C. Wang. 2018. 管理特質與財務危機關係之研究. 中華會計學刊 14 (1):97-128.
    Libby, R., and D. M. Frederick. 1990. Experience and the ability to explain audit findings. Journal of accounting research 28 (2):348-367.
    Lo, A. W., K. Z. Lin, and R. M. Wong. 2022. Does availability of audit partners affect audit quality? Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting, auditing & finance 37 (2):407-439.
    Ma, Z., R. Wang, and K. Zhou. 2021. Generalist CEOs and Audit Pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 40 (4):123-147.
    Martínez‐Ferrero, J., I. M. García‐Sánchez, and E. Ruiz‐Barbadillo. 2018. The quality of sustainability assurance reports: The expertise and experience of assurance providers as determinants. Business Strategy and the Environment 27 (8):1181-1196.
    Mayhew, B. W., and M. S. Wilkins. 2003. Audit firm industry specialization as a differentiation strategy: Evidence from fees charged to firms going public. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (2):33-52.
    Myers, J. N., L. A. Myers, and T. C. Omer. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor‐client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review 78 (3):779-799.
    Ocasio, W. 1999. Institutionalized action and corporate governance: The reliance on rules of CEO succession. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (2):384-416.
    Ohlson, J. A. 1980. Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of accounting research:109-131.
    Olsen, K. J., K. K. Dworkis, and S. M. Young. 2014. CEO narcissism and accounting: A picture of profits. Journal of management accounting research 26 (2):243-267.
    Palmrose, Z.-V. 1988. 1987 competitive manuscript co-winner: an analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. Accounting review:55-73.
    Reichelt, K. J., and D. Wang. 2010. National and office‐specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of accounting research 48 (3):647-686.
    Seo, J., G. Lee, and C. Park. 2022. CEO labor market and R&D investment in high-technology firms: an empirical study on the disciplinary effect of CEO labor market. Journal of Management & Organization:1-18.
    Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of accounting research:161-190.
    Stanley, J. D., and F. T. DeZoort. 2007. Audit firm tenure and financial restatements: An analysis of industry specialization and fee effects. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 26 (2):131-159.
    Tseng, C.-H., Y.-S. Chang, and M.-J. Shiue. 2012. 個別會計師查核簽證家數與企業盈餘品質. 中華會計學刊 8 (2):217-256.
    Wang, D. 2006. Founding family ownership and earnings quality. Journal of accounting research 44 (3):619-656.
    Yeh, Y. h., T. s. Lee, and T. Woidtke. 2001. Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of finance 2 (1‐2):21-48.
    Zhang, Y., and N. Rajagopalan. 2003. Explaining new CEO origin: Firm versus industry antecedents. Academy of Management Journal 46 (3):327-338.
    孔繁華、張瑀珊與陳郁雯，2020，忙碌會計師與盈餘管理之關聯性，當代會計，第21卷第2期：269-302。
    王明昌、鄭揚耀與柯建全，2015，企業財務危機前之媒體管理，會計評論，第61期：77-119。
    李建然、陳信吉與湯麗芬，2013，客戶重要性與審計品質-從簽證會計師角度分析，當代會計，第14卷第2期：147-174。
    李春安與徐傳瑛，2010，董事會獨立性與企業財務危機關係之研究，管理與系統，第17卷第3期：467-499。
    姜家訓與楊雅雯，2005，會計師事務所之產業專精及查核年資與盈餘品質之關係，當代會計，第6卷第1期：23-60。
    范宏書、陳慶隆與吳靜宜，2007，審計客戶重要性與會計師的產業專精程度對公司盈餘品質之影響：審計組別之證據，文大商管學報，第12卷第1期：75-107。
    張育甄，2013，合夥會計師規模與裁決性應計數之關聯性，中原大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    陳皆碩、鄭國枝與康湘婷，2016，會計師產業簽證經驗與簽證工作量對財務報表重編之影響，中山管理評論，第24卷第1期：153-198。
    廖秀梅與洪筱雯，2010，非審計服務、會計師任期與審計品質，當代會計，第11卷第2期：151-178。
    薛敏正、黃劭彥、劉福運與林惠秋，2019，會計師事務所內合夥人間之網絡關係與盈餘資訊性，會計審計論叢，第9卷第1期：43-73。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    109353009
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109353009
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200662
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    300901.pdf1100KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback