English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50803902      Online Users : 814
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/140201
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140201


    Title: ESG表現與性別議題於公司治理決策
    ESG Performance and Gender Issues in Corporate Policy Making
    Authors: 林佳賢
    Lin, Chia-Hsien
    Contributors: 陳嬿如
    Chen, Yenn-Ru
    林佳賢
    Lin, Chia-Hsien
    Keywords: 股東提案
    股東積極主義
    性別
    Shareholder proposal
    Shareholder activism
    Gender
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-06-01 16:26:23 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 女性執行長相較於男性執行長更容易收到股東提案,尤其是質量較差的股東提案。原因在於機構投資人會因為認為女性執行長有較高的社會偏好所以投更多跟環境及社會議題相關的股東提案;而個人投資人則傾向於投更多跟公司治理相關的股東議案,原因在於他們會受到性別刻板印象的影響認為女性較難以適任執行長的公司。然而,更進一步的研究結果指出,雖然投資人會受到性別刻板印象的影響,這樣的刻板印象會隨著女性執行長有較佳的表現而降低,證明了資訊不對稱的狀況也會造成女性在職場上面對的玻璃天花板問題。
    Firms with female CEOs receive more shareholder proposals, especially lower-quality proposals, than firms with male CEOs. Institutional investors are more likely to sponsor environmental/social proposals that are ultimately withdrawn after private negotiations, while individual investors sponsor more governance proposals, targeting female CEOs’ performance. These results indicate individual investors tend to perceive female CEOs as less competent, while institutional investors target their more democratic leadership style. Further results suggest the differential treatment toward female CEOs is mitigated when they outperform their peers and when female CEO representation is greater, highlighting how information asymmetry contributes to the glass ceiling female CEOs face.
    Reference: Adams, R.B., and Ferreira, D., 2009. Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
    Adams, R.B., and Funk, P., 2012. Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter? Management Science, 58(2), 219-235.
    Arrow, K., 1973. The Theory of Discrimination. Discrimination in Labor Markets, 3(10), 3-33.
    Barber, B., and Odean, T., 2013. Chapter 22. The Behavior of Individual Investors*, 2, 1533-1570, Elsevier, Amsterdam, North Holland.
    Beaman, L., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., and Topalova, P., 2009. Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1497–1540.
    Becker, G.S., 1957. The Economics of Discrimination. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
    Bertrand, M., 2011. New Perspectives on Gender. In Handbook of Labor Economics, 4, 1543-1590. Elsevier, Amsterdam, North Holland.
    Bertrand, M., Chugh, D., and Mullainathan, S., 2005. Implicit Discrimination. American Economic Review, 95(2), 94-98.
    Bertrand, M., and Duflo, E., 2017. Field Experiments on Discrimination. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, 1, 309-393.
    Bertrand, M., and Hallock, K.F., 2001, The Gender Gap in Top Corporate Jobs. ILR Review, 55(1), 3-21.
    Bertrand, M., Kamenica, E., and Pan, J., 2015. Gender Identity and Relative Income within Households. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 571-614.
    Bohren, J.A., Imas, A., and Rosenberg, M., 2019. The Dynamics of Discrimination: Theory and Evidence. American Economic Review, 109(10), 3395-3436.
    Bordalo, P., Coffman, K., Gennaioli, N., and Shleifer, A., 2016. Stereotypes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1753–1794.
    Borghesi, R., Houston, J.F., and Naranjo, A., 2014. Corporate Socially Responsible Investments: CEO Altruism, Reputation, and Shareholder Interests. Journal of Corporate Finance, 26, 164-181.
    Brahnam, S. D., Margavio, T. M., Hignite, M. A., Barrier, T. B., and Chin, J. M., 2005, A Gender‐based Categorization for Conflict Resolution. Journal of Management Development, 24(3), 197-208.
    Bugeja, M., Matolcsy, Z.P., and Spiropoulos, H., 2012, Is There a Gender Gap in CEO Compensation? Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 849-859.
    Choi, S., Fisch, J., and Kahan, M., 2009. The Power of Proxy Advisors: Myth or Reality. Emory LJ, 59, 869-918.
    Cuñat, V., Gine, M., and Guadalupe, M., 2012, The Vote Is Cast: The Effect of Corporate Governance on Shareholder Value. The Journal of Finance, 67(5), 1943-1977.
    Denes, M.R., Karpoff, J.M., McWilliams, V.B., 2017. Thirty Years of Shareholder Activism: A Survey of Empirical Research. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 405-424.
    Duchin, R., Simutin, M., and Sosyura, D., 2021, The Origins and Real Effects of the Gender Gap: Evidence from CEOs’ Formative Years. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(2), 700-762.
    Eagly, A.H., and Carli, L.L., 2003, The Female Leadership Advantage: An Evaluation of the Evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 807-834.
    Eagly, A.H., and Karau, S.J., 2002, Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598.
    Egan, M., Matvos, G., and Seru, A., 2019, The Market for Financial Adviser Misconduct. Journal of Political Economy, 127(1), 233-295
    Elsesser, K.M., and Lever, J., 2011, Does Gender Bias Against Female Leaders Persist? Quantitative and Qualitative Data from a Large-scale Survey. Human Relations, 64(12), 1555-1578.
    Engelberg, J., Gao, P., and Parsons, C.A., 2013, The Price of a CEO`s Rolodex. The Review of Financial Studies, 26(1), 79-114.
    Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., and Muslu, V., 2011. Shareholder Activism and CEO Pay. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(2), 535-592.
    Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., and Stubben, S.R., 2010, Board of Directors` Responsiveness to Shareholders: Evidence from Shareholder Proposals. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(1), 53-72.Ewens, M., and Townsend, R.R., 2020, Are Early Stage Investors Biased against Women? Journal of Financial Economics, 135(3), 653-677.
    Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., and Mura, R., 2016. CEO Gender, Corporate Risk-taking, and the Efficiency of Capital Allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193-209.
    Francis, B.B., Hasan, I., Shen, Y.V., Wu, Q., 2021. Do Activist Hedge Funds Target Female CEOs? The Role of CEO Gender in Hedge Fund Activism. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(1), 372-393.
    Gantchev, N., and Giannetti, M., 2020, The Costs and Benefits of Shareholder Democracy: Gadflies and Low-Cost Activism. Review of Financial Studies, f34(12), 5629–5675.
    Gupta, V.K., Han, S., Mortal, S.C., Silveri, S. D., and Turban, D.B., 2018. Do Women CEOs Face Greater Threat of Shareholder Activism Compared to Male CEOs? A Role Congruity Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(2), 228–236.
    He, Y., Kahraman, B., and Lowry, M., 2020, ES Risks and Shareholder Voice, Working Paper, European Corporate Governance Institute
    Huang, J., and Kisgen, D.J., 2013, Gender and Corporate Finance: Are Male Executives Overconfident Relative to Female Executives? Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 822-839.
    Jung, J.H., Kumar, A., and Lim, S.S., and Yoo, C.Y., 2019, An Analyst by Any Other Surname: Surname Favorability and Market Reaction to Analyst Forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(2)-67(3), 306-335.
    Karpoff, J.M., 2001, The Impact of Shareholder Activism on Target Companies: A Survey of Empirical Findings, Working Paper, European Corporate Governance Institute
    Karpoff, J.M., Malatesta, P.H., and Walkling, R.A., 1996. Corporate Governance and Shareholder Initiatives: Empirical Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(3),365-395.
    Kumar, A., Niessen-Ruenzi, A., and Spalt, O.G., 2015, What`s in a Name? Mutual Fund Flows When Managers Have Foreign-Sounding Names. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(8), 2281–2321.
    Matsa, D.A., and Miller, A.R., 2013, A Female Style in Corporate Leadership? Evidence from Quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(3), 136-69.
    Matsusaka, J.G., Ozbas, O., and Yi, I., 2019. Opportunistic Proposals by Union Shareholders. The Review of Financial Studies, 32, 3215-3265.
    Matsusaka, J.G., Ozbas, O., and Yi, I., 2021. Can Shareholder Proposals Hurt Shareholders? Evidence from SEC No-Action Letter Decisions. The Journal of Law and Economics, 64(1), 107-152.
    McCahery, J.A., Sautner, Z., and Starks, L.T., 2016. Behind the Scenes: The Corporate Governance Preferences of Institutional Investors. The Journal of Finance, 71(6), 2905-2932.
    Niederle, M., and Vesterlund, L., 2007, Do Women Shy Away from Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067-1101.
    Niessen-Ruenzi, A., and Ruenzi, S., 2019, Sex Matters: Gender Bias in the Mutual Fund Industry. Management Science, 65(7), 3001-3025.
    Petersen, M.A., 2009, Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435-480.
    Phelps, E.S., 1972, The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism. American Economic Review, 62(4), 659-661.
    Prevost, A.K., and Rao, R.P., 2000, Of What Value Are Shareholder Proposals Sponsored by Public Pension Funds. The Journal of Business, 73(2), 177-204.
    Renneboog, L., and Szilagyi, P.G., 2011, The Role of Shareholder Proposals in Corporate Governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(1), 167-188.
    Reuben, E., Sapienza, P., and Zingales, L., 2014. How Stereotypes Impair Women`s Careers in Science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(12), 4403-4408.
    Ryan, M.K., Haslam, S.A., Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Stoker, J., and Peters, K., 2016. Getting on Top of the Glass Cliff: Reviewing a Decade of Evidence, Explanations, and Impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 446-455.
    Solnick, S.J., and Schweitzer, M.E., 1999. The Influence of Physical Attractiveness and Gender on Ultimatum Game Decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(3), 199-215.
    Stock, J.H., Wright, J.H., and Yogo, M., 2002. A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(4), 518-529.
    Strine, L., 2014. Can We Do Better by Ordinary Investors? A Pragmatic Reaction to the Dueling Ideological Mythologists of Corporate Law. Columbia Law Review, 114(2), 449-502.
    Tate, G., and Yang, L., 2015. Female Leadership and Gender Equity: Evidence from Plant Closure. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1): 77-97.
    Thomas, R.S., and Cotter, J.F., 2007, Shareholder Proposals in the New Millennium: Shareholder Support, Board Response, and Market Reaction. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(2-3), 368-391.
    World Economic Forum, 2018, The Global Gender Gap Report, available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2018.pdf
    Wolfers, J., 2006, Did Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates? A Reconciliation and New Results. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1802-1820.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    106357501
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106357501
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200446
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    750101.pdf2119KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback