English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50801901      Online Users : 814
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140010


    Title: 酷兒化「檔案」:臺韓酷兒檔案庫與創作轉譯
    Queering Archive: Queer History and the Archival Creation in Taiwan and South Korea
    Authors: 陳佩甄
    Chen, Pei Jean
    Contributors: 台文所
    Keywords: 酷兒化;檔案;同志運動;文化史;污名
    Queering;Archive;LGBTQ;Cultural History;Stigma
    Date: 2021-08
    Issue Date: 2022-05-03 16:26:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 2019年臺灣完成同性婚姻合法化的階段性成果,同年也是首爾酷兒遊行舉辦第20屆的里程碑。本文注意到的是另一個時空上的巧合:2019 年臺韓亦同時舉辦了以「文獻檔案」為基礎的酷兒主題創作展――即「QueerArch」與「一次重訪臺灣同志汙名史的邀請:文獻x創作計畫展示」。這兩個展覽皆與「酷兒/同志檔案資料庫」的建構緊密連結,也呈現對於兩地酷兒/同志史的反思。透過讓臺韓兩地酷兒檔案庫與創作展互為參照,本文以「檔案的不可能」、「檔案作為主體/題」與「無痕閱讀」等幾組概念討論檔案的「酷兒化」,並認為歷史檔案不應被視為主體形成的源頭而是知識生產的對象,因此酷兒史的建構不僅是性少數的歷史修正工作,而是能讓共同體的塑造朝向更多元的歷史書寫與想像。
    In 2019, Taiwan’s legalization of same-sex marriage and Seoul’s 20th queer parade all mark the mile-stone of LGBTQ history and movement in Taiwan and South Korea. These recorded public events have certainly become part of collective memories of a generation, while at the same time, raised the questions/ tensions about/between dominant public history and submerged past. This paper observes the other two cultural events related to queer history happened in the same year of 2019: the exhibition of QueerArch in Seoul and of Revisiting the History of Tongzhi Stigma in Taipei, both reflect on the issues of queer archive. By inter-referencing the two exhibitions and the construction of queer archives in Taiwan and South Korea as an illustration, I propose a mode of queering archive that views archives not as sites of knowledge or subject retrieval, but of knowledge production. Furthermore, it calls into question the coming of the future, requires users, interpreters from different generations to wade through the diverse material of queer history in the making.
    Relation: 臺灣文學研究雧刊, No.26, pp.71-100
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/181856492021080026003
    DOI: 10.3966/181856492021080026003
    Appears in Collections:[臺灣文學研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    9.pdf1431KbAdobe PDF2293View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback